Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0493.056 2000-2002- ' Volmno .� rime - J BY - a� — ,r- --------------- County CoundIT , Puna Demographic Landscape 5;�:�'!R"'. Census P ,`�°r .. ro 1996 ��': opulation u�_Mr Units of 5.oNo People V�1�eaau ' 'ice: ` . •'•.' •.�' '. r ", - - �:...•^,��,-,. -•�._ �• ' •rl'r ' "kin s Each circle shows an area with a population of about 5,000 people, according to the 1990 Census. Comm. N®. i q a' Fi le No. 9°' Ref, To: Ref. Date JUL 1 2WV Development permitted for 1,500 to 2,000 dwellings, but covered by lava since 1982. Area of approximately 1.000 dwellings permitted, not including Ohana. 0 -; `,! , •ter ,,,�"'t ,' \ i X / ` ""Each oval or circle shows an area of Puna where development is permitted for 1,500 5� to 2.000 dwellings, not Tncluding Ohana dwellings (which have potential to double the count). This unit of development potential represents (at three people per household) about 5,000 people, the size of a town or neighborhood served by one 1 e ementary school for 400 children. Puna Demographic Landscape The size of the oval indicates density; Currently Permitted Development the smaller, the greater the density of permitted development. -� : E SAI':@ sell trYi rrYrr-ir�'rr'r'Iit4YrY,trY r ri=11010 i Yr rYYYYrrrrrr�rrrrrrYrrrrr tM;rkrYY'�'iFplrKirilCrirYtYS, MRS, A:,E - r:r:rr rrYrrr rrr r-r.IrrYYYYnrrr ri. I119rr`i[li'rr'*YYNAi-mmL rr119frY'r'YYrYYY'rb'_Ii Y Y'r'r'i. f9Pr'r'r'Yr'iirr rYirr rfrrY: rrrr:r v Allik?s. ,SiMalYlir.rrr1A rrAtY,rY rrrY rY•rrrtirYrrrYY• ' rrrrYrrr ICOYCiE AE{B9E�:1 i i rrrrrYY�t�afrrrrrrYr 1 i rr Rlf'/YIYrrF iPr YYYr'IY7p'i _ i riiliYirY'YY rfr Yr{�rriYl'r IMI` - t _ 'ffYYWrONI I iYrrrrlf��rIIYrYYYfr`r 1 rYYrYrr1FN.91rYYYY"YYYt" 1 rY r;1(rrY'BYtStr■YYy rY-Yrr1 7CWO 1 rr rrrYiiilY�grtl. i , �r'�ir�flir5�fiiiYi aaw r.7frrY rr3fF IiirliM.YYIY. 1 rYr:YYYYiKeKYf14fYYiFr71YY. I rrYYYYYYYNfrYlifirYlYr1rY� E�E1Ee�1r:y6 IrOOOr.i wall ` I rY�rYYYYeIFYrrYYr YrYY r rrr'rYYY riY'Y Y' y IY f '1 - 1Tii'rrl1ftili YYYYY'Yril� r rYAfif51Ilk :11 _ :- lYr rrltA 1F�rgt�y1,14 rrr. .:. Y'i'Yr"irfYi(rr'�f3tYYY"Y�,Y YNi. r r7YYfrrrti. age r rr[li�rwr<rrYrKrar.rrrY .r,�,� �rrrrrrwerfrrrY.l�rrrrti.. O ----------------------------------- i C m m age v ($ 0 What is build -.out? Build -out is the state of the planning area when all currently permit- ted development, plus the expected balancing land uses and infra- structure are in place. In Puna, that means a house on every lot and all the other uses and infrastructure that can be expected to be needed by that population. Why do we need to plan for build -out? 1) Infrastructure financing schemes, such as TIF , impact fees, or improvement districts require a comprehensive plan before the money can be spent (although sometimes the money can be collected, and part of it used to prepare the plan, which must be approved be- fore the infrastructure can be put in).. A comprehensive plan, by definition, roust show how infrastructure will be supplied to all cur- rently permitted development in the planning area. 2) Planning for build -out saves public money. 