HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0730.007 2000-2002 JNty'~F N44Y
Harry Kim ~ ~ Barbara Bell
-
lSirector
9rE•OF ~HF'~
~.6i.K.1.1~4 SJ l~ L mob `L6 A~6~ LB~~~
` t~
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
25 Aupuni Street, Room 208 • Hilo; Hawaii 96720-4252
(808) 961-8083 • Fax (808) 961-8086
141E1110IiAND U1~I
®Al'E October 2, 2002
T'® Councilman Dominic Yagong
Chair, Parks and Environmental nagement Committee
Hawaii County Council
FROIIlI Barbara Hell, ®irecto
SUI~JECT : Waste-Reduction technology Vendors' Presentations
October 15 and 16, 2002
Per your request, please find attached the confirmed schedule of vendor presentations
to the Parks and Environmental Management Committee on October 15 and October 16,
2002.
Also enclosed are three (3) technology overview worksheets from:
• Environmental Group
• Brightstar Environmental
• EnerWaste International Corp
Additional vendor worksheets will be forwarded to you as they are received in our office.
If I can be of further assistance, please don't hesitate to contact me.
attachments
Comxm. N®a ~ _ _
File No. ~..,,,gm
R,ef, fio:
R,ef. Date n
~
J~SY OF hA~
j ~ ~~,4oi,,;
Harry Kir?t Barbara Bell
Mayer - Direct®r
•~qT gyn. in;~p~
F Of ~Np
~I.IYI~RZ~~T D[~ ~~~ttt
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
25 Aupunf Street, Room 208 • Hilo, Hawaii 96720-4252
(808) 961-8083 • Fax (808) 961-8086
CONFIRMED SCHEDULE FOR VENDOR PRESENTATIONS
TO PARKS AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
OCTOBER 15 AND 16, 2002
DATE/ - VVORKSIIEET
TIME VENDOR TECI~INOLOGY CONFIRMED RECEIVED
Oct. 15, 2002: - - - - - ~ -
9:00 A.M. Consutech S stems, LLC Incineration YES
10:30 A.M. Environmental Group Waste to Bldg. Matls. YES
1:00 P.M. Brightstar Environmental Thermal Gasification YES
Waste Recover S stems, Inc. Anaerobic Di estion NO (see Note**)
Oct. 16, 8002:
9:00 A.M. RealEarth Aerobic Co ostin YES
10:30 A.M. Enerwaste Intl. Corp Incineration YES
1:00 P.M. CCI Canada Com ostin ,Inc Anaerobic Di estion YES
NOTES:
* * Waste Recovery Systems, Inc. (Anaerobic Digestion) was invited but is unable to be physically
present. They will be submitting the Vendor Worksheet responses, a video tape, and informational
brochures for the Committee. They are also requesting to be notified if an additional presentation is
scheduled for the council committee.
l o-OZ-02
WO12~CSFIEEI' FOR VEN®ORS OF WASTE RE®IJCTION `fEC9~NOL®GY
FOR IiAWAI~I COIJN7'Y COUNCIL. COIVI~IIfiTEE
ON PARKS AND EN\/IRONi~ENTAL ~IIANAOEI~ENT
OCTOBER 15 AND 16, 2002, HILO, NAWAI'I
NOTE: This is an overview for County Council members, Environmental Management
Commissioners, public and news media.
TYPE OF TECI'INOLOCaY: Brightstar Environmental's Solid Waste Energy and Recycling
Facility (SWERFT"") Technologies include sterilization of mixed municipal solid waste (MSW),
recovery of all inorganic materials and rigid plastics for recycling, and the gasification of the
remaining sterilized and washed organics. The produced clean burning synthetic gas is
utilized on-site to produce renewable electricity.
Marne of Company: Brightstar Environmental, LLC (BEL)
Years in Business: BEL is a subsidiary of Energy Developments, Inc., a public company
founded in 1986
Contact Person: Ron Manville, Vice President -Development
Paul W. Alford, Business Development
11llailing Address: 952 Woodstone Drive
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808
Phone: (225) 769-9801
(985) 878-1977
Email: ron.menville~a brightenv.com
d alford~a msn.com
Website: www.brightstarenvironmental.com
What waste stream components will you process? {glass, metal, plastics, greenwaste,
paper fiber, other)
BEL's SWERFTM concept accepts mixed MSW and processes all materials referenced above.
Brightstar however, understands that potential synergies with existing or desired recycling
programs may strengthen the County's overall waste management program. Of the
aforementioned recyclables, Brightstar sterilizes and recovers all glass, soils and gravel,
ferrous and non-ferrous metals and rigid plastics. Greenwaste, paper or other fibers which
cannot be recycled are washed, dried and become the solid organic feedstock for conversion
to, and re-use as a clean burning, "renewable" synthetic gas. Municipal sludge may also be a
component of the processed organics if desired by the host entity. These sludges are largely
water (typically 80%) and reduce the already low water consumption of the SWERFT"'
What components of the waste stream will you not process?
A SWERFT"" is designed to accept mixed residential and commercial MSW. White goods such
as washing machines, refrigerators or furniture would be separated and are not processed
through the SWEI~FT~". White goods may be mixed with sterilized ferrous metals to aid in
compaction for shipment, and furniture may be sent to a C8~D facility. Construction debris is
also not accepted into the actual SWERFT"" process, however the facility may accept pre-
processed organics (non-treated lumber or trees that are ground and screened for metals
recovery) from a C&® processing facility should the economics prove viable.
What percentage of the waste stream will you divert from land~lling?
~rightstar currently touts 90% diversion of mixed MSW from landfill. Srightstars' goal however,
is 100% diversion through recycling and beneficial reuse. These numbers do not include C&D
or white goods processing and re-use but such programs may be operated by 13rightstar
Hawaii County or local small businesses and incorporated into an overall program of re-use
and recovery.
What is the composition of any residue (in tons and as a percentage of total I'~ISW)?
Is the technology scaleable?
Dry char and ash (approx. 5%) maybe evaluated for beneficial re-use as patio pavers, other non-
structural building products or as a soil stabilizer. Sand, soil and other inorganics (approx. 5%) washed
from sceened pulp may be used as interim cover at the remaining landfill. Broken glass and gravel may
also hold value as an add mix in local aggregate markets (asphalt).
Every component of BEL's S WERFT"' is designed as scaleable. Pre-constructed facility components
including steam autoclave, gasification units and power generation equipment amve skid mounted and
designed for expedient installation. Each steam autoclave processes mixed MSW and separates pulp
which feeds two gasification units, which in turn provide synthetic gas to power 3-5 engine generator
sets.
.
10li'hat is the minimum tonnage you can process daily?
SEL SWERFT"' can process as little as 150 to 200 tons per day of mixed MSW. Project
economics improve when quantities approach and exceed about 400 tons per day. Upon
review of the County's Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan, Srightstar would like to
discuss the potential to construct the front end, mixed MSW facilities on both sides of the
County. This would facilitate separation of recyclables as soon as possible, increase
remaining landfill life for both landfills, and minimize interim cross County trucking. This should
also provide additional time to accomplish necessary environmental evaluation, public
comment and permitting phases before the addition of the gasification and renewable power
generation phase of SWERFT"" on the West side of the Island.
In the interim phase all ferrous and non-ferrous metals and rigid plastics would be removed
from the waste streams for recycling. Should the Eastern Landfill run out of space prior to
commissioning of the Western SWERF~"", a greatly reduced volume of MSW (organics and
residuals) would be transported West for landfill. All recyclables from the West would return in
the same vehicles to the Eastern "Front End Only" Falcility to further minimize cross county
trucking. Upon completion of the Westside SWERF's gasification capabilities, non-
recoverable organics from both facilities would be gasified at one facility and landfilled
quantities would dwindle.
