HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0730.003 2000-2002 V~tV,OF ~q61.
00'~~
Harry Kim _ Barbara Bell
Mayor ..a,o:.~"N ~,o..°.,~~ Director
T,aTF OF~H~'~P
DEPAR~'lO~IEN'T OF ENVIRON10~dENT'AL 1VIANAGE1dIEN'I'
25 Aupuni Street, Room 208 • Hilo, Hawaii 96720-4252
(808) 961-8083 • Fax (808) 961-8086 ~
September 9, 2002
TO Chairman James Arakaki and Council Members
Hawaii County Council
FROM Barbara Bell ,
Director -
RE Addendum to the Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan
for the County of Hawaii
COPIES/ITEMS DESCRIl'TION
Barbara Bell, DEM, Letter to How/Harding ESE Comments/Questions inclusion in
Final Addendum to the Integrated
Solid Waste Management Plan
Comments from Barbara Bell Addendum to the Integrated Solid
Waste Management Plan
TRANSMITTED FOR:
[X ]Information and Files [ ] Approval
[ ] Signature and Return [ ] Review and Comments
[ ] Signature and Forwarding As Noted Below [ ] See Remarks Below
[ ] Pursuant to Your Request [ ] Filing and Return
REMARKS: - _ -
/sh
enclosures
~rrlln. ~t~
ale No.
1~~~~~~t~~ ;
Ref. ~o.,~..
~,ef. Date SEP d 9 ~ _
JN~Y'OF y46Y
4~'~ 7~
Harry Kim Barbara Bell
MQyOP w ~uu''P~ IDirectav
q>E ®~.aP~N
Cn>~ixx~~~r ~~~tt
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
25 Aupuni Street, Room 208 • Hilo, Hawaii 96720-4252
(808) 961-8083 • Fax (808) 961,8086
September 3, 2002
Mr. George How
Harding ESE
Newton Square Business Center
98-1247 Ka'ahumanu Street, Suite 305
Aiea, HI 96701
Dear Mr. How,
Please address these comments/questions in the final draft of Addendum to Hawaii County
Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan.
1. How will you be responding to the questions/comments included in the public statements
generated at our three public meetings?
2. Please provide a chart showing projected quantities of trash for the island, east and west, for
the next 20 years. It will need to combine population growth estimates, with resorts and
other businesses factored in, including the national data about individuals generating more
trash per person each year.
3. The commissioners and the Council members would like any changes from current draft to
final document to be in ramseyer format.
4. Since organics other than greenwaste have been identified as approximately 15% of the solid
waste in East Hawaii, a plan for keeping foodscraps, sludge, and other organics out of the
landfills is needed.
5. The commissioners request anaction-plan chart identifying actions and who would be
responsible (Council, Department, Consultants) is essential. The goal is to identify actions
required for ultimate implementation of the plan.
6. Addendum must conform to all applicable sections of Hawaii Revised Statutes, most
obviously 342G 25 and 26. Please show how HRS has been satisfied.
7. A discussion about trucking is warranted. This would include the economics of one landfill,
strategies for minimizing trucks on the road, minimizing trucks during heaviest traffic times,
and the size of trucks relative to our road system.
8. Curbside recycling/trashpick-up. Ikeep getting questions about efficiency and costs. The
SWAC had a working knowledge that curbside would be too expensive, especially to provide
the same level of service countywide. This needs to be reflected in the plan.
Also, for your information, we are inviting possible vendors to speak to Council and the
Environmental Management Commission. We have sent out an inquiry email based on the
vendors identified in the addendum, as well as others that have surfaced from the public
meetings. We're suggesting late September or early October as a possible time to have a Council
information-gathering meeting.
Aloha,
Barbara Bell
Director
J~~y'~F Ngei.
4~ ~ ~ ,1,
Harry Kim Barbara Bell
Mayor sr wo,;'c Director
9tE Oc •N~'i,
~LIYIXI~~~? II~ ~I~1T~ti
DEPARTIVIENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL lO~IANAGEMENT
25 Aupuni Street, Room 208 • Hilo, Hawaii 96720-4252
(808) 961-8083 • fax (808) 961-8086
September 9, 2002
Mr. George How
Harding ESE
Newton Square Business Center
98-1247 Ka' ahumanu Street, Suite 305
Aiea, HI 96701
VIA FAX: 808-486-7184
Dear Mr. How,
To confirm our previous telephone conversations, I am submitting further comments and questions
regarding the Addendum to the Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan to be incorporated in the
final draft.
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. Semantics. I would prefer to stay with the term "transfer stations" for our existing
"convenience centers". It seems less confusing.
2. Semantics. When talking about trucking to Pu'uanahulu from East Hawaii, the phrase
"residual waste", instead of "waste" is a better descriptor.
3. The benefits of long-haul trailers need to be described in terms of their efficiency over our
existing trailers.
4. Submitting specific costs and benefits for avoided costs and efficiencies of installing a waste
reduction technology will give reasons to provide funding.
5. If you find the need to repeat information, please do not use the exact sentences or paragraphs
that have been used previously.
QUESTIONS-IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
1. Funding schedule. P. 81. Please expand on the phrase found under "Establish drop-off centers
at convenience centers" (transfer stations). "Contractors' expense to be recovered through
waste diversion grants."
2. Two-stream collection system. P. 69. This assumes that greenwaste and scrap metal are also
collected separately?
3. Material recycling plan required for any Construction and Demolition permit. P.71. We will
need to determine how detailed we need the plan before giving a permit, how much
accountability is required, and how much enforcement we are willing to provide.
4. Integrate the sort station with materials recovery. P. 72. Why do you mention plastic as a
recyclable material? Do you think it would be cost effective to collect #2 HDPE, #1 PETE, or
are you looking at implementation of the bottle bill, or all of the above?
5. Integrate the sort station with materials recovery. P. 72. How much acreage is needed for a
material recovery facility? Would two on the island be logical and sufficient? One at
Pu'uanahulu and one in East Hawaii?
COUNCIL ACTIONS REQUIRED-A LIST
1. Greenwaste ban at the landfilUtransfer stations.
2. Establish County policy to restrain disposal of recyclable materials (Resolution, in conjunction
with approval of the plan?)
3. Landfill bans on greenwaste.
4. Institute new fee system for waste management. (Example, on the property tax bill.)
5. Increase funding for waste diversion program. P. 69. To what level should the diversions be
funded? Is there a range?
6. Increase tipping fees at landfills. P. 70. What amount should the tipping fees be? Is there a
range? Please add solutions/ideas to avoid illegal dumping as well as ways that have been
identified in other communities for businesses to stay profitable while the County can achieve
its goals.
7. Fee change for C&D waste recovery. P. 71 How much of a difference in tip fee pricing is
needed to encourage contractors to separate loads?
8. Making the Solid Waste Division an enterprise; revenues earmarked for Solid Waste Fund, or
as an item on the property tax bill. P. 74. What exactly do you have in mind? The narrative
states that the SWAC didn't believe the time was right for a residential user-fee.
9. Building markets for recovered materials, especially C&D, glass and green waste.
COUNCIL FUNDING ACTIONS REQUIRED
1. Any waste reduction technology.
2. South Hilo landfill closure.
I look forward to working with you on all these matters.
Si~elyG'~
Barbara Bell,
Director