HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0102.052 2000-2002 4E OF y, ~Pr ~v~T
4h/ 1G6• 1 ~L~LIV t~ ~3151,aelfl
BENJAMYN J. CAYETAN® °j ~ ` ~ ~s DIRF,CT®IL
GOVERNOR ~ ~9ii~._.eb~.___..a- _°--°-,s.,._.-.~
__.._.~Ii~~®
e~ o ~•-.-~••-~~dJLHNE N. NA16SU0
'y ~ ~1P34y Cosendl Deputy Director
t! Adrninisffiation
Y'9.PKW.pi~'•.
Po1AItIART E. TSUJ%
STATE OF HAWAII ~p~' D~ector
l~lm~e~~~~~~T ®la P~.B13L1C $a~~E'TY Corrections
919 Ala 6Noana Boulevard, 4th Floor SIDNEY A. IiAYAKAi3/A
Honolulu, Hawaii 96814 Deputy' Director
I.aw Enfokcement
No.
September 16, 2002
Ms. Rhonda Robison
73-4159 Kahauli Place
Kailua-Kona, ~-Iawaii 96740
Dear Ms. Robison:
Thank you for your letter of September 5, 2002, in which you expressed some of your
ideas and concerns relating to medicinal marijuana. Let me respond to these issues, as
you raised them.
Count;,!
Council's Condition # 5
This condition directly aflFects the Departments of the Attorney Cpeneral and Health,
rather than our Department. l~Ievertheless, we have strong reservations about its viability
and wisdom. This condition would require the State enter the marijuana distribution
business. However, the State would not be able to control the supply level or the quality
of the product. V6~ould the State be vulnerable to legal action if the product were inferior
or contaminated, or if it did not have an adequate supply to distribute to persons with
certificates?
Moreover, the possession and distribution of marijuana is still illegal under the federal
law. It would truly be unwise and irresponsible for the State government to knowingly
engage in an activity prohibited by law.
The Medical Marihuana Program is Currently in the Wrong Department
Please understand that the Department of Public Safety (PSD) did not ask for
responsibility for this program. In fact, the initial drafts of the legislation placed the
program within the Department of health. During the last stages of the 2000 Legislature,
it was decided that our Department would become responsible. I believe that the
Legislature made this decision because it wanted to establish the program as a
demonstration at first. Please remember that we are among the very first states to have
such a program. Therefore, strict controls were needed to insure that the program was
implemented within the specific constraints established in the legislation. PSD already
regulates pharmaceuticals, and registers persons who prescribe, dispense and distribute
(lo~Yain. Noa
Pile ~dcaa
ref, `~o:
"An Equal Opportunity Employer/Agency"
Rhonda M. Robin®n
Septeanber 16, 2002
Page 2
pharmaceuticals. Moreover, PSD is responsible for the administration of the laws
regulating controlled substances. Marijuana is a controlled substance, under both the
state and federal laws. Therefore, the Legislature determined that PSD would be in the
best position to insure that the law was implemented effectively.
If you believe that the Department of Health, rather than PSD, should administer this law,
I urge you to work through your legislators. Only they have the authority to make this
change.
Flaws in the Current Law
We agree that there are flaws in the current law. If you could provide a specific proposal
to remedy these flaws, we would be glad to consider them for inclusion in the legislation
we plan to submit to the 2003 Legislature.
No Need for the Hawaii Count~Police Department to Nave Access to Personal Medical
Records
We totally agree with this. Our Rules do not permit this, and we strictly adhere to our
Rules. We provide information to a bona fide law enforcement agency only if they ask if
a specific person is a registered user or caregiver. And we only provide identifying
information. We do not provide medical information, we do not provide any information
unless it is solicited by a bona fide law enforcement agency, and we do not provide
information unless the request is specific.
Medical Marijuana Supplement Program
You propose that a program be created to allow medical marijuana patients to donate an
overflow of an adequate supply to other patients. There are two important legal problems
with this proposal. First, I-iawaii's law allows a certified patient and a registered
caregiver to jointly possess an adequate supply of marijuana. "Adequate supply" is
clearly defined as the amount jointly possessed by the patient and the caregiver "that is
not more than is reasonably necessary to assure the unintemapted availability of
marijuana for the purpose of alleviating the symptoms or effects of the qualifying
patient's debilitating medical condition...." As I read the law, there cannot be an
"overflow" of adequate supply. Such overflow would be in violation of the definition of
adequate supply.
The second serious problem with the proposal is that it would violate the federal law.
What you propose seems very similar to the clubs involved in the case of United States
v Oakland Cannabis Puyers Cooperative. In that case, the U.S. Supreme Court
decided that the club violated the federal Controlled Substances Act. We cannot and
will not support a proposal that we believe would violate federal law.
I hope this addresses your concerns, and clarifies our position relating to the various
issues you raised. Please be assured that our Department will continue to administer
Rhonda M. Robison
September 16, 2002
Page 3
the medical marijuana program in an objective a manner as is possible, and in a manner
that is consistent with the law. We believe that the program has been successful.
Perhaps it can be made better, and perhaps the law can be improved. Again, I urge you
to work with your legislators if you seek changes to the law.
Very truly yours,
TED SAKAI
Director
TS:wsf
c: Hawaii County Council Members
Dominic Yagong
hobby Jean Leihead-Todd
James Arakaki _ Chairman
f Aaron Chung
Gary Safarik
Julie Jacobson
Nancy Pisicchio
J. Curtis Tyler III
Leningrad Elarionoff
Keith Kamita, NED Administrator
Herman Moore, Deputy Director-Law Enforcement