Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0349.444 2006-2008 2~ Report to the Twenty-Fourth Legislature 2007 Regular Session from The South Kona - Ka'n Coastal Conservation Task Force y~ -o >x 2~`s_~~T~ V ~j• S ~ . S? ~`'~~'•~'•••».......~a p.'~' '+r.f Prepared by State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources In Response to House Concurrent Resolution No. 5, House Draft 1, Senate Draft 1 2005 Regular Session Honolulu, Hawaii a December 2006 Comm. Na 3 ~ 'l. Ref. Ta MeseNei 1~ Ref. Dote .IyN 19 2 w Q '.f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n 1 ` r . ~ ti ti. e ~ 1 +rt: 1 ~Wi ~,I~~~I~ _ .`"''i rr This report is dedicated to Jimmyleen Keolalani "Keola" Hanoa, July 5, 1960 -March 13, 2006. Keola was born and raised in Ka'u and was a kumu (teacher) to na kamali'i (the children) and people from around the world, sharing the importance of restoring and protecting the 'aina, culture heritage, and traditional lifestyle of Ka'u. Living at Punalu'u Black Sand Beach where she grew up, Keola devoted her life to protecting the sacred historic and cultural sites and critical habitats of the honu ea (hawksbill turtles). In 1990, Keola established the Kukulu Kumuhana 'OKa'v Learning Center at Punalu'u and for more than 16 years, provided cultural and environmental education programs to students using traditional hawaiian teaching practices. The native endangered species in their habitats became educational tools and the surrounding environment, a living classroom. Keola and her mother, Kupuna Pele Hanoa founded Punalu'u Preservation which in 2004, expanded to become Ka'u Preservation. Keola dedicated her life and her teachings to the preservation of Punalu'u as a cultural resource and educational center. In her efforts to achieve this goal, the South Kona - Ka'u Coastal Conservation Task Force was created. r.r~ Table of Contents Executive Summary ..........................................................................................1 I. Purpose of House Concurrent Resolution No. 5, S.D.1, H.D.1 ...............................3 II. Description of the Area .................................................................................5 A. Regional Context .....................................................................................5 B. Project Area ...............................................................................................7 1. Marine Resources ...................................................................................7 Z. Flora and Fauna ......................................................................................5 3. Cultural Resources ...............................................................................5 4. Recreational and Scenic Resources ..........................................................9 III. Methodology ..............................................................................................11 A. Establishment of Working Groups ..............................................................11 B. Identifications of Areas that Should be Protected ...........................................12 1. Area I: Southern Boundary of Hawai'I Volcanoes National Park to Honu'apo ............................................................................................12 2. Area II: Honu'apo to Eastern side of Ka'alu'alu Bay .................................14 3. Area III: Ka'alu'alu Bay to Pali o Kulani ..................................................16 4. Area IV: Pali o Kulani to Manuka ...........................................................17 C. Proposed Future Uses and Limitations .........................................................19 D. Mechanisms to Protect and Manage Identified Areas .....................................19 E. Funding Sources ......................................................................................20 IV. Task Force Recommendations ........................................................................21 V. Bibliography ..............................................................................................23 y,.- Figure 1. Project Area Map Figure 2. Area I: Southern boundary of the Hawaii Volcanoes National Park to Honu'apo Figure 3. Area II: Honu'apo to eastern side of Ka'alu'alu Bay Figure 4. Area III: Ka'alu'alu Bay to Pali o Kulani Figure 5. Area IV: Pali o Kulani to Manuka Appendix A: The South Kona - Ka'u Coastal Conservation Task Force Members Appendix B: House Concurrent Resolution No. 5, H.D.1, S.D.1, Requesting the Department of Land and Natural Resources' Division of State Parks to Establish a South Kona - Ka'n Coastal Conservation Task Force, Adopted by the Twenty-Third Legislature, State of Hawaii, 2005. Appendix C: Task Force Letter dated May 1, 2006 to Governor Lingle for a "quiet" period of non-approval of subdivision or major development in the project area. i.r Appendix D: Governor Lingle's response to the Task Force dated June 28, 2006. Appendix E: Ka`u Preservation Punalu'u Impact Study and Punalu'u Survey, March 26, 2006 - Apri124, 2006. °~r~ Executive Summary ~ The South Kona - Ka'u Coastal Conservation Task Force was established by the adoption of House Concurrent Resolution (HCR) No. 5 House Draft (HDl), Senate Draft (SD1) (HCR 5 HDl SDl) of the