Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> FROM :DR ROGER 8 LYDIR WEISS FRX N0. :8083252299 May. 21 2003 03:34PM P 1 <br /> ~x ~~~-s"~~7 <br /> ~ger~I.4Nerss, PFi.D. o <br /> PSYCHpLOGIST <br /> PERSpNAL COUNSI~.,ING & BUSINESS CONSULTING QC~ ~ ~ <br /> ?0. BOX3178 ?(Qifzwxynar7fawaii96745 Z ~ ro ^'TI <br /> Z ca •'7 <br /> a~rd~~d'orca[~gistervf Ojfiec l~l~ <br /> 7fealtk Sero+cc Xravirfirs in 9's~kofogy ~ax(8A8)325--2299 7fomc (de8)~~,~> C~J <br /> ~-c fV <br /> Councilman Curtis 2yler V ' Z (ro 3 ~ ~ <br /> Dear Curt, <br /> We have taken a look at Section 19-59 regarding Native forest dedications, <br /> and I have spoken to Wes Takai for clarity. <br /> It resolves the vld problem and makes forestry dedications "run with the <br /> land", and yet for people who have just S acres, like my in-laws who have <br /> been in the Forest Stewardship Program and have dedicated to forestry, it <br /> might disallow them as the current reading in (b) (l) A states: <br /> ...which is covered with at least five intact and contiguous acres of native <br /> forest * is eligible for dedication... <br /> We propose inserting at the * "excepting a homesite of up to X/4 acre:' <br /> Additionally, in the current ordinance, 20 acre parcels that have been <br /> subdivided into 5 acre parcels have already committed the new owners to <br /> keep their forestry agreements for the purpose of watershed and ecosystem. <br /> This insertion would be fair and appropriate to the commitment that these <br /> members of our community already have. <br /> Would you please make this insertion which we believe will be beneficial to <br /> the forest and to our community. <br /> Mahalo nui loa for all your many efforts, <br /> 'ef'~° , <br /> Ro r A. Weiss Lydi A. Weiss <br /> Comm. No. <br /> Ref. To: <br /> Ref. Date gip' <br /> ~v~_,r.,.=--~ <br /> <br />