HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0582.037 2004-2006 County of Hawaii
Waste Reduction Facility
Design-Build-Operate Procurement
Project Update and Discussion
August 22, 2006
Bob Bingham - R. W. Beck, Inc.
Kyle Rhorer- R W. Beck, Inc.
Rick Sapir-Hawkins Delafleld 8 Wood LLP
rlf^~E~wr~>..
Toda 's Discussion...
• Overall Update of Waste Reduction Facility D8O
Procurement
• Waste-to-Energy Overview
• Stage 2 Request for Proposals Summary
• Stage 2 Submittal Requirements of Proposers
• Keylssues/DecisionPoints
• Questions and Answers
General Reca
• Identified County Objectives
~er»m. No. ~
Ael. To:
ft®!. Dote a 2 2 1
Statement of Pro'ect Purpose and Need
• Due to the eventual closure o/the South Hilo SanRary
Landfill, the County o(Rawai irequires amethod o/long-
termdisposal o(East Hawaii solid waste. Thef method
should:
- Provide refiabk, cost-eflecfive waste dispasel using commercially
povan technologies.
- Maximrze island seBSUlficiancy and sustainab~6ty by the benefidal
ufid'zadon of wade through energy, soil amendments anwareused
mderiels.
- Minim¢e nodal and environmental impacts.
General Reca
• Identified County 06jectives
• DefinedAccepta6le TechnoPogies
• IssuedStagelRFPandAddenda
• Received Stage 1 Proposals
• Evaluation Committee and Consultants Conducted
Evaluation
• Evaluation Committee Short-listed three firms:
- Covante Energy Group (Waste-taEnergyJ
- Wheelafxdor Technoogies (Wade-to-EnergyJ
- L-Con Canstrudas (Waste-to-EnergyJ
General Reca
• Provided Short-listed Firms DRAFT Stage 2 RFP /or
Review and Comment
• Comments Received on July 31d
• Inftial Discussions of Comments with Each Proposer
• Ident~ed Key Issues for Further Discussion
2
EISPN Status
• Project team discussed project with various
representatives, (e.g. Sierra Club, civic associations)
• Public meetings
• Project publicized in various media
• EISPN is now complete (finalized April 2006) and
incorporates public comments
• EIS process vrill proceed in coordination with
selected Proposer
Waste-to-Ener Overview
• How does d work?
• What are the environmental issues associated
with Waste-to-Energy?
• What is the track record?
• How do we assure they meet human health and
environmental ohjectives?
Wast - o-En r Ov rview
How does it work?
v..,._
3
W s • ~ •Ener y Overview
• Each solid waste management option has
environmental impacts
- Landfills
• Airemissions
• Odor antl Lider
• Grountlwatercontaminatbn
- Waste to Energy
• Air emissbns
• Ash disposal
Waste•to•Ener Overview
• Over 90 Operating Facilities in U.S.
• Average Emissions:
a...e.
_ •...e. v xaev~
oarrt~r.
+e%c ~erom
PNnYY W W 0.N 1lM ~0wn
SuYP¢N• J IDII
xwa.~oa.. rm wn
w~ae.
oww w a •ox wm.
Worry 0% 0.m IIb% ryLCn
WMn !M mpNen
wa om pox iva ~ya..m
~wme. a~.ax
Typical Contaminants from Landfills -
Airand Groundwater
ChamkaAS Orpanlc Canpountls
McNana Toluene
Cabon Oioutla DkhbranaMare
Nitrogen Epylpenzena
Amrgnia ACBbM
Sulhr COmq NnylAcetab
Cabon Moiwxide Tetrachbraetlelene
HYdm9en Ymf ChlpiEa
NMDC Metlry1 ENyI Ketore
4
W ~ -En r y Overview
Reduction o(Dioxins in US Waste-to-Energy Plants
nm~r oo.~,. Emu.bn.
twrwus
p~r'r
)
J~ (i
Waste•to•Ener Overview
Global Warming Potential
• Global warming is caused by carbon dioxide (COz)
and methane (CH,)
- COZ-Waste-to-Energy
- CHa-Landfilling
• Methane from landflls is 21x more potent in trapping
solar heat than C02
• Solid waste to energy systems offset COz emissions
from other power plants
W te- -En r v rview
• How do we ensue that the Waste Reduction Facility
meets human health and enWronmental objectives?
- Endorsed by EPA
- Meel all 2gulaling standads
- OversighUMonaodng
- Pedonnance standards
- Contract with companies that have proven track record
5
Sta e 2 RFP Contents
• Volume 1: RFP °Front End"
• Volume 2: Draft Service Contract
• Volume 3: Technical Appendices
Stac e 2 RFP Contents
• Volume 1: °Front End"
- Background Information
- Overview of Expected Facilities and Services
- Terms and Conditions
- General Technical Requirements
- Summary of the Procurement Process
- Summary of Proposal Submittal Requirements
- Proposal Submittal Forms
Sta e 2 RFP Contents
• Volume 2: Drag Service Contract
- Contractual Requirements
- Pedods of Work and Key Milestones
- Business Terms and Conditions
- Performance Guarantees
- Term
6
Sta e 2 RFP Contents
Volume 3: Technical Appendices
- Permining
- Performance Guarantees
- Minimum Technical Requirements
- Construction Requirements
- Quality Management
- Acceptance Testing
- Operations and Maintenance Requirements
- Schedules
- Financial and Insurance Inkrtnation
Sta e 2 RFP Contents
• Company Scope of Services
- Support forElS Process
- Permitting
- Design
- Construction
- Commissioning and Acceptance Testing
- Facility Operations and Maintenance for 20 years
- Processing of recyclables
- Hauling and disposal of residuals
Sta e 2 RFP Submittal Requirements
• Signifirant Effort by Proposers lrll be
Necessary to Provide Responsive Proposals
- Technical Approach
- Management and Organizational Approach
- Business /Financial Approach
7
2 RF mi al Requirements
• Technical Approach
- Facility and Waste Reduction Technology
- Site Work, Amhitecturel Approach
- Key Facility Systems
- Drawings and Diagrams
- Measures to reduce Envirenmental Impacts
- Approach to CooMinating with Existing County Processes
- Facility Opeatons and Pedormance Guarantees
- Operations and Maintenance Plans
to 2 RFP ubt i I Requirements
• Management and Organizational Approach
- Project Organization and Team Stmdure
- Project Implementation Approach
- Project Schedules
- Quality Management Plan
- County Coordination and Communication Plan
Sta e 2 RFP t i I Requirements
• Business/Financial Approach
- Project Guarantor Commihnent
- Service Fee
- Design-Build Price and Drawdown Schedule
-Surety and Insurance
-Other Contracting Requirements
- Service Contract Markup
-Alternative (Pdvale) Financing Plan
8
Si nificant Effort b Proposers
• Proposal Preparation Requires 3 to 6 Months
• Facilities Must be Designed to 10-20% Completion
• Cost to Proposer = $300,000 - $500,000
Questions and Answers
9