HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0122.053 2000-2002
Turning Point for Families, Inc. _
PO Box 612 • Hilo, Hawan 96721-0612 Phone (BOB) 935-8229 Fax (808) 934-7600 t,ad~n29ilhawau net
i
~ ~.J
r
March 30, 2001
County Council Members
County of Hawan
25 Aupuni Street
ITilo, Hawan 96720
1tE. Clarification noel Approaation rogarding "Non Profit Cxant Bequests" question and
answer Meeting held at King Kao>ehameha Hotel on March 22, 2001
Dear Council Members,
I wanted to add further clarification to the letter seat to Nancy Pisiccio on March 23n1
(attached to this letter), from Mary Navor of Turning Point for Families.
Mary Navor had responded to Council Member Curtis Tyler's questions in the letter
dated March 23rd, but I just wanted to cLrify that there were some Wanes that we have
proposed for increases, but at the time Mr. Curtis wu kddog at the aYocatioaa to the
prognsms of the diffareot positions These increases were not the projected Wary
increases, but the re-allocation of time noel Wary portion to the speci& programs,
which may have included wme portion of the Wary itkrases Mary did anwror this in
"Question #1" of her response letter, but I felt more cWification was needed
Secondly, I'm not sure, from some of the discussion on March 23rd, if I was roalring
myself sa clear ae possible as to what our overall goal with our employee's saluies is
Currently we are trying to bring the salaries of some of our empbyeess up to the minimum
range of salaries being paid for the name pasitiaos at other ageoc~es in our coarwnity
and state The board and administration completed an extauive review and some of the
Wanes aro 33% blow the minimum Wanes of other people doing similar jobs in our
community and state At the same time we saw that about half of our empbyeea were
being paid salaries comparable to those in our cotnrmrrtitia end no increases are being
recommended for these people The increases that we aro aiming for have also been
evahutted and prioritized, so that some employees, even with the recommended increases
are still 15% or less blow the nrninwm saWies of others doing the same job in our
coromurrity and state I state thin to show flat we are trying to be as conservative yet fair
as possible Some may interpret some of these Wanes as high, but they are at or blow
the salaries of other people in our comnnmity doing similar jobs
Comm. Na ZZ •
~g~ F51e No.
A United Way Agency ItCf. TO.
izor MAR 3 0 2nnl
Lastly, I wanted you all to know that we are well awaro of your 5nancial constraints and
the Loge need in our county ao many fronts. M s provider we need to continue malong
the state awaro of the needs, but we are jwt being ralistic in our budeeting and fairness
to employees and Laing you, the County know the needs that are here, whether they are
fully funded or not
We appreciate and thank the Councal Meruben for their tia?e and effort in malting vary
tough dedsions about very important itauea in our camty
Please fee] free to contact me if any further information ie needed.
Sincerely,
r~
Lee Lord, Executive Director
Attch: Mary Navor letter 3/Z3/Ol
1 a ~ l~ U
Turning Point for Families, Inc.
PO Bon 612 Hilo, Hawaii 96721-0612 Phone (808) 935-8229 Faz (808) 934-7600 admin2Eilhawaii nct
March 23, 2001
Nancy Pisicchio -Council Member
County of Hawaii
Hawau County Budding
25 Aupuni Street
Hilo, Hawaii 96720
RE Response to testimonial questions held at King Kamehameha Hotel on March
22, 2001
Dear Ms Pisicchio
We would like to thank the County Counal Members again for giving us the opportunity
in giving testimonial statements and being patient with us on our responses
At the testimonial hearing, Council Member Curtis Tyler asked two questions pertaining
to the budget that I was unable to answer I again apologize for that and hope that the
Council Members accept this delayed response The following were questions referring
to our Shelter budget pages
Question #1 -Why are the increases in the proposed program
budget under line items for the administrative staff so high
compared to the preceding year?
We looked at our administrative staffs trine spent on each
program Based on the additional funding soun:es we are seeking
and the workload for each program, we did a re-allocation of trine
and salary portions to be spent rn each program
Question #2 -Why are we showing a decrease in the remainder
various positions?
A correction on the program budget for fiscal year 2000-2001 It
should have read $30,000, as the amount shown $55,050 was the
proposed amount for Frsca/ year 2000-2001, but revised during
this fiscal year to reflect the actual funding sources approved and
received '
We thank the Counal Members for their patience and consideration in the submittal of
the above responses
If there are any additional questions, please feel free to call Lee Lord or myself at 935-
8229
Sincerely, / -
C~
Mary Navor -Fiscal Officer ~~*y' -
~~C7 A United Way Agency