Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0212.389 1996-1998 ~%~i~ m u ~ c< ~ C ,J^ CC ~ Ail ~ /~i, ~e f e-c. ~a~Cc_ fU,' ~¢fUNi ~ Cr C~n--~ 1r2~t.'out~~ l~wsF i~-~L~rx~-- ~~oe, a.~,~__ `--~C u cLe~ ~c~~,•a-lam . ~.~L~y ~ ~ G~CoCu~ ~ ~ ~y~~- ~ CID G~~~ ~"~c ~'~-~.c1 . ~ f/~-c.~ ono X-e.L.a wb ~o ~ ~-~~'tos z` yon ~Q ~ ~ ms's oCo ~ ~s2 ~ m. FND~C~ /~~9'~ 9 ~.t. ~ sanded G1 U~ leaf, Dgfti MAY 1 6 1998 9~~-~~~ ~ i ~~~-arc .~cc~ a.~ ~ , ~ ~o~i.~sp . / ~lojtu Yia#.~ .t~; CC ~ii~~~f~2=c i~ _ T'~"`.~ , -a _ ~r-~-,,,-.~. .°t..:-r:~ No ^~afe Thr •--si,c1;_# For E>:pcsure T„ (,,,w~-p.;;= R.~i..~jorl~t,<;~~{ ~k i Sohn 6o-Fmen - a pton per in Nadi a~iv n l'cs~c' h v~~o co - d,5covcrcd. •ul'4ntum t33 •tr+d hdpad. isolafia -th~~~ ' 'bd.`s l~; mil;9~am q{ Plarlontum . In t459 5~•; Il NOT WoPPi e.t obew't 'Pa lok of ncst~ c v~,t .fh,,_b¢in~-4~s bf hK.elcaP poweh.-----~}tl_._._~i_ll~i,a~_our Ou~.~) . _r t~. e i.uJ:, G'1. r~2' ,I Y' ~,=ut'I ~ g.,,,,i ur. :ire,=.:_- i..._:.= IP.: ~=..'18.. r G.a F- _ r. r_ -.ht .:.Ih v~'.r . i 'r q.~~ _ - .1 T}le i41-afar.-. .J:+ .9.d~raSE }'ler@ ~i- t.};.? oiairri chat llat-rn tr-nru v_~nivircr ra,~iatiutl, a pr~cven carcin:-;~er. and mutagen. "•x,ly hypothetical" at. low dose-le~.~els. Thi'= C'[':i. _.i ,,Fir-ie , .r. ~.i _ _#ih..° ?u:. _.l'i`c. ri ~ ..urtlai _,d.__ ~_i _ N+~ _a.r '#ew •JC~- v _µ~tS~._. a. a .'C,. _ i~}le pure: ~°6 ,~f t}713 rr•mmuniCd r,l Jn i8 t0 9#lOV yOU, in abbreviated fash.on, the factual basis for reje:~t.ing the r-lain that no her-m has yet been proven from low-dose radiati:?n and fur re.j ecting suggestions that your duty is to fight "radio-phobia" over a caroino,ren which tar};wires': high .#o:es. ~ stakea are w,_rth some your time, Hc,w so? P,ecause ionizing radiation is not an e>:ctic caarincgen and rmatagen w}lich expOBev 3 small segment of the population. Low-dose ionizing radiation reoeived from •lat,u,ai bac:~nr",tn„ hour._,:.._, numerous wadi al procedure=, nuclear pollution, flying, and sometimes from occupatiotlal e~:po:a,ares. How many other proven human carcinogens can you name to which everyone is a:r;posed on a daily and lifelong basis" ^•};,<;r^± ;s Id:_~ ~aT__ 'Ihre-~hol.# For E:cf~o_,,wrF 'Io I;_w-Dose Radiation '~:C, o* + ?he evidence t}tat, r.}lere ,s no safe do"«,-1e~e1 ..f ir~ni~ina r=adiat.ion Ina tnre_.hold dose.i mearu that journals and other media contribute to cancer (and inherited afflictionsi whenever they include disproven ,Maims which encourage a casual attitude toward extra exposures low-dose ionizing radiation. We }}el:eve ±.hat you want. he1A .rr'vF,,-. r, s,ac}~ mrs-,ties. ~aa~ . .lx`~u; 4 ~ ~ <:a~'~'~~ Part 2. * Boma Intt-od,actary Information .i ,~,Ys•',,. * Assertians in this communication era supported in detail, and with very epacifio sa,arcing, in C~cfman 1990 (~haptars 1u", 19, 20, 21, 32, 33'. T}1.=r? Is `wo Saf? Threshold For E::t%c•s,ar? To Lcw-Doses Radiation (p7 ct" 34' a. * Cancers require the presence of damaged genetic malecules .r. the _tnc,la ,_e:is which :urn malignant. Likawls-=, inhal'it?~_; aff 1 is=.ions r?quir? the pr?serge of c]ama<;?d .gene` _c Cm_,1P U.,=_. *t~a =.in,~~l? ;=iii ir,-.m a], i,Lal a 1?`~y ;j a, .7•P72. qen:-ti,_ mcleculas a human, _~L-nue leu_: ate rh? !~6 human chrom~sc~.e<-,, aac't; c,r~- -•ubl--=_I':anci uNA he1i:• pJlus as=_ciat?rl Mains. r. * After damage occurs to a genetic molecule, the cell attampr.,s to repair it. If r.};a ,?il ~achi,=ve: perfart• repair, the ganeL iC mG i2C,],la I'PC;a Ir,_: 1'° ':'fi3r, dual it j~~~ a_; ;~O ~7=_e ye 17ad + The menace t~•}~~alth invalves the genr-.tic -Damage which is unrepaired, unrepairable, ar misrepaired. Tile °~.~:blesome tri=. * Whan the damage is c,~mplex for example, when the opp~sit? strands of the double he_li:c have been broken pieces of the DNA do,~ble-helix sometimes and up in the wrong place, or become permanently lost. These i~aiiuras cf~ repair are not ih?ra Is i1o Safe Threshold For ;=.!pos,.~re T•-~ Low-Dose Radiation (p3 of '_,4~ disput?. * By contrast, the cell is exquisitely efficient at repairing injury to single strands of the double helix. It bees beer, =st•im•ate<1 that., every day, each ,~e11 cepas wir.h at• least _ . , i00 DNA injuries in ]u ed by routine rhPmicai aounces (including fry radials 9r b _ed by '-h? •_eli ,sel: Such standard repairs mrg}it. ba compared to raplar:ing a lamp':; hrol~en Iight bulb with a r,aw bulb. Af~tar "rapai°. the lamp wor~}.;~ par-feor_.ly again. y . ~;-,:......ad;at+on has' demonstrated bevand any .5~y,ubt i~•~ abilit•v tc break both strands of the DNA_dauble :Ielrx at t}'te same time. •I'his ability has made it "famous" among tux:- agents as a chromosamo-breaker: (If anly one DNA's*,rand breaks,,the other strand holds the chromosome together t) ,a, * i;ount•1?ss axpertm?n*..s have been done on cail.=_. to measure the spaced with which they repair radiation-induces DNA c]amaga, br:t.h single-st•rand and double-strand injuries, Even after extremely high radiation doses, that repair which does occ-.r is complete within. about & hours, and most of it is aamplere within about. ~ hours. dersrood by comye -icon with the annual dose which everyone ! eceives frnm nar aryl sources. Exr_ludin radon, F~n e~cf-P`r3~1 q agrla~uraY. dose get;! - y Y ~'-Ge t~ cells h% f.~'r~.~,a ' --~~~~~~about 0.1 rad.1"'zarefors acommon expsrimenral J ~ }an ~LS~ R cads, dellvereo ~ an instant ("acute" dose deli Y~, is C A.n b ~ about 1,000 t.imss higher than the tonal annual natural dose. And yet pp e.:par,m nrs show r„-= human'ea~t~t`cighi'epar capsciti`yr I xr enzymesJ,~'o Sope+°6+ith~~GB u Indeed z'epaxr~ c ty seems 'not averw'het~mecj'•evon a •;r~osear~a 5"QO -tads -and mora~ ,;i _ _ _ ~ i. Thy s:cplanation for residual, post-repair damage i° rot a lack of rape---e.apac.ity or time, but rathar~an.!:inFierent~ ixiahflity of the repair-system to ifix~certain complex injuries to ; gen+?tic moler_ules~.~ :a .i j. + A radiation-induoed chromosome abnormality does not always r'; 11 the c=__ in wh;eh it. pets i:_:ts, nor does ir_. always graven`. `he _.m c.. :~.