Srightstar is aware of the potential upgrade of the Saddle Road and/or Route 200 which was a
major consideration in recommending a single gasification facility with separate recycling
facilities. A single SWERFT~"which accepts all MSW from both sides of the Island is available
at potentially lower costs than is achievable with the above described scenario. Two smaller
SWERFT"~s at both ends of the island are also available at potentially higher costs. Sri htstar
will need to better understand the needs and desires of the County's residents businesses
and government prior to ~roposinc~ a specific project scope
11Vhat is the maximum tonnage you can process daily?
As referenced above, Brightstar's SWERF~ technologies are scalable in design and increase in capacity
by about 250 tons per day with the addition of each additional steam autoclave, and associated
downstream gasifiers (2) and power generation units.
Capital c®sts:
Brightstar assumes all capital, permitting and facility operations cost within its suggested build,
own and operate contract format. Brightstar recommends this format due to our "emerging
technology" status and to remove all financial risks from the host communities and businesses.
Brightstar's revenue stream is derived from MSW tipping fees, sale of recyclables and
renewable power. In certain cases, another potential revenue stream is generated from the
sale of the bio-oils referenced herein.
annual operating costs:
See above capital costs explanation.
Cost per ton:
MSW tipping fees may range from $50-$75/ton depending on the mix of facilities and sites
chosen by the County, quantity of MSW and municipal sludge available, value of recovered
recyclables and the value of renewable power sold to the grid. bong term facility leasing
arrangements and cost to landfill residuals (<10%) will also impact MSW tipping fees.
Brightstar can refine tipping fees for SWERFT"" as well as costs for separate recycling facilities
upon further review of the specific desires of Hawaii County. However, prior to execution of a
Waste Supply Agreement and after all of these issues have been considered and a thorough
review of the project completed, BEb will offer a guaranteed long term contract for the
processing of the County's MSW. The County will bear no risk associated with the variables
described above.
Financing possibilities:
Once again, Brightstar proposes a build, own and operate contract format with a long term
fixed unit cost for MSW processing. Brightstar believes that its' client communities should be
offered the opportunity to own these facilities as early as 1-5 years into the contract. The
County's ability to obtain low cost financing upon proven long term continued performance
would facilitate a significant reduction in the MSW tip fee at the Brightstar operated facility.
Acreage needed: 3-5 acres per facility.
P®onser generates! (in Il41V41'): 8-12 MW
®ttaer end pr®ducts: Bio-oils are a potential by-product which may be produced and
recovered should even lower emissions be desired at the SWERFTM site, or if low renewable
power market prices dictate. Re-use of the renewable oils may be within the East and West
facilities to operate package boilers, gas turbines, or other systems. The potential also exist to
sell the oils to a refinery, utility or other end user looking to replace fossil fuel with renewable
fuels.
Risks: All technical, operating, and financial risk are borne by Brightstar within the proposed
build, own and operate contract format. Brightstar would be investing $30-$50mm depending
on combination of facilities selected by the County. Upon further review by the County, and
upon initial acceptance, Brightstar will be excited to host a facility tour for appropriate Hawaii
County representatives to visit BEL's operating SWERFT"" in Wollongong, Australia.
Should there be a delay in permitting and commissioning of the gasification phase of
SWERFT"", the MSW Processing Facilities then in place on both sides of the Island would
already be recovering inorganic recyclables and plastics for re-use. The facilities would also
be producing a sterilized pulp. This pulp could potentially be utilized as an organic fertilizer, or
composted for further volume reduction (composting would not be necessary from a pathogen
standpoint as mixed MSW is initially heated to 130° C in a 40 minute batch process)
Substantial research and development has also been performed at BEL's Australian facility
relative to the agricultural value and application of such an organic fertilizer.
~nvir®nmental impacts:
The construction of a SWERFT""would initiate a long string of environmental impacts. Initially,
the source of potential organic landfill leachate contamination will be eliminated. Odors
associated with the daily landfill of mixed MSW will be eliminated. Birds, vermin and
windblown debris will be greatly reduced. The emissions from 8-12 MW of non-renewable
fossil generated electricity wilt be displaced with renewable power. Should the SWEF~FT"' be
sited at or adjacent to the West landfill, hazardous emissions of methane (an extremely potent
greenhouse gas) may be recovered, purchased from the County, and cleaned prior to
combustion within the SWERFT"'. All ferrous and non ferrous metals and rigid plastics would
be recovered and recycled which should reduce the environmental impacts of processing
virgin resources. Minimized trucking within a combined Island system, sending recyclables
one way and organics and residuals the other would reduce associated truck emissions and
noise.
The SWERFT"" itself will be a minimal consumer of water at 40gpm or less, and, dependant
upon moisture content of the MSW processed, may be a net exporter of water. Land
utilization would be initially 3-5 acres per facility with the savings of about '/2 acre per year in
avoided landfill space. Aesthetically, a SW~RFT"' would be a low profile, enclosed facility with
all garbage receipt and processing performed indoors. Negative air would be drawn from the
MSW processing area and fed as combustion or makeup air for power generation equipment
to reduce or eliminate odor. The conversion of solid organic pulp to synthetic gas is
performed without air or oxygen, therefore no dioxins, furans or acid gases are produced in the
conversion or gasification process. SQL's synthetic gas is a dense, clean burning, medium btu
gas which has combustion emissions characteristics similar to natural gas or propane. CO
and C02 are the major emissions from power generation and combustion of syngas to heat the
gasifier tubes. Necessary air permits will include limits on emissions at or below levels of
electricity, to be displaced by SWERI=T""
Social impacts:
A SWERFT"" operation as described would create more than 30 jobs for Hawaii County
residents. Hourly positions would be substantially above minimum wage and would enjoy full
benefits. Salaried management and engineering positions will also be available. It is also
important to note that jobs created within the recycling phase of operations would involve the
handling of sterilized recyclables and not raw, untreated MSW.
A 13rightstar commitment to building a SWERFTM in Hawaii County would include planned
participation in public education and awareness relative to technologies employed and
implementation of the County's overall Integrated Waste Management flan. Additional
positive impacts include but are not limited to jobs created in various recycling and reuse
markets available for development by locally owned small businesses.
~°irrseline from acceptance to full operation:
With a long term contract in place for the disposition of Hawaii County MSW and for the
purchase of renewable power, I~rightstar could have the "Front I;nd" MSW processing and
recycling facilities constructed and operational within nine months of receipt of Solid Waste
Handling Facility and other necessary permits. This may be segregated from the gasification
phase of SWERFTM due to the potentially longer lead time for gasification and power
generation permitting. This would also enable Srightstar to expedite recycling efforts, extend
the life of existing landfills and minimize cross County trucking prior to construction of the
gasification facilities.
Due to the modular, scalable design referenced above, the gasification phase could be
delivered and installed within six months of receipt of necessary permits. This timeline is
assuming the MSW processing facility and foundations for gasification facility would already be
in place.
The overall permitting process for a complete SWEftFT"" is currently estimated at two years.
This timeline may be shortened with the assistance of State and local authorities, however
environmental assessment, public notice, and the public comment and review portions of this
schedule should not be reduced.
COUl®1TY OF ~IAWAII WASTE I~DUCTIOl~T
QUESTIOl~AII~E
October 1, 2002
Note: the f®Ilowing process proposed by IrnerWaste has been successfully used to
dispose of ~l9SW for 12 years at Sydney, NS.
