HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0404.001 2002-2004 I' i'1
io,.
r.,.'
State Planning and Research (SPIt) Prol;ram .'i
Proposed Worl: Ilan Norm
Giscal Ycar ZOO.i, Pcdcral-,lid Projcct Ne. SPIT-0010(2.5) .i'
1. Item & .AL'encv
~4orh Item: I-HC-4.D3: Puna Regional Circulation Plan (Amendment#1)
:1,,cut:v: Planning Department, County of Hawari
(_'oortiinalor. Roy Takemoto Phone No.: (808)961-8288
Priaition Deputy Director fax No.: (608)961-874?
IL ~~'nrk 1[em Information
4. Objectives:
To develop along-range regional circulation plan for the Puna area on the island of Hawaii. This
regional circulation plan will identify future County arterial and collector road corridors to mitigate
present deficiencies and to serve future regianal land transportation demand needs based on the
approved Hawaii Long Range Land Transportation Plan, General Plan land use and adopted
County zoning designations. The plan wrll include recommendations to adopt an official roadway
map or other implementation options to respond to proposed projects that may be impacted by
proposed corridors. The corndor locations and widths will consider multi-modal options.
B. Description (scope of work to accomplish oh.jeetive):
The Hawaii Long-Range Land Transportation Plan (HLRLTP) is an island-wide intermodal plan.
Similar to the Keahole to Honaunau Regional Circulation Plan funded by SPR, this project will focus
on the HLRLTP's highway recommendations within another particularly problematic region, the fast-
growing Puna area. The planning will consider alternatives to acwrnmodate multi-modal options
within the corridors. The HLRLTP recommendations are very generalized. This regional plan will
analyze in more detail the circulation of this region and identify corridors in sufficient detail to enable
improved coordination with land use rezoning and subdivision approvals, as well as improved
programming in the County's CIP. The regional plan will verify the underlying assumptions used in
the HLRLTP and General Plan. Where there are reasons to modify the HLRLTP or General Plan
alignments, these deviations will be highlighted and explained. The plan will include a map showing
the proposed corridors, tax parcels, proposed development projects, zoning, and general plan
designations. Based on the findings of the plan regarding implrmentahon options, this plan or
cornponenls of the plan (e.g., roadway map) maybe officially arlopled by the County to provide legal
"teeth". Public involvement will be coordinated through nteetinys with special interest groups (e.g.,
affected landowners, community and environmental groups) and general public meetings. The
analytical methods and public involvement program will comply with Title VI and Environmental
Justice requirements.
C. Project ,fustilieation (reason and need for project, cite rc,adatory requirenrcnts):
For certain regions with high development potential an intermetliale planning level is necessary to
bridge the generalised planning framework of the HLRLTP and Ilse more deladed highway design
phases. This intermediate level of detail enables the legal establishment of proposed arterial and
collector corridors in the face of ongoing development so that a continuous and feasible corridor is
available when CIP funds are allotted to design and construct a project
l>. Previous Dion-going wurl<, related to wort.` item:
None_ Comm. No.
Ref. To:
Ref. Date
1
P Y ?0113 SYK Program, Arncndnienr I
:Apps m~rd fi~ tllAv.q 12%;0
111. ~Vorl: Item'1'asks and tichedulc
('ornplcto the li~llowing table for the work items by listine nll the expeclud tasks, products, mid
expected cornplition dates.
Cnpectetl
~ ~ C'omplctionl
Task ~ Daic
.'~~u. '1'aslcs Ucsrripliou . „ 1'rorinclx (Dl o/_Yr)
_ _ _
r 1 Develop_wnrkplan. WorkPlan. 10/02
2 Select ronsuitant. Consultant 3103
I.._ - - - -
_ contract. _
3 Collect data and prepare base map. Maps and 6/03
preliminary
_ _ _ findinJL_
_ 4_ Solicit public input. - Public meetir~#1_ 6/03_ _
5 Develop rerommendatlons re: corridors and Draft report 8/03
implementation.
6 Review by agencies and public. Public meeti_
n~_1t2 9103
_ 7 Refine recommendations. _ Final report- 12/03
1~'. ISudoct 13rcakdnwn for Fiscal Year
A. labor pxpcnditures:
Laeox rurvulNCSOUxcx _
I asL AJtlitivu 1'OTAt Fcdcr rl ~'on-
~nf+) I Poulton/Agcury Ilrs 12034'%,) ---CUSP SI'x _ Olhcr F_cdcral
2, 3 5, 7Civil Cnr incurs 100
_ _ _..$330 $330y
1 6 Deputy Du 152 - - 6.85. ~ ~ g
y
_ 53
1 7 it 7 ~ 3,59 --~3,J97
-
1 / DMD ~ 126 ~ 964 - 5 96
2 7 EM-5 130 4,577 4 57
i CIS 4 _ _ 1 04 _ . _ - 1 04
3 7 tanner 17 181
2 81
1, 1 5 7~Transrt (FM 31_, 44 ~ 197 - 192
_ - _ -
I07 AL l A13O1t I ?t;PF;NUI'1'11RF.R $30 062 $3QOH2
f3. Non-Labor 1{xpendiUn~es, excluding contract services culls:
i ~ - FUNDING SO1 xC):
'I'u.k--~ '1'07-AI, FeJeral gnu-~
Ucsrtiption lSpecily) COST I til'R $ p!h[r~ F'cde_r:d
'TOTAL NO\-LABU12 F;XI'H:NllI't'URF~ $0 _ 5t~- _ ~ _ -
I~Y 2003 SPIT I'r a;lam, ~Amcndntrnt"I
.'~ppravcd by I~L114'A 12777
(bnlrac[ ticrviccs Gxccuta] (The total contract cost is rcllcctcA 11 contract exccotion):
_ I I~NUINf S(1l!_RCk
I:u6 I U I AI. 1 rderal ~ Nun
~u(i) Cu~drai l(~l Uiviriphun (Spccit~) (l>ti'1' tiPR Othu 1'uleral
3 Plannm~lEnginE e.nng C onstlhnt $120,U00' $72U 000 ~ $120,00
j IO"I'AI 'SON L:VSORFNI'FNDITURES
V. Overall Ruc1~M
TOTAL Federal
F~~ ('USF ti_I'Ii _ Other (.ppccil~) Other (spocif'v) _ _ Non- Federal
2003 $1 i0,OR2 $120,000 ~ $30,Of32
TOTAI, $1!i008" $120,00 - $30 Df1
3
FY 3(10± SPIZ Pnq[ra m..4 mrudnn~nl I
Ahltt'iivgd b} I'I I~I'~A I "'pi