=iinr,. When the injured cell divides, the same injury is ter-.cared in the new calls In ~.ha A-bomb surv.,;;r,, _;;rsa cnr°`""=sc;na ~ ,-mal;r.ies lave bean obser•?ed even 40 years - _._ter ie ._'.rnb;.ri,;= T}xe;r ra:~liar.ion-caus:at.ion is indioated by file posi t; ve _„_=.._-r=_: ,^_=n-_-e' The higher the bomb-dose, the higher the frsquenay of~abnnrm.alit.ias (P;oda.u,a 199:=). k. x Residual unrepaired and misrspaired chromosome damag<_ ..,.;rne.z, ".,_._,_1 :amk:1•=s ;rr~3dt.a_t._d ;n !ab d;_h«;~- %.n vi*.ro%, is visually detecra:ble at acu*,e radiation doses as low as 2 cads, de_~p;ite cr,a<ia mec.;__~s cT obsarvar;~:n (I lo,Yd 195:_:. Mora.-vet, t-•ha residual genet.;c u=_mage which can n.=t be d?t.eoteri with su_h mer.ho,ds Cn,~,y a;np; -he arrc,_r= e3ar. _~,_r.~d, L, * J7c,.es residual damage also exist, after repair-time, if low doses are received slowly by living humans (:n vivo!' ','es, roc exam_r_~1~, ?'-~`~ra _hrcmc=_:ome damage has been :~hserveci amp.=ng Alaskan nar.i7e': ,.'L: RI n,.~:.33r 'iii lour„ in Sjii t.a Of very ~iradua} aCCUIilU is6l nn GT- 3r%vUt.•..`)~~ e'n. t,ra e:CpoSUI"B per vaar i•:r iQ yaar'v SAC i970 ? : ~a __~nr _ mosc:ne cia.maga ha-_ bean observed among rnac leer docb.yard workers ?=--posed very slowly to les°. than 5 rods par year ( Evans 1=l , ; ar:-ra ;:.hrouu,some damage has been c:bsarvad amnr~7 various population= living where the chrorac natural dcaa from radiation abo~-= 3verac;e (for ?>:ample sae Barcinsl~:i ;~97G; Maruvama 197E?. [Oe~ae cad is also called 0.01 Gray.I Part * Where•'„ the Controversy, in Visw of S,ach F,vidance? m. * 1: residual genets damage }lao bael-i nbsarvad even from low radiation. doss ar. slow dose-rates (para. L, abc~:e), how: q..:..:!..r.w^ -...~..,M- Fva.t yePwyt'. y N. ' ~ S~ can.-anyone still,.claim,thateev,iderlpe~rof,harmFat low. doses.ris dust tlletiC3 car that harm requirss high drGes? k~, n. M Here's how. If challzn~,7ed, they say: ii) Since a press space for next page Arrow keys: Up and Down to move. Right to follow a link; Left. t. go back, Hielp 0)ptions Print G)o M)ain screen !~)uit /=search Cdelete]=history list. UebCrawl?r Szareh Results for: "radiation (p12 of 34) connection is just hypothetical between real-world health effects and misrepai;,ad or unrepair?d geret.lc injury Txom radiation, the evidence of harm to health from lcw~dose radiation is just hypr_,t}latiC.a1; and (Zi Since there are radiation doses i~wzr than occupational doses, and iower than fallout doses, and lower than a,-,y de~e~_==. can evar afford r.n _t.ud;?, the harm ar_. thes? lower d.-.ses «ill always r?ruain unproven. They -uggest that maybe, at. some e;tt.~-~[N,~? i:_~w i,,~z ,r __-I? :'ap it }e_.c;m?s ar-e~_t. ~ iJe recognized a met}u~ci which could cope with both ?iiffir.:_tacs. R~=gir!rung wrt.h Gafraan 19.1 (pp.~, „i, iG ?volved In i~of~an 196i :r;p.4`-ii', and vcfman i'9;6 (pp."-~-i4). In ~oFinan .9ciq, wry :~laveloped thz rn?t•hod and the wider.~..a in ._iztail. Fail presentation ta~~-: 7l") page° not s,ult•able f-cr a journal. ~e Wall Y.?d r~ knOW 1: t}7? t}lr?5}?Old 139Ue, for I9tll Zing tad lot lGn, Crnl1•~ be settled. Our analysis proves, by any reasonable standard cf scientific prooF, that share ie no soft dose or dose-rate of ionizing radiation. W? have f,,=.~ur,d rzf~utation of our pr-cot. G'Il r.}la ~L]G 3.h•-G~•}~ lP) r C~') M 1-• ~ - F ~ r-N-~ n2 r-r--~-er~e~.L: c' '+~=~.,-e-r contrary, our method is extznsiveiy confirmed in the 1993 rzport of the Un-ted Nations iUNSCEAR 19Q:3, asp. pp.F27-6'3F=',, p.O£~1, p~:S'?F• Table 1',. q. > F•?r rea,:ar=_ ro ;understand }low our met'rcd overcomzs thz.obsraclea desr_ribed a}?ove (para. :li, you need know how ionizing radiation "works." I*. works very differently from toxic chemicals (para. cc, belcv)." y Part 4, * How Ionizinu Radiation "Works" r. ~ Ion~aiF!g x$diayt~on_.includea;.b~ta particles, alpha particles, gamma rays.. and x-rayst" the term excludes radio, microwave, infra-red, and visible radiations. press space for next. page Arrow key_: Up and Down to move. Right to Tollow a link; Left rc. gn back. Help 0>pticns Print. G)o M)aln screen ~>uit /=search Cdeletel=history lisp T'rere Is "fo Saf? Threshold For Exposure To Low-Dose Radiation (p14 of 34) .,w,-:-... -z.. . s. x w'l~i~a,'pnrtio_I~ ~;,4I_Q~-'~~.'~~~''_ _-=_but-they differ mpcrtant wav. Ber_.a particles are endowed with biolcgica rj' nna"E"urat~'"°" This energy he coG1F'~ro ~`tNl< ~Cl, 'Z'aii~`~ie~ o f`d t nan.~ non - b<{-ci elcetrons cA ,r r, * ' ~ s (called radto-ntscl es, radtrisotopes) I. I i r to 'fh~ F1ui r 4 ~ '=rt, is I3s,_ {mod 1n 'n'1O^ y one Hadto-nuclsdes.o ten omit,~gammaL~taa~,.t''°"'~§"'p~.~ess of"decayinj' ~ t,ntc erable,~nucY; ~ z: x _;~u.~.. u . * :Qamma""r'ays are "pFtotons~- - r of"~;`T'~`g~itxYia n~ too much energy, for'~t"umarts 'io X=rays are ice gamma rays, except x-ra shave Ieas ever ss~g y gy ~ ' `photon: ''Hoch"are ganffratecl ~ by "nature" and by man-made genera ors. ! ~ * The photons of x-rays and gamma rays dc, their damage tc cells by Ynocking electrons out of ordinary mc~ecules and causing them to become beta particles which travel tIW^ough the cell (and beyond) with biologically unnatural energy. ;1+.ere are about EO'l million typical cells in 1 cubic cent meter. The biclogi~~al damage caused ty ionizing radiation, including gamma rays and x-rays, is due tc high-speed particles traveling through cells and unloading con~.antrated amcunta of energy ir, unnatural places at random. Each particle creates a very narrow path of disturbance :called a primary "ionization track"} as it nloads energy at irregular intervals. Alpha particles dcr_'t travel far; they unload their energy within just a few cells. =.;~ce vir*,ua.lly no one claims any threshold dose (safe dose) fca- alpha !.r?'-aciiacior„ ~,-ur Worn invoivee. 'tiiah-s}1?e,I •_ia; tr,•.;> pare: + alJvUC ~ . The amount of energy transferred in an z.^.stant, from the high-speed electron to nearby molecules, is often, many times larger than the Single energy-transfer, which xcur °anyway" in normal cell chemistry' and mer_.abolism. ,This unique feat.