My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0937.034 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0937.034 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 2:13:52 AM
Creation date
5/9/2008 12:00:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0937
Point
034
Author
Jerrie Bennett
Communications - Referred To
PSPRC
Comments
Presented: PSPRC - 6/20/06
Document Relationships
AGE PSPRC 06/20/2006 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Public Safety & Parks & Recreation Committee (PSPRC)
BIL 301 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
COM 0937.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> Page I of 1 <br /> <br /> <br /> Mitchell, Megan <br /> <br /> From: Murashige, Laura <br /> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 8:36 AM <br /> <br /> To: Mitchell, Megan <br /> Subject: FW: bill to limit number of pets and tag/register all cats <br /> Importance: High <br /> <br /> <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Jerrie Bennett [mailto:jerrieb.southpoint@hotmaii.coml <br /> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 12:30 AM <br /> To: counciltestimony@co.hawaii.hi.us <br /> Cc: Kfairies@aol.com <br /> Subject: bill to limit number of pets and tag/register all cats <br /> Importance: High <br /> Please be advised that I oppose the bill which would require all cats be licensed and tagged and that <br /> would limit the number of pets per household. <br /> I can understand the health concerns of the county in those rare cases where unstable persons might <br /> be keeping 25 animals in a small house on a small lot in unsafe and unsanitary conditions. Of course <br /> this is a public problem. Those people are not going to comply no matter what the law is. Why punish <br /> the many to catch the few? A little investigation would identify those who are not competent. <br /> As to feral cats - Having lived in Ocean View in the past I remember the misery of swarms of rodents <br /> during the years feral cats were killed off. Mice and rats are a much worse health issue. <br /> <br /> As to limiting the number of pets per household, I'll consider that when the county agrees to limit the <br /> number of adults and children Der household! <br /> <br /> I live on 3 acres on ag land. I have fenced one full acre for my 4 dogs and I do have one very old cat <br /> who is a wonderful mouser. I guarantee my animals will never cost the county anything. However; <br /> consider the multi-family, multi-friend households with 6 o 10 (mostly unemployed)adults and 12 or 15 <br /> children (and you know they exist). Cost to the county and tax payers - look at food stamps, additional <br /> law enforcement needed, FREE public schooling, free health care, wellfare and all that comes with that. <br /> Requiring that cats be collared is dangerous to their health. Most pig hunters don't collar their dogs <br /> for safety reasons. Limiting the amount of pets responsible pet owners can have is not necessary. It's <br /> time to attack the real financial drain and public problems in this county. Don't waste time and money <br /> on licensing cats and limiting pets. Use that money to go after the users and abusers of the "welfare <br /> system". <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Get MSN Messenger _with FREE Video Conversation - the next best thing to being there! <br /> <br /> Comm. No. <br /> Ref. To pf <br /> Ref. L) ate . <br /> 6/20/2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.