Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0106.040 2004-2006 Page 1 of 1 Murashige, Laura From: blann [blann@gte.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 6:07 AM ~ r J i i i J To: counciltestimony Subject: suffolklPua'a rezonings ;1., . 1 oppose these upzonings until the N-S transportation corridor has been upgraded to have very much higher traffic throughput. A[ that time further rezonings should be considered based on agreement with the general plan. Noting that the parcels for these developments were deliberately subdivided to circumvent the LUC, causes me to lack confidence in the developers. Noting that Horton is owner of at least one parcel, yet the company name is missing in the approval process, further undermines my confidence. The Pua'a proposal states that' a supermarket MIGHT be included', which is to say that the space might also be any other legal use. Then again, the developer may re-sell the parcel [o himself under ye[ another Horton name, and demand approval for a totally different project since the zoning will transfer with the parcel. The alternative developments might further degrade the traffic flow in this corridor. We have seen too much bait and switch in rezonings. Be promised some bo[ique shops, get a Lowe's. Please defer action on these applications until infrastructure catches up. Let us save the precious approvals for pure affordable housing projects. Respectfully, Marshall Blann Comm. N~ Ref. To: r° Ref. Late 5/10/2005