--~e of icnizin~7 radiation probably explains why ionizing radiation. is so _ J !a ~ Y_ iL - "good" at breaking chromosomes and inflicting other complex injuries an the genetic ymolecules. Every track acting without help from any other track has a chance of causing an unrepairable carc inogenic~inaurY„in. a. cell. ' y. * At..,~sgh5radiation doses,-many tracks frog h~qh-speed alect~gns pass, through every.,ca11 riit~Y~etas. We 'focus or, the nucleus because that is where t'~ie human'3..:pertetl.o tnoleeuIea are located. How manv rra ks' At l00 redo from ttieddical x-rays, aEout 'I30?' _ .primary tracks cross every`cell=nucIeu~ (Gcfman 1990; ba3ed on 30 t.~V -rayc ~n rh_ average, from ~0 1 V peek 7 ,4r~';104 ~rads,5fzgmt.gamtoa rays, about, 3(„itQ~,~rack~,scrrnss every, cell-nucleu~ (C'ofmati~l9~r; based•t3n "'B"0 YpV gamma r.avG from ra•3ium-22b or decay of ~ =ium-137 into stable barium-137). + What happens at 1cW doses? When the tcra.I dose about. 0.?S tad (750 milli-tads) from medir_al x-rays, the average c number of traels per cell-nucleu=, is ono track (Gofman 194x3, Tables 2C-Mi. At total doses cf about 0.33 tad {330 milli-radsl from radium-22G or cesium-137, the average number of tracks per r, , r = - - - cell nucleus 1s one track. ~"'~''"`t3 annual dose of 0.t.,rad from+ natural background: s ~ krYmb2er'~~"CP~6~t'F!k tcEE riucYeu~'"i~;r~gt~idi'i k~ilttt^tr>~~yaarr~ . ~ . aa. ~ B1.+t elzctrons can nor. bz subdivided ii to frac*.ions. ei.the~ a.,celh nucleus experiences an electron-,track, or rt does not Ye or no` at'~ery Iow .total- dose5~, some nuclei"experience.,one..track.or a few tracks, and other nuclei' experience no irradiation at a1T,; ~ bb. * When the averagetnumber of tracks per nucleus is one track, 37% of the nuclei experiencz no track at all, 37% x experience one track, 13% experiernce two tracks, 6% experience 3 tracks (Gofrnan P~9%, Table ?0-td). Trac}:s arz a special property making _onizing radiar,lon vzry diffzrec;t Tr-.;m toxic chemicals. Chzmical=_ can be present, in a cell-nucleus at lower and lower concentrat_ans. For _i'2T(l i. ;a i.-_, '.};zr~_ 1 n0 I:itiliGLiRt ~..i ,p~Yni'.'r':3t1 _•fi. :•.2 itT~ radiation, one crack is the least. possible invasion it .an Inflict - - - - - - ---e , „a - , _ _ _ upon a call-rna_:1F,1:;, At `.hY __.lular }~„gi, .;~na trace t're iGwe_'t• --~-_i?;1~_ ..~.•e, and onz tra_.k presents the bast poss_~-iz r_hallenge for the rzpair-system. T're aplit~-sewn=i _ccar:->nce .~f r.re,•k p. :plc; the w,=_ dose-rate. o,y. * h: mar: evi;_ierce -.:-:ows health harm ~=._•sd by .yo='. '•hr=h :e•iiv,a ~ `='u_ a `aw tra as ;er li--~clt' then suc1:~ zv:cdencz wipes c_._ t•he hop) that "r~zpair` canYeve- -:sliver a ;}:resh;_id ~r }afa doe. t„aces. ~i, ab•_`;e) Part * Human ~tudizs Showing Ramat,ion-Induced =sneer from Minimal Doses ee, I2: the mainstream madical literature erz ~uitz a .,,Parr--r+-+. dg Ott 1'~SZ'iT""'im_*~--~e3'i,i` .~-t_ _ +,a -k ~ T _ li_ l,lY _.v- 1. " ? - _ number of epidemiological studies showing that even minimal doses ofd ionizing radiation induct extra cases cF cancers. Tha -fzrenoas are flagged GJt}1~in the list. ff. • For the fl•-,ryged studies, wz firn2red ^_ut the average number of track- per nucleus ;_aused by each ei=„^.sure (GoPman 199fj;, gg, The avzrage number of tracks thralgr Bach cell-nucleus, par exposer?, ranged from 0.3 track to I? tracks, with this distribution: 1~.3; 0.7; 1.2; 1.3; 2.1; 5.2; 10; 12 tracks. In other words, some studies meet a very strict definition of lc`dest• pcsstble radiation doses (para. c:=, above), and others are nearly minimal. ~ - ----•'-~-r-s-,. - _ ~e+arrcc~ or urrepairable, ur ah. * if only the 6-track, 10-track, and I2-*.raci: . studies existed, someone would be sure to speculate that "maybe 6 traci.s overwhelm a cei}'o repair-'capacity. Maybe there 's a safe dcce at tracks." S. 'rapkse~raq~) L ~1ata.on;~ doses of, 2 to S rada,~.so 7urh specuYstion wouI~ e ~arcl`ro eccn'cile Arrea i~~t~-Hji ..a - 'its~l~t+s-t+v f~e}}ere 'ireie, ves' r - with evidence of abundant repair-capacity at 100 to 500 rails (see para. n, above). In any case, such sper:ulatlon is ruled cut by the tudiae stlcwing excess cancer from even lower track-averages per? t~ucleus~. i~. + B;: at:y reasonable -tandard pf plroof, the canhlnat:•.:r. of human =f!._lemioi;,gy anti .rocs}:-arai•rsis raemon-rates t.hara ,s no threshold dcsa or dose-rat.e below which "rapair" invariably prevents health harm. * . ~ _ _ a:, arror assert th.=. c. no }„aman _ _ ±ence ~a }'sort(, }7°~lth at• minimal ,1n'oe-~FV~=1=_. lr, ti C.°~ ' .se_ ?.tbiiC_ ~1_w., is:7!;,=~° :.~i erttr-!~_ ~~atit c2" 3 V~Y'y _-ei harm. The flaggsd studies rule out speculation that low-dose~~^ radiation may be eithar risl;-free or "gacd for you." iwnre~ rB:~13'~l On ~arC inOgB;l?Si. L3 t}?e ...c.1 r. ~f ~__d1.;dl injur-y'= the _7~nar.i_ ~„_.__~~i ther: the r'1a'7cre~=: *_~udl~_ _trong': wa_.-. r.hat- Y.hh- r Y:af'n `3 -:T ,',!nodal zrradip` rn +i!Gf __,~~C.-. }"]ramp. r: - _ 7 . ,iii i_ a • /-=.P.a ~a_ ~ 1 * It i.s espec ia'_iy powerful evidence when a _~ommcn r,=p, 1.. s _ `'r:_rG a /aI'Le7;/ -a.l-.at L:U1 9.;per:eYCo~. :•}7B "_aryr~ed stu•:Ii~_ include infant:.: in-urero, :~hildrer., ado ~.r.=men; h::_:h-err _•I-ryy ,gamma rays, med lcal x-rays acuta .ingle -.^sas, acute _erlai doses, and chronic occupational dcse~. + IL- wcrt•h ;:ot.i;;:y that acute aerial :~o_:-=_. _ in women who racelved repear_.ad Icw-dose chest fl?a,~roscople=_:, =_curred wit~~ p'ent.a Y ..e tot- the ,-epalr-system to ~~:mplete its W.rr, cn damaged i;<c•'_ec,.;les hefer e the ne..t .:-ray exam f para. g, above; , If repair could always work flawlessly when the x-ray dose is low, then~'~ such women would show no radiation-induced cancer from. the •rery highi ' radiation dosses which they gradually ar_.c:umulated.,After f?awies5 repair-wort;, t,`"ie women would never have any cancer-risk leF. from ..}ie i;:r'e•Vl:.,w° pvp~._t:I`e w}IE.tI t}lt-.y Y'a..:?ivad t,}1e n?Xt, 6:ipO5ure the aer!e„ GaGh expoSUre Wnuld l~Cl]r On a ~ieail .slar•e " mm. + T}la evidence of excess breast cancer in the' fluoroscoped women is very solid, and show.<_: a positive lose-response. This evl,:lenca of radiati~~n-induced human cancer i:, .A _34[r,-~{~~.,J n_.,,., _ _r-}~~+h• c -.._'rrFriey r_ 1_ r widely acknowledged and cited but. not many.peispleerecogrize that~~ ibis evidence of cancer-induction res+alting from nearly minimal ~~es. of,:radiation per exposure iabout 6 ro 10-tracks~;per average~~ .M. cell.