HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0125.002 2006-2008 Page 1 of 1
Murashige, Laura
From: Bob Ward [rgward007@hawaii.rccom] [,%,i~ ~'~;j(1 ~~M f]!'I Q ~'t
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 10:31 PM
To: Council Testimony ~
'~.IJVt'a:
Cc: Laura Dierenfield
Subject: Bill 34
Attachments: CC-La'i'opua.doc
I would like to submit the attached testimony related to Bill 34. If the design is adjusted to conform with
the General Plan, Kona Community Development Plan and Bike Plan Hawaii, I support the increased
spending.
Robert Ward
Kailua Kona
Comm. No.-~"-~~2---^
Ref. To: Pre, .ra C..~w
Ref. Date MAR 2 1 911107
3/20/2007
TESTIMONY -HAWAII COUNTY COUNCIL -Bill 34 (Draft 2)
Prepared by:
Robert Ward
77-6526 Ho'olaupa'i St
Kailua Kona, HI 96740
Thank you for the opportunity to share my concerns. I appreciate the efforts that the Planning
and Public Works Departments have made to develop this project. However, it was
disappointing to learn that adequate bicycle facilities have not been included and that retaining
the utility of the existing multi-use pathway has not been addressed. Therefore, it will be
necessary to correct a few omissions. These changes are minor, so the required adjustments
should not delay this project. As a member of the County Bicycle/Pedestrian Committee, County
Highway Safety Council and the County Transportation Commission my recommendations are:
Amend the design to include bike lanes as part of the extensions of Keanalehu Drive and
Manawalea Street.
• The Hawaii County General Plan (HCGP) is very specific in its goal to make available a
variety of transportation modes. The policy outlined in the HCGP seeks to incorporate
bicycle and pedestrian systems and to enhance the shared use of roads by cyclists and
pedestrians.
• The preliminary report for the Kona Community Development Plan (KCDP) supports the
implementation of Bike Plan Hawaii. It clearly indicates the community desire to provide
separate lanes for bicycles and to include the appropriate bicycle facilities in all capital
projects.
• Bike Plan Hawaii (BPH) has already identified Keanalehu Drive (including both the
existing roadway and the Kealakehe Pathway) as a Priority I project (70c) for adding
Bike Lanes. The extension of Manawalea Street has been included as a Priority IV
project (75) to include Bike Lanes when the road is built. Even the extension of
Keanalehu Drive up to Palani Road has also been included as a Priority IV project (70b)
to also include Bike Lanes when that road is built.
Consider minor design chances that will encourace cycling without delaying the oroiect or
increasinc costs.
• Eliminate the gutter joint 2-feet from the curb. Provide continuous paving from the Bike
Lane stripe to the curb face. This will eliminate the potential hazard of a longitudinal
groove and avoid collecting road debris in the bike lane while reducing future
maintenance costs.
• Consider substituting Profiled Pavement Markings (PPM) to maximize retroreflectivity
under all weather and lighting conditions. The '/<-inch high profile is less hazardous to
cyclists then the conventional Retroreflective Raised Pavement Markers (RRPM) that
may be as high as'/<-inch when installed. PPM provide excellent visibility as well as a
subtle audible warning.
• Review storm water inlet design to reduce the potential hazards for less experienced
cyclists. A roadway that averages 8 % should be able to adequately dispose of surface
runoff without inlets that include severe depressions or sharp drop-offs.
Insure that a pedestrian friendly environment is provided when the typical design cross-section
is constructed.
• A 7-foot wide sidewalk is desirable, but the pedestrian traveled way should remain clear
of obstructions including vegetation encroachments, hydrants, signs, poles, unstable
utility access covers, and even curb ramps where possible.
Provide standardized crosswalks that are well marked with retroreflective Continental
style longitudinal stripes. Consider adding high visibility fluorescent tactile warning strips,
lower curbs with a tighter radius and improved curb ramps to reduce pedestrian
exposure, and if appropriate, raised crosswalks.
Consider installing pedestrian lighting instead of current practice of street lighting that
remains a holdover from an era before xenon headlamps and side marker lights. Fully
shielded pedestrian scale lighting would be more efficient and provide better illumination
of bike lanes and sidewalks, as well as the cyclists and pedestrians themselves.
Evaluate replacing the segments of the multi-use path that will be eliminated by the connector
road alignment.
The Kealakehe Pathway is the only multi-use Path in West Highway that is closed to
public traffic and has no cross traffic. It is also the most logical location to support a
"walking school bus" or "bike train". It fills a community need by linking major school
complexes with major residential areas. It would also serve the proposed 1,100
affordable homes in the area, as well as the proposed Civic Center.
The HCGP policy is to encourage development of walkways, jogging and bike paths.
The proposed KCDP seeks to create paths between all subdivisions. BPH indicates that
separated paths are preferred for basic bicyclists and children.
Installation of a meandering path would create a suitable gradient to meet the
accessibility needs of pedestrians and achieve AASHTO recommendations to
accommodate all levels of cyclists. The availability of State land makes this a realistic
possibility. The Department of Parks and Recreation has an exemption from additional
environmental review for paths less than 10,000 feet in length. The DOT currently has
$3 million accumulated for Safe Routes to School projects that could provide additional
funding if needed.
As an active participant of the Kona Traffic Safety Committee and the Kona Community
Development Plan Transportation Working Group, I am hopeful that the County will support the
desires expressed by its citizens to provide a safe and walkable community with more bike-
friendly facilities.