HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0454.005 1996-1998
'J~ry~
STEi'HEN] MENEZES
Menezes Tsukazaki Yeh & Moore R. seh TsuxnzAx~
ATTORNEYS .4T LAIN f' ~ ~ TTIOMAS l.H. YEH
MICHAEL W. MOORE
100 Pauahi Street Sulre 204 Hao. Hawaii 96720 ,
TclcFhone~ (808) 961-0055 FAX (808) 969-1531 ~ 7 a~ ~ q 1
L lli ~ ,.t~
i. ,
C.~- ~ .
October 20, 1997 COI,` i r . • ,I
County Council
County of Hawaii
25 Aupuni Street
Hilo, Hawati 96720
Re: Review of Si¢n Ordinance
Dear Chairman Arakaki and Members of the County Council
This is to provide you with comments for consideration in your review of the County
Code provisions which relate to advertising and signage.
Our suggestion on the administering of such Code provisions is that the function of
decision-making on variance applications should be delegated to an agency. We believe that the
County Council should, as it generally dues under the County Charter, set policy m this matter.
This policy can be administered by the designated agency, such as the Department of Public
Works, which administers various standards in the building permit process.
If the concern is that there will zhvays be a need to provide for additional consideration
for exceptional circumstances, perhaps the Code can be amended to allow sign variances to be
considered by the Board of Appeals which currently acts on variances from other portions of the
Code.
Our observation is that, although very conservative in nature and perhaps rightly so, the
signage standards could be revised to allow slightly larger signs for small business proprietors
who advertise at their place of business.
We hope that these comments are helpful in your review.
Please contact me if you should need any clarification on these comments.
Very truly yours,
MEI~IEZES TSCTKAZAKI YEH & MOORS
~u ~-G,
R. BEN TSLTKAZAKI '
rt DTa
RBT: sr
N1Je I(a~
Ilef. Tot
I~ OCT 2 0 1997
L'd tFST o?~ ('~~(d8) Mt1"1 rv~ '1,11C W'81,1W Wd57: d8 L5. 82 170
Menezes Tsukazaki Yeh & Moore STEPHEN J. MENEZes
ATTORNEYS AT LAW R. BEN TSUKAZAKI
THOMAS L.H. YEH
MICHAEL W. MOORE
100 Pauahi Street Suite 204 Hilo, Hawaii 96720
Telephone: (808) 961-0055 FAX (808) 969-1531
October 20, 199? ij~;~l L! 1
County Council C~-. ~ ~,~'l
County of Hawaii COU, ~ ~ ~ ' "
25 Aupuni Street
Hilo, Hawaii 96720
Re: Review of Sien Ordinance
Dear Chairman Arakaki and Members of the County Council:
This is to provide you with comments for consideration in your review of the County
Code provisions which relate to advertising and signage.
Our suggestion on the administering of such Code provisions is that the function of
decision-making on variance applications should be delegated to an agency. We believe that the
County Council should, as it generally does under the County Charter, set policy in this matter.
This policy can be administered by the designated agency, such as the Department of Public
Works, which administers various standards in the building permit process.
If the concern is that there will always be a need to provide for additional consideration
for exceptional circumstances, perhaps the Code can be amended to allow sign variances to be
considered by the Board of Appeals which currently acts on variances from other portions of the
Code.
Our observation is that, although very conservative in nature and perhaps rightly so, the
signage standards could be revised to allow slightly larger signs for small business proprietors
who advertise at their place of business.
We hope that these comments are helpful in your review.
Please contact me if you should need any clarification on these comments.
Very truly yours,
MENEZES TSUKAZAKI YEH & MOORE
c~-
R. BEN TSUKAZAKI
RBTar