Twenty-Third Legislature in 2005. HCR 5 requested the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR), Division of State Parks to bring together a diverse and broad group of area stakeholders. The stakeholders are community-based full-time and part-time residents from the four main communities in the district of Ka'u (Hawai'i Volcanoes National Park, Pahala, Na`alehu and Hawaiian Ocean View Estates) as well as the mainland. These dedicated individuals are a scholarly kupuna, cultural practitioners, community resource individuals, large landowners, farmers, governmental agency (s) representatives (County, State, and Federal), nonprofit conservation organizations, a nonprofit economic development administrator, and educational -agricultural and conservation -resort land managers (Appendix A). HCR 5 was a direct result of the Ka'u populous, preservationists and the broader public's outcry for a solution (s) to protect, preserve, conserve and restore (if feasible) the Ka'u and South Kona coastal districts. Thus, the purpose of the Task Force was "to review, analyze, and report to the legislature on the impacts being made on the fragile and historically essential coastal lands and near shore marine areas of South Kona and Ka'u...and to identify issues and solutions...". The acknowledged region represents the largest area of natural and undeveloped shoreline in the State of Hawaii. This coast stretches approximately 80 miles from the southern boundary of Hawaii Volcanoes National Park to Miloli'i in South Kona and is largely pristine, unspoiled, uninhabited, and undeveloped. The area is a source for recreation and subsistence for local residents and is the likely landing point of the first Polynesians to reach Hawaii. Well-preserved cultural and historic sites still dominate these shores. The South Kona - Ka'u coast is a treasure trove of Hawai i s unique and endangered species. Eighty to ninety percent of the Hawaiian honu'ea (hawksbill sea turtles, Eretmoche/ys imbricata)nest on the Ka'u Coast, and the honu (green turtles, Che%nia mydas) are found in the water all along the Ka'u- South Kona Coast and can be seen daily resting on the shore at several sites. Furthermore, the most critically endangered marine mammal in the United States today, the Hawaiian monk seal (Monachus schauins/ancti), are being seen more often on the remote Kau Coast, with a birth at Kamilo Point in 2001. Despite protection under the Federal Endangered Species Act (1973), Marine Mammal Protection Act (1972) and State of Hawaii Wildlife Policy, Chapter 195D, Hawaii Revised Statutes, only 1,300 to 1,400 monk seals are known to exist today. The rapid decline in the monk seal population is primarily due to human activities, interactions with fisheries, shark predation, and prey limitation. In addition to this report, the Task Force accomplished other important steps in the past year. These include involvement in the recent successful National Park Service reconnaissance survey that found that the South Kona - Ka'u area likely contains resources of national importance. The Task Force also called upon Governor Linda Lingle and County of Hawaii Mayor Harry Kim to implement a "quiet period" where subdivision and development in the area would be paused until the Task Force could issue its policy recommendations in this report. *.,.r _ The Task Force believes that the cleazest path to protection of the chazacter and culture of the South ~ Kona - Ka'~i coastline is through implementation of specific recommendations that were endorsed by a majority of the members voting. It should be noted that because of the diversity of backgrounds and interests of the Task Force, general agreement could not be obtained for all of the recommendations. Some were strongly objected to and although two additional meetings were held to see if the differences could be worked out, consensus could not be reached. A summary of the full list of recommendations is provided below: • The legislative creation of a special conservation zone called the "Ka'u Coastal Protection Trust" that extends from the southern boundary of Hawaii Volcanoes National Park to the ahupua'a of Manuka from the shoreline inland for 1.5 miles and from the shoreline out into the ocean a distance that would be determined by the boundaries of specific Marine Life Conservation Districts (MLCDs), Fishery Restricted Areas (FBAs), Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), active and historical Koa, and any other new or historical marine managed area along the Kati Coast. This area would bring greater scrutiny to potential development but also greater financial benefits to landownena who voluntarily cooperate with preservation goals. For example, the Task Force calls for state legislation to be enacted to allow additional tax deductions to private landowners in the area who donate their land within specified times to the Trust. Additionally, the State--in conjunction with the County of Hawaii, the federal government, and interested private parties-are to develop financial plans and set aside distinct funding sources for the purchase of private lands in the Trust azea, should landowners be interested in selling to the Trust. m.r t • Legislative authorization and funding for the formation of a South Hawaii