1. Type of Technology
The technology we plan on using is mass combustion yielding steam and electric
energy production. For the current Hilo landfill waste stream we would propose
to provide two combustion units of 150 tons per day each and operate them
initially 5 days per week.
2. Name of Company
EnerWaste International Corp
3. Years in business
Eleven
4. Contact Person
Thomas Dutcher
5. Mailing Address
PO Box 1194
Bellingham, Wa 98227
6. Phone
360 738 1254
7. Email
enerwaste@aol.com
8. Website
www.enerwaste.com
9. What v~aste streams will you process? (glass, metal, plastics, greenwaste,
paper, fiber, other)
a. All residential waste from COH Transfer Stations
b. All Commercial waste
c. Offal, dead animals, fish carcass
d. Cut tires
e. Sewage sludge
f. Waste oil and grease
10. What components of the ve~aste stream dvill you not process?
a. Construction/Demolition materials
b. Clearing and grubbing materials
c. Asbestos
d. Medical waste*
e. Contaminates soil*
f. Green waste**
*-These can be processed safely with special handling and recordkeeping.
Green waste can be handled if the alternative of shredding for mulch is
unavailable or cost prohibitive.
11. What percentages of the waste stream dvill you divert from landfilling?
Approximately 90% of the waste currently delivered to the Hilo landfill will be
diverted.
12. What is the composition of any residue (in tons and as a percentage of total
MSW)?
The residue from this process is ash and is non-hazardous. Ordinarily this
amounts to I5-25% of the incoming waste stream or, for the current Hilo landfill,
eight to fourteen thousand tons per year. This ash composes approximately 5% of
the incoming waste by volume.
13. Is the technology scalable?
Yes, we manufacture units as small as 50 tons per day and as large as 200 tons per
day, so the plant can be scaled up or down and added to in increments as waste
increases.
14. What is the minimum tonnage you can process daily?
Generally we may turn down our units to 70% of rated capacity and still achieve
the specified results. For the plant we would propose to replace the Hilo landfill,
we would shut one unit down and operate the other unit at 105 tons per day to
achieve maximum turndown.
15. ~6'hat is the xnaxiflnurn tonnage you can process daily?
We propose to install two units rated 150 tons per day each and operate them 5
days per week initially. The rated capacity is, therefore, 300 tons per day. As the
waste stream grows, we would increase operation to seven days per week which
we estimate would permit disposal of up to 94,500 tons per year (allowing for
planned and unscheduled outages) before the plant would need to be expanded.
In either case, receiving of waste is planned for seven days per week. On-site
waste storage will be limited to approximately one week of storage.
16. Capital costs:
Capital costs range from fifteen to twenty million dollars, depending on the
method of financing, cost of land and other factors.
17. Annual operating costs:
For five day per week operation, the operating and maintenance costs are
expected to amount to $30-$40 per ton, excluding capital cost retirement, profit,
land acquisition costs and any fee for disposal of ash at Puuanahulu landfill. The
total annual operating cost is a function of the total waste processed which, for
this purpose we assume is 90% of the current Hilo landfill waste of approximately
63,000 tons.
1~. Cost per ton:
If, by "Cost per Ton", it is meant to be the total tipping fee, this would amount to
the annual operating costs indicated above plus the capital cost retirement, profit,
land acquisition costs and any fee for disposal of ash at Puuanahulu landfill, less
any credit for power sold to the utility.
19. Financing possibilities:
This system of waste disposal is well recognized in the private and public
financial markets and is readily financed in either market. It is our intention to
seek private financing in conjunction with a private operator if selected for this
project. We have two private operators who have indicated a desire to own and
operate this facility.
20. Acreage needed:
For the 300 TPD plant we envision, the plant will occupy an area of less than 3
acres.
21. Pove~er generated (in Mme'):
This process produces 5,500 kW (5.5 MW) based on rate of 300 TPD. Internal
consumption amounts to 275 kW (0.275 MW). Net power to the grid is,
therefore, 5,225 kW (5.525 MW), based on processing at a rate of 300 tons per
day.
22. ®ther end products:
We can provide optional processes to turn the ash into usable products such as
aggregate, cinder blocks, etc. These processes have been demonstrated but we
have not researched the market on the island of Hawaii.
23. Environmental impacts:
The principal negative environmental impact is in stack emissions. This process
is equipped with the maximum available control technology which will reduce
emissions to a fraction of the amounts allowable by regulatory authorities (EPA
and DOH). The ash is non-hazardous but, by Hawaii State law, will be required to
be landfilled in a "monofill", that is, a landfill area devoted to ash alone. Noise
impact is a site specific consideration, however the maximum truckloads is
expected to be 15-20 per day and will be restricted to daylight hours.
This process has a lower inspect on greenhouse gases than landfills and
actually emits less criteria pollutants than the diesel engines in trucks which
would otherwise haul the waste to the Puuanahulu landfill
24. Social impacts:
The principal negative social inspect is one of a negative perception that this
process is equivalent to incineration. It does not, in any way, resemble Ilse
incinerators of the past. It is clean, unimposing, and en environmentally
beneficial means of waste disposal.
This process can operate in conjunction with as weld as in lieu of other
recycling efforts for paper, glass, greenwaste and other potentially recyclable
wastes. This process contributes to energy independence and provides high
quality jobs to the consnaunity.
25. Timeline from acceptance to full operation:
The manufacturing/construction time for this system is approximately 18 months
from receipt of an air permit. Time to obtain an air permit is site specific and
would range from 12 months for a site with an existing Covered Source permit to
36 months for a site requiring ambient air quality monitoring and full PSD review.
.v
~~S~r~i ~il~ ~~i i~~g
~~ir~~nt~i r®~~ts d ~et°vi~es
Since 1989 9/25/02
WASTE REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY WORKSHEET
TYPE OF TECHNOLOGY: WASTE TO BUILDING MATERIALS
NAME OF COMPANY: HYDROMEX, INC.
YEARS IN BUSINESS: INCORPORATED 1994
CONTACT PERSON: ASSOCIATE LARRY LEAF,THE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP
MAILING ADDRESS: 350 WARD AVE.,STE 106, HONOLULU,HI.96814
PHONE: 808-637-1944
EMAIL: ENVRNMNTLGROUP@AOL.COM
WEBSITE: N/A
WHAT WASTE STREAM COMPONENTS WILL YOU PROCESS? ALL..EXCEPT BELOW
WHAT COMPONENTS OF THE WASTE STREAM WILL YOU NOT PROCESS? PCB;
CERTAIN HAZMAT; UNTEATED MED WASTE.
WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE WASTE STREAM WILL YOU DIVERT FROM LAND
BILLING? 100$
WHAT IS THE COMPOSITION OF ANY RESIDUE (IN TONS AND AS A
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL MSW) 0
IS THE TECHNOLOGY SCALABLE? YES
WHAT IS THE MINIMUM TONNAGE YOU CAN PROCESS DAILY? 10 TPD (TONS
PER DAY)
WHAT IS THE MAXIMUM TONNAGE YOU CAN PROCESS DAILY? 2000+ TPD..
CAPITAL COSTS: 50 TPD= $4,000,000; 100 TPD = $5,000,000: 200 TPD
_ $6,400,000..
ANNUAL OPERATING COSTS: 50 TPD = $639,155.00; 100 TPD = $1,005,415;
200 TPD = $3,411,900.00.. (REF. ATTACH. A)
COST PER TON: 50 TPD = $50.13; 100 TPD = $39.43; 200 TPD = $33.45
(REF. ATTACH. A)
FINANCING POSSIBILITIES: YES- WITH LETTER OF GAURANTY 1000..
