Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0087.004 1996-1998 ~Mtv or M~K~, ;d= ` Donna Pay K. Kiyosaki Chief Engineer Stephen K. Yamashiro Mayor ~ - ; ~ir0 Sumach •4.p ~+j•• * °;p~ Deputy Chief Engineer r~ u_• C~OIYTIt~i 0~ ~2SfUtTit DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 25 Aupuni Street, Room 202 • Hilo, Hawaii 96720-4252 (806) 961-8321. Fax (806) 961-8630 -r February 5, 1997 -n _ O r C` MEMORANDUM - T0: Dominic Yagong, Councilman t-' FROM: Jiro Sumach, Depu Chi engineer _ Cn C'~ SUBJECT: PAUKAA COMMUNITX COLLECTOR SEWER, PHASE II For your information, the attached background data is provided to assist in the review of the subject resolution. Attachment Cc: WWD _ ~o._-`-~ ~r. _.~t1'z_ • BACKGROUND INFORMATION PAUKAA COMMUNITY COLLECTOR SEWER, PHASE II 1. What is general background of project and why is it required? a) Old plantation system dumped directly into ocean in violation of Clean Water Act b) County through consultants perform engineering study and environmental assessment which defines area to be served by STP. (ref. Eng. Report & Map, 6/73) c) Council authorizes Mayor to enter into agreements for federal grant (ref. Reso 8/20/75) d) County applies for and receives federal grant for 75% of construction costs. The grant conditions require 75% comrection and design compliance. (ref. Grant ) e) STP construction completed. Plans for Papaikou-Paukaa Sewer approved by County. f) Plantation closes and population declines, County cannot meet grant conditions. g) EPA audits and declares County ineligible for grant funds due to non-compliance. h) Papaikou Sewer Phase I and Paukaa Sewer Phase I construction completed. i) County objects, EPA issues revised Final Determination Letter (FDL) which amends grant conditions, lowering the design capacity but not the 75% connection requirement. Construction of Papaikou Ph. II and Paukaa Ph. II required. (ref. EPA 9/24/93) j) County constructs Papaikou Ph. II, Paukaa Ph. II still outstanding. k) County receives notice from EPA reminding of grant requirements (ref. EPA 4/3/96) 2. What are the benefits to community? a) Cleaner environment i) Less pollutants in coastal waters ii) Less pollutants in groundwater b) Elimination of cesspools i) Reduction in odors, leakage and backup problems ii) Reduction in vector problems (rats, mosquitoes etc.) c) Improvement to private properties i) Reduced maintenance requirements ii) Easier to subdivide/ohana iii) Increased property value d) Stimulates the local economy i) Provides jobs for construction workers ii) Provides business for consultants and material vendors 3. What are costs to community? a) Connection costs (range from $1000 - $5000 in Paukaa) b) Permit costs ($20-$30) c) Sewer fees (currently $18/month billed bi-monthly) d) Possibly higher property tax based on increased value 4. What are the implications if project is denied or delayed? a) Per EPA, project should have been completed 6/96. Cancellation or delays to the project could subject the County to repayment of a proportional share of the grant which amounted to $6,891,902. b) Funds for project were planned to be disbursed by the State Revolving Fund (SRF) on 1/97. Delays to the project disrupt the cash flow of the SRF and could cause the project to be removed from the priority list. The County would then lose the benefit of the low-cost loan program. ENGINEERING REPORT FOR THE ,r. PAPAIKOU-PAUKAA SEWERAGE SYSTEM PAPAIKOU-PAUKAA AREA, HAWAII BUREAU OF SEWERS 8~ SANITATION COUNTY OF HAWAII CHUNG DHO AHN & ASSOCIATES, INC. HONOLULU, HAWAII JUNE, 1973 • ~ ONU4E4 I B<Y S O 2~ ' II S~NCA4 LL\ 13 ' ONOMEA PUMP STATION ~lES„.i srnEa„ ~ - \ UNSEWERABLE AREA iL ~ 12 ~ LINE ~ A~ o. ONOMEA TO PAPAIKOU f~' p4.j ~~.:r5"a r.^.Jl~ ~.f} ..~1 I 0 r , i \ , ` 8 ~ ~ 9 z a ~adpauiDu: ~ ~ I w ~ o 'E" ~pe.