'There are two main "police" powers -required of government: A. public health and safety, and B. prudent management of the public purse. A gives government the responsibility to set the codes and stan- dards that make infrastructure a requirement. B requires government to plan ahead so that infrastructure money is spent wisely and for the most efficient result. If we do not plan for build -out, we are much more likely to have *o re -do our infrastructure improvements again and again because they turn out to be in the wrong place, or not big enough, or installed before something else that should have come first. 3) By planning early, we can lower our potential environmental im- pact and thereby substantially lower our infrastructure costs. Problem: Lack of balancing land uses in Puna The County of Hawaii General PIan, environmental protection and democracy all require that a complete range of land uses be provided in every community, so that }obs and services are located conve- niently close to residences, and so that every community accommo- dates its "fair share" of Locallv Unwanted Land Uses (LLTLLUs), such as low-income housing, homeless shelters, power plants, and solid waste disposal facilities. Puna lacks most of these kinds of balancing land uses that would provide a basis for economic development and necessary community support facilities at build -out. Problem: Rural Character vs. Suburban Sprawl Issues: Present land use patterns in subdivisions are suburban sprawl that encourage a rtcommuter culture. it Build-out that maintains the present pattern of the subdivisions will encourage regional facilities and further sprawl in the agricultural belts, increasing the potential build -out population and displacing the best agricultural lands. Commuter lifestyles have high transportation and infrastructure costs that require higher incomes to support and may make alternative, traditional, and subsistence lifestyles increasingly marginal. t .c .� R 1'�' e"t+�.s=. .. - - 4w '>!/' s ��-• ' ?i.. .titer .7 ;. .`r. `. t} �. .'.� �." �� +gyp � �t .°°� � 1 P•' �aj F .. ) �Z r A. •OLAA ^� .: �. :i I•' �-"_. / im+ X41 J O Z v FOA£Sr \ -� - AAO _�v�T"'--"--.--"�-'-'---'-'.-«---...)i / A r `� 7 RRES,AVF `� t / - '" ✓:�, _�;t. „„ J� , - '.�.�.�___.= ` 'f ""._ //KEAAU `/ � r ��� �~�Y is L[ ;-i` ') j��N4WJ// may+• 3 ..jY ''jv� 1 _ ."„"''--�"'1�"r r Y ,,,)�"OIAq IO—L 1 \ l .,� •--/�/- - (t. A_T_rT�'f / %` f� r'`----'--�-""", ><'''� �Z ;~n .' MCUNT4IN VIEW •'a`rT - \ URTISTOW H'"= �_-•-- -` `22�( .►� at 'ar �' � r .l y"a/ � _�'_"�"�� _� ��\`� � � r'..-" �__� ��= i _ ! ��!->\ ql, �f�y�a ''°.'�_W Y . w� - 5. 77 77+ rz PUNA . ' /`r , r' �.w _ �^� J c„�, '-{� / ", `\.r:_ -- \e ,r •.. ,F JRf STS' Q t7 i\�. .\ ,�.< < c.` 4 �� � � f ;k° t._ \ "-_.._.�=� � _-•._'' �`" r. �,_ 1 ,.' r.• f` � ^ (, ^ � =�Y -'"` 'r r �, r •i./„�^^�""'�^^^^---�.-�.�-��-�,��C'µ_- + <• �. :` u ti`.•i �\ �'t t,_ f4 LcT.G_ z.r�4 .'� \�// =\ �;' C r n^ -_I_� =-- _..._�r \ '^µ--...�._�., -..__r I�.1� KAPCC t" `,tv � � �Y `L\ a�' c �`cs S- e •�c �S- \ �w"' ' % .. �.1 t- � f �-•-"-_'I `,7�\ `� � L cc v� C.Y 4�.C� y�C c.0 c���t. C" c -c _'t r•- �-T--.