ACREAGE NEEDED: 50 TPD = 200 FEET X 140 FEET; 100 TPD = 360 FEET X
265 FEET; 200 TPD = 500 FEET X 320 FEET.( REF.
ATTACH. B)
POWER GENERATED: NONE UNLESS FUEL BLOCKS PRODUCED FOR EXISTING
COAL POWER PLANTS..
OTHER END PRODUCTS: BUILDING, CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS; FUEL PRODUCT
LANDSCAPING PRODUCTS; (REF. ATTACH. C)
RISKS: NONE..
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: NONE.. NO POLUTION; NO AIR EMISIONS,ETC..
SOCIAL IMPACTS: NEW JOBS; NO NEW SITE NEEDED ..CAN USE EXISTING
TRANSFER STATION AREAS OR LANDFILL HILO..
(REF. ATTACH. E)
TIME LINE FROM ACCEPTANCE TO FULL OPERATION: FROM 90 DAYS TO
180 DAYS DEPENDING ON SITE PREP. AND SYSTEM SIZE..
THANKYOU FOR THIS OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS ALTERNATIVE
TO LANDFILL OF SOLID WASTE FOR HILO..
ATTACHMENTS: PRESIDENT
350 Ward Ave. Suite 1fl6, li~a~~l~a~, ffi, iTSA 9(814 - F~~see: 637-3944 FAX: (3~D~) 59~D940
F~ava-r~~nt4Gr®up(~~ael.ea~t
I
J
F'INANCIAI, Pi2[~dtECT10NS FQIt A 50 T()N iiYl)~d()Mi±,X 1'I,ANfI' ~ ~
(jI'T'i~A7'1NG `TV4'O SIIII~TS iN li~)Td(l~_1!_~l:i.~, ll.n«'A[i. ~
TII't'lNG ~'FES (C) ~ 1,7~i5,1?l?l?
~'I:C)T~UCT S.A~11FS (1)) (C`ON:~LRVATIVI?) I.II;t0,12lkf)
C[Yi-A1,1R'CC~i~I+`, ~ :Z,R!l~.f?l1f1
A1.?;~~~iN1S~i`~=~A I~IV~°, (1C) 2:~9~1~0~
S~.L~'<S fl'4.~~~'1'lNU (i~) 7fr,50f1
[~l~stlir~NCIE / ~.,~GAL (I) 2 .~l1ll
~1:ll~+~l'3?~iv~~.i~{+?":#+, .[~..I+,i',!(~~S (l.a) IR? 1 l~;
~'!~!Ti~,t~~~~'~~J ~L'~i~~~)1,F ~±,+(~Lill'14~IT;N°t' (11'[) 1"?,i2:~
('Dill~'.1'~~~i~~AL; (((iii)[ 3~"~},f)?l~l?
` 1~7~~~~ry !'J~J~JAN~~,I ~t.T~ ._...._~..-,..ter / ~/L~k1'
`tf`)I'AL q.)$'~1,t~_1~'t[taCi k~j1,~"I/,NSi~; 1,lK"i,i f1
A;~S~1M1'''fl IONS
+R'-} ~T'~CC~'(1~g-~S ~~~`r{a![gtsi~~ySEltiyG'7A"Sy} ! yy tY
U} ,4.~:9 ~ Vl~ 1 ~ Ji1!.,fl~ ~JI~,a'BFi 1.~~~~~a1i3_~Tll~i7•
S7fl / ~'Y3;'~ i~t(.TNI~''I~AL S~L1T) ~'~STL (1~11SV6' } .ANA CONSTIdtJ('7'!(?N 1)N~ l~1~1~;,
A?~JlY~~kII~L'if~ 7~~'~~'T,~ C~:f~TS ~~B I `I'i0?rd t"lE~t1S C?TiIE~ I'~+~J11UCT + INE;1.1 ~1)~f~(: 1' 1~.II iar r ~ ~t
11~ifL;t..C~ ~?~'IC~; ANia ~'0~:~,
~A~iFU t~1V ~ I'.~'.taI'LL 32.(1[1 l Ii0U1~2 7'CITAIJ WA[:F.S ANa) i~FNI;i#1"i I~At'1~„A~rl~,.
ix) ~,~,~d.1ALS 15~1~ t)1F 1'tit~~)tJCT SA.1.~:5.'C$~LIS l~itJl~l~Elf~ COl_I1..I? VARY ~VI7'1~ T~ PI+; !)1~
C~~)N~.itA~...t,~9 ~"1.C.
i) VAI~t:S C~Jh~i'ANY A.N.D A.I~FA.
~,ITi~i 1~~3~~[1 ~+i~~~ (,FNF~~fiCl?~S ~t~ ~L1~CTR1~"I"i'Y, C?AS ~ t?iL.
I) ~t~AA~(yt)7qq`~~l ~(§(~;~"~(p~i~'~q~~~~q~~"~+{~`:~y;J
2rA 1NICg~J~~g¦.+q, pp' ~p(~~ 1¦1g~} y¦ ~Nr ¦)y¦ A {¦^~¦pH C T
~pLA ¦ lf~J;~l i R 1~.J f\~1~ .D!~~^i.~L: i1F¦- ¦ V, A'~1:'3~P1 ,`~1, \~IN M1/ SJ \.•.l'R.~J A=A~I,J~ .V'~ lY?
A~:1~,N"f`~ t?~':t) l.ivi TIFF ~`~(3€~`~,SS ~~.[~i+:.1~ItS+~,~sZ:1~I'i ii+10'VA'~Tii`. ~?~1 I~I;Af~i. ()iV l.:~t'~',~~+If~i {
~°[~t~C~~_~sS~ t~~~' S(7?it1:~: ACr~:NT`S 16~r~.Y .i!:C,}UT~I). S'4't, C`{!'1;+~'T'1'IU:~ (~t.)lll,i) t_xg
~'1'
~iFCA~.P
"TC1°I't~L `~`I~~S PFR I~LAl4~ 2~.~ '!1
`~`fi`~`l`~~ ~N)i`IF FF '1'C11~1 ~ i 1l~ ~?Il
Tf~T~L t~~~~ ~'~~F'IT ~~~'t`~l~ ~ b3.as ()R ~(,G17,~75.!!!1 / ~ 12
_ _
.3
"Serving tf~e 1~Vc~r-!e~ i,~ctf~"
~n~-ironrnecatal Proc:iucts anti Sc~~ ~~ices
``-__qY
Si~~ce 19,g9 FINANGIAI, I'ROJEC'1'IONS FOR A ~iU TC)N tlYr)R(~M(;X !'I,nr!'1'
INCC~r7L rrr;R Y~nx
TIPPIN" FEES (r_} $ x;10,000
FI-;C~1)tICT SAr,ES (d) 1 0, i)00
`1'O'I'AL INCOMI . , i~~, (i;iii
0!?rRA'I°l.rG _IXPC~.I?
nDr'fIPIIS'1'RnTIVE (e) J,'~, .`.,00
OVERIIEnU (f) 3~3, 2'_~0
t,~~~R ~ ~~n,zoo
"nL,i~', & ~;ARY,ETIPIG (h) 7F;, 5011
IC,f~f1R.ArICF,'/1..I','GAI, (i) ~;r)~)
`T'E "1'I PIG (j) ~ (1+:~!)
