HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 047 Draft 01 2000-2002 COUNTY OF HAWAII STATE OF HAWAII
RESOLUTION NO. 47 01
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COST ITEMS AGREED UPON BY THE
EMPLOYERS AND THE UNITED PUBLIC WORKERS (UPW) AFFECTING UPW
BARGAINING UNIT 01 AND EMPLOYEES EXCLUDED FROM BARGAINING UNIT
01 FOR THE CONTRACT PERIOD JULY 1, 1999 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2003.
WHEREAS, Section 89-10(B) of the Hawaii Revised Statutes relating to collective bargaining
requires that the employer " submit within ten days of the date on which the agreement is ratified by
the employees concerned all cost items contained therein to the appropnate legislative bodies", and
WHEREAS, the same section further provides that all agreed-upon cost items are subject
to appropriations by the appropnate legislative bodies", and
WHEREAS, after months of negotiations a settlement was reached between the employers
and the United Public Workers on behalf of Bargaining Unit 01, and the settlement was ratified by the
membership of the bargaining unit, and
WHEREAS, the cost items included in the settlement are shown on the attached exhibit, and
WHEREAS, the estimated cost to the County of Hawaii over the new contract, as shown in the
exhibit attached to this resolution, will be $2,383,757, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII
that the funds necessary to pay the obligations under this agreement wdl be included in the operating
budget in FY2002 and FY2003
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution be forwarded to the Department of
Civil Service and the Department of Finance.
DATED: Hilo, Hawaii, this 9th day of taarrn , 2001.
INTRODUCED BY:
COUNCIL MEMBER, C UNTY OF HAWAII
COUNTY COUNCIL ROLL CALL VOTE
County of Hawaii
Hilo, Hawaii AYES NOES ABS EX
ARAKAKI X
I hereby certify that the foregoing RESOLUTION was by the CHUNG X
vote indicated to the right htreof adopted by the COUNCIL of ELARIONOFF 7{
the County ofHawai`i on rte,-rr, a, ~nm 7ACOBSON g
ATTEST: LEITHEAD-TODD
PISICCHIO X
SAFARIK X
TYLER X
YAGONG
6 1 2 0
i
Reference C-105/FC
t~a""'~2r~~"~ 47 01
COUNTY CLERK CHAIItMAN & PRESIDING OFFICER RESOLUTION NO.
County of Hawaii
Bargaining Unit Ol Settlement Costs
July 1, 1999 (FY00) through June 30, 2003 (FY03)
Annual Affect on
Payroll Cost Base Pav
Effect ort payroll
FY00 & FYOJ - No Increase
Base pay at 10/IS/00 $ 13,239,537 $ (3,239,537
FY02 2%across-the-boazd (ATB) mcrease on July 2, 2001 264,791 264,791
3%across-the-board (ATB) mcrease on January 1, 2002 202,565 405,130
Total payroll cost m FY02 $ 13,706,893
Base pay at 6/30102 $ 13,909,458
Base pay at 6/30/02 $ 13,909,458 $ 13,909,458
FY03 2% across-the-board (ATB) mcrease on July 1, 2002 278,189 278,189
4% across-the-board (ATB) mcrease on January 1, 2003 283,753 567,506
Total payroll cost in FY03 $ 14,471,400
Base pay at 6/30.03 $ 14,755,153
Less base pay at 10/1/00 $ (13,239,537)
Increase to base pay due to this settlement $ 1,515,616
FY02 FY03 Total
L244L21 L2907=031 EY49=Q1
Determmattort of total mcrease m cost dye to proposed contract
Total payroll cost for each fiscal year as per above calculations $ 13,706,893 $ 14,471,400
Less base pay at begmnmg of each fiscal year (13,239,537) (13,706,893)
Totaladdihonalcost 467,356 764,507 $ 1,231,863
Add affect of prior year mcrease m base pay - 467,356 467,356
Total mcreased cos[ sub3ect to frmge benefits 467,356 1,231,863 1,699.219
Certam frmge benefit costs (27 77%)• 129,785 342,088 471,873
Bonus to Deferred Compeasahon Plan 66,264 144,576 210,840
Increased costs to be paid 663,405 1,718,527 2,381,932
Employer's contnbution to ERS (9 75% of total mcreased cost subject
to frmge benefits)' • 45,567 120,107 165,674
Vacation, sick leave and holidays (21% of total increased cos[ sublet[
to frmge benefits) 98,145 258,691 356,836
Total increased costs $ 807,117 $ 2,097,325 $ 2,904,442
•Frmge benefits mcluded are overtone, prenuum pay, temporary assigtunen[, compensatory time, meals, workers'
compensatton, and unemployment compensation
''Actuarially de[emuned contnbution rate for classes A and C per ERS annual actuanal valuation dated
6/30/00 However, [he amount of the County's contnbution for fiscal year 2000 is already
established and will not change because of [his payroll increase Fulure years' contributions will be
affected
County of Hawaii
Bargaining Unit 61 Settlement Costs
July 1, 1999 (FY00) through June 30, 2003 (FY03)
Amual Affect on
Payroll .oct Base Pav
EJjecl on payroll
FY00 & FY01 - No /ncrease
Base pay at I/23/O1 $ 11,691 $ 11,691
FY02 2%across-the-board (ATB) increase on July 2, 2001 234 234
3%across-the-boazd (ATB) increase on January 1, 2002 179 358
Total payroll cost in FY02 5 12,104
Base pay at 6/30/02 $ 12,283
Base pay at 6/30/02 $ 12,283 $ 12,283
FY03 2% across-the-board (ATB) increase on July 1, 2002 246 246
4% across-the-board (ATB) increase on January I, 2003 251 502
Total payroll cost in FY03 $ 12,780
Base pay at 6/30/03 $ 13,031
Less base pay at I/23/O1 $ (11,691)
Increase to base pay due to [tits settlement $ 1,340
FY02 FY03 Total
f~Q41-Q2.1 f14414~) EYQ9_=Q1
Determ:rtatton ojtotal increase in cast due to proposed contract
Total payroll cost for each fiscal year as per above calculations $ 12,104 $ 12,780
Less base pay at beginning of each Fiscal year (11,691) (12,104)
Total additional cost 413 676 $ 1,089
Add afl'ec[ of poor year increase in base pay - 413 413
Total increased cos[ subJect to fringe benefits 413 1,089 1,502
Certain fringe benefit costs (21 50%)* 89 234 323
Increased costs to be paid 502 1,323 1,825
Employer's contribution [o ERS (9 75% of total increased cost subJect
to fringe benefits)** 40 106 146
Vacation, sick leave and holidays (21% of total increased cost subJect
to fringe benefits) 87 229 316
Total increased costs $ 629 $ 1,658 $ 2,287
`Fringe benefits included are overture, prermttm pay, temporary assigrimen[, compensatory tune, meals, workers'
compensation, and unemployment compensation
'`Actuarially determined contribution rate for classes A and C per ERS annual acmanal valuation dated
6/30/00 However, the amount of the County's conlnbutton for fiscal year 2000 is already
established and will no[ change because of [tits payroll increase Future years' contributions will be
affected