„l1?3&!e?~acper,:~4„FaSY"axamina~~~)a nn. • Our final point ocncerns the immune response. Wa',ye heard people speculate dike *.•his: "Everis`f,:'a'Fraction ofa tow-dose genetic damage _is-ilnrepaired or urrepa irable, cr srepairad at the lows.=_ dose-levels, the reavltrng aasecera vaulJa a ~adr few~t",Chat the'^immune system wand tha~ ~ bodyr ~~`.cipher dliir~exiseet,3 a}~ainst,~a~ieer,would;,etiminatq,hecr':~-The avidei?ca r fIa;;ged 4'a' studies refutes that aulation, and sc dces logic. I '~gdys~ +',:;d ~ nattaral..d9Fanaes'autbmaticaltv4eliminata,aingle~caricet~sl~u.~sGmans~/ r~,,,~, could never develop cancer- from- asiy cause (incl+ading hires doee'~ }`''~"i'--- radiation>. Bur, lr_.ts of peoples do develop cancer. Fatal cancer. In tr' the USA,'22X of all deaths era-due-to cancer:"$ H''-=1 `}~s'x gK - A.-r nt - '9}ni++-~e~-Fi F:i-' - ~-ina=-~az~ Fait y;.~-Point oummsria + ?Dint One: The radial i:_,n do:e _rom ;s-ra;~„ gamma rays, and ha':.a ,?,art.i;_.!e=.: ~:'eiivere'. isy i?l~rii-_,pea;:i ei=ctret?_ r.ravalir+r? t}:rou_ah ,~umar, cells and .reefing , imar;J _ot:i~ation `~t-~--na. Whenever flier? 1. .any r3C}lest. i;7;- .a~~=8, iGedn• n-]Ills _3ii= afiC. tU.iC iel 3I'a :7elrrj Y_Y°_'~?. el~~.r 7ra~.1-.: - TherE a2'a a99Ut rll. i1 l1 iGi1 ±':v rsiGal ____c _riv.. _,.'.}ii.= c+rtiii,etBY', ? _ _i;nh aw_.. Every t.r3r Y: Wit}-L'?Ut ari;r t?2 = :r~~m art~~tt?et= cra,_1~~~ - ha.=_. a ci~ance of 1nPla,tirna~ geneti_ _c,7ury if tna track rravarse: a --il-:,ucieu=:, ~ }',.,it`. t. ';~}lr,:'« ~T}ier'=; are :•.O fr.?.;.. *.ipnai ele.=_^~r~~. T}liS mean°. tt;at Cne i.%we ~,_{r,=;e^ ra<1is Y.lpn 'on U7}S a CBi 1-. .UC le,.l Gan r~:par i,_ n,_ _ . = one _ . ~ _ t~ron-tree... , "i t F• t ~ }^'t - ~h~+-7~-i~"+i~--i4*~3-~.rr'--=rr.-i=.~~ -~Si - l + - - k ~ ~ n , ~ mint Four: There i-~ solid evidence that -xtra h,aman cancer c'•a=-~. :.c,.u- from radiation 'loses which deliver ;,,~=t one or a few trac::s per cell-nucleus, cn t:te average, See paragr=_phs ee-mm, above. + °oinb rive: Thug we rznca that theta is nc doses or close-rate i:~w aneugh t-o g,aarartee per"i sot. :-apair oY" av.--; c?;rcir+cgen;c in_iur;r lrn:iuced by radix*..lon. Some ca.roirc_,cnlc injuries are just unrepairad, ~:.nrepairabie, or misrepaired. The :rou171esome trio." Concl,asion' It is fact:aally wrong *.o balre•Ja or to claim that no harm has ?vet been proven from very low-<x_~se radiation. Cn the contra2',v. Exi.=_:t.i!1,~ h,:man avidwnce sh~vs cancer-induction by radiation at and near the lowest pcssibla dcse and dosrra*_.e wit;? respect. to cell-nuclei. By any reascr,abla - standard of scientific pr•.cf, such evidence demonstra*.a~s that there i-, nc safes do_a or doses-rata below which dangers disapp-ar. N~ threshold-dose. Serious, lethal effects from minimal ra`.3iation doses ~+e are rut. "}iypotnetical," ",just, thaoreticai, cr "imagit:ary." They are --s-- i-mr~ 'FSTrc*~d i'~~ tcm'-93~.~_8.:.:~ab caw o~a-=.+t'~'~SJ real. rt "The e;;tent to wi. _n radiation-induced DNA damage i,.~;~ ba_ correr_aly repaired at very low doses and very low dose rates is ,'r- beyond the resolution cf current, experimental techniques. If DNA double-strand breaks are critical lesions determining a range of c,>11,a1.ar responses, including perhaps neopiasrio transforaation, then it may be the*, wholly acr_urata cellular repair is ur:2ikely even at r.}:e very low lesion abundance e;;pected after low doses and low-dose-rata irradiation... UNSCEAR i99+~ Rapcr"., p.634, para.?4. ~ "it 15 _;h1Y unlikely that. a dose t.hreshoid r.;ne initcsl mcie~^,alar' •aataar~e ill`iA, uF,^a,.:=_;e ,ir!,~1:;~t.r-~a,_:: `:m .3nv ionizir._~ ,adiation has a f~_nite proba'rilit.v of produ._i;;g si<abl? -i-:a. .,r a -vnic dam~-.;e ire,'- in, ca-' -mar-, t't,e DNA. ~-1i• if the . =_;ul*,,;,cr mniec;..iar damage, pl,:: =ny a,_3di`.,~,nai as-=c;ar.e-. damage ,.~cm r..he =.=.me .ra<:k, ':ere 31'ae.Ye: :e},air'ed '?ith fi.c.t.ai ei'r~-,F ncy _r_n,~jd there be any po=_.=ibi i;t;r a dose threshold .~~_,r c=..sF-;u-res. aii~aiar cff_7r^_. UPlSCEAR 1'?9~ Report, p,r,36_ pare .84. "Biolc~~_:_.ai af.`ecr._. .are believed to wise preclomira:;r_r from residual DPdA ::hanger r, hat oriyir,ata from radiation damar~e c. f-;rore,_~_r_,rnal ilNA, it is .,,h repair response of the ,:ell t.=~,.^ determines fate. The majnr.ty cf damage repaired, dui it is rernain72iJ unrepa fired or misrapa irsd ~_3ama _re the. r. i:_ considered responsible ,or cell kiliinrr, chromo.samai aber-ati~ns, m!arati:_n=, r.raras`c¢-ma+ions and oancarou:_: chances." i , _ _ _ _ _ J.y_ yJ _ _ _ J_ _ _ n-, ~ L'PISCEAR 1953 Report, p.uRn-691, para.32'_. " keference Listing AEC: I ~ . Atomic Ener~ay Commis_ion. Reports dated March 27 and M.Y 1970, from John P.. ;otter, Director of AEC"s Biology and Medicina~ Division, to U.S, Senat.or Mike ~raval of Alaska. i_~+_.ter was repor+,ing on a pilot study of Alaskan narive_: by 3.~. Brewen. Barcinal-:i 197. M.A. Barcinsl<i at ai, "Cytogenetic Investigation in a =z-azilian Population Living in an Area ref Hich Natural Radioactivity," Arner. J. of Human Genetics 27; 802-806. 1975. Baverstor_}; 1981. i$ , n _ _ u~,. T,n r _ 3Jn v _ _ " - r T?. - ~ t: " c• , _ t n a..S'~:akebr a t-rT'6T~ rt~ ) Keith F. BaverstoY'' et al, "Risk of Radiation at L Dose Rates," Lancer 1: a:~ 33. F;-b. 21, 1981. Baverstxk 1383. tt Keith F. Baverstr_,ck + J, Vzru-,art., "A P,fotz or. Radium Hody Content and Breast Cancer< in U. K. Radium Luminisers," Health Physics 'r4, Suppl.No.1: `%'7G-~'7. f98:. Baverstack. 13?7. # Ya,th r Baversrock: + D.G. Papworr_•h, "The U.K. Radi,am Luminizar Survey," British J. of Radiology, Supplemental BIR P.eport ~1: 'i1-76. ;BiR = Brlr. Irsr., of Radiology.) 138?. Boice 1977. # John D, voice, Jr, + :c.R. Mcnson, "Hrzast Cancer !n :!omen aT ter Repeated Flanroscopic E;camirarion~' -f the Chest, of the ;Qa.t.=. Cancer irr_a.°3+: ':'~=-8.2. 19^.. ,7-_i-~:: B,_:r=. .~t. zl 'L-_. r.lraat__„ ~reaat. Drozs an:: Brzas~ ~~ar' >?t Yi=: n.'-_~c Y>r~.J with Rep~a` J Fluor ~:~F=::- -'t.