U`I'It~I'1'I~S (k) X5,`75';
Al A t N'~l' N n 11 C C~ & R t E' 11 r R S (I) 1 , i J
h9A'i'I?RIAL IInNDI,E C'v7U I Pfli~'N`[' (m) 1 1
C'Ht;fIICAi," (n) 1 5 j, 0i)(1
hiI(>i'ELLr,IfECt? _l, i'00
,POT~L OFCR~'~'I'Ir~CI EXPEIdSE~ E~39, 1
' AssurlPTlOr~s
a) One 8 l?r. shift c!nly.
b) ?.55 days pFr year r~herai. i_oll,
c) The $40/ton is an average of municipal solid wiste (h1Sf~1) q~;~~:~/Inn
used oil at $55/harr.el or $250/ton, tires at $1.00 cac]~ of ~~,8t1; tor,
constuctiun debris at $40/ton.
d) Flocks, 25 wt.,50 cents @, 80/i:on.
e) Incl~cdes effir.e and worker.
F) Office misc.
y) Based on 5 peohle (a $21.00/hr. total wages and henefit; pacLage.
fa) Equals 15~ of product sales. This number could vary with tyE~P ~~l
COntaCtSr etC.
i) Var-~ies by cominany and area.
j) Process control.
k) Either d~iesei for generators or elecl:~~icity, ~.I~~:; ~~r ~~il.
Routine maiutecance.
m) Payments en forklifts, front end loa~3ers~ etc.
n) Agents used in the I,r-or,ess ar,e present. in caste sf.ream, e~~ ~~cc~~ i~~n
purchase of some ayents may be required. we expect this ~~oi!l~l cn:,t
$12.00/ton.
RECAP
A TOTAL `!'ONS PER YEAR 1 2, 750
B OPERATING EXPENSE PER TON $50.00
C). 'DOTAL INCOME PER TON $8(1.00
D) 'T'OTAL GROSS PROFIT PER 'I'ON $30.00 OR $3I3),500/VR.
45 HARDY COURTS STE 1 1 9, GULFPORT~ MS. , 39507 • TEL 1 (f18II) 493- 60(5 'FAX F~01 n f~ , i
"Serving the ~~'r~r1~:~ with"
. ~ .
~nvironrnental Products and a~~rvices
Since 19:59 E'INANCIAL PROJECTIONS FOR A 1 OU TO[d II'r'I)1;OMf;X I'f,11f~T
INCO['IE PliR YEAR
TIPPING FEES (c) $ 1,l)1U,i~UU
CRODtJCT S~ALRS (d } 1 , t1~'U, UUU
Total Cnr,oIDe 2, (1i1, DUf)
GI'EI2A`1'1NG k:XPE~IE
AI?c~llftl r`PRA'CIt~E (e)
SAI,~S & 77ARKETIi~lG (h) ~ 1 53, ODU
INSlJR11NCE/LEGAL (i) 5f)()
UTJI,ITI1?S (k) '71,y1(~
MATI?'i'F,'N/~tICE ° REPI~JiS (1 } X50
i~911'1.'F~R I11L I3 ,1 ['1I')I:E EQIII PP1E;PJT (m } 1 1 i
Chf?~1i(;nJ,S (n) 3U~~, ODU
f9I,~Cl~)I.LhNEO11S _~1 5~ 3Ot;
T(:J1'AI, UI'I:RATIPdC~ EXI'I;NSE 1 ,!)U~, 1 ~i
' ASSUNIP.TIONS
a) One 8 hr, shift only.
b) 7.55 days per year operal,ion.
c) Tito $4U/ton is an average of municipal solid i~~asf.e (f1S1~1) a] i,:';;I~~n
used oil at $55/bai rel or $250/ton, tires at :~1 .OU eaclt~ or $:`3t)/t ~~n,
construction debris at $40/ton.
d) Alocks, 25 wt.,50 cents ea., 8U/ton.
e) Includes office and worker.
f) Offir,e misc.,-
g) Based on 6 peoplo @ $~1.U0/hr, total wages and benefit [~a~k~~~o.
hl Equals 1f~`~ of product sales. `I'bis number could vary ,•;itlt ty1}~ of
contracts, etc.
i.) Varys ley company and area.
j) Crocess contr.ol..
k) Either diesel for generators or eleci:ricity, gas or oil.
1} Routine maintenance.
m) Payments on forklifts, front end loaders; etc.,
n) Agents used in the process are present in the waste stream. nu
occasion, purchase of somr! agents may be required. i~1e e;cpec~~ i It i
could cost a maximum of $17,.Q0/ton.
REC11P
A) TOTAL TONS PER YEAR 25,500
OPIFRAT2NC EXPENSE PER TON $40.00
CL TOTAL INCOME PER TON $80.00 "
D) TOTAL GRUBS €~ROFIT PER TON $40.00 OR $1,020,000.
45 HARDY COURTS STE 1 1 9, GULFPORT, MS. , 39507 • TCI, 1 (88£3) 493-fi06~i 'PAX F(11 51~, 1 ,
~irl~lr9C1~) Pf~J~~BiC?9~aS T®r ~ ~uu 1 ott per ~nirc
Hydroata~x ~i~ra! i°~}-ari~)~ging ~uilciir~g ~ioeks
~l~~o•~~ ~ i'oTt ~°~s ids ~ _ Y'~r Y~~r
'Til ire. F'~~s c) $60.00_ ~?.9, OU(....:~..~6', 1 20, 000
f'rr~eiv~4 4U. 00 1 G, UOC ~l 0UO UU()~
~-ol~,l !r'o~~~~ 1 OU. UO 40, ~)Q(~ 1 0, 20U, 0~~()a
. _ ~..~,,,..~...m. -....-M
0aP~r~~~+ ~~s~s~
~,r1~,-o~r??tf~tit ~ 0.70 7F)~1 _ r l [3(:)C~
C,)v ~t . 0,50 2G0 ,.,...-.~.,.~;N.::.`' 1 C'(lU:..
l,~L+or g.tt(~ 3 6G0 .--~-0lE ~~.)0
It~~~tt~te~~~t ~ ~4 i 0.50 200 51 C~~JO
T~s(~{t~ s,~) 1.~0 5!~aQ 1~12,DL~c.)
l~#:i9iii~~ it .aO 200... S~,UUO
1 r3 00()
A`~ra~~~~~t ? €~~~tr (I 1.501_ 000
. .
i ~ ~ s ~i-) C} 75 3t?O r 0 ~0[?
,r.
i~ t 1 ~ne~ ~ ta, n - .s.~....-~..
1 ~>CkO ~ $00 1 2?~1 ~?Ott
~esl~~ rA~~~#~t~~ ~ac~s°~ns~ 33.5 ~.f3 300 ~ 3 i 1 U[)
y~ ~
r 5~
C~ica~s ~rofii M~rgon°;~ .-6$
I~.:_ .
t
ASSU~9PTIOi~tS
a. 'i'wo 8hr shifts/day.
b. 25:~~ days/yr.
c. The $60.00/ton is the old tip fee plus rJO SUf1SIDY [JEFU[~;U!
d. ?5 pnllRdS each at .50 cents/block.
e. Includes olfice worker.
f. ~~[fice misr,.
q. teased on 7 people/shift @$32/hr total wages and benefii_ pacY,a~~{~
E~• Eq~aa).s 15~ of product. sales.
i. Varies by company and area.
'j. Process control..
k. [ncludes power source- diesel generators, elec~riciiy,
I. Routine maintenance.
ra. Payments on [orkiif.ts, front loaders, etc.
n. Agents used in the process are present in waste. On ocr~a~.i~~e;
purchase of ome agents may he regi~ireri. t9~ r~xpnct IM,_i~ 'li?/ I
o. Earnings before interest, taxes, d?prer.iation, and ~rin~~f i~ ~ki~~!~.
