Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0595.002 2002-2004 AFR-30-209G FRi 04.38 FM CofN County Clark Office FAQ: N0. P~08 961 8812 P. 01 A1-R-29-2~4 m'o 749 PM P. LAWRENCE CONTRACTING 808 963 E112 61 ~~~1...~ ~'i i._'_1 lC'uy FiPfi i?9 P(7 3 0; Phyllis Lawrence ,C,~ f P. Q. Box 31 CC7UIV~1 ~ . Fl~i;'.,N,^;i [-1Or10mu, [~aWa1i 96728 March 21, 2004 Qr. Fred I-Iplschuh ~ 1-lawaii County Council 2S Aupuni Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 bear br. Holschuh, 's'hank you for returning my phone calf on Friday. As discussed, 1 am concerned about the increased Property 7'sx Assessments. My property TMl{ 2-8-015-024-000 was assessed ,it $$3,600 last year, Which was my purchase price, This year it is assessed at $131,000. Based on the current tax unit $9.85 per $1000, value, my tax will increase from 823.46 to 1290.35. This for a 6 acre pazcel that is being fenced for cattle. This does not include my house lot. When ]called the Property Tax Office, Y was informed that the assessment increase is based upon property sales in the area the past year. We should not be taxed because someone else sold their property or built a milllott • dollar home in our area. Tax them. This is agriculture land. In July 2002 we bought our propertg• (adjacent to our home) from a Realty Company, who months earlier purchased large pazcels from C. 9rewer who is selling their land holdings. nn that issue [feel the Council should investigate means of taxing the people who are buying and selling "to make a buck" (speculation buyers? than to tax local people who are trying to make a living on their land, phis practice, if enntinued, will be taxing family fanners out of businesv and/ or out of their homes, This will also hinder young people from purchasing Property in punning a fi,ture for themselves and their children. Comm. No.Jrq ' Z Ref. To: Pre77e~tsd Ref. Date M~ AY,.,d 9~Od--