~~~ II .a TREATMENT PLANT ~ i , 6 U MAUHAU DT. ~ i ~ - PUUEOPAKU U a a LINE ~ B ~ ~ PAUKAA TO PAPAIKOU a a s i 4 Y 3 .p 'vnuKnn aT. PAUKAA +o„Q~„ I NSEWERABLE AREA ~4 5 , SEWAGE DRAINAGE PAUKAA AREAS PUMP STATION ~J` lEr~ g4 Papaikou-Paukaa Sewage System -45- Figure ~-2 Co~inty of 3lawaii--Mate of Hawaii ~esolittion IIE IT RESOLVED IIY 79~E COUNCIL in and for the County of 1?await, at a meeting held this date, that the Mayor of the County of }lawaii, he and he is hereby designated and authorized to sign in [he name of the County of }lawaii such application forms and other documents for construction grant benefi [s from the appropriate Federal agency for the Panaikou Sewerage System in South Hilo, Connh~ of Hawaii, State of Hawaii. RE IT FURTHER RESOL\'}:D that the Chief Engineer he designated as the au [horized representative [o receive all cmnmunlcat ions. RF. IT FURTHER REf07.+'P.D that the County C]erk he and he is hereby directed to forward a ropy of [his reso]vti on to any interested government or governmental agency. Dated at Hilo Hawaii, this 20th day of Anq,}lst , 1975. 7NTAODIICED RY: unci an, County of ail - _ ~ - _ ROLL CALL VOTE COUNTY COU h`._IL Hues Noes nit County of Hawn: Carpenlei X Hllo, Howo~i Dc Laz _X _fal _ - X I herehy certlly Ihol Ib~, fo:v~omg RESOLL' 'ON ~-as by the vole Indicated to Ni -mka _ _x _ _ _ the nghl he:eol adopted oy the COUNCIL of Iho ~ounly of Howali on Y,owohora R August 20, ].975 Lai ___-_-___.x Levin R _ 1'adoo _ _ __x _ _ MTEST: Yamada X 9 n Im !?BY l:$TIFIY that above s a (LAS' ~ C-11 26~pWG 56 ~i?.e~f~~ ~P!' of the orifi'.rul ~ ~ a..:. + Robert M. Vamo Ted T. Suz ul~o a to CmOp. cenicn•,aw a r,ts:, ~ ac orvi¢x . a H /Sy COUNTY CICRK ~ - " - ,~~~..,Z~ t , tFA 9i~ s"A~'o. i ~ UNITL-v STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ~~t ~o~E REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, Ca. 94105-3901 SEP 2 41993 Ms. Donna Kiyosaki County Engineer Department of Public works County of Hawaii 25 Aupuni Street Hiio, Hawaii 96720-4292 Subject: Audit Report No. E2CWM0-09-0052-2200030 Grant Nos. C15-0060-02 and C15-0062-06 Docket No. 09-93-AD03 Dear Ms. Kiyosaki: This is a revised Final Determination Letter (FDL) by the Regional Disputes Decision Official (DDO) in accordance with 40 CFR Part 30, Subpart L. This revised FDL resolves a dispute at the Regional Administrator level. After review of additional supporting documentation and arguments provided by the County of Hawaii (County), I hereby revise the March 23, 1993 final determination as described in the following. The notes below correspond to the notes in the Audit Report Summary of Findings. Please note that some of the documentation submitted by the County does not meet the requirements of the auditors at the audit resolution stage, however, this documentation does meet the equivalency requirements at the RA level and is hereby accepted. This decision does not set precedent for resolution of similar issues raised in future audit reports. Note 2A C15-0060-02 In the March 23, 1993 FDL, I disallowed $6,891,902 for the underutilization of the Papaikou Wastewater Treatment Plant and interceptor sewers for Papaikou and Paukaa. The current flow to the treatment plant is .14mgd, which is only 40$ of the .35 mgd design capacity. In order for the cost of this grant to be eligible, at least 75~ of the homes and structures in Papaikou and Paukaa must be connected to the sewers. The County must also show that the treatment plant receives flows of at least 75% of the design capacity. After reviewing the basis for design and the most recent census information documenting an unexpected decline in ' ~ Prin fed on Recyc' population, a readjusted flow rate of .24mgd was accepted in the March 23, 1993 FDL as the design