RECAP
HYDROi~EX 200 TON SYSTEM COST $ 5,100,000
10 YEAR LEASE @$77,295/r~o. OR 927, 540/YR.
OPERATING EXPENSE (EBITDA) 4, 748, 100/YR.
TOTAL INCOME 10,200,000/YR.
TOTAL NET PROFIT $ 4R524,36~/YR,1!
d 1
~
~9..
~ ~
~ ~.~I
'""=dI11111111110Rlilllllillif1111111111111111111IIIIIt111111111N1111111111111001111111111111I1111d10111111111,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,efllllllllllr7nilrrlrlllllqlllllllllllllllllltllltltllllgrl4
- - t-"=:
gg~~ -
S.d
i ~ ~ ~ ~
~ _ d_ _._._.s
~ -
- ~
~ _
i _
I r t
j ~ €
~ ~ ~
_ 4;~ ~
~ ~
g~ ~ a .var. ~.r<d ~
~ ~ ~ ~ _
- s~
fi
`n"" lte.,
i
1
~ f
_ _ _a'~ l i
_ ~ j =
~
~ ~ ~ j
h.
'
ti i =
~
~ -
E~ a
l~
m ~I
~N
~
~ ~
~ -
`#t8 dAddDDldlDddOD(Pldlll(DI(1dd(NIItBIP(1111i610b1117lDDNtlldP171ldlldD7itddPBddld/i1D11/7Ji11PPtttt(illidl(J7II1tJJIHIi17PItiJ4tJt1JUJINI17NIt1fnttl , , dill7llddRl
~ulluunuutaaee:a@uannnmaulunaln!unuuwluunnlnuullsanuumuunulanuulnuunlanlnnnunluncu+ulu . , . nnuemnnnnununt.
r_~
~'1A ~ hPT>~-~ ~os'r~TlRes ~~iS~~MZ iY'Yi~~ - t•:.:F
a.,/ ~e`
-
~ _ Lf'..
C_
s S~ = r
~ i ~ `
i
f ~ ~ ~
t:`)
i {
ea i*) S
Z.~i ~ ~ Z'; ~
c
~ ~ ~
~ = ~ ~ ~ 1
i
_ _
, _
~
i f
!
E
g,
e
_
I j -
~ Z~
E
ly ~ ~e~
~ ~
r
,~,n,~,~, $§33!'3§ -.eEbS4§§4338D§f4E3d3§S4B88@818%888M@II8@el8l8aI8I88YP@8d1dd88II8818@a88a87t88t81B11888ai888888811D8III8888i77dB8111188181888888@888188Y81118181d117t1B8886111 , , ;,@18 i~
k ~
-
I. _ . 1 , r~
hT.
~ ~ _P^ n
~ ~ ~ ~
'w`~ ~ .
a
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~r r
~ F"
ee
~
~ ~ 3 _ ~ j
~ I ~
~ say,,
r ~ ~
~tlltlllltl~i! litl~lttt@@til ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a
~ lgt . ~ rr ra ra r rr
C
(,c ~ ~
~ P :
r
}L. ~ ~
~
c ca
~ J ~
~ ~ ~
c~.~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ v
ca ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~
~ o 0
~ - ~
~ ~
...T
PRr,F 1P
~1IIlU1_IL111t1A~i1111A_I!_I111~111~11:.:,,<.~.;~....~11~111114f11A111111A11AlAwt1~R~/~
~ R1) i
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ > ~
~ I 1 trS ~ ~ [ ~
' ~ ("h,
i ~ C
~ ~ ~ .l
~t
~ ' ~
~ , ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ i
~ ~
~ ~ i
~ -
~ ~
~c ~ n
i
~ ~
~ i ~ ~ ~ ~
m
~ ~ ~s
~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ -
i
P
_ ~ ~ t ~
~..~J
'P 4A
~
~ i
- ~ _ , . _ _ d~ ~ ~ --ter
~ Y
j QP ~
~ ~ ~ ~
Q!
~ ~ ~
~
~-I
N r "li aI it M~ .`r,, ~
j
Ile'.%rrpl 'rR~$~fit1~ 'A a: r§ /A'~1/1l:`vl f~aS(F/dfir e^, ~4~~'/>Tf()1®7P49( ~pr'/}/'~Alr'fr~ ~!?vi~ir~~ae ~j. r.~l).~;~.,,:,,
~~?~rvrl~ ~rtooif~~fxfra~~At~O f1~~°fri fr~Pr AB~luw~~1 i~agPAIA'1°~ ?a€~•=a•rurrfir9r?
T'he t-lydrr?rv?ex process is c~/pahle of producing ~ vaide range of rr~a~hl~ rrnrlalr..tc ii~~~~ l,?r?rl?~r~ta a?~+ rr-~ ~?Any
inexpensive to produce artd Can therefare~ be Corripetitiv?~ly priC~ri ?:nm~smf~r9 to !4i9rrilar C'nI1V~r1ti~+r1~1 t,Ir•re
The various Flydrorrtex products ray be generally grouped into thrs~~ r.~t~onri~c
1. ~uildie~q, constrt.oction rrtateriaPs
2. i" reel products
3. Landscaping pr®ducts
~arildirtg lat~rl~
Nydrorraex building materoals are r'~sistant to tire, water and t~rrrtites, this rYr~kir,a tlt?~rn highly rIclai?saF?l~ r<< ~,)~n~
constructictrt projects. Included among the uses of Nydrorvtex bui0dirtg proctur•.ts arr' ttrn fnllr:+a~inQ
17 ce~ncrete~tyg~e building bBr~cks, bocks, etc.
flooring
cra:~trsrrt prefahs
larrrtber r'eplecerrtent
retaining ~salls
decking
Oencing
gatard rail posts
rrtediart dividers
n p:~rking 4ot bumper blocks
iFre~4 i'r~drac
Ftydrorrrex can process ~eraste s~rith higher l3TU value such ms plastic, organir°c, nil snrl t?airrt. it +/,tn ~ '~~P?nr
burning Coal substitute. This fuel rvtateriat cart be degraded in a pyrolytir Prnit nr r~gr.~8~r rn~E hr?n?inp r~ ~),a.-~,
generating steast~ which can be !reed to cre€~te electricity. In addition, any ash rf~riB~irginq frr?rrt the rYrr`i' 1?nit
or furnace coatld then be recycled through the l~lydror~tex plant 4o be one of the inctr~rli~nts rPC~ri, in , ?~ainq
building products.
Various f®rrrts ®f fue! products include: • fue9 briquettes
• fu®l pellets
• other custorrti~ed fuel proctrocts
~gr9cu~or~l R~oduct~
~y selecting a higher properrtion of ®rganic waste, the i-lydrorrt~x pr~sr~sc can rrrakn coil s?Phct?t~)~ ~ ar?ri
enhancers. The pr®cess, which ct~at~ss tht "soil„ in retinutes is rt?rtch rncrre ra~?iri than tractiti<~?ral rr,)?~ ),atir?q
rrae$hods.
Agrrcr~~rrra! prt~iraePs ror~lci irprlrrd~!:
• top-soil retainer end compost
• spage beds
• decorative rocks, flagstones
• grounds and turf underlayrrtent
• berrrt under~yrrtent
• spilt boxes
• drainage panels
_ _ ~ . T s .
