HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0580.002 2000-2002
BOBBY JEAN LEITIIEAD-TODD oa'~`•~°~.•-`"~!~ Phone: (808) 961-8261
Council Member ~6i~; Fax: (808) 961-8912
a; S~
_ s r)r-i1i _
1~ OR `Mad1
COUNTY COUNCIL i , '
County of Hawai 'i
Hawaii County Building
25 Aupuni Street
Hilo, Hawaii 96720
April 17, 2002
The Honorable Harry Kim
Mayor
County of Hawaii
25 Aupuni Street
Hilo, HI 96720
Dear Mayor Kim:
RE: Bill No. 205 Regarding Streets and Sidewalks
I am transmitting a letter dated April 15, 2002, from Charles Hanson, who has taken the time to
submit some valid written concerns about Bill No. 205 relating to Street and Sidewalks.
Please review and comment on Mr. Hanson's recommendations. If his concerns warrant
changing Bill No. 205, I would appreciate transmittal of a Draft 2 to the Council incorporating
his suggestions in time for the bill's consideration on second and final reading on May 1, 2002.
Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
i..
c_z c~ ~ -
Bobby Jean Leithead-ToddL"
Council Member
Att.
cc: Chair Arakaki and Council Members (w/o att)
Dennis Lee, Director of Public Works (w/ att)
Galen Kuba, Director of Environmental Management (w/ att) ~~,n, IeT~,
h'il~ No.' ~ .
l~f. `l`a.
Charles Hanson
PO Box 7113.97 _
Mountain View, HI 9b771
i It =lei =
. _
1 S April X002
Hawaii County Council ~ :
25 Aupuni Street - _ ~ .
Hilo, HI 96720
Re: Bill 205 concerning Streets and Sidewalks -Revision of Chapter 22
This bill has a number of problems and should not be passed without a lot more work. It
would repeal and replace the existing Chapter 22, but does not address all of the areas
that the existing Chapter 22 addresses. Also, there are a number of technical flaws.
I see problems with a number of the definitions in Section 22-1.2.
(i) `Banner" means any temporary sign which is suspended over a county stmt.
A banner could also be displayed parallel to the street. Also this issue could
be addressed in Chapter 3 which is titled Advertising and Sigms. Delete this
definition.
(2) `Bniiding means a structure which is occupied for residential purposes or used
as a place of business.
Since the section on buildang numbering has been removed, this is
unnecessary. Also, the definition is inadequate. For example, is not a vacant
house a building? Is a greenhouse or chicken coop a place of business?
(7) "Driveway" means a road on private or public property giving access from a
private of public street to an established use an tha property.
Change to: `driveway" means a road on property not designated as a public
or private street that provides vehicle access to the street.
(14) "Roadway means that portion of a county street, excluding shoulders, curbs,
gutters, sidewalks or other roadside drainage facilities, used exclusively by
vehicle traffic.
Change to: "roadway" means the central portion of a street right-of--way that
is used for vehicle traffic. It does not include shoulders, curbs, or any area
outside the shoulders or curbs.
I find the use of "exclusively" especially troublesome.
(19} "Violator" gneans the property owner, lessee, or the person responsible for
the violation.
I hope that the County does not see all property owners as violators.
Section 22-2.1. Encroachments.
No object shall be allowed in, under, or over any county street, except objects that
are permitted by the director, chief of police or other provisions of law to be in, under, or
over a county street, or which have a clearance of fifteen feet or more above the surface
of the street, such as the canopy of trees.
A distinction needs to be made between the central portion of a street and the area outside
the curb or shoulder. Sometimes a street right-of--way is wide enough that there is no
problem with trees and shrubs growing on the outer fringes. Out in the rural areas, the
outer portion is sometimes undeveloped raw land.
Section 22-3.3 deals with banner permits. There is far too much detail. Let the director
allow permits for whatever seems prudent and reasonable. This is not that common an
occurrence. Also it should be dealt with in Chapter 3.
Section 22-4.9 (d) deals with Location of driveway approaches at intersections. The
phrase "the intersection of property lines or their extensions" is used in several places to
refer to the corner of an intersection. This is confusing and probably inaccurate. Better
terminology might be, "the intersection of the property lines or their extensions that form
a corner of the intersection."
Section 22-4.9 (e) deals with the maximum number of driveway approaches. The limit of
two driveways might be unreasonable for a larger property. Allow more driveways as
long as the percentage of-curb space used up is not excessive.
I am not comfortable with Section 22-8 dealing with penalties and enforcement. There
should be a clear methodology of escalation when a violation continues. First the
violator is notified and told to take corrective action. If the violator does not make a good
faith effort to fi~ the problem then a fine is threatened and then imposed. There should
be a limit on the amount that a violator can be fined without taking him to court. Open
ended per day fines are too much-tike a police state.
I also see a problem with the format that has been adopted for the County Code. The
Article and I3ivision categories do not fit with the Section and Subsection categories. I
think they cause confusion and should be eliminated.
Thank you for your consideration,
Charles Hanson
_ ,