The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCOM 0582.012 2004-2006 County of Hawaii Waste Reduction Facility Design-Build-Operate Procurement Project Update and Discussion February 28, 2006 Bob Bingham - RW. Beck, Inc. Nyle Rhorar- RW. Beck, Inc. Rick Bapir- HarAlna DelafiNd b Wood LLP •~(<wti?roi~. Toda 's Discussion... • Overall Update o/ Waste Reduction Facility D80 Procurement - Gene21 Recap - Stage 1 Request ror Proposals - Waste Reduction Technology Assessment - EISPN - Next Steps and Schedule • Questions and Answers General Reca • Retained Hawkins DelaOeld 8 Wood LLP July 2005 • Retained R. W Beck, Inc. October 2005 • Statement o/Purpose and Need and Pro/ect Team Recommendations Endorsed Odoher 17, 2005 • Preparation o/ Waste Reduction Technology Assessment • Preparation and Issuance or Stage 1 RFP • Pre-proposal Meeting and Site sour • Issuance of Addendum No. 1 to Stage 1 RFP • EISPN Process • Preparation of Stage 2 RFP (currently underway) Carom. N~.. • 1 Ref. Tor E Rwf• Uate u 1 Re uest for Pro osals RFP) -Stage 1 • Intmduction • Background • Business Terms and Conditions • Procurement Process • Proposal Requirements Re uest for Pro osals RFP) -Stage 1 Introduction Including Need and Objectives - To select a D80 Contractor that will provide: • A reliable bng-fertn, sefl~suffidere so5d worse disposal caution • Maximized waste reduction and susfainaalay and minimize coast entl environmental impacts • Spedalrzed expertise • An efleclive DBO project delivery team • Asirgk poirrt o/responsiM'Idy • A msfefFedive solution • An expeddious and eflcienf project schedule Re uest for Pro osals RFP) -Stage 1 • Background Including Anticipated Scope of Work and Acceptable Technologies - The selected DBO Contrectw will be responsible for • Obtaining permtts end approvals • SufWo'ting County's EIS process • Design erM construction a Waste Reduction Facilely and support facirm~es/nhasaucture • Commissioning and aaeptanoa testing • Laig-term operations end maintenance • Longterm pica end pedormance guarantees 2 Re uest for Pro osals RFP) -Stage 1 • Background InGuding Mficipated Scope of Work and Acceptable Technologies (Continued) - Based upon ISWMP aM the updated Waste Reduction Technology Assessment the'AcceptaWe Technologies' ere: • Waste-to~Energy (mass bum/ • Waste-to-Energy (refuse denied IueQ • Thermal gasfication (pyrolysis and convenliOnaQ Re uest for Pro osals jRFP) -Stage 1 • Business Terms and Conddions - Based on recammeridations fiom f0/17N5 meeting - Contract pdnciples and p2liminary risk allocation • Project guxanfa arM othersecurdy • LiabTrty amtt o1100%ofDesign-BuiN Pdce • Pemrits and approvals • Ownership end (nandng • Payment provisions - Fnnancirg and ownership approaches Facili Financin and Ownership • Public financing and ownership - Benefits • Lower finanang reks and hansacfron costs • Cmeol over capdalimprovemenfs and modilkations • Ownership o/resitlual veNe of entl of mrrtracT term • OppatunRies fo refinance • Ad6ty fo lemrinale cwitraQ la convenience - Weaknesses • Reduces capacity for atldRanal debt • aontlhoklers must be repaid even if prged tails 3 Facilit Financin and Ownership • Private fnancirg and ownership - 8enefifs • AM41B Sbf1WI11MI1MYapwaYB4 MSpQ'1b1b'apllM'mYKB ' (.{~W ApINIIMIIId ragwMb~lOaldPS'~Id1 • FMS aP tWldne C.OKII~'luraarorPAeC - WBBkr1455B5 ' ~•y aNlbr 419~TapsmMala BI1CC0'146f1M C9lY • RNb11 R'Ia 1MabLS r~mwYrM.1SIa Ve1M l11EYaB l1g1115 • lsa mNdoda•uWdmRaMawrGS/mod'fiuems • CanerYNKa krmna6'allmwa eaA•nrR • CYry~fcAM 4wNfecmbarl.WUCarn • lintspdfc sata'apaonsMwgoltarEaq brrri Service Fee Pa ment • Puhlic financing and ownership - Sernce tee canpments: • OVd4tionb wnimrawwicesmAe be lro Pm'+ba epSraiM • InbMial+^Mf Ao earonaaer4J • Md(amElrop4r+mrRMaannaMesl of aid ollmMCiq Pwpd - ~nNPaYS fo-lacildy capital cosk through interest payments end twrM repayment fo fandholder5 - County pays for operations and maintenance costs tNOUgn 08M sarvire lee - County owns residual value of FdpfitY of end o/contract term Service Fee Pa ment • Private financing and ownership - Service ree canponeMS: • Opw4tiurs rHmrMnenroswNCe be lb pivYe aPwrM - a4.~~zw>. mn..~mnw.q.