7RF't'~ ~p°9rver6 ~'4asn+) fl~r1r:, /-tr).~r 1 ^r~%are• r`n Q+911;i fF..... (f11,t1) X14 a rani„) r . ~
~t
L~~ -
~~~c~~t~~TM~~~~i~
A,ss~,~xns~rat ~;~~r.~c€r~3aors
i1~~z°l~ ~11~~~~I~t
6t-~+25~ K.a~ae6~~~z~~tsa d~«=tr.
T-~a1~4~<aA, ~~h~t, k3~g~aii °6?41.
• (JPfirrr {~D~) ~:~7-~!J~1 ~ • F~~x ~~7-~~QCl3
~;~1~~~;r~lt~egr 19~i3
~~~t ~!°tttl~z~1 it r~l~y tnt~~~ff'l
t ~F~;(c ~.~;nri e1 ~€Ptifi~f:i ~riVll r~tl#l~~l"lt~'~i i~l~(~?c~~)r, ~ , SIr1'.`A 1,1„w~ft~}}",! ~ 1~,`Itil
ti~~? ~ "i;'J!1't~r'1ri~f;l°i`lr~,.~ ~'~i.~a7`:4''L?~!r{e fit ~v~"~•"Jl''l~.tiC1Ci. i c PE'i f.~UPr~li~ iil~tl~~:~ir lT~ ~?l?V+.:~ ~~:~ri+',~Iil~.
{ C~v i7ni ~'~~y C'~i`ttFy ~1~~#t '~i3~ i-~f'C~I<.ir'~~X (1~~ ~~'~°r'~~;~dil f,~{~'sr; rs~..?F i ~°~ni~''.:' ?i•'~li" ~3i~ti~+11 t,~s•e:~~,4~4
irit~
1 } (~~~~.k@~ 1~1 ~rtic CgI~i~Jt~L~i~~}, (Ji~r~~l~ ~!C}74i'~~, Ceil k3C~t~ iJ1f~~1(~;'.it~~?
(~.sC:?), i''''~i#"~#€~~i9~lt~ i~~~tv~ (in~i`f"-1~?) ~~i~~3~, ~~ri~C~ ter ~~:~yt, ~~}~~;r1;it1P f~19nXlc~~;>, t.~?~ar;~
7)i t~z~i'~`il~S ,~4i~ ~o09cat~nt~ tF'10~~~) ~r~y ~ti"~~r ~t~iiEet~rlts ~r7c1 r~~t~ tE~l€~ st~Y"1drr:~~ u(
tt i~ 1 ~i~~t~~ !sir A+c~t.
.ri~s~ 4-~9y~r~lrs~:c ~y~t~m dc~a~~ nUt karlrn or irlr;iP~~rz~l~ tfly~ ~vr.~~t~ E~r(~+t~ut~t ~~t:i t4t~?
5~'t'tg~ i~ ¢t~ItY ~-~t'3t;4r+~~~1. ~t`t)(L"+~`?~a~4k'~{t`°. f~.3rr?~?S ~)r S~"-i.~~3~ ~q~~.J:~k tltti j`~itc~ ~'r:~s'•'~ ~~^Y'i,){~~5~t'
.y,~t~l~. fit!! I'~~i~tl~s ~5~et c+r rlr~;el~t~ ~r~r~~tl~ts r~ re:cy+::l~r.9 k~~ca~ iP~lt~:~ if ice: ~y;.~.tcrri.
-I"P,~? ~-iy~;reaP~~;x ~y~t~r-n ar:~~~ c:F:~~le~+~ ~.n~ t~~t~:~ ~t tt~P~ ~-Eydrt~rt~~X r,F~~r~tic~P~~l V~~ *t~
"i r~kc~o~slt ~t~rYt lve:~t~el ire tits ~it:y caP i-I~~~i, Cf~9if~rr~i~, t)~fi-~ r:~t~rir+~ 1~'~?~.
k,....
_ F _ ,
F~l~r`ie.~ (~ti{~t~~~t ~~t
"~f7rviny the Gt~orld u~itll" ~
. ..1 l
~rtviron~x»rttal Frodu~cts artd Services I~
AUI'11U12I7.Ell IiYliRUr1EX REPI:ESrNT~1I_VE
Since 1989 4
1lYI~ROrI>~;~~ s~r~;~vn~.DS for zEIZU I;rI~ ~s:luiJ ~ ,cc~iv_rl~v.t
°re,+,.ini; Ir;rs bean proven tlr~t rto lla.rm['ul. fami.ssi_c~n5 ,rt:e t;i vf~rr orr t c, t 1~~•
,Ai.r~ or W~r.t far Supply, t:he System i s totally enc losr~cl . 11YllI;(~r1i~ i llc i rl~>r .~r~ f,„
na matF~r_-i<~lt,, s~~ there ~rre na emissions into the .-++~nu~sl~herF~. 'I'llf~T:~~ ir: ,11~;;,
no tlarmf~.~l i~f,sidue rern,=1i.tli ng t`or suhsegttent di_st,os~-r1.
TIiIa ~EP.O Er1IS5IUN:~ 1'RU(;ES`
1 . l~.11 ~,~~tses al~~i 7_idui~3s released dur~.irtg the process rrr"e r~~c~yr, [fed r lr,-~,,,~h
a Scrubbing system. 'I'tlf? scrubbing r;yst:ern is a l stake ti,-e r: spr-.i~~ c!,;,rn~x~?
that dr.riws tree ,<lir inr.o one side spraying i_t with fx"estl la~iter• t
c~:lai_ri.fy tlaf~ air by way ot" Negative Pressure, t_taprl c3i_sc,ll~r-~cacl tilt:c~r~f;f~
Charcoal Filtra1~ion prior to f?ntering thf~ /ltmosphFare, ;lll{t i..^, c`nrl~r;ill~ 1~
tnc) tl ~ i. a ~'e ~ .
"I'1-le tlc~l_m.~l liXllFtfJP°1k~: e~Ir.ri_I~ment cottf igur_st i_ol_1 I~~r~_,~,ri ilr~ ; r~~,r- fi+-~,~}1
~r_iciit:i_I~n t_o all c~tc~secl h~~ldi_tt,~ car p~r-oec~ss t:~,-rnk ~`orl+ ~3iuil,it>, I i.c[ni. c'~;,
,.infi sirnlaltan~,ous r_~vr~c:uati.on by ltegati..ve I~i'ess~Ire c,f any f~rnnc~s c,r j~:,ls~c>~;
to the wet sc~ r-r_rl~b~r system..
3. Ut.her plant. erlR.ti.i~~ment, particulax'ly ~~,x:~ot.u~~~d tlr<~ rni,u~r sy~~r.E~m :~Il~t r~,,-r~~~i i~,r,
Systems ci'tx:`r~ct:E~~l. ii:c~stl ai.r s4~reeps across the trrar~lC :lr'f?,'-i c~;~r~ryi rr~; r,~,~
fumf~s or gases i.ttt:o tl.e negative iressure system.