-st. .~:3 r.. 9C.i:^r.-.. ' iii 3T.. i,.a'1 ~~=rB.I-', .u i"_. 7J ;91+, i9~i;:, ..haoe_9^`. Marli;.~ _;ha~~, ,:;•~:.~_,r,Y.^,; ra<llcl~_gl:_,_ 8t.~=r_•her, ..lg, in ;;ea'sr.'tt - - - - - _ . ~ _ t nal, Wall S.trL=r .ourrai, p.r- _i,1iy f', 19'~=~. H.J. Eve. n:_ et• al "Ra~~llat.lon-Indu_.*:d Chrom,?s- P a - - ~m_ Ab_rt~•ationo in n,~,1=i.~ar ilnri; ?.3rr} LJnrL;EY.°~i~ ^:ar,J.r? n^,7. 1,~~_I lic;~man 19?1. Jc,hr, W. ~GI"mar, + A;^thur R. :'am ~1 ~ r "c , b ..pldemYO, Dear: Sl udl°.= ~?f =:arcincgene_:~> `.Y IvnlZing Radiation," pp.2.^5-^?? in r:-'a. zed ings the -,..t.h .,rl~:eiey Sm}x~:oiurn on Ma Ghemat.icai Stat.l_.tir_s and Prc~aabiilrr n I, ~ ^r' 1071 .;,.y i Unlver=_it.y r•; --alxt~rnla Frans, Bel-i;elzy, G,?:`man ! 981 . John W. Gofman. Radla*_.lnn anci Human Health. 908 pages. ISSN 0-_"i5o-275-~, LCC1'i 8.'-~F/..=4. Sierra Club Boot= Sar, , Frarnr. _ co . 1=!81 . Gofinan 136. Join W. Gcf~man, "A=_~s~s:=ing ~_hzrnobyl'_ :=:,Weer Conseruenczs. Application of F_,ur 'Laws' of Radlat.ior, Carcinogenesis." Paper presant5d at the 19~tx3 nar•Inral ;Weer, r." P ing of n.. American Chemlral SociBt•Y, Symposium or. Low-Level Radiation. Sept. lw~=A=yr . l.rr+_'--"-`7' _ . . - _ _ - G t r r F t , a s 3 i t}e; -5. " _ a J~f . 1986. tm?t man 1990, John 41. Gofine.n. Radia?;ion-Induced Cancer fr om Low-Dose E;posura' An Independent AnalyaYS. /+8Q pages. ISBN 0-932682-89-8. LCCid 8'9-6241. Committee for Nuclear Responsibility, Sati Francisco. 199:x. Goldberg 13'.?5. Henry Goldberg. Introduction`,•o Clinical Imaging: A Syllabu<~ From the Steven E. Roos Learning Center, Gepart•ment. of Radiology, Univ. of California S.F. Medical School. f995. Harvey 1985. „ Eli~abat.i, B. Harvey ar. al, "Prenat•al X-Ra.y E•:posure and Chlldhcod Cancer in Twins," Naw England J. of Medicine '12, :do.9: 541-5<~5. Feb. 1985. _ l ua~,let H. :h:?i rman V-"t ai, .~k'1rB.35t I,arcer In GiOmen wl Lh -__i_~j lr;glg ' u Exposed to Multiple Aiagnostic X-Rays," J. of the !natl. Canczr Inst. 81, No. 17: 1307-1312. Sepr,. 6, i9c~'~, v ~ Putlication of ax p y " panded follow-u stud is a cted soon. _ _ . ernes rQ~f•'! i ~ f'+- ~v! ei t !a}s;4.,i 5a.+{+x 9 t Jt y TY mot. Gecffr~y I~. Howe, "Epidemiol~y of Radiogenic Breaet CaI-ICer," pi,.119-129 in 'bock) Radiation Carcino;~anzsi::: Er:dzmiolcgy and Biological Significance, adired by John G. fs•_•;. tee, Jr erne! JJSZrh F: Fr~sumeni. $aven Pra_: New York Clty_ 1154, Hulka 1995. Barbara Hulka + Aza~ieh T. Stark, "Braast Cancan: :ausz and Prevent.:_n," Lance±. z4e;: ~83-Pt;?, SeFt„ 30,.x,1=. 4'_gGiama 1~~~J. _ _ _ _ i r-- - __.u 3k_i 31, ''~~SGb6_f1[7p1 G`3;r :Oiil r`Gtary?_. __Ji n,; i.'al 'JC_:...: _'r ;d.. ...=_u:'e_ ai ~ pc°tzr_, adlat.i __.t° . t~._ _ _.4: ~t1Sef G.!„ '_:=_:.3 e?. .aj, "Frz~uznciz= ;t Chrorno=coral Abarra*--" - Ind+.~czra ii; ..Umati B1C .•r1 LymphrCy teS iiy L.`W il,='=~ JS' n-t_a'~ lr'"~`=..._. `.i. ~a,,~1at S:•ii v~l,:_]gY i1~C.1 -i'.il=- .;;ice. ,i,_ P sti Ma ,~hnn, "Prznatal ,t-Ra~~ .fl~,°,, ai'J ~:1Ti1 .an.~zr, . :^da*_.1. '=anCZr ln_:r,. __.sl''3-1131. 1'_~t'z~. Piaruy'ama ~12'?c, T+.-~.--~~_F is r. , -,..i r, ,t,_,a 1. i _ _ - ,r: t{~-;~) i'"aruyama at ai, "Down's ~yndr_%roa and Yzlatz,-; Abnors~__:ties in i'~.•_f f? Va'.; iS<grC•~Aid T{ndla_t1.^di t-;t _=,3't.gi f~^-_:3 iii,ilal, Nabure ~'0-6i. "a76. ''.Rie lFr' i1C=i, 3 Ant}i,,n? 3. Miller zt. al, "Morr.,aiit.y frarn Brzast. %ancer ~tr..er Irradiation during Fluarocoplc Examinaticrs... England J. r_: M@.ti'iC in° P1C. iCt. lane-12)9, li)4;i Modern 1's'",?. # Baruch i?oda;1 zt. al, "Th.yrc,id Csnczr Fo1lcWirrtl S~.alp :.:-adiation," Radi,%iVgy 1°~: X41-7:+4. 1_9^?, Baruch Modern at ai, "Incrza_ad kill; cf Breast. Cancer .3=-er Low-L'Je Irradiation," Lancet 1: 625-631. March v=. 19°3. ' Myrden 1J69. ,:.A M;r.ien J, E. Hiit~, "BrFa=__ ~anczr Fallowing Mul*_- Fluores:copies durinc A,-tificiai Pnz+amcthorax Tr=ats=rt o` P,..lmanar•r Tuberculnsi_:," Canadian Mzdicai A_sn. .;c.°-~na1 U)0• jn%n_10".. 1169. Sito jniCk 1'J9`. Andrew A. Skolnick, quoting radii}logi~t. Stephen Feiy err...', citing _ 'i~sn--r - rz~- A _ ,gyp s;,, _ _ - - - - - H-a,-}.p*rrls-at:-~-u'_ Muir ~a~~-G-:y!r=--=~eee 9h i~s~t t, T _ . 'many radiation physicists,' in "Medical NEWS and Perspe;~tl.,~es,," J. Amer. Medical A:_en. 274, tio.5' ~='-36''3. Auc. 2, 1395. Stewart 1956. - Aiic~ M. Sr_.ewart at al, "Przl iminary Communication: M,. ignanG _ r~ GiaaSe in Childhood and Giagncstic Irradiation Ir,-~tera," Lan,_.et .;«7. 1956. ' Stewart 1958. # "~H ~4 'yyP n d~Y ~s JL $ R S } W C i ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 !~:.ce ;'1. or.~W.art. ar. ai, 3~ar,,.ry` ~~~i7ilC3}~ic:,d 'i:~ignar?cies," Eritis'r. Medical ;c,ur:,31 ;n;~5-1=08. 19L'_', t\:. J_ ~UBW31". "t $J, ;a7 c'-8.i '~i713~~.1a. .!7 LC_ Ei"t BC$d :.1 kBia*. i.~n '_l~st~_. :\-F,a ar~,y v'hi l~~hc:~d n~._ers, ;,ar7c~c . r... .~i9. ';r.:`..=~:i Nar.,,-,r~s .,,.i~ntit':._ ~,:,mmiGt.a~ ~;n rho Effecr:= f A^.,?mic =_~lia~~on. Lource~ er~,.3 Effe~~r~: r.,*' Sc~niziny R.sc~ia~icn: i;??^C~=~. S!'~3 Fep:F.,r^ *.u r~,.a ~~er;,_<ra: _setr~bl~i. ~x ^_.h Scien`.i f;, :,r?:~.;-_;:r_. _l r_,a ~~s. i.r, in,a~:c. ,'Ei': 'a,~-i-i;a'~i, ~--ii. ~9~. . _ ~ _ a~ :?cam:'.t>?e fcr Nua.aar i~esy~oa-sihiii.v, fnc. °_i5 r. S"i: ;'S;'+'_~_. Sin Yi'~[~r i::~r, i~a ';,iGt G_, iivP.. ~,r",hr_t-`-:Y,-. ;7` ~vy,,;,rr,~i~.~i .70iA:~T"'d.ia`„pYi i'. iii~ti _r,gna~ r.~u~ .17,x_ 29'_. v ar_ ra:.~ ~~:.lutiril_;_. Tii;s ~~3c-r;,en" i-; .7 a.vai.a".le ir: „1'a:.n Y,TML a;?d ASCii ~~;<t ra*, na,as reality: the ..oalth covL_: of l~~w-,ev.-° ~ ~ _ ion_.:ing radia.,iGn ip16 oT ~9) • Killing Our Owr,, ' Chrohlcling th«= Cisaster 7f Americ:a'_, Experience with At.a~ ra•iat.icn, i94=,-1982 ::,ntairs,: herein is BTML, ASCII, and F,-,,,t„cript Y'ormatad copy of the ccmplate book by Harvey Wasserman ~ NGrmar. SGlamcn with Robert Alvarez r< Eleanor ::altars. This 't.ook pI';c'ricies a r _ u`rea' ~~,wf-~-, tf rma i r abr_,ar. haw J f~oaral authorities consist . gntiy -antiucte-r a,} ;un~aar„ar+-al e,ifaetat.lons about the +~evalapmant of ru ' ear e :7nclc<iy in erret , al r ~winr; nr~ p,atiic G~~a~,YaI~6 i 2 15 :.:iuc:ar.;.or-: ab:.,_tt. t.tle __=:t.