capacity which will be used to determine fulfillment of the 75$ requirement. The County plans to construct the Papaikou Phase II Sewers and Paukaa Phase II Sewers which will fulfill the 75$ requirement. The Papaikou Phase II project will sewer 39 homes and increase the connection rate in the area to 90$. The Paukaa Phase II project will sewer 150 homes and increase the connection rate in the area to 93~. Assuming a flow of .05mgd1 from the projects, the plant will-receive .19mgd, which is 79% of the adjusted capacity of .24 mgd. The March 23, 1993 FDL determined that the cost questioned by the auditors would be eligible provided the County submits documentation that it will construct Papaikou Phase II and Paukaa Phase II projects in accordance with the following schedule: Start Finish Construction Construction Papaikou Phase II 3/94 7/95 Paukaa Phase II .1/95 6/96 To date, the County has provided the following documentation. Papaikou Phase II - State Revolving Fund (SRF) Priority List - County's Six Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for current state fiscal year 93/94 - plans - County ordinance appropriating County funds for CIP projects including Papaikou Phase II - County resolution to apply for the remainder of the funding via Farmers Home Administration Paukaa Phase II - SRF Priority List - County's Six Year CIP for state fiscal year 95/96. ~ This estimate ie based on the following calculation, using 1990 census data: Avg. # Persona Total Total Homee Per Home Persona Av¢. Flow Flow Papaikou 39 x 3.03 = 118 x 100gpcd = .0118mgd Paukaa 150 x 2.4G = 369 x 100gpcd = .0369m¢d 0487mgd 2 ~ e - plans As further assurance of project completion, a special condition will be added to Grant No. C15-0060-02 requiring the construction of Papaikou Phase. II and Paukaa Phase II projects in accordance with the previously identified schedule. The Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) will track the condition on a quarterly basis as a part of their quarterly status report. Additionally, EPA, Region 9's Municipal Assistance Branch will track the County's progress on their audit tracking system. In the event the County fails to construct the collection systems as required by the special condition, the County will be required to repay a proportional share of the grant. Based on the documentation submitted to date and the soon to be added special condition to Grant No. C15-0060-02, I hereby find that the $6,891,902 previously disallowed is grant eligible. Eligible $6,891,902 Ineligible -0- Note 4 C15-0062-06 In the March 23, 1993 FDL, I disallowed $58,299 for the purchase of emergency generators for the Wailoa and Pua Pump Stations. The audit report states that the emergency generators are an unnecessary cost outside the scope of the approved project and are therefore an ineligible "add-on" which has no relation to the original grant. The original grant was awarded on August 13, 1984 to construct a collection system serving the Ice Pond area on the Island of Hawaii. Flows from the Ice Pond area are treated at the Hilo Wastewater Treatment Plant. On April 17, 1986, a grant amendment was processed which decreased the grant based on the March 19, 1986 Approval-to-Award for the installation of the generators. We disagree with the audit report's statement that the generators are an ineligible "add-on" which has no relation to the original grant. Emergency generators are an eligible item. Both the Wailoa and Pua Pump Stations are in the same facility planning area as the Ice Pond Collection System, as defined by the Clean Water Act, Section 212(2)(A), and 40 CFR 35.905. Sewage from the pump stations and the Ice Pond Collection System is treated at the Hilo Wastewater Treatment Plant. Although the generators were outside