Fisheries Management Council (incorporating all districts of northern -southern Kohala and Kona, to the Kati boundary of the Hawaii Volcanoes National Park), allowing the establishment of a council that is similar in organization and composition as the West Hawaii Fisheries Management Council, to protect and conserve coastal resources in partnership with the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR). • The creation of an advisory board comprised of 7 members who are Ka'u Kupuna, landowners, land managers or residents who shall advise and recommend action to DLNR and/or the Planning Department of the County of Hawaii on any land use requests that involves development and subdivisions in areas identified to be protected. • Establishment of a "No-Development" setback line from the coast to protect resources, subject to changes where preservation corridors maybe enhanced by the development. Such development within the setback that is allowable shall include an integrated resource management plan and a perpetual preservation corridor, with infrastructure that is supported with allocations from the common area charges assessed against property developed along the coastline and areas mauka. I. Purpose of HCR 5 HDS SD1 The Twenty-Third Legislature of the State of Hawaii adopted HCR 5 HDl SDl (Appendix B). The concurrent resolution requested DLNR's Division of State Pazks (State Pazks) to establish a South Kona - Ka'i3 Coastal Conservation Task Force (Task Force) to review and analyze the impacts being made on the fragile and historically essential coastal lands and nearshore marine azeas of South Kona and Ka'Fi. HCR 5 HDl SDl directed the Task Force to: • Identify those coastal lands and near shore marine areas that have environmental, cultural and recreational values in need of protection; • Identify mechanisms and sources of funding for the protection and management of such resources; • Propose future uses and limitations in the identified areas that permit minimal man-made structures, manage activities that may degrade or deplete resources, and avoids the hazazds from potential volcanic activities and lava flows; • Propose measures for the protection of marine animals, such as monk seals and green sea and hawksbill turtles, and their nesting and habitation areas; and • Seek funding from the private sector, via grants and contributions to support the activities of the paztnership. HCR 5 HDl SDl also requested that the Task Force submit a report, including proposed legislation, to the Legislature on the activities and progress of the Task Force, including azeas identified for protection and strategies to achieve protection. Further, the concurrent resolution called for the Task Force to cease to exist on the last day of the Regular Session of the 2007 Legislature. October 2005 began the regulaz monthly meetings of the Task Force, excluding the month of December. All meetings were "open" to the public and held at the Pahala Community Center in Ka'u. At the initial meeting, members introduced themselves, shazed their community association affiliation, and stated their vision of Ka'u relative to the objectives outlined in HCR 5 HDl SDl. By the second meeting, the Task Force elected "Auntie" Pele Hanoa as its Chair. In February 2006, Carne Kuwada-Phipps, a trained facilitator with the Department of Research and Development, County of Hawaii, was engaged to assist the Task Force in focusing the discussions on the duties set forth in the concurrent resolution. One of the first things that the Task Force needed was to define their operating principles. These principles set the parameters for every meeting with respect to how people communicate and how decisions are made. The members were asked to talk about the values that are important to them so that the Task Force could develop a foundation for which there would be trust and respect for each +wr other's ideas and interests. Facilitation of all subsequent meetings enabled the Task Force to concentrate their efforts on the tasks that needed to be accomplished. Adopted at the Apri12006 meeting was the Task Force's mission statement: "We seek to preserve open space and the unique lifestyle and history of Ka'Fi for current and future generations utilizing the values of: Pono (fairness), Ho'owaiwai (enrichment), and Malama'Aina (care for the land). Collectively, we will pmvide specific recommendations that will help preserve and protect the cultural, biological, and spiritual values that makes Ka'fl, Ka"u." Concurrent to the Creation of the Task Force, in Mazch 2005, Congressman Ed Case was corresponding with the National Pazk Service (NPS) to perform a reconnaissance survey of approximately 80 miles of the Ka'Fi coastline. The purpose for the study was to evaluate the resources to determine whether it should be included in the National Park System. In his letter to the NPS, Congressman Case stated, "The Ka'u coastline presents a rare opportunity to preserve and protect an entire coastal system of a unique natural, scenic, historical, cultural and ecosystem combination found nowhere else in our world. It is also under tremendous development pressure, and these resources will in all likelihood be lost if we don't move to protect them soon". In responding to the Congressman, Frank