Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0387.021 2000-2002 12-63 61 10:49 DON JACOBS T:86B 965 6361 P:61 ~®n Jac®bS , , 1 S-~~~~ P®pa~ Strcet ~ ,/96.5- Pah®a, I'°II 96~~13 ~ol~~n~~ E~Cemb~$ 3, 2Q01 , . 2 Pages T~o: Chalrrraan Aaron Chung and nnembers of the l-laonraii County C®uncil I°in~ra~e ~omi7litt~~. Re: dill 121, 13raft 3 In Seotloe~ 19-53 the ~lawall co~„~ty Code them are nine classi~catior~s: (A) unproved resid~tial, (Q) l3nimproved residential, (C) apartment. hotel and res®rt, (E} Commercial, {F) industrial, ~Agri~u6tura! or native forests, (~P) Cor~ervati~on, and (I) lion~eows~er. Pet Secglor~ 1 ~-9~ {c) The shall set the tax rates for of property using the following method: (1) hlet taxable lands and net taxable buildings o~ithin each class of property to be derived fror» real property. (2) ~`he percentage of reveroue to be raised from net taxable lands and net taxable buildings within Bch class ~nultlplied by the total revenue t® be raised from real property In order to determine the amotant of revenue to be derived. Page 1/2 Corte. No~ File 1+1®. f. ~~o _ 12-03 01 10:50 DON JACOBS T:608 565 0361 P: 01 Q~IESTi0N5 1. YVhat is the current percentage ®f revenue to be raised for each classification ®II reai pr®perty? • Has this lnfor~ati®n been made publics 9Nhen? 2. Have these perctrotages been used to calculate ti4t tax rates for each class ®4 real property t~1.~.nearest c~rrt as set forth in stab paragraphs (3) ~ • 9f ~®t VVhy not? Since these questions are pertinent t~ the testirv~ony I plar? to give before flee I°inance ~omrnitt~ on Wednesday, ®ecember 5, 2001, I may ask these questions at the public hearing. Please F~aX ansanaers to these questions to ion Jacobs 965-®361. `thank Y®u. Sincerely lion ~a~~bs Copy to: 141ay®r Marry Kira Rage 2/2