the scope of the original grant, the EPA Regional Administrator expanded the scope to include the generators by issuing an amendment in accordance with 40 CFR 35.903(d) and 40 CFR 30.700. Additionally, in regards to the absence of the generators in 3 the Hilo Facility Plan, facility plans are not required to contain a list of every piece of equipment, fixture and appurtenance which is eligible under the construction grant program. In fact, 40 CFR 35.917-4(b) states that facilities planning will be conducted only to the extent that the EPA Regional Administrator finds necessary in order to insure that facilities for which grant funds are awarded will be cost- effective and environmentally sound. Cost-effectiveness is ensured by reviewing possible project alternatives. The only alternative to installing emergency power generators is the no project alternative which is not a viable option since the prevention of raw sewage spills is required by the construction grants program. Environmental soundness would not be jeopardized by the addition of emergency power generators. Emergency power generators do not change either the environmental impact of the wastewater treatment system or the level of environmental review needed because neither the degree of treatment nor the capacity of the existing facility would be affected. In fact, the addition of emergency power generators increases environmental soundness. The emergency generators are a reasonable and necessary part of the treatment plant, within the amended scope of the grant. Furthermore, the emergency generators eliminate the public health threat associated with sewage spills and maintain the integrity of the wastewater treatment system. I hereby find that the emergency generators are eligible pursuant to 40 CFR 30.700 and 35.940-1 and that $58,299 previously disallowed is grant eligible. Eligible $58,299 Ineligible -0- CONCLUSION The following is a summary of the determinations of eligible and ineligible costs: C15-0060-02 COSTS CLAIMED ELIGIBLE INELIGIBLE Total Project Costs $6,923,095 $6,915,616 $ 7,479 Federal Share (75%) 5,192,322 5,186,713 5,609 C15-0062-06 COSTS CLAIMED ELIGIBLE INELIGIBLE Total Project Costs $ 347,794 $ 347,794 $ -0- Federal Share (75~) 260,845 260,845 -0- TOTAL AUDIT COSTS CLAIMED ELIGIBLE INELIGIBLE Total Project Costs $7,270,889 $7,263,410 $ 7,479 Federal Share (75$) $5,453,167 $5,447,558 $ 5,609 We have reviewed the project files and note the following 4 status of grant payments to date: Grant Number EPA C15-0060-02 $5,186,713 C15-0062-06 260,845 Total $5,447,558 If you accept the above-noted determinations, the final payments for these projects will be as follows: C15-0060-02 EPA Final Cost Determination $5,186,713 Paid to Date 5,186,713 Balance Due EPA $ -0- C15-0062-06 F,PA Final Cost Determination $ 260,845 Paid to Date 260,845 Balance Due EPA $ -0- TOTAL AUDIT EPA Final Cost Determination $5,447,558 Paid to Date 5,447,558 Balance Due EPA $ -0- We appreciate your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions, please call Ms. Meiling Lincoff at (415) 744-1944. Sincerely, ~Qy/J)ctlrt. ~ No'ra L. McGee Assistant Regional Administrator Office of Policy and Management cc: Ron Beeler, OIG Geary Pena, Sacramento-OIG Marie Leung, P-4-2-4 Rich Hennecke, P-2 Tiffanie Pang, P-4-2-1 Dennis Tulang, HDOH 5 ENVIRONMENTAL MGT DIV ID~8085864352 JAN 17'97 925 No .001 P.01 • J~~iro s/, rFS ~d~l~ ~ A I,.~'~r UNITED STATES t?NVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY d~~,~.. ~ REGION IX ~ c ~r1 cno~[o 75 Nawlhome Street San Francisco, CA 90105-9901 ~ ~ rl it' ` ~4~r April 3, 1996 Postdt° brand taz trensmhral memo 7671 ~ er apex ~ .