Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0019.045 2002-200401/07/2003 14:36 8089677581 MORRISON ARCHITECT PAGE 01 VOLCANO - HAWAII - 96785-0131 Telephone (808)967-7512 FAX (808)967-7581 E- m a l l b o o n e 0 a l o h a. n• t 7 January, 2003 Hawaii County Council County Building, Hilo Ladies & Gentlemen of the Council: I am writing to oppose the above noted application for a number of reasons that relate directly to Volcano Village, but also to many of our small communities on Hawaii Island. The State of Hawaii "Volcano Historic Building Inventory" (1993), an official document of the State Historic Preservation Division of DLNR, has identified more than 130 qualifying buildings in the community - the highest percentage of any jurisdiction in Hawaii. From this one can see that the historic character of the Village is largely intact and is therefore worthy of serious consideration for overall preservation by some means. A structure such as is proposed by Mr. Thomas will severely impact this historic character, as well as not being compliant with current County of Hawaii Planning Code provisions. Warehousing in CV districts Is not permitted under this Code and the proposed use for the structure will not meet the Code requirements. Comm. No. • •'i 5 File No. Ref. To: 0 Ref. D`W-J-JAN 0 8 2003 _ 01/07/2003 14:36 8089677581 MORRISON ARCHITECT PAGE 02 The scale (size) and character (design) of buildings can be either a significant contribution to the overall character of the Village, or can be a severe detriment. The commercial area on Highway #11 outside of Hilo is perhaps an excellent example of the negative impact such structures to our community. As the Council has heard, there are no objections to the provision for the retailing of the proposed products in the Village - it is a needed and anticipated element which the community needs. However, warehousing at the scale proposed simply is not in character with the overall Village, particularly when it is located on the main road along which many of our historic properties are located. The commercial needs can well be served with a far less Intrusive facility. The Council carries a significant responsibility for the preservation of the rural character of our island and the built environment is perhaps the most important consideration involved. Once one inappropriate structure is in place, little can be done to mitigate it - just as the demolition of a valued historic property cannot be undone. Decisions made now will effect the future of Volcano Village for years to come and 1 urge the Council to look far beyond the immediate application to judge the long term effects which will be the result of such decisions. As a 30 year resident of volcano Village, and as an Architect working State-wide in historic restoration, l am deeply concerned that this seemingly small decision could destroy the character of one of our Island's unique communities. Please, consider this carefully. nn0gRs Aloha 1_� C? I I W" StIONAL No. 6 Boon orrison y�wAn, v5 Architect