Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0349.228 2006-2008 Murashige Laura From: Kathryn Biglow [kealeka007@mindspring.com] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 1:11 PM To: counciltestimony@co.hawaii.hi.us Subject: Save Punalu'u! 1 ''-i ~:~~1 JL4; 5 Dear Hawaii County Council: `~'~and one who has I am speaking as a landowner on the Big Island (Ahualoa, since 19~/~), lived in Hawaii since 1965. I am against allowing Sea Mountain V permission for their proposed luxury housing development because of the certain environmental degradation that would follow. The history of the Islands during the past 40-plus years is one of rampant, ceaseless development. I have personally witnessed this. One hotel or housing project or golf course after another has claimed the best beach real estate--Hapuna Beach and the Prince Hotel being a prime example. Because of sewage and landscaping fertilizer runoff--especially for golf courses--ocean water quality has deteriorated around these developments. Reefs are smothered, fish go elsewhere; limu unnaturally flourishes. And who profits? The primary winner is the development company, and perhaps a few politicians. Only a relatively few low-paying jobs go to locals. The result is that the public has restricted access, the existing ecosystem is adversely affected, and one more gorgeous spot on the planet is ruined forever: all for a very small number of people to make a lot of money--money from land and sea that belongs to ALL the people. I wholeheartedly support Resolution 169-07. The Black Sand Beach area should be purchased for future generations of Big Islanders and to maintain protection for the endangered species that live there. Hawksbill turtles, Hoary bats, and Monk seals need a place to live, too. The precious and finite natural resources of Hawaii should no longer be for sale to the highest bidder. We have more than enough "development" already. Sincerely, Kathryn Biglow former Ranger, Haleakala National Park Comm. No. ?J ~ 1 • Z 2.- Ref. To: Ref. Date ^~UN 0 7 2001 i