Hays, Pacific Area Director, NPS, informed him that he himself would partidpate as a member of the Task Force and that the NPS would complete a reconnaissance survey upon a Task Force recommendation to do so. The Task Force approved having DLNR send a letter to the NPS endorsing the reconnaissance survey and offered to assist with this vital and promising effort. (*Note: The reconnaissance survey azea was adjusted to include the azea from Kapao'o Point at the boundary of Hawaii Volcanoes National Pazk southwest to Kahilipali Point. The mauka boundary follows the Mamalahoa Highway and includes 23 miles of coastline. The NPS is planning to submit the reconnaissance survey to Representative Case in eazly October 2006.) One of the issues raised during earlier meetings of the Task Force was whether the State and County would approve development proposals while the Task Force was studying the azea. After many discussions, a majority of the Task Force members voted that the primary goal of the Task Force was to preserve and protect the natural, cultural, environmental, and recreational resources in South Kona - Ka'u and to ensure that there would be mechanisms available for their protection. For this purpose, the Task Force sent a letter to Governor Lingle in May 2006 asking for her support in causing a "quiet period" of at least 1 yeaz so that "no" subdivision and "no" development proposals were to be approved in the coastal azea extending from the southern boundary of Hawaii Volcanoes National Park to Milolii and up to 1.5 miles inland. The "quiet period" would allow the Task Force time to complete its studies (Appendix C). An affirmative response from Governor Lingle was received. She said she would suggest to Peter Young, Chairperson of DLNR to scrutinize applications for land uses in the Conservation District and that he is to inform the Task Force of these applications. In addition, Governor Lingle said she would provide a copy of the letter to Mayor Kim and Council Chairperson Stacy Higa suggesting that "r" Special Management Area permit applications for land uses in the Agricultural District are also to be closely scrutinized (Appendix D). Special Management Area permit applications for land uses in the Agricultural District are also to be closely scrutinized (Appendix D). II. Description of the Area A. Regional Context ' Hawai i Island is the second most populated island in the State and the fastest-growing with an estimated 167,000 residents in 2005. According to statistics collected by the Department of Business, Economic Development, & Tourism, most of the new residents to Hawaii Island are from the United States mainland and the other islands. Experts predict that this growth will continue and the population will reach more than 217,000 by the year 2020. The district of Ka'u is located on the southeast side of the Island of Hawaii, comprising approximately 624,995 acres or 922.3 square miles. The district is so large it could contain the Islands of Oahu, Molokai, and Kaho'olawe. The coast of Ka'u is the longest undeveloped shoreline in the Hawaiian islands, stretching 80 miles from South Kona to Ka Lae, South Point, and onto the southern boundary of the Hawaii Volcanoes National Park. Despite the long coastline, a limited area of the shoreline is easily accessible without using afour -wheel drive vehicle or driving 12 miles to South Point. Ka'u contains a variety of habitat, from 'w.r prehistoric rainforest to dry lava desert, windblown grasslands, ~ and rugged rocky x ,>;sr r coastline. Two azeas ' with the most pristine and critically important habitats aze Punalu'u Black Sand Beach, nesting grounds for the endangered honu ea (hawksbill turtle) and threatened honu (green sea turtle) and Honu'apo Bay** and tidal wetlands, where the Hawaiian monk seal, the State's most endangered animal with only 1,4001eft in the wild, has been spotted. (**Note: The recent acquisition of Honu'apo lands was spearheaded by a community group, Ka Ohana O Honu'apo, working with the Hawaii Island Land Trust, The Nature Conservancy, and The Trust for Public Land who secured state, county and federal funds for its purchase from a private developer. Long term plans include reestablishing it as an estuary and nursery for fish as well as a potential breeding site for the ae'o, the endangered Hawaiian stilt.) ti The majority of the lands within South Kona - Ka'u aze designated by the State Land Use Commission as Agricultural or Preservation (P-1 and P-2). P-1 lands aze placed in the Conservation District such as Hawaii Volcanoes National Park and the Ka'u Forest Reserve. The only urban zoned ~ lands are the 433 acres in Punalu'u owned by SM Investment Partners, a portion of which was developed as Sea Mountain at Punalu'u. For more than a hundred years, C. Brewer, also known as Ka'u Agribusiness dominated the district of Ka'it with its landholdings, political power and its sugaz industry. In the 1970s, facing the reality of a declining mazket for its sugaz, Ka'u Agribusiness sought to diversify into macadamia orchards, tourism, and housing, as well as its other agricultural pursuits. In 1972, Sea Mountain at Punalu'u was developed with a golf course, tennis courts, a 76-unit condominium project and the Black Sand Restaurant. In