Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0937.037 2004-2006 Fage 1 of L Mitchell, Megan From; Murashige, Laura Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 8:30 AM To: Mitchell, Megan Subject: FW: Bill No. 301, -----Original Message----- From: Darcy May [mailto:mndmay@hawaii.rr.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 7:33 PM To: counciltestimony@co.hawaii.hi.us Subject: Bill No. 301; Dear Council Members, I am writing because l do not support Bill ft. 301, Article 4, Section 4-19, Registration fees for Cats; Section 4-20, Issuance of registration and tag for cats and Section 4-21, Proof of sterilization and micro-chip implanting. If cats are microchipped, the HIHS already has a complete list ofALL microchipped animals, including dogs, cats, rebbits and birds, in their microchip registry. If the animal is already microchipped and listed with the HIHS, this proposed registration with tags is totally redundant. The $4 or $10 fees proposed can't begin to pay for the personnel required to run such a program. Its fiscally unsound. Is the county prepared to hire "cat police" to enforce this cat registration or are the already overworked HIHS staffsupposed to do this, too? Most cats in this county are mousers and ratters, thank goodness. Wearing collars with tags would make it virtually impossible for the cats to do their rodent-control jobs. Rodents have excellent hearing and a cat might as well be wearing a be# as a tag. Of course, there's the problem of collars on animals outside. It's very easy for a cat to get caught on obstacles while wearing a collar and people buy the cheapest collar, which is certainly not the break-away variety. I'm sure finding a dead cat caught up on an obstacle isn't a pet owner's dream come true and this unpleasant picture will keep many from bothering with registration and/or collaring their cats. And if they did buy the break-away variety, they'd be regularly having to get new tags as the tags would be hanging on the collar that's hanging on the obstacle after the cat is gone. Another issue is TNR for abandoned cats and their offspring. It's my understanding that the County Council adopted a resolution some time ago advocating TNR (Trap/Neuter/Return (Release) as the only workable and acceptable way to deal with abandoned cats and their offspring. This proposal flies in the face of that resolution. The HIHS already has in place a system whereby people who desire to have their cats Comm. No. 93 Ref. To: W r-S PIEt 6/20/2006 Ref. bate rage 2 of 2 • /D'd can get numbered tags. We believe these sections of the bill are ill-conceived for the above stated reasons. We would, however, support that all non-microchipped animals reclaimed from the H/HS be microchipped and entered into the microchip data base before release to their owners, at the owner's expense. Thank you for your consideration, Mike May 73-9 909 Alihilani Dr. Kadua-Kona, H/ 96740 6/20/2006