=; r.o ina;nan health, as wall ore denying what thF fay f wra`• people per='onally e,perienced to tar~hJf',t}ieir-:; own heal be,r,y _-;mp remised, I,ailled, ;n.a in mazy oa'~sI~,J~~`~'e(1tU1}1AVVAlI short.. "rile au+.i~ors =:ompiled a ;treat deal cf document.atior, From r.t~=..-v 1±-w: -di 1~.-^ii-.~ bn1':'I 1 !_ra. r-/ etld .:li i._r _ ~ I, :uho s,affered from effact~_ 1: _:-:~_.:ura ~o ic,nl~,rn7 ra:i~~t.i 1 _ S.+ fi _rP.3tP(] bV ri~~mh ,i .5°-- ?..-l:'t- r7O 'iar~i 1i..;aChi Ve ='f3"3 aro.i mater-,e.l=- u_ part. r.heil- ..~,k>5. alr.tl p,r,-,_ce wh:_, hoc the ru.s.`or^,;.,r;r ._!c,w,-:win_- .Y .I_lc.ee.r ;~~!n'.^, ~~st. .it _ - - cs, a.;`•or~ ~'an um m .g mi_ -ny ant. hmant plants anJ nuclear a.-, ie -c_ _.r ra_;= .,aIIr Cr. ;.r _,.r.=-r r.[rl~I',' !'.ear:f:ry°. .ma 'a°...1 ' rl ra rr-mot ~ i_ _ :;e} '.r - -1 "_cr i,? n« .4tom:o _rlerc;y _.._..._.',Si 1n nG~~ and, Wha*-; _ 'da_ __-.rasa. _Z2~~ =air ?;1m15 i .~.a~ aril - tla ~rIBY K =Aa -'a- _ _ 3iG' lOpn t't, ri<SnnCV " cii~nl .._r_. ~ '.7c z.Iti~t Jr ma. - 't]!'_,° 1~8't0,~` --.,.'ri . Foe*-4l V_ PA'S-- _ _ ~-mpl v _~h _a-ne crarl - ers _ and -.,artirne~. _ J fw_lear rachf --_e; '.~«~mr_~,_. - ~Ui.'_.:Or, nr _I-i 325I° f tea'. PI e'! «_hartar, - L a,yy,, -.1: `i?1c ':a5 1rTYIq ~1nCe r:~lil\'iilt: v;y ji1'j tila t~ '=aflrl0}, ii`L:St theca ~ii' people iUa fic:ialai and, mere imipcrtant :,till, that nuclear pcwer i.. !.:.:o dat-r•Yerous to have around. But :t. is clear the, our aoverna,ent is sG deeply committed to rnaclear weapons and nuclear power that it will i•_mora damning evidence, deny the r.ru*,h, mislead our people, jeopardize health and oven life itself, and try to blacken r.ha reputation of sciantlaLs vhG disagree with ite policies. , '1 ?ai'na:a't' -_el iev-? tiiat. a`_' :_O[-i a°. 7hare C'«?flYiit2 s,aspiCion cf [r3lm 1'' Ja ~iu~~ =crlI G°_ a3 Rla. 7naT-~ n= re~.i ,lot i•"J', 13 Y1Tie make avert' efr;_,r".r. eliminate 1 f.-al parti<_,alar'ly st.ron<~1y about, radiation;. b,-ca,ase ,._.hlidrnn era rl,_ich mot.'.> vuiner-abl_e than adulta--not only in +-e~;ard to rile likelihood •-~f ~ievel~a;rnx leukemia and cancer, b,at. ai=o of l:,eir-,g horn =,+itil phyeioai or mental defeats. And once muraticns have teen prod,aced in genes, they will be passed down forever, _ Dr. Ben~lamtrl Sporck, from the Introduction * 'act et Fa! 1..,_;t•. Low-f evel &adiation from Hiroshtma to I=;land, 19F'~ Three Mile . D H ~ - eve io izin_ _ - } . r~ ~ - Cont.ained herein is+HTML, ASCII, and Postscript. formated copy o. t.ha comp'ar'e booi< by Dr. ,F- '=t=_ There is a great deal , Eri.~t ~ ,_Ingl.ass. discussed end examined in this 1~_~Gk t.o aubstantiate the author'- ,:onrl,aslon reached by Dr. St.arnralass that low-level ionizing radiation eras*,ed by the failGUt from nuclear bomb t.estinq and fr~_•m rnaclear power plants--both ;~,zhlic!.y acknowledged aocidents like Three "tile Island a-= well as the ro,at.ine, legal radioactive emissions in liquid and gaseous ;orm--has e;<.acted a vary high toll c.r. the qua.it,,r ~.f' public health in the United Stares anc3 around 1£ '>o ,y.~ -,1J _ mt<i rr.,~q .J w . lu t :ear: 17 ~i Pn-~, ']Pnv the t.rurh, mislead our people,' aop 31-.- heal ran' a~an i f~ tseif, and t•ry to blacken the ~ _ ,alt- y _4cirae wlth >.ts nil' repute ~ : - _ _ ~ r[t a- +r .r - 1 a ~n P1 a "I ? - n _f~ 1 Y?r na.. try} 'p -J? f1a ,r. ~ , r , m n~xe ~,:al m r _,ri -1: rce a , ':a7 < uia! r, a ~ .at c ri i?4,n=•_d 1-' 1 f•Sel l:ar~iculaI"ly SCTVn,71Y ']Gut ,?verv Sr~r..~ , _.n11 if?tl ,at a mt,},_1'. II!l`7"!' VU lndrab Than 3'~'~Lt-s --nGt r'?`~1a lY1 a? Rx only in regard to ire l keg hGOd Gf devel~_p>ng ~1'au3:emia ar.•s cancer, but. alsovf being h='~ with physical or man defects. An+3 once mu*,ations have been pr aced in genes, y will be passed down ~ °~,r:,~ forever. .xt 5: . - Dr. Benjamin Spock, f th ntroduct3on u,; . - * Secret. Faliot;t, Low-Leve nadiatl l from Hir:.shLma to T"r~c-e Mile .It cC'1 9'- .,..-i:f 'ati =tan` -i.= ~=T'~~ - .~.C=} ..5 u_ a _ _1 - +n!i I. ~i'.' _ ~^I ~,i e t~il _..G 3. _^~qr,l = ~ f?t:h.g l l'.. .r~, a? _ - ..ii 3 r9L 4~-'15, _~LI3_ _ -C.lva =t!t :dl ~ .LjR1 ~ n ~'7- '•-ll5~, r it -}t. - _ > t.r l `?l- - y , -_r, ~.l_ax _t -t,_. . *.u , -'~amerura_ _._7. lie :r?4•-IY `hr 1.~ a r.,-~:~~"1 ~q _ -w +._-f.ni ya 3'^.-., i,S,xr _ --t IL'- -i i. -.tt, nu _Yr,lt. increas-~:= !r. rw_rtaL-_ -ac.'ae~ `.:eii Itl carc?r~, lei, emi.,, '~lrf=~:, f1~=_ ii'~. ~hI"Ori^G ii in?d8?f. r ".rn ~rr~nr',r - _ __,.=star; rrar^,S _ GL}°" .7 .h~3Pr.gr-_. I t wa:,- n,_,t. -,,:r ;7ilyslcs and tachnoi•~~;y `..hat Ivsd Fn inade~%uaCe, b+at our knowledg of biological systems and thai enormous aGilit to ~onc?r;t.._ _ a,,.?r,--. 3:- _ h? =.L". ,tea, t.h=_ j,~rou,l, -1. t.~_e.. ro- .,;.hour ~•.;ic~ im.- -.e, 'a~~ ~ r.>>s. Ir. .J~-l'. Ct'.- 2 `.i'~ 'v [,C°n`i-ati„t i `.•~l-= ,5 =.:~ZII a., T; _.p th-: :,?W~!., .1 .i_- ~-ri`_f3n: }Z,= ~o.}iii). _i~_~( r w _L1['l ~1[lCe 3l. },Uih-=; gal='., !'a. i_9 1.:?. G _.,~ryl, ,n_, __.:~3i llv r' i'_ ;,il 1F. W S1•g a. 7,?h. _ _ =s~_?tIl Wu .r1- __-i _ 3Gte~ p.=.',. i --~tii .lrei_ h~fi17i5?~i a'7" . 11.1 tt, t.i'fv _ _ _ r ~~t ~ Ail j:lY ..ea ill 4' _F,ha . `}a::Ti_J_. 'l, C;3;- a: t}l? }lr:=;? ('ii5 T3:3nd gr.~__=nC s?c7an:i ni:•=C1 _ ~1T~_'-:'L•.- ,5:?d 'J?OI ai 4131 ~ °JJtJ?i uaUZ at.? ;n -iT:°1 ltigv ~_.?1l ~!"}.~,~iC L'!a, «}lBt}ie- ^,}1° pUl:;li_ :;?p']i r, ~eiZ.3 Vg 71 . + P•:r 7r-oc}u 7i~.rtl ~ lrctx'.3~._ -~~~-a*_.e,-1 a>:~°rpts fr-*s ~ .n~i,u_ ' :t. :aa c-,ot cur plhysi,=s gild -.c.hn•.:iosi that. had oaBn ina~c;, -ta, bur. , . our cnowladae of birfio Lcal svBt.ema and ;hair enormous a~ili tc 1"a _.,:;r-8na_e- O t.}Ze iYU1G 'try riGYteBmen a-nd WGU2,~ tend %'.?i 1? ~.a'. t.her? '.as ind??: r?a.son fcr dee~, - - I ~cnc?rn, hac =~.,~scat?c. .here wa-=: nc _afa lsvei radiation, and the ,anborr: ar._ .h? yc,~na arm ~~learly core vui,l?rahia than a,9ults. Trott: chapters twel-~e and sevancaan respecc.ivaiy Hea;.r}~ C:._.r_ of Nuc.iear Technol,~Ira =_.arie:; -,*.ari _.-..ernet #y1,t'll?J,1 yk?c t•3 ~-r I~~cS in :~hr__!>>.~_:a'aa Sea. V' + Rook Introdu~-lion (t ':des .elected excerpts from va -pus ;ap;r.ers ) It was not our f>ii?/sics and technology that had baen inadequate, but our knowledcre of biol~~gical sysrems and their enormous abilitY..t.4_....