Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 252 Draft 01 2002-2004 COUNTY O~ I-IAWAI`I STATE OF IIAVVAI`I IaESOLUTION NO. ~ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CORPORATION COUNSEL, AND HIS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES, TO ENTER 1NT0 AN AGREEMENT WITH THE INDIVIDUALLY NAMED PARTY, WHO IS AN EMPLOYEE OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII, TO REPRESENT HIM IN THE CIVIL ACTION ENTITLED KEALOHA M.J. WELLS, ET AL., v. LT. ROBERT HICKCOX, ET AL., CIVIL NO. 02-1-0149K WHEREAS, Officer Wayne T. Mittunaga (hereinafter referred to as "Officer Mitsunaga") is being sued in the case entitled Kealoha M. J. Wells, et al. v. Mark Farias, et al., Civil No. 02-1-0149K; and WHEREAS, Officer Mitsunaga is being sued in both his official and individual capacities; and WHEREAS, on September 10, 2004, the Hawaii County Police Commission found whatever involvement Officer Mitsunaga might have had in this matter was also done in the performance of the officer's duty as a police officer, pursuant to Sections 52D-8 and 52D-9, Hawaii Revised Statutes, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Office of the Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of the State of I-Iawai`i has rendered the opinion that representation by one attorney of multiple parties in such actions is improper unless those parties waive the potential conflicts involved or unless the governmental entity agrees to indemnify all the individual parties for all damages, including punitive damages; and WHEREAS, the Council of the County of Hawaii finds that the acts alleged in the complaint, if occurred, were done in good faith and the probability of punitive damages being adjudged is small; and WHEREAS, the Council of the County of Hawai°i finds that the payment of punitive damages serves a public purpose because it encourages public service, minimizes the costs of hiring a cadre of attorneys for the County of Hawai°i, Lt. Robert Hickcox, Det. Mark Farias and Officer Mitsunaga, and assures that a plaintiff can collect on his or her judgment, if any; and WHEREAS, the Council of the County of Hawai°i further finds that for this reason, it is in the public interest to indemnify the individually named defendant, that is, Officer Mitsunaga, in this action for all damages that may be assessed, including punitive damages, so that the Corporation Counsel, and his authorized representatives, can represent the individually named party, that is, Officer Mitsunaga, who is an employee of the County of Hawai°i; and WHEREAS, the representation by the Corporation Counsel, and his authorized representatives, of such individually named party, that is, Officer Mittunaga, is not an admission of liability by the Council of the County of Hawai°i. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII, that the Corporation Counsel, and his authorized representatives, are authorized to enter into an agreement with the individually named party, that is, Officer Mitsunaga, who is an employee of the County of Hawaii, to carry out the purpose of this resolution, to be executed and provided by law. -2- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the County of Hawaii is authorized to sign the above-noted agreement on behalf of the County of Hawaii pursuant to the Hawaii County Charter. Dated at Hilo, Hawaii, this 20th day of October, 2004. INTRODUCED BY: COUNCIL MEMBER, C TY OF HAWAII COUNTY COUNCIL ROLL CALL VOTE County of Hawaii Hilo, Hawaii AYES NOES ABS EX ARAKAKI X 1 hereby certify that the foregoing RESOLUTION was by CHUNG the vote indicated to the right hereof adopted by the ELARIONOFF COUNCIL of the County of Hawai` i on October 2 0 , 2 0 0 4 HoLSCxuH ATTEST: JACOBSON X REYNOLDS X SAFARIK TULANG X TYLER X 5 2 2 0 G~~~~ ~'I•~l~c ~ ~ Reference C-36.6/Waived FC COUNTY CLERK CHAIRMAN & PRESIDING OFFICER RESOLUTION NO. ~ ~