Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0846.000 2002-2004 J~~Y^0! N,!L LENINGRAD ELARIONOFF°',~~, PHONE: 961-8265 Councilmember FAX: 961-8912 r +~E'OF MF'~ OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNCIL. County of Hawaii Hawaii County Building 25 Aupuni Street Hilo, Ilawaii 96720 r October 29, 2004 MEMORANDUM TO: James Y. Arakaki and Council Members FROM: Lenin a El rnivo-~, ~ air Planning Commitee SUBJECT: A Resolution Requesting the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaili to Render an Expedited Decision in the Appeal of Civil No. 00-1-0192K, Walter John Kelly et. aL vs. 1250 Oceanside Partners et al. Attached please find a Resolution Requesting the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii to Render an Expedited Decision in the Appeal of Civil No. 00-1-0192K, Walter John Kelly et. al. vs. 1250 Oceanside Partners et. al. The intent of this resolution is to express the Council's interest in a prompt, clear, conclusive and conciliatory resolution to this very significant lawsuit. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. LE/rf Attachment < Rps. 2(09-v q DISTRICT 9 Comm. NO. Waimea, Kohala, Kawaihae, Waikoloa, Puako Ref. To: Hawaii County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer Ref. D ate NOV I 7M vv w LENINGRAD ELARIONOFF ' PHONE: 961-8265 Councilmember v~ l FAX: 961-8912 1 O OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNCIL County of Hawaii Hawaii County Building 15 Aupuni Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 November 1, 2004 MEMORANDUM TO: James Y. Arakaki and Council Members FROM: Leningrad Elarionoff, Chair Planning Commitee SUBJECT: Request to Waive A Resolution Requesting the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii to Render an Expedited Decision in the Appeal of Civil No. 00-1-01921-, Walter John Kelly et. al. vs. 1250 Oceanside Partners et. al. Pursuant to Section I(g) of Rule 4 of the Procedure of the Council of the County of Hawaii, I request your support for waiver of this matter in order that the Council's action, if favorable, may be forwarded to the Hawaii Supreme Court in tandem with other amicus briefs and filings associated with the appeal discussed in this resolution. It is therefore advantageous that approval is granted and the matter placed onto the next Council agenda (November 10, 2004) for review. However, in the event this request is denied, for whatever reason, I understand the matter shall be referred to the Planning Committee for placement on its future agenda. Sincerely, L L in ad El not , hair Planning Committee =County o Disapproved/Date/Refer to PC: James Y. Arakaki, Chair Hawaii County Council LE/rf Attachments DISTRICT 9 Waimea, Kohala, Kawaihae, Waikoloa, Puako Hawaii County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer