The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCOM 0455.004 2002-2004 April 19, 2004 RE: LEHUA LANI LLC Puapua'a 2^tl ,North Kona, Hawaii TMK: (3) 7-5-20: 71 ~ 72 O r. Special Management Area Use Permff and = r' County Rezoning (A-5o TO RS-7.5) cY~ Dear County Council Commfftee on Planning and Chairman Elarlonoff, - 0 Please be responsible. Do not approve this project for the following reasons: 1) MORE DEVELOPMENT ON ALII DRIVE MEANS MORE CARS AND MORE CARS MEANS THAT PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS WILL BE AT A GREATER RISK OF BEING KILLED. 58 more homes mean an oddfHonal 116 cars (2 cars per household) and an additional 693 trips (116 can ~ b Mps per day) along AIB Dfire. More development always means more can and more can on ABi Drive means that pedesMans and bicyclists are at a greater risk of being killed. We had a recent pedestrian death this year and several pedesfrian deaths over the last several yeah on Altf Drive all because of vehicles. Enough afready! 2) LUNAPULE ROAD AND ROYAL POINCIANA DRIVE ARE ALREADY OVERBURDENED WITH TRAFFIC. When the council voted to close off a very important mauka makai route through Kahakai Estates back in December 1998 they failed to inform the 100 people who aHended the hearing that they had already approved several supersized condominium protects along Alii Drive which sprung up soon after. Traffic from these projects continues to heavily impact both Lunapule and Royai Poinciana today. Both old roads were not buiff to handle the 5000 plus vpd that travel them. Lunapule doesn't even have shoulders for pedesMans and residents on both roads have a difflcuff time extffng from their driveways due to the increased Taffc. Allowing more development along Alii Drive pours even more frafflc onto Lunapule and Royal Poinciana. Be responsible. Do not approve this project. 3) THE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS CREATED BY THIS PROJECT ARE MUCH MORE SERIOUS THAN THE ONES CREATED BY THE NANI KONA AINA PROJECT. This means that ff you are going to vote against approving Nani Kona Aina then you must do the same for Lehua Lani. It is the responsible thing to do at this time. S~in/cerelyJJ, /7Gtiu~~'l~i i~~~ ~Gaw~ka~ ~.oc,~~ ~-(~r-2on Signature Print Name Date rya Rw~l i~o~~c?arw K- Kcm~ ~ie~l4-o Address Comm. No. SS. Ref. To: Ref. Uate April 19, 2004 RE: LEHUA LANI LLC Puapua'a 2"d ,North Kona, HawaPi TMK: (3) 7-5-20: 71 ~ 72 7 Special Management Area Use Permff "n and County Rezoning (A-5a TO RS-7.5) T' Dear County Council Committee on Planning and Chairman Elarionott, _r_ Please be res onstble. Do not a p pprove this project for the following reasons: 1) MORE DEVELOPMENT ON ALIT DRIVE MEANS MORE CARS AND MORE CARS MEANS THAT PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS WILL BE AT A GREATER RISK OF BEING KILLED. 58 more homes mean an addffional 116 can (2 cars per household) and an addffional 693 Mps (116 cars ~ 6 trips per day) along AIB Drive. More development always means more cars and more cars on AIB Drive means that pedesMans and bicyclists are at a greater risk of being killed. We had a recent pedesMan death this year and several pedestrian deaths over the last several years on AIB Drive all because ~ vehicles. Enough already! 2) LUNAPULE ROAD AND ROYAL POINCIANA DRIVE ARE ALREADY OVERBURDENED WITH TRAFFIC, When the council voted to close off a very important mauka makai route through Kahakai Estates back in December 1998 they failed to Inform the 100 people who attended the hearing that they had already approved several supersized condominium projects along Alll Drive which sprung up soon after. Traffic from these projects continues to heavily impact both Lunapule and Royal Poinciana today. Both old roads were not buiff to hondle the 5000 plus vpd that travel them. Lunapule doesn't even have shoulders for pedestrians and residents on both roads have a dffflcuff time exffing from their driveways due to the increased traffic. Allowing more development along Alii Drive pours even more traffic onto Lunapule and Royal Poinciana. Be responsible. Do not approve this project. 3) THE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS CREATED BY THIS PROJECT ARE MUCH MORE SERIOUS THAN THE ONES CREATED BY THE NANI KONA AINA PROJECT. This means that ff you are going to vote against approving Nan( Kona Aina then you must do the same for Lehua Lani. It is the responsible thing to do at this time. Sincerely, A I LUG~n0. ~~s~~,r~e«,1~ ~~'db0'-~ Sig ature Print Name Dale '~tQ-(o1~3 Le~,ua. Rd. Ka,,lu~-Ktmo- ~4l gb'i~}o Address Apri119, 2004 RE: LEHUA LANI LLC Puapua'a 2^a ,North Kona, Howai't TMK: (3) 7-5-20: 71 >4 72 O ~ ~ - Special Management Area Use Permff - and -r County Rezoning (A-5a TO RSJ.S) cn Dear County Council Committee on Planning and Chairman Elarionoff, ~ Please be responsible. Do not approve this project for the following reasons: 1) MORE DEVELOPMENT ON ALII DRIVE MEANS MORE CARS AND MORE CARSiMEANS THAT PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS WILL BE AT A GREATER RISK Of BEING KILLEDf 58 more homes mean an addtional 116 cars (2 cars per household) and Ian additional 693 trips (116 cars ~ 6 Mps per day) along AIO Drive. More deveopment alw ys means more cars and more cars on Atli Drive means that pedesMans and bicydtsts a~ at a greater risk of being killed. We had a recent pedesMan death this year and several edestrtan deaths over the last several years on AIB Drive ail because of vehicles. Enough already! 