Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0210.006 2004-2006 rte °r M~k'i Harry Kim ~ Dixie Kaetsu Ma or • Managing Director Y , ~'+i'• Peter L. Hendricks • Ci`M' _ ~ ~,peputy.Man~ingiU~Sector I.'.: ~i,~i '~.1 (~OUiltp Of ~dbJ~l`t 25 Aupum Street Room 215 • Hilo, Hawaii 96720-4252 • (808) 961-8211 • Fax (808) 96,1- 55 KONA. 75-5706 Kuakini Highway, Suite 103 • Kailua-Komi, Hawaii 96740 ~ I (808)329-5226 • Pax (808)326-5663 May 16, 2005 The Honorable Stacy Higa, Chairperson, and Members of the Hawaii County Council Hawaii County Building 25 Aupuni Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Re: Committee on Finance Communications 210.2, 2103, and 210.4 Discussion on the Request for Proposal Process for Waste Reduction Technology Dear Chairman Higa and Members of the Council: 1 would like to thank the County Council for its involvement in finding solutions to the County's solid waste situation, and the support for efforts to reduce what goes into our landfills and to find along-term solution to the disposal of this island's trash. This letter will detail the process followed in evaluation of waste reduction technology proposals received and set forth where we are today. RFP Review Process ¦ Request for Proposal issued October 29, 2004 with proposals due January 21, 2005 o For financing, design, construction and operation of a Sort Station and/or municipal solid waste reduction facility o Proposals received January 21, 2005 • Evaluation committee established o County personnel o County Council representative o Private sector representative • RFP contained minimum qualifications that offerors were required to meet to be considered "priority-listed offerors" (Section 4.5 on pages 13-16 of RFP) o Process state of the art o Contract guarantees o Organization and personnel requirements o Financing data 2~ Comm. Na Ref. To: Presae L R~,E. Uata _ MAYS I lawai`i Countv is an a ual opportunity provider and employer. May 16, 2005 The Honorable Stacy Higa and Council Members Page 2 • Evaluation committee met five times over several months to review and analyze proposals o Where necessary, additional information was requested and received from offerors • Evaluation committee reluctantly concluded that it was in the best interests of the County of Hawaii to cancel the RFP o Cancellation is allowed by the Procurement Code, §103D-308, HRS o The evaluation committee found nothing in the proposals submitted that made it, in its opinion, in the best interests of the County to proceed to further negotiations and possible issuance of a contract o Cancellation was chosen for the benefit of the offerors who presented proposals o When an RFP is cancelled, proposals remain confidential o Letters informing offerors of cancellation of the RFP were sent by Purchasing Agent Bill Gray on Apri128, 2005 o According to Corporation Counsel, a cancellation is final and cannot be rescinded • An Executive Session was held on April 20, 2005. At that time, guidelines were discussed and supported by Council on future actions to be taken in achieving their goals. Finance Committee Meeting, May 17, 2005 • Because the RFP was cancelled and information received remains confidential, any discussion about what was included or not included in the proposals received is to be conducted in executive session rather than in an open meeting. • On the advice of Corporation Counsel, we are unable to publicly discuss the proposals, their strengths or shortcomings, at the Finance Committee meeting on May 17. o This restriction applies even if an offeror wants to publicly discuss its proposal. o The offerors can disclose any information they want, but the County cannot respond in open session. • There is an executive session on this topic scheduled for Wednesday, May 18, where information about the proposals and the evaluations can be discussed, with the understanding that privileged information disclosed in the executive session must remain confidential. Please understand that this is done only to comply with legal restrictions in the Procurement Code and to protect the interests of the companies that submitted proposals. May l6, 2005 The Honorable Stacy Higa and Council Members Page 3 Conclusion At the Finance Committee meeting on May 17 we are limited in what can we can legally discuss. We will be prepared to provide you with details about the proposals received in executive session on May 18. As we work on where we go from here, we will keep the Council informed on our timelines and proposed actions. We will follow the guidelines already established in executive session. Thank you for your understanding. Aloha, -v" Harry im MAYOR cc: Barbara Bell, Director of Environmental Management Bobby Jean Leithead Todd, Deputy Corporation Counsel Bill Gray, Purchasing Agent