� �� I._.. .. �'\._.-�---""�-�\.�`�c�; _ r aolro-_r. u � _ x t � •t :. L- .•c. � Fri � �_._- ""=------' `- ` � ��,'._/ c \ - \ .�Ct' ------" t AWc� F Problem: Roads Safe neighborhood roads (roads with adequate sight distance to have time to stop before you hit a walking child) cost from $500,000 to $1 million per mile, depending upon the width and the surface applied. The better the surface, the less the maintenance. So, figure $50 to $100 per frontage foot, assuming you have a neighbor across the street paying for half the road. $5,000 to $10,000 for 100' of front- age. This does not include the costs of the primary, secondary, and major arterials for commuting. The average dwelling generates 10 trips per day. Arterials can handle from 10,000 trips per day on two-lane with access, to 45,000 trips per day for six lanes with limited access and without a one-way rush hour. They cost from $2 million to $5 per mile, not including intersections and bridges. High Impact Puna now: 158.4 feet/person pavement Build -out: 21.1 feet/person pavement Roads Difference Mass Transit Pedestrian Neighborhoods Housing Clusters Jobs and services conveniently close to residences 3-40 % to 2,500 % difference paved area and cost Low Impact Cluster Development: 6.3 feet/person pavement Low Environmental Impact Lifestyles = Low Infrastructure Costs High Impact Septic Tank,Water Tank Big House, 2 -car garage Big driveway, Long Frontage Drainage Difference Central water & sewer House clustering Pedestrian neighborhoods 50 % to 70 % less additional run-off 50%v to 70% savings in crest Low Impact No water or septic tank Small House & Qarage Short driveway, short frontage Low Environmental Impact Lifestyles = Low Infrastructure Costs C.- t� +e r•t.. ':✓s -,t-� r` ' �p ti - fr _ r. t , ♦ roti tiS:T r � � � 9 - -I s' Y R S°s`r.-r Von �y'f�•-- �"r�a.'•rl l �l a a - r o .1f rtt, 2 >7t ii x.g ,g.rti ah fit r ix� J+ s rT i Sfr 't a. Ah'' swt'tl7 � ,tir ✓' >L";ti9 -- ,7 r • vy ji,� Te 13° '.,fit' A: arr-• - r � a _ rx r r ^ a z r r `"� f ({ r r ` � � `t � F t^ Sa 1_Q nil / r ■ 't,. < L �`r Y �jr'��€ r c r `r �F:� •/F.r, a e" a n z t,c Frt'*r � �`r er rF�r o, ��-a-Fr ;r•�r/rte'.. r rF_z;n '��f ;� / � -� t a l'�- c. c�� j.�iCp t1� v' 4 }) , ••`4 ++v - J 'rF ♦ r r «+ r S;;/ rri "W", 7, �ti a < Y�• f1 it o 5 Y i .iJp� .,F..F'ar'S.r�:�^ rr r � sn.t2'� ,F� �• /�{i rjl}� rfj`} }})i11f - (}} ii}�`}�� � rri S�}\ if} � �� c �� . Nil y{ Eil ( t f c. 'tr.,,�r^,q �p F .r' err / r A r}r rr r`.}iuA S-}} r 1 :,i❑., ii����(r/(t�} ���E ( ,i )-.�' far :r ,;� r ftri*•. �-�r�^ r -r' yC,y2� rjl;r`r r ` r' A ' f1 r'��( rfr t /i f it 1 ## } "T �l��� } ft Af J$ (I}r ff(}�}{f'; 1t}(�: J n `icy '� ^ O 1 y — �fl!iS mangirigi i -jam -} {y s{�(4�} sU HMO ,4,=�� � � I �f } SI✓�. 1~ � r1t�_���}�}fs\ #}?��t2} \ � _-rr��.-�a'�' + r r r,�}'�is 1 1$S}} 1 � ti}/!! y � -tis r } +r ❑' ���y ik `\i' � � 2} }, / I Iyi /`�� DI., :,oy�}:'kr} i}�r�s® _ •���i}} }i} rt-r�) }w - } r r� r t } � of yrrr AIr tffr r♦ - i!rE S,�1Srr ' ^ � o� riif�.y. } �pI ' 1: g }(S � f 1(+rrs�S } }4f�y V HH rri _ � 1f�S ��� • iii�r rrr .?F-j-S}".S'k, `Rro� l ( ! t Z r r .?F-j-S}".S'k,