Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 1064.007 2004-2006 Page I of 1 Lively, Barbara From: Yuen, Chris Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 10:25 AM To: Lively, Barbara Cc: Hayashi, Norman r Subject: RE: ~.s Ct) O.--, r*, We did complete our review of the EIS. There wasn't anything in it specifically about ast~stds. -O N The procedure now is that Group 70 will publish the availability of the draft EIS in the OEQC Bull h and the public will have 45 days to comment. If someone wants to comment about asbestos, they should-write to Group 70. Then Group 70 will have to respond to the letter. :3 After the deadline for the comment period, and after Group 70 has responded, they will make any revisions they want to the draft, and ask us to accept the revisions as the final EIS. If the Planning DepeitmentNcepts the final, then the public has 60 days to challenge that acceptance in court. Now, turning to the possible purchase of land at Punalu'u, Chap. 343 requires an environmental assessment (or possibly full EIS) for any purchase of land with improvements on it. So if we are seriously considering purchase of a parcel with a structure on it, we would have to do an EA before committing to the purchase. -----Original Message----- From: Lively, Barbara Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 10:59 AM To: Yuen, Chris Subject: Hey Chris, Bob is wondering if your department has completed its review of the Group 70 EIS for Punalu'u? We are interested in any information it might contain about the abandoned structure on TMK: 9-6-001:003, specifically any reports on the presence of or removal of asbestos. Some Council members are concerned about rumors they have heard about this structure containing asbestos and the possible liability it may pose for the County should they approve Bob's resolution to purchase the area for Open Space. Aloha, Barbara Comm. No.~101164.7 Ref. To: O AA" 1 Ref. Date _SEP 2 9 2006 9/28/2006