HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0766.029 2004-2006
Page 1 of 1
Murashige, Laura
-
From: Melissa Fleming [mfleming@co.hawaii.hi.us]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 9:36 AM
To: Murashige, Laura
Subject: FW: Attached Letter
Attachments: Public hearing Letter KKE Nov 7th 2006.doc
Hey Laura. More testimony.
Mahalo,
Melissa
From: Adele Decuyper [mailto:bert4adele@msn.com]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 9:04 AM
To: Isbell, Virginia; Pilago, K. Angel; Jacobson, Bob; Higa, Stacy; Ikeda, Donald; Arakaki, James; Holschuh,
Fred; Safarik, Gary
Subject: Attached Letter
Aloha, Attached is a revised letter for the County Council Meeting on Wed.
Nov 15th.
Mahalo
Adele DeCuyper
f.,
CO
-b
Cli
Comm. I
Ref. ToPre;w" 6
Ref. Date
11/13/2006
BILL 251: Public Hearing (OPPOSE BILL 251)
Adele DeCuyper
75-272 Malulani Drive
Kailua Kona Hi.96740
Nov 9m 2006
Chairperson Higa and County Council Members,
Dear Chairperson Higa,
I wish to thank you and the Council members for voting for a public hearing on the
rezoning of land for Kona Coffee Estates. I have to remind you that giving us one week
to prepare appeared to be an impossible task. I thought the plan we were pursuing was to
meet with all the different players and see if we could develop an action plan. It was
especially surprising when we tried to elicit cooperation from the Department of Public
Works and the Planning Department, no such help was forthcoming, in fact there was an
air of hostility when we asked questions or telephone calls were not returned. We did get
a return call from Stanford Carr who was unable to meet with us until just before the
Thursday meeting. We certainly got the feeling that we were being pushed aside as a
nuisance in favor of the developer. We heard from many people that we were wasting our
time as it was a done deal even though no approval process that we know about has
occurred.
Contrary to the statements made by Stanford Carr and Richard Wheelock that only a few
people living in Malulani Gardens are in opposition I have in my hand a survey done this
week with signatures of 75 homeowners stating they are against what the Kona Coffee
Estates is proposing at this time. Had I had more time to contact homeowners living on
the mainland, Japan and those on vacation there would be many more.
ISSUE: 1.
Malulani Drive: The connector road developed when Lowe's was built between Henry
Street and Queen Kaahumanu Highway (QKH) was and is a mistake and hazardous to
Malulani Gardens traffic. In Dec. 2003 Mayor Kim had the road barricaded by the
Department of Public Works and was NOT to be opened until such times that it could
meet all safety standards. It has remained closed. The safety factors still exist and are
probably worse today due to the increase in traffic.
The former owner of the property now owned by Stanford Carr petitioned the State
Department of Transportation to install traffic lights at QKH and the intersection to
Malulani Drive. The installation was started a few months ago and as far as I know has
stalled as the State now has a plan to widen the road from Henry Street south of Malulani
Drive. However, that does not really solve the problem as the bypass from Henry Street
still exists and Malulani Drive (Roadway Lot 44) appears not to be wide enough to
handle four lanes of traffic. (See attached letter from our Association attorney.)
When Malulani Gardens was developed a stub out road was made to favor the Kanuha
property. Stanford Carr actually only has access to his property across Kanuha's.
SOLUTION:
Lowe's has no problem right now with one ingress/egress through Henry Street. In fact,
in Lowe's Deed it states that they will have one ingress/ egress through Henry Street.
My suggestion is to CLOSE the road by ordinance from the edge of Lowe's property that
would only allow traffic from Kona Coffee Estates, Kanuhas and Malulani Gardens to
access the QKH from Malulani Drive. That I believe was the original plan.
In the past we have also suggested widening the road by incorporating the park and
creating roundabouts (traffic circles) there are no signal lights needed in this design.
These ideas were rejected. For safety reasons Malulani Drive CANNOT be opened until
QKH is widened and the traffic light activated
ISSUE 2. ROAD H
When Malulani Gardens was going through the permit process in 1999 the Planning
Department in phase two requested that "the internal roadway system for the subdivision
should be designed to interconnect with adjacent developments to localize their internal
traffic movements" As of now there are no developments on either side to connect to. Mr.
Carr had made the suggestion that that road could be used as his "second access" road
and a construction route that is in conflict with the intended use stated in the PUD. If used
as a construction route how would Stanford Carr prevent his construction traffic from
taking a short cut through Malulani Gardens' private road? Is he going to repair the
damage? This action would destroy our gated community.
This proposal doesn't make any sense at all. Carr's development is 108 acres, Malulani
Gardens is 23 acres. Granted that it is low density, I believe that he still needs an access
road further up the subdivision not at Road H the mid level road crossing Malulani
Gardens that will divide and compromise our gated community.
SOLUTION: A
I don't think we should have to defend the use of this road. It is clearly stated in the PUD
what the future use is for.
I don't think we should have to defend our gated community either. Ipso facto.
We didn't create it, the County allowed it to happen and now because it seems
convenient for Mr. Carr he thinks he can take our gate away, if that is the case I want to
see all the other gated communities take their gates out also including the ones that Mr.
Carr has built. I also hope that he is prepared to take care of all of the internal private
subdivision roads in perpetuity.
SOLUTION: B
Move Road H the middle level road to the mauka end of the Malulani Gardens
subdivision. Brian Cook the developer of Malulani Gardens has a one-acre parcel that
could be purchased by Stanford Carr. I believe this could solve many problems, access,
water and future connectivity as desired by the planning department. This would also
prevent division of our community.
Joel Gimpel, Chair, Public Affairs says, "the right of way for a crossover to Malulani
gardens is admirable, but because Malulani gardens is a gated community, we doubt that
access will be permitted".
Mr. Gimpel also mentions Kakalina, " This corridor is contiguous through Kailua View
and Kona Heights. It lines up with a I-acre Ag parcel owned by Brian Cook just mauka
of Malulani Gardens and continues north to the Kona Coffee Estates parcel and on to
Palani Road"
What a perfect solution, we all win.
ISSUE 3: WATER
Water is a huge issue in Kona.
Malulani Gardens is on a "Private Water System". We were promised that when future
development occurred we would be hooked up to the County Water System. This is one
condition that CANNOT be negotiated. That promise must be fulfilled.
SOLUTION:
Right now we are not sure where the water for the Kona Coffee Estates is coming from.
Several plans have been put forth none as of this date seem to be solidified
Please inform us with a real plan not just "maybes".
ISSUE 4: TRAFFIC
Traffic is a huge issue if you are in the Kona Crawl everyday.
SOLUTION:
Do a new traffic study that is not paid for by the developer.
The stretch of highway between Henry Street and Nani Kailua needs to be widened
before we put more cars into the system.
GENERAL COMMENTS:
Gated communities are known to extend the life of the land as the Homeowners
Association enforces the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions that all have to abide by.
It is cheaper for the County as they are not responsible for the upkeep of the private road
system.
Wait for the Kona Community Development Plan before we do more damage that will be
hard to correct. Work on the infrastructure. There are a lot of bright minds around to help.
Sincerely,
Adele DeCuyper