~tupftPi{~ Fw,n ~~T ~4~-I. Mr. Peter Boucher, Chief o. co. - Wastewater Division pep1. FhoneN County of Hawaii ~'6' ~11~ zs Aupuni. street F.xN9~/_J6 FaxM 5~'b. ~~y i•ii.].o, HI 96720-4252 Subject: Collector Sewers for Papaikou Phase II and Paukaa Phase L1 bear Mr. Boucher: On~September 25, 1995 we received a letter from Ms. Ki.yosaki informing us of the progress the County of Hawaii. is making to construct l-he above-referenced collector sewers. Al- this time, we request another status report. Please inform us of the construction start date for Papaikou Phase II and the estimated completion date. Also, please indicate the completion date for design of Paukaa Phase I7, the source of funding Co construct this project, and the estimated construction start and completion dates. As a reminder, the County agreed to construct these projects to resolve an EPA audit (report #E2CWM0-09-0052-2200030) which questioned the eligibility of EPA grant funds provided to construct the Papaikou wastewater treatment plant. Refer to EPA's Final Determination Letter dated September 24, 1993. Thank you f.or your continued cooperation. If you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter further, please call me at (415) 744-1944. Sincerely, Linda Reeves Project Officer cc: Dennis Tulang, Chief, DOH Wastewater Branch I'ruuod on Atwdrd /'alnv EPJ'JIPONfgENTRL MGT DIV ID~8085864352 JGN 17'97 926 No .001 P.02 _ .r....s Cn I.L t•nV IC'-.~4•~nYr-nil ASST 'CE AMENDMENT C-15-0060-02 a pllOp01) AN[NOMCNT NO. (P levee tied uaaerveRwta en twearae) 10 NOTE: Tb• on Qfval Ameodmmt vtN one cepT moat be exeeated ae4 retuned to rSe Gnats Admitiatr•don Dtriaioa [or Hudqu•rten a•uataaca aw.rda pnd to the Gunta Adtaialatretlon Bn attics for SUte and IocaLL aasiaunee awards witSiR 3 teaks alter nee/pt or wiNlu m7 en enuoe of Ume aa. mq be ~anud In wAt1RQ by EPA. Except as say be orheee,iaa provided, no eeau as • malt e! the Amendment maT be lnenuted prior to Ute eserndoe of eba Aa atetanea Apteadteeet by the panics Ih crate, • Receipt o(a wri[2en lefwal, ar failure tR receive the peep erly executed deeugeRt within the pnacibad time will Ratilt !n fhq ler- enleaJeo of eooeideratlen e[ tLa Aaaistanee Amendment OT EPA. GENERAL INFORMATION APPROPRIATION ANO ACCOUNTING DATA app RpPRIA TION NUMBER AGCOURT NUYOfR OOI ECT CLASP COO[ N/A N/A N/A O ESCRIPTION 01 Aw EN DMENT: PU0.5U.NT To EPA A531STANCi RlGU CATION ao CPR )OJee "P ROJEGT C!IA Np CS AND ASa13TANGE No OIR• ICA TIO Na'• ANO as CFA ]o-90ot ••pp RM AL AaS15TARCC Av ENON ENTa." TNC AeovC NUM[[R ED Aa313TAMGC ?C RECMl NT 6 Av CNO[O ?a IOLLOea: 'This Adminiatrative amendment reflects conditions to EPA's September 29, 1993 revised Final Determination Letter for the audit report No. E2CWM0-09-0052-2200030. The County will construct the projects listed below in accordance with the fallowing achedule~ Start Finish Construction Construction Papaikou Phase II 8194 B/95 Paukaa Phase II 8/95 6/96 AwARO APpRO~rAI OPPICE ISSUING OPPIGE DgOANILn TIOM ORCANIf AT10M U.S. EPA, Region 6, W-2-1 U.5. EPA. Region 9, W-2-1 . DDPEaa AooRfsL U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 75 Hawthorne. Street 75 Hawthorne Street RECIPIENT Oa OA N12A TIOM N.MO A00R [33 Department of Public Works County of Hawaii 25 Aupuni Street, Room 202 Hilt, HI 96720 g acePt as provided heroin off fsrtna and cond/Non: of tAa hulG aealaranw allraemenq Ines b7na rpraior amendments, rennin onebnQed and in (u 11 force an4 elhet and subject ra a!I aopllcahle prowls ions or a0 CIrR Chapter p 7N[ UNITEO STA TCS JG AMI=RICA !Y TNC U.S. CN~/IRCNMINTAL Ppp TrC TION AOf NCY 31~NATUPa OI Aw ND Or/ICIAL TTPED N.Nf ANC TITI.f O.Tf Harry Seraydarian. Director, WMD OCJ 26 1993 NO ON OHNALf OP THE OESIp NP TC+ RECIPIENT OPp ANIZA LION fIONaTUgE TYP f1 NANf An0 TtTlS COUnty Of OAT[ Stree Yameshiro, Ma or, Hawaii ll l~ 4 fps Pa.T ty00-q00 (R.-. II_ ) PREVIOUS [pl ilON la Oa)O~[T E•