Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0400.013 2002-2004 DEC-19-2003 10 56 CYRNOTECH/NL"fREri E08 329 3597 P.03/03 REt. i'~iE_(J Below are the many reasons as to why I Ern opposing the Oama~valoorr~nt: (not in any particular order) ttJJ[C~h 11 PIS 3 22 1. Loss of quality open shoreline sparx in Kona for residents to er~T' " ~ ~'+~'~/f1!I 2. Decline of tourism dUe to overdevelopment; visitors corns here for tropical paradise experiences, not for resorts arxi shapping. s. increase of uaiiic on ar7 aire;~ty par~i'sy~ea road system 4. Loss of view planes, decrea:~ed value~.s Uf mauka ~~ropertles 5. Desecration of Hawaii's cufir3ral assets • 6. Ocean, air, and noise polla~tian 7. Proximity to the Kona Intem:artaonal Adrport 8. Overall community oppositio n (t per..onally do not know anyone who is happy with higfti-end develoi~ment in Kona) 9. Rich developers becoming richer at tt?e expense of all HawaiPs residents , t 0. For those of us who moved ~ihe Thp Big Island from mainland cities - we moved here do get away fi orn concrete, traffic, crowds. We came here for wirri haairty, nr~en Sr~aCp, and elhnw room, Many of ~ will move from this . ishand in search for #hese needs. Please do not take these needs from any of us, local or transplant. Mahalo for your conside~tion and tiros. Nicholls Davis Kealakekua, Hawaii Comm. No. 00, Ref. To: C~ i flb'i~N{~ .U ` -~1N(lOJ Ref. Date i'"_r ~~iil0~ Sz 1Z Wta 6T X30 E0. Piz