__.._..W.,.•. ~.~.a~•• an ;!,_noentrate tc~ti•=~ acent.s. Just, ae. in the case of DDT, it was not the amount. di=trik;utad thrcughc„at the environment. that vas so serious. It wa_ the aele<.r.i•re cancent.ration in the food chain and then in the newly for~ain;r nr,-ians of the r'a}.~id1y developirq young embrya. Since all hicthar ar~imai=. including man, mu=:t pass through this criticall,v _.=t~sitive pha'.;--, it. wa.s dear tlzar, uni~ss the problem was widely r ra SzFn ai 1 a'- ~ed ,aprm, mgr. cu1~ e, rn.ish himself and all - ~an_,n-. through `•he ~Y - ra:;iar,icn on the ;..1o1t, brat. thr _,,:.:_7 i~ t.h~ -f«-?Ct _-n t}t2 wan};.,--1r. link i;: '.ne ..}twin of li`'e--the 'Jr"'i Lei:. ~ vrn,inC(, r.. Sas', ~ ar at- t~'~- " _a I_aanti -i rr• 7ar:; dir. :.,r._,re;a i !~;;i~; _.~obal Laur~at~a it ?hy-;i;;io~_r! ' Wits-n ...-:m.-,~,:^ ~=is-.:i _ - - anci Medicin=7 uha=.he_ tit=+ pub: _ =ionic. believe me + F - n T;,.r.r .'tu -tion ~ 1;7cLa =°L~~-_ed excerpts f"r;=m various ~;,a.~~t.ar= , It va_. our „~ivsie:> and .achnolo,77i :hat had bean inadequate, but. our lcnowladge of bioivgical systems and their enormous ability to - - -----------L------. tea=:aU3"-anGa=: r, t1,? 1ndU ~'t.r';! _:gpY:esmen ar:d WGUld tend t_ iiF.11•=•tic that. there way _ndaed reason .°,?r deep concern, as I iiad indicated, - There wa-: nc safe levai :cf radiation, and the ur~borti and the young - are ..early more vulnerable than adults. from chapters twelve and seventeen respectively Dr, fiosaize BertelL Dr, Ernet Sterr.~la==_, and Dr, Jr_.nn __`:nan, 19_;1 • 3~~'. ;=:-ri .m Da3"i i, i_:: r. w,w !.~~al F:3 :~li` .~L, !{i ~'Ir:, a'v°, + ~~L 2J_ai _:?„`~3aC't+~ii. ,_ur:'i:'a 1'wm ta,:a ~,ti_ `.1B'.=, and Ali _Ic~ T~:.r.lmon~=.p Dr. ?_'=alia ssert-i "_re he rio,-1..1 i«omen', :,,ngre„~. Mi~smi, l:-+s=': . Nuclear ~~uardianshia Pro,iacr,'s ,:Wring '92 "'Drum newspaper + Ae._2'ted r,,=ts, Arti ;1_._=, Tr.a t'i_crinr.s and Ecoi: E:;;_orpr,a ~al~=4i Gassini NASA's Daadi? 2iutcnlum Probe ~~am47i 1ni:I Wi'J}', '.he DeYt1 T}'ta Ua.E Iii-_._:i,_,n, ~_at~snt°d _ Story Cln Earth, Arcei~.~n For' 61~zeie•-~r Aboillica~ 'Spring ':37 ,Eat.}~erinr; abut. down the Nevada ':ast Site i •7~:ai t.~:^~ ~opy of _r;me of the info at above _it;i=: La i~arnet; An Int•ernar.lcnal Antinuci-ear P,:_tion In France, :".rcr. I;iTE.^-,NAT: ~tiAL NLII_LEAn FREE r~REEN _:!)NFEgENr_.E, Sepramber 1E-14 199^ Ea=.`.=r_n Lony _slard, The Sag Harbor Fro:;ac_: L~ _,r _ ~.v,ia. :,yi~~,._ ..cnL it! WCHf'wY: #4^' Phe FourtF; aorserar,: N,_ac!,=ar' Tachnoicgy D_c- e- , ~ `b I 21 , 1995 ~ , Exr_z;lGnt backgrounder cn: a, o new bomb- rade uranium 2 r _~,.•~~;g;-.~ - 4 35 and:.. i 4~, rata n,- ~rali _ Jal-,an rmanY, an uGSia arP ranitt 1 12 e_rer I t.~.r tecilnoi.r<y r -'a. , ~.}t@ py'r L=ia,1 nUC1E3Y' 71ub° ~L~__~ aaiown t7iArr.Hii_un itr?entorlce worldwide s~^ rf n~~}, , r rile imposai}~iilit,,~ of ~;u=_:t keeping t r 1'(,~. Z 1J ~.~_aft~f~,= le _~.?elitc2~_e> .*,he _ _rrnes- nt:vlet: Uni:.-.;n _ '?i t.rl Gi' 'di hf:_>_'+. Or'13m, :i,i.r.l Bar - , 9 t.yi~.i bra i r,. COUNlY ',r._ ~;ta, .~„'J R~ tha!_ N1,-Jti 1'2[7 ,"y „,n,t aamaga i•_', "na „mot-,, -r _ [a !S.q _ai _._'t"~~_ _d~e.Et. _.3,1C@r .~.3.~`°_. 1`J'c'+° ut~=.=:. =-322_ %a,i 2[n i::eHr 1`i 4I'e'?0nt.a}-Ji2 ~~i SBa sE, In tY2@ I:-.' _.=p=2 =,T .flat ,13R'1nq ~rea3b t::3nGCr P.Jt }lapj]en by e'~z:itin,7 vnreoessary e:cposures to carcinogens .:-:a::51-_ __en~=_ . .__hn ~~i-man _ .ew b:__.., .,r _ _ at__, _!i'. in,7 _i 1,.at.iv!"i. emtidr ln' ~:F~=~ . _ _ ~ : rn ;,I : ud ws ~_r~==r_?ir~_z,meHt.a.t eth_ _x~_~rt wl=:. the }'e:_];:,...a: r~a~s _ t.~,mrn. tI<ri_), r _mp,f~.w .o .,t i~cJ r.., _leclar- _„_-_irci =i rile Hari:-,- 1nw-level In_,cl~ar n.. G•r~l- _7,_r1~ rz_. . .rcet_n,:. •BRCi Iu'v:~ .1 .1•-1 tlav>ual:c.ver -them i=.._, be _I,:mpeci ;nto =.r:3;nar'~ m,ant•_lpa;. .:9.rn.:iI L _ and ir:c iner3 i.=:r=. * The Prlc2 Power-. P. k.[•mi~='. Et i°,'-_iY'- `r'r-ems Ride, Muit,in3 r.iona l_ Mon i t:,r . : ar,.uary _ _ ...ra: Ci_=:ic:r~: S;r,e F_C•iH0[n1C Failure oY Nuc'lg7r 1'Ower, ? i3t-earro~ao~' =t.udv relea.sa.-3 asst 1?,-e¢,ii?r, _stimar.e- chat ,adaral outlays iY'oID l'd~i1 t.: i'_i''-l(_'. for rtari~ar Rower total?d ~9' billion in 1990 dollars. This =stlrnat~ relates Lo i:,?Sta of RP<D and regulation, _ r, 'Jr;..., 1'r, r.-_.CPID~rr iJr~R'aQ2 Cr ~ . it _ ,rh i;, ar in:au 3; to r ac_1 l,nt.s, Y._ ['_a..r=i h."` ,•r!"11'. ?R[ te. t.K!' _IO 1.1*..I~'~ 71 ~ splfr r I~.- _,.d~.,rs-' ~,r ,:iFr-a. apr7P~p,I13 ,r.2_.~ n!~u - ~ e~ , ..:c l- r_rat +c ~~?.r - nu.-lean ind'2sYt-y. , t.};e ,:_[t,ar,r_;g companie=_: li}:e Ganrral Ele<_`ric: that. w;-, ~ i,,. - i;t3 ~ [rt[fl .r'.:, -.1 1t -•lAI ~.2V 'P' t•=2' Ht laAr r. .ra}' - e Alder ~n indemri Y A -t which ~r ,a . n t 'rs a 2 11 u ~ -'.i _ '1 ~ abi t}i._ tr.;. --a?- ui•3, .hry irl t,}i,~ evF.n`, ~,f a major ,~,.=_-ar acc:i:i:=nt, +-,.h~ ,n re =er, t. arner~:imer~`. t.,.-, ~-Ar1d~»I-:oti. U•~".tl it l3C a2'@ i.ir«1 'r ~ n ra<~.ilrc'•:~ ID3 ii,Ya :1i1 mlliiOn ,n 17tS,lrarl•e t~ ,~,;er h+t•i 1= ll.+h;:i",:/~ if' ~~lalms for _sn aceide2';t. e:<oeecd that. smount, ea.~.h nuciaar *.,!itv is rectulreci t.o ,-cntrib,zte ,zp to :Cii3 million for aach r?actor they operate. This arran7eman+; ca>_ the 1iaLility any coven utility 3b 32;0 million, and of t:na entire industry at under ~7 billion. E-a t.im3ta'_ ~~f t_.he ~..o.rs a m3.]`?r n,zo i.3ar goo id ~tlt. vary. UUt . -y~ uci•ae.r ur.=.iirlas Ta;ia far ahc,rt _-Y r.,.ez`.ir,a the human haal:h and 1]~~ ~ r ~}rna re~: rha` w:~u1c3 resin' . ,_nerai A~~cnunrln t 'of'fice bid b l~a~i -=:rlmar__! in ""7 Char„ under avara~e ,eaathFr ~ ~i+i_,ne, p-V~L~~ ~ ].,7sr==~_,-ora a manor .cigar acCirlanl, ,::cnald ire ae hint- - X15 hiliicn. r; iJ`~ analyis ny t're Sandia National Laboratvr;? for the Th,,~.~lesr s=:ruiatory '~:_,mrnlss.inn tNRC? found t.hat., and«;r a worst-case scenaric.~ financial lr,>~~..=_•as (nc±. lnrludin_; an-sita damagae? could _ a-'anc;e fe~'crtn X58 billion t.o X314 blliion. 'Phe pcss~ihility of a lar~7z-_:cale accident. occurring is not remote; the NRC itself - est•lmatas there a 4` percent chance of a major "core melt" nuclzar a.cidant occurring in the Uni*.ed S*.ates within tha next~20,. - year.. ,~~a~'+u~~~~ ~ q;t:.