4. It: is at~ttici_l,atefl that where chf3rnicals or cont.~rni.n-rt.f~d l i.~lr.~i_c3~. ~~rf~
being introf~ue~f~d into the 1?rocfass f whether for. ciistruct: i arl,
neut.rali.zafiifan or u,e as process reagents, contai_nmr~tt!: C~3I11Cr; c,r of i~~~r
acc~ljtable tilethods are u9ed~
5. I-,icluicl di_sch~~t:ffti from tlrc~ HYDRU1~lEX System is pnr~t c>~ t11F, l~r.,_,c~r~~;~:,
These li_fluicls a2°e recirculatfad directly back ir~.t.-o rt?.e r.-coact i.c~n }Ir7lrli_rlt;
tanks for rf~use
~ T,~1Rr,Y 1_,~,~-
I,ARRY LEAF 1'R F; S I. [ ! 1I'J T
PRESIDENT CSI-y1~~~~~~~ THE k:NVIE:U[~dr1F')`J"I'/1t. C~[',t_~!'1'
Phone: (808)637-19~
Fax: (sosiss~-195 ~ ~1UTHUR 17 Ell I~IYDRUr1-E;X l:F'F~E; F ~1;[1~C11~1. t~' i~:
~,r,vn,mntlGroupC?~aol.corr. Since ]?3
`vVn~il Ave. ~1j3R l06 H~~:,lulu, HI >jr id USA ,
35U Ward Avectt~C • St~lte 106 l-~otaolul~t, I-€I, USA 9b~14 • Tel: l (~(k4) 591-77~z F'~.x:1(~)~) 5~~ .1)e~,ic
.
HYDROMEX 50 TON WASTE SYS'I'liM
OPERATIONS PERSOIdfdf~L PER 8 HOUR SIIII~"C
I. 1- SUPERVISOR: TRAIIJh,D IN ALL ASPECTS OF 'I'II1; HYI)ROf'?(;X SY`;'i'~i~1
OPEKATION ANll CAPABT,E OF MANAGING 7'H E, f'i?P11,L,},'1'E OPFRA`i'(nl~l.
ALSO RESPONSIBLE E'OR MIXING ~'ORMUI,AE ANI) ~'(ih9E'U'['FR 1,I'i'E?R~l~l'R
INCI~UI)ING OIJALITY CON'T'ROL 'T'ESTING AI~II~ REPORT`,.
II 7.- IIYDROPIEX E~UIPf1ENT OPERATORS: CAFABI,E OF' OF'C;RA'I'.ING 11LL
COMPONENTS OF `PHE IIYI)ROMEX SYS'PEM INCLUUII~G ROUTINf~~
PREVI?NTATIVia AND CORRECTIVE PIAINTENANCE. SHO!I[~D BR
[~9ECHANIGALLY INCLINC,D AND ABLE 'I'O 6~I~)RY Oid IIF~AVY !?(,)UII'!IF'I~I'i'
WI'.T'H TOOLS AN[) MONI'I'ORI[dG DEVICE
III EQUIPPIEPIT OPERATORS: TRAINED AND ABLE 'I'0 OPP,RT:TR 71NI) REP?1iR
FORKLiF'I'S AND FRONT EfJD LOADERS. OTHER T)U7'IES (^IUUL~f? Ifd~,I,UI~I?
INPU'P E'EF;DSTOCK INSPF,C`I'ION AND COPI`I'ROG A hJF~,I,L A:~ T~T~,Ii'C
SUPPORT DUTIES TO THE HYDROMFX EQUIPNIE'fd`I' OPERATORS.
IV 7_-C~,EPIERAL f'IA'TERIAL HANDLERS: C.'APABLE OP' hlfiA~'SEf;R1.1? (~i~'
INCOMING MATRRIAI,S E'OR RECYCLE PRIOR 'l'U HYDROf1l;,~ SIiRh;l?U119~;.
ABLE TO USE Sh1ALL 'I'Oi)LS Aldl) FOWER SAb~S, h" 1`(,'. ALSf1 (~;R[~II'I?'11~
OUI:,GAI~L HEl,PIR"..
NO'T'E: `I'}IE 'I'O'PAL FEISONIIEL f'OI~ EACH 3 HUUR SIII["i' ;~I{r_~[JLU I'i'
A'1' LEAST 7 PEOPLE UR 14 S'I'AF'F FOR TtdO SIIIF~1'S 'I'0 PR~I~UCF, 11U>>
PKOCESS APROX. 100 TOPIS OE 6dASTE F'ER I.)AY...
i
Daily grlitinn: pa^ifir,.hrerrRal rncn ~ + ~ ?
±r.
_ _ i
}
~ { {
~ ~ :
{
f
c. : ~ 1t k
I IOllOll.[yl_[ W~'l~l1S ~ :~Y~` ~ R ~ ~
l~i~ol~c~sal to [~~al~~
'
3x~ 4
I~roc~ucts ot_~t c~f~ ,
} k'
i.;: ;
Is~[1~~~[l~ [llat~°r[<~l % ter, - . 'h~
A vk,
#
8y Prahha tiatnraJart ~ ~'s{{~~•.,,
Ituildirt wrrurf lrin!; vnu rate (inm all: r,~;d ~ x ~
wwstr is I arty LcaF's rtr,•am. ~
'4;: .
Icaf.l+residrnt of Ilrr P.nvironmrnlal ~
Croup, wants to ctruelop a six-month pilot '
prog~~am to make products out of In, .tfill
material. Ile subrnittrd a propord to the cntd- .
mnntcnlal dit~sion of the City and Count}' of '
I Innoluht to that cfTect [ iu• idea is to use ash ~
from the city's II PO~4Elt waste-to-energy ~ ~ > , ;•fi; '
' ~
facility, plus residues and ether waste from
Ilawaii 111e[al Rccyding that now ends up in ti<
landfills to make cnnslructinn and building ~ 4~
materials such as Inmher, fire-retardant ,aa< ~.y
hoaulc, cinder hlncks, freer palls, even rail- i~
ttav lice ~
he city and county will generate a gross ~
pmlit of $(i3 per ton and f1.6 million per year, { _
1.vaf r,linuiles. ~
I,caf would set up the eyuipment, preferably a,,.i , <i:
at Carnpbell Industrial Park area. to operate
} rr, f~
eight hours a day and process 5fl tans of waste.
Alter the pilot period, the city will have the ~
opl.ion to purchase the equipment. Leaf would {
then he able to lease the equipment from the ~ { r
city and county and become an operator. '
The eyuipment costs $4 million and is avail- ~ ~
ah!e from Hydromex, a Palm Springs, Calif.-
based company that developed the processing s ~ ~ ~ £
of binding liquid and solid waste. 3 ~ ~ `
Leaf describes the a ui meet as "an Indus- ~ ~ '
q P
trial sine pasta machine for waste" yy
~i.
The process begins with dumping solid waste '
- s sh and landfill material ---into the machine w y. •
with a binding liquid. A plate then delineates
shapes and dimensions as the machine
• squeezes out the product which has no odoz
The Environmental Cmup plans to charge Larry Leaf shr>urs laniifill tvzv.te matte into a fireproof k:oard.
i1 Power and othees a fee of $70 per ton for
processing the waste. Recyclers at present pay restaurants and groceries as a liquid hinder in his comp:nr: 1 he at',rnt, rthnrn I r~l ~ ~-iii t
a discounted rate of $36 a ton, 50 percent Tess the process, saying this will reduce chemical iclvntifi', t.nnld bray the r,pripmcnr h I h,
than regular price, to dump a ton of waste at expenses for the company F•.nvinnunrntal (irony and Icn~~ if to t t.. ' t
the landfill. llawaii Metal Recycling says it The Environmental Croup has begun ergo- "ft's the r•nd of the landfill ern as v • ~ ii
can't afford the city :t fees and wants with- nations with possible clients for the produrls, hufay," Leaf says.
drawn) of the tip tees. including a railroad and several snwmiks on
T'he money would go to operational expens- the mainland. fir•rrclr Frahlra fVatnP2s?n he r-rn,il ,.r
Fs and add to the bottom line, Leaf says. Leaf met several weeks ago with a Ira~ing rrrntarajnn(~ hi: jnrrnralcr ern nr J•r /•h, ~r
I{e also proposes using the wet waste from agent interested in working with the city and 955-F.(}Jf.