Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0452.015 1996-1998 +~-8¢.t,-OS-97 17:55 S.P.S. Inc. 505 488 5360 P.Ol - . _ Seamount Enterpr~~~~~i ';~1 2 c5 Operations (d,b a ) G'~- Administration. Ka'awaloa Orchards ' 845 Be41e~dIPl E #3oR KUA Fruit, Y.O. Box 339 Seattle, WA 98102 Captain Cook, HI 96704 Tel. (206) 323-0653 (808)323-2933 Fax (206)325-5855 Eric Curtis by fax: (f~Cb) 322-3896 Bill 129 Agricultural Project District wear Eric, October 08, 1997 Further to our conversation earlier this week, the easements o~.~er your lots were a_ways intended to be used as expansions for a private road. As you will. recall, phis is see cut in the Roadway Tlse and Maintenance Agreement and easements of record. County dedication is not a practical alternative for our rural neighborhood, and this was never suggested as an option. Liability Concerns have been addressed by our offer to fund the formation of a L-_mited ~iability Company which you previously agreed to chair. Seamcunt has agreed to a 20' r^,ad as a re.sul~ of your group's meeting with Councilman Reynolds. i?OWever, I CO ^.t1;:',:e t(~ bP11e`,~e ~_!'id~ 1` WCUld be d better choice to follow our engineer Leo F'leming's advice and go Frith an 18' road~~ay in a 22' right of way. I believe that a narrower road is in everyone's best interest. The lanes on the Golden gate bridge are 9' wide! Easeme.its Al and A5 are .~',eamounc's private property right serving all of the lands makai including the proposed APD. The development of i<a'awaloa Road by Seamount is impractical, if not impossible, and is not an option that Sea^,.ount is ~~-filling to pursue. wm,~ ltla~ Z F'I!e xo. ZNCs Ftef PrQSentec~ ktef. Crate OCT 1 S 1997 ' Oct-08-97 17:55 S.P.S. Inc. 505 a88 5360 P.02 Seamount has conr_inuously stated in open hearing and i*: writing that if the APD prcJect is approved in its present form, the Private Road will not be aed as a basis for further rezoning makai of the APIA , Neither Sally F<ice nor I ever represented to any of you that the long existing easement rights of record were going to be limited to the APD. Lunar Freivalds and Barbara Allen may have misunderstood the meaning of rezoning, but Sally is quite certain of wha~ she said, and has a reputation for being true to her word. when you purchased your lot from me ten years aqc, you knew >rhat I owned the property makai. As part of "Contractual Agreements that Survive Closing", you agreed not tv ob;ect to further development of the property makai or Easement A-5. I expect these personal contractual obligations to be honored in good faith. As a long time resident., T find it d:.fficult to believe that these pre-existing lots which have existed since C~:e 1930' s were r.ot. in your practical knowledge. Nor do I understand how this was not <:learl}' understood frorn our recent detailed conversations. Our continued statemEnt that there would be no fur*_:r,er rezcr.ing makai, leads to the question: what is existing or permitted makai of the APD? In the case of Andrea and Brian Lievens, A.~:drea as my realtor in r~,any transactions, kr:ew about the preexisting lots makai. The exact number of these !•ots was discussed :}~,e night before the Planning Commission hearing, and Brian went on tv discuss this with ward Fujimoto i?.cq. the nexr day, August 7, 1997. Allegatio~:s o` misreLresentation or Surprise do not hold up. The record shows that Seamount initiated an ongoing dig Logue Witt: the r.e_ghbors from toe Oct;-08-97 17:55 S.P.S. Inc. 505 5188 5360 P.03 outset in May of this year in which Seamount has made every effort to address your ~or:cerns. I believe that Seamount has agreed to realistic solutions which address your legitimate concerns, and I am appreciative of the good offices of Councilmen Remolds and Tyler.. Si(n~~erely Yours, Chr'stopher Morrie Seamount Enterprises LLC cc. Sally Rice Tim Lui-Kwan Esq. Nawa_i County Council.