~ ..~u'•'r[t~ i~naw -;_I fta~, ~,r ~'i rl r .,r: -n`.~t- i]a' ar. rft r, i'?~-~' cr-t61 nn C-nt~uSa pn ~~w p~. , t.-1;:_ '?.l~l ari iJ _'a_ ri'~- :_t, at V'lq _'_:yr.3 YY'.-m t.}'!.~lr _:.hl' :f t~_fi-' - n-r _ YJ~ ~ _ 'r. .'i. .,_r:~ .z...,, _ Sri wi, r ".'.+i t": ~ i~-._._, ,:ir,; t_ _ aF:f_ 1 r ~A.IF ~'P@~3 txl PL(i..- C~h, '}:Ct,_ ~.1._1"tG? .J _iC ;a.~r x'." .apt i. Pi 'j7i]:. •7y ,'C~m Ele--r.ricir.y .•Too =heat-. t... Meer' t., i,;hare:-_tl'r =:af Fceactor~ incl,adirt~ ramon,_r other,i _~cticn~ :.n 1 _ 2aaice of PJUClear Phyeics and`F1=;sion , ~Jranium: its Uses and Hatar:-3s o Basic Characteristics of Rea;_tor T;!pes + Sciance far Democratic Aotlon, IFFR Nawsletter r FI]v~_._cal, d:a.=laar. _..a ":hemi:=a_. Pr.c,p-r.•.;z_ of F1'ar.~~nium § i;- ._r a t i r 3 . a _ a,_ i '1 i ~rla-' e r _._.'_,;;ti1CB.t.iGn=; :iadi:JHC`.i'!= .+a~`_ r .r ~..I - i.a_ 1^+~' _ 3rz -l:;a:_ r ul ''l +.3 Ci aY'J atlu Pti.at}i,a'~y a.]r3 mac, er.,cz ~~_=I ,--.t,.pile _.,zwarc3ship : rz [r, Tl'- -,.7rz1: -'ll+l t.r c.rf~:,'_, -_3i4,t, ',_1~11i:-'~. ~.,?i, _d"-a'r,ngiG t.1]a --p.a.r;me:._ ~r:?2"7, _ r~.aa~_ -~'•3['.-- lta- ~ k .far.„_.'. F ~ Nc.,,-Pr-r_.1 i-nation Con,-equenr,z= p}-,e Lepar ~menr of r.+]er;rr's E; ,.ei M ,suer ~,.t. Pr•= ,t "r„ + F_..._~~Mat.zriaie. ,n a ,~la:.s, ^ark''~: T=clinical ar::: ?clicy ~st;ect: the D1 =;]osir,icn Piuton:t,am ._,:r.] Highl~.f Er]I-~ichad Uranrom i + Graen Evii of Twc Lassars, by Harvev Wasarman, senior advisor to Sreanpeaca USA, August 25, 1396 Pulp yrt.tor,--The !rr,l,ar.:_er f:,_~ncapt i )r ow , ct .o i.a i.._ LL nW ~;i sp,-°B.i ~:a(J3C1ty;, kJY i%i=.~=r;,}rzlia .ii,art.nr . Haar't lar-;1 =l jit'i`at~i=.: Prot.a _:i file ir,Vis^~_~I':.m~tt'„ ltin, j fQs'.hI1'a=~.1?a WSSE L!ranium Project frorc Am=t.zrdam a-;] e.=__zntiai and lnvaiuabie T U,,arl i,:al N11,~1i1[i aNi3 Mlllyna Was nn intr.idi_Ct1Crl + Uranium ':``ir,ir,q 811..llography, ~-ia:_...=_t En~~`,.=h ar, F-er-~ch l ;jnr;',aage p.ubi,car. i.~.na + Health Hazar,as ;or Uranium Mir,?r-s F.ssi_;enta _.nium ulniC._I al:d it]dl_iaSi_a]c Peor1? ~4hFnFUm M;UTa}UF~s DapletFd Uranium sn "'1 ar VPrerans ~,Biblio arad Cthers by. . `g° ~Y $el ~ + WS$E.Chernobyl Special (from April 10, 1996): r • ! ~ >h q~eat tvff~including: , ' +P ~Y b, o a Rbr e : ucYea~r„ x•stasY''it~ ,}.895) . . ,a 0 Year History of OpposiCion"to Nuclear Powar in California r ~'-~~~<<-1:'. ~ both links in here are broken ~ + Diablo Canyon Timeline Part I, part I: 1963-1981 - + Diablo Canyon Timeline Part II, 191:2-1996 + Dlab2o Setc.lernec;t wlii katepayers :LSU &iiLon Decsmber . 1i?=' - ',~F,F.L' 'ALU%'`: 1 _1~ ro 't'.a'_''•f5, kpr i _=t.h i99k'. - - _ yet _=-~In... :2_;= '.i,_- , tnl w k'- -w [ a1i ~.q~-r.L•Je w_=-= ~hLsm=. =_u~ecf b~ irs__aar _d,:=r, ~ Ann,. Ar.omi: :irr~wlrrt Up Wlr.}1 f.he Atom, a record of the atomic: weapons detonated in the Plumbbob Series at tha Nevada Test Site, 1957 j 11 3;:ie<i _,-~6: Th? Atcan r= Duy c.r ~yt. $ii_ 31re= _r.~i,a;Jcs _ _ _,le ~rltl~~~Iltai _%.t .t/~~^. iCr .)~3ii~_ti~. ~(,.,c~-ar Mcl;i~sr-'=r;llrie N,acl'>=. Infarma.tiot; anci F.e=.=:. Sn.__- + M,aln~.,,~r;_c57-,a2 ['1-_•nl,.~~r'.: _~}.r., :'J'-1~. issue _~r~ Phu=~'_=-.. _ F,~=},er~ ir~~~~..ae:, _ vdf r~. `r }1: _ lr!« _._.':La lr: vivL.=t rYea~-Jk"~ ..P.e..~JlJ'Y:e rr'-pn~yal" In iii: ~~~~.:31n 'b _=,j idrN,=.' S aji'la- WtaJiVa:" _.r. + `_l;~alaR F_.'ural I=?-v,i.rid- L~r'^"JlaQ1:?ar W3H» ~_~._~-k.riL7 ?l L.i~iec',I ~i'ik'L::•hm«?T. Pr C21: E'r3t 1Jn :.rS C,rII~3t; !.JR-Y'L•;. ;j Ur4 i 3'ii}r E;9E-: d ASlti t1,dC ~•'.ur WBaji:=913 8t!Aff hr, ;p: ; , ; araday. ee . Latrobe . edu . aul""khorse i 1 /ant. i -nuk;es,' Tha h?rrobyl di=_:a•tar h±. r. r; : r' "a.p l _ ca . ee . i atrobe . ed,a. x_,_1:8080 '°k};or _,e l i i anr. i-l:u.:eslc};errrob yii I ,_.w_t.f.rei kadiation mat~riai http:/!lapiaca.ee.latrobe.edu.au:8080/-khorsell/radiatien:lcw-leve li rwm H.,.~Qell 1 hers 11@FE LaTrob FDU AU cc kvmL. 1 1n~ am on + iduclear Waste C1[.iz«n's Coalic.lgn llfi i~tarvland Avenue, NE . 8ulte 8U"' Washing+.,~n, DC ZUOfi2 - ~'L~ 1-IO Maryland Avanu®, NE ~"i/,-` Wa=.i~;.clc~ron. LC :~U00' _,3u7-°_ Jf X02; _„=-0'?•'~ (fax i i ifii i iak'~"_ _ _~rit i81 .CrCf h`~tp:,'"iwww.essen,isi .•~r:t/orps: nwer_/nwcc.hmi Daa.dly Nuclear Radiation Hazards USA Lou3s._- Franklin-$amirez & John Steinha,_h y I Eart.}1 Loda_a :I 7615 Lake Drive Manassas, VA 22111 703/222-7570 "III 703/222-9196 lfaxl~= { jstienbach&igc.ocq-~ti , 2 dietinct venUee r> ' ~ -,r. ~ lptl r-t. .~S; .per. ~•~-T p~~ -i__ Ilt `.yi J'?w ,31~`~. .,GRti ~~"i1E-i _ a8,~:, , « Sr.k ahol_l.r i;l Nuc is=ar Waste ~._pa ..i,=red:bla L:>t .af S~`.0 groups . ht gip:,'/wlJW.n,..~.}'i2r.:,?. ev. _~'.flii r.r, «i0(Olit..,id~•d_~S/CD2~-Q1)^~~ * Pl~.~tonium Chailange: M~mi:era and Friends 15°0 New York Avanue, N.W. Suite 300 Washington, DC 20045-4709 202/62A-9352 -5917 - ~~r~:~~' ~ :"a„_.___ IDa__=,: ='n=i oar., i~~ !Vito) ~Vn,- hr.a_.r:. ~r~..a.nir.or'_iI IVu,_lear C_;rrrnl :its i;l t,~re~i 1000 t~annactic,at. Avenue NiJ, Suite °04 Wa~h:rn7t,~n, Cr=, 2~:05~ 21t^,i 45"-0392 (fax ) nciLmailgack.com http://www.nci.orgincii + Nuclear Guardianship Project press s ace for next ~l~_._ a.C _i~ Tj'PrI.C _ i \ raav id .~culp@env ironat."org ht.lp : ; lwww, i'aB .'r-;1: p,xbi gen/ f~,xcha f Lange: ,r Nuclear ir,f'ormat.ion and R~*_+cu:ca Service iNIREi 142.=+ 16th St.rer..t• NW, #«U4 Washington, DC 29C36 X2/328-0002 202i'462-218 ~ ~ era Y. n ir': ~et@ i gc . org ii*_.lp:; %www.nirs.erg/ ; * Nuclear Con*_,rol Institute 1 ,U~u ~.~,-.nr.,cl;c,x*. Avenue NW, ^avit.a 804 .o 2,'.2,'4_,.:.-Il:]~SS ~Y3:) nciL~mailback.com 1-ittp://www.nci.orgincii' ~ Nuclear Guardianahiy Project .lv inocha mar',.=_c'!, Cn ?n7~=; Vii'; _°5_~-~_;1C~ pis _52-391E f=..:` Piulonium Free Future ~zr;zl.zy, CR 94702 :iil ,'?:iii-`; P?,G:S _ pi f~igc.or<a * Cduclzar Agz Peace Foundation 1187 Coast Village Rosd, Suitt 123 Santa Barbara `3108 805/365-3443 rat haul _al1tY r~adiat:on rzn::wablzs ratviilz limas rat haws reality many worl,.b~ itunp.9o;~rs _:o,-,}.hwesr. lar~~e LiFeWKb ern:3 er_.rp rauv _ ;y ~ - _ ~ . to _ao_back. ru :'i~rwaya .isri s.. ' iL 3_ZC