+rFw~rn..x • PowicaYraawu'waflhpnale w.nerrli+MOw7 - Nie,.a - q;,w: - Coun~yrepays pnvafecompany la /aciliry capital costs, refum ai inveshnent end operations and maintenance costs Through O8M service tae - Private cwnpanyrefains residual value WlacilRy 4 Re uest for Pro orals RFP) -Stage 1 • Procurement Process / - Evaluation Committee / - 'Shod listing' process J - Drag Stage 2 RFP/Contract and receipt o/comments - Issuance of final Stage 2 RFP/Contrail Re uest for Pro orals RFP) -Stage 1 • Evaluation Criteria - Technical qualifications and expehence • Minimum qualificetims - Management and organizational capabilrfies - Financialqualifications Re uest for Pro ~osals RFP) -Stage 1 • Stage 1 Proposal Content Requirements - Technical qualifications and experience • Relerence prged(s) satislyaig minimum requirements • AKemafive pa/ecf delivery (DB, DBO, EPC. etc,) • ConshucfiM pekvant and general) • Sfadup, cwnmissioning and acceptanre /rekvanl and genera • Operations (rekvanl arM gencraQ • Commerpel viability of proposed'A¢eptable Technokgf 5 Re nest for Pro osals RFP) -Stage 1 • Stage 1 Proposal Content Requirements (Continued - Management and organization capabilities • Organhation than aM subcontracting plan • QueGfications olkey sfafl • Team experience with implemerrting quaAly asswance /quef crontrol plans • Change ceder andcleims history Re uest for Pro osals RFP)-Stage 1 • Stage 1 Proposal Content Requirements (Continued - Financial qualifications • Full discbswe end demonshefion of finarrcial strength • Financial statements • Fixed or cnnhnganf 4abildies and oMw obNgefions • Gedd ratings • Ldigafion • Project guaranlw • Surety Waste Reduction Technology Assessment • Assessment Objectives - To determine waste volume reduchon of technology _ _ _ _ - To determine cornmemial status o/technology - (proven technoogy arM per/omiance guarantee) - To identify risks associated wdh technology 6 Waste Reduction Technology Assessment • Assessment Process - Identify waste reduction technologies from ISWMP - Conduct new technical and market research to determine: • Waste prWuctarenvironmental contrak • AppRCad~6tyro Counrypoject • Commercial status (ferhnical d finenaaQ • Approximate cost • Risks - Select 'accepfa6k;'technologies per County of>jecfives Waste Reduction Technology Assessment • Primary Considerations o/Assessment - Volume reduction - Extent olpre-processing required - Commercial status o/technology Waste Reduction Technology Assessment ~--~-•--~~il %v~~~~ 3 d - Q-z,.~ • Technologies Evaluated (High Temperature) - Waste-to-Energy (Combustion) • Mess bum • Refuse-derHed Nel (RDF) - Thermal Gessocation • Pyvotysis • Convemional gasificatbn • Plesme arc 7 Waste Reduction Technology Assessment • Technologies Evaluated (Biobgical) • Anaem6r'c Digestion • Aerobic MSW Composting • Bio-Re(nirg Waste Reduction Technology Assessment Summary o!(uMings - Volume reduction w«wFm~ fio-90X b.. a.~ WhOfinRl 66 ~ l6X PDF, nGUdry PpF pogvsump CaRnn6wW lhbm~frWlutlml%rtlyN• ]5-9614 Ilkulpg gppwv b mlme rolra9aln ruwatlc pp«tlee 56-fi0% Im1WMpsP~ ('~•7 MRF~ b lenur• mn ~newc YSw Cwrye•6119 60-]9X I~qutlig pspa«•• rQrty Mef~ b rmoro ro~ ogYiO Waste Reduction Technology Assessment • SummaryolFindings - Waste-fo-enemy (mass bum and ROf) waste reduction fechrrologres are the most commemially and technically viabM !or the County's application. - Thermal aasrfication end conventionaq technologies are primarily in the demonstration phase wdh a lew lacilrfies in operation in Europe and Japan g Waste Reduction Technology Assessment • Summaryo/Findings (Continued) - Anaerobic digestion is a new epplicafan for treating municipal solM waste (MSW and is rrot Yulty commercial in the U.S.. Extensive •hordend• processing would be required for use on this project. - Aerobic MSW orocess~ is a proven, buf problematic technology in terms of processing raliabildy and end- product marketing. Waste Reduction Technology Assessment • Summary of Findings (Continued) - Bio-refining has not been commercially proven for MSW feed stock applications. (Proposed plant in New York has bean under devebpment for over 10 years.) Waste Reduction Technology Assessment • Recommendation - °4cceptable Technologies" - Waste-fo-energy (mass bum) - Waste-toenergy (refuse derived fuep - Thermal gasification (pyrolysis and convenfionaq • Request for Proposal - Stage t requires vendors to utilize one of fhe °Acceptable Technologies" 9 EISPN • Status - Project team has d'scussed project with representatives from: • Sierra Gub (meeting held 22tie6) • Karroelabua Industrial Area Assocation • Panaewa Hawaiian Fbme laMS Community Association EISPN • stems - Publi meeting to he held an March 1 - PmjacllwDlicize0 and nrea5ng announced in news dories: • Hares Tnbuw Hwak • WW HaYa TOEay - ghat pubFctity • Displry Yl In NLB HRI, HfHCaleMa . flr(tE • EnwmiMalMaugnmMfaimieaonemal • Yreegr CuxM uexY4tler EISPN • Status - EISPN is approximately 95%complete - Input from public meetings will be incorporated into EISPN - Target date for EISPN mmpletion: Early March ~ Next Steps and Tentative Schedule • EISPN Public meeting 3/1/06 • Publish Drag EISPN 3/1506 • Stage 1 proposals due: 320/06 • Evaluation and short listing complete: 4!18/06 • Issue Final Stage 2 RFP: 7/14/06 • Stage 2 proposal evaluation complete: 1122!06 • Contract negotiations commence: 17/14/06 • Contract executed: 2/15107 Questions and Answers 11