2) LUNAPULE ROAD AND ROYAL POINCIANA DRIVE ARE ALREADY OVERBURDENED WITH T AFF When the council voted to close off a very important mavka makai route through Kahakai Estates back in December 1998 they failed to inform the 100 people who ftended the hearing that they had already approved several supersized condominiu projects along Alit Drive which sprung up soon offer. Traffic from these projects continu to heavily impact both Lunapule and Royal Poinciana today. Both old roads were of bulff to handle the 5000 plus vpd that travel them. Lunapule doesn't even have should s for pedestrians and residents on both roads have a dffflcuff time exfftng from their drivew ys due to the Increased traffic. Allowing more development along ABi Drive pours eve more traffic onto Lunapule and Royal Poinciana. Be responsible. Do not approve this prof ct. 3) THE TRAFFI PROBLEMS CRE TED BY THIS PROJE T ARE MUC M RE ERI S T AN THE ONES CREATED BY THE NANI KONA AINA PROJECT. This means that ff you are g ng to vote against approving Nani Kona Atna then you must do the same for lehua ani. It is the responsible thing to do at this ffme. Sincerely, I! ~i ~aS ~ L~'~U~? - SI ure Print ome t\~\ I Dale 4 \ , Address April 19, 2004 RE: LEHUA LANI LLC Puapua'a 2'b ,North Kona, Hawaii TMK: (3) 7-5-20: 71 ft 72 ~7 Special Management Area Use Permff C T; and _ County Rezoning (A-5a TO RS-7.5) Dear County Council Commfftee on Planning and Chairman Etarionoff, Please do not approve this project for the following reasons: 1) MORE DEVELOPMENT ON ALIT DRIVE MEANS MORE CARS AND MORE CARS MEANS THAT PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS WILL BE AT A GREATER RISK OF BEING KILIED. 58 more homes mean an addlHonal 116 cars (2 cars per household) and'I an additional 693 Mps (116 cars ~ 6 trips per day) along AIR Drive. More devebpment alw~ys means more cars and more cars on AIR Drive means that pedesMans and bicyclists a fe at a greater risk of being killed. We already had a recent pedesMan death this year and several pedeshian deaths over the last several years on Alii Drive all caused by Wehicles. Enough already! 2) LUNAPULE ROAD AND ROYAL POINCIANA DRIVE ARE ALREADY OVERBURDENED WITH TRAFFIC. When the council voted to close off a very important mauka makai routs through Kahakai Estates back in December 1998 they failed to inform the 100 people who; attended the hearing that they had already approved several supersized condominiul`n projects along Alii Drive which sprung up soon after. Traffic from these projects continu@s to heavily impact both Lunapule and Royal Poinciana today. Both old roads were shot buiff to handle the 5000 plus vpd that hovel them. Lunapule dcesn'i even have shouldelrs for pedeshfans and residents on both roads have a difflcuff time exffing from their ddvev~ays due to the increased hafRc. Allowing more development abng Alii Ddve means further abuse for Lunapule and Royal Poinciana. Please do the responsible thing and stop the abuse now! 3) THE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS CREATED BY THIS PROJECT ARE MUCH MORE SERIOUS THAN THE ONES CREATED BY THE NANI KONA AINA PROJECT. This means that ff you are going fo vote against approving Nanl Kona Aina then you must do the same for Lehua'Lani. It is the responsible thing to do at this time. Sincerely, l .,e.n I. ~~v~ t ~ ouch-~~ ~Iq~ Signature Print Name Date Address April 19, 2004 RE: LEHUA IANI LLC Puapua'a 2^d ,North Kona, Hawaii TMK: (3) 7-5-20: 71 >L 72 r.~ , Special Management Area Use Permff~' ~7 and ~ n ~ rl County Rezoning (A-Sa TO RS-7.5) c fV f~? Dear County Council Committee on Planning and Chairman Eladonoff, n Please be responsible. Do not approve this project for the following reasons: ~ _.s o 1) MORE DEVELOPMENT ON ALIT DRIVE MEANS MORE CARS AND MORE CARS MEANS THAT PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS WILL BE AT A GREATER RISK OF BEING KILLED. 58 more homes mean an additional 116 can (2 cars per household) and an additional 693 trips (116 can d~ 6 Mps per day) along AIR Drive. More development always means more cars and more can on ARi Drive means that pedesMans and bicyclists are at a greater risk of being killed. We had a recent pedestrian death this year and several pedestrian deaths over the last several years on AIR Drive all because of vehicles. Enough aheady! 2) LUNAPULE ROAD AND ROYAL POINCIANA DRIVE ARE ALREADY OVERBURDENED WITH TRAFFIC. When the council voted to close off a very important mauka makai route through Kahakai Estates back In December 1998 they failed to inform the 100 people who attended the hearing that they had already approved several supersized condominium projects along AIR Drive which sprung up soon offer. Traffic from these projects continues to heavily impact both Lunapule and Royal Poinciana today. Both old roads were not built to handle the 5000 plus vpd that hovel them. Lunapule doesn't even have shoulders for pedestrians and residents on both roads have a dffftcuff time exffing from their driveways due to the increased haffic. Allowing more development along AIR Drive pours even more traffic onto Lunapule and Royai Poinciana. Be responsible. Do not approve this project. 3) THE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS CREATED BY THIS PROJECT ARE MUCH MORE SERIOUS THAN THE ONES CREATED BY THE NANI KONA AINA PROJECT. This means that ff you are going to vote against approving Nani Kona Aina then you must do the same for Lehua loot. It is the responsible thing to do at this time. Sincerely, Sig ature Print Name Date Address