November 1975, a tsunami rearranged the coastline and tossed C. Brewer's plans to the wind. That event, together with an economic downturn in the mid-1970s, caused a stall in the project. In the eazly 1980s, a new, lazger scale master plan for Punalu'u was prepazed. However, in a legal action filed by local residents, further action on the plan was stopped by a court order. According to the Environmental Impact Statement Preparation Notice prepazed by Group 70 International, Inc. for Sea Mountain Five, LLC, dated December 2005, the current plans aze to "develop a 433 acre partially developed pazcel with residential units, mixed uses, a world class destination resort/hotel, a championship 18-hole golf course, cultural/marine center, upgraded wastewater treatment facility (WWTF), water reservoir and other supporting infrastructure. " The landowner, SM Investment Paztners, conditioned the transfer of ownership of the land upon Sea Mountain Five LLC 's obtaining the required pemvts from the County. '`""r There is a growing community movement in Ka'u that seeks to preserve the ancient Hawaiian sites, native flora and fauna, ocean access and wide open spaces. This movement is determined to find ways to prevent further development in Punalu'u knowing that there will be significant adverse impacts on the azea's natural and cultural resources, particulazly the endangered Hawksbill (hone ea) and threatened Green Sea (honu) turtles, the Hawaiian monk seal, and the lifestyle of the people of Ka'u. Joining the preservation effort are private nonprofit organizations like Ka'u Preservation Counal, The Nature Conservancy who purchased 24 acres at Kamehame, a key nesting site for the honu ea turtles. The Trust for Public Land with Ka 'Ghana O Honu'apo acquired 225 acres in Honu'apo for a park and the Hawaii Wildlife Fund spearheaded the transfer of 1,200 acres along the Waiohinu shoreline to State forestry management. Locally, the Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Committee of the Hawai i County Council recently took action on two resolutions authorizing negotiations to purchase 785 acres at Kiiwfi'a Bay and 10 acres at Punalu'u Beach Park. The Committee identified Kawa'a as their #1 priority with Punalu'u as #5. Mayor Kim identified the Punalu'u lands as his second highest priority for the County to acquire under his new policy of preserving public access, open space and natural resources. The Department of the Interior purchased 116,000 acres of Kahuku Ranch adjacent to Hawaii Volcanoes National Pazk, increasing the Park's size by sixty (60) percent. In his remarks at the dedication ceremony, Senator Daniel Inouye said: "We are in a race against time. As the urban dedication ceremony, Senator Daniel Inouye said: "We are in a race against time. As the urban sprawl continues to spread beyond Oahu and into our neighbor islands, we must be very vigilant in yam, setting aside lands, which must be protected". B. Project Area The project area starts at the southern boundary of Hawaii Volcanoes National Park down and azound Ka Lae to Miloli'i in South Kona, from the shoreline to 1.5 miles inland (Figure 1, area in red). The shoreline portion of the project area comprises approximately 80 miles and is lazgely pristine, unspoiled, uninhabited, and undeveloped. It is an environmentally fragile coastline with natural resources of significant value such as fishponds, estuazies, a high diversity of native coastal plants, and nesting areas for marine animals. Both along the coast and inland, the area is rich with historic, cultural, and recreational resources, containing numerous ancient heiau and other culturally and environmentally sigmficant sites ~ E k ,yam - es 4~ r wwn kAY4W y~~~ ~ ~ 'd}y6 ~Si xE"~ ~ c o, i 's S c y, F fe , r Fry. ~_n3i ~ z ~i, n9 gY' ~ ~ Fh Y ! F ~ % .S" a ~ ~ `t HAWAIY .r. ~~y/, - a em~w~n.en Nap . ~ ¢ ,~i t ~ x~ ~a ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ , ' ~ w; ,,.E r ~ ~,u, w 4 ~ ~ f sm "i ^ti.c W'ACHU ti. ?I a I r^ ~ s .w o ik f _ _ x I 1 ~-_11 1t" L_._J ~All/~lA _ _ i v Yy 1. Marine Resources • Nesting sites for 44 of the fewer than 80 hawksbill sea turtles known to nest in the Hawaiian Islands. The hawksbill is a federally listed endangered species and is the rarest sea turtle in the Pacific Ocean. Over 90% of hawksbill nests in the state occur on the island of Hawaii, and 11 of the 13 known nesting sites on the island aze located within the study azea. • Feeding sites for the threatened green sea turtle. • Shoreline havens for the endangered Hawaiian monk seal. vi,.,,. Rare anchialine ponds that host endemic and native shrimp species and insects. • Intertidal pool complexes that provide nursery habitat for marine invertebrates and fish. 7 • Living corals reflective of very good water quality, and probably indicative of low land nmoff and sedimentation. • Limited algal cover, implying healthy populations of benthic invertebrates, low nutrient runoff and fish populations that have not been overexploited. 2. Flora And Fauna • Habitat for indigenous shorebirds and seabirds such as the Pacific golden plover, wandering tattler, ruddy turnstone, sanderling, wedge-tailed shearwater, and black noddy. • Localized wetlands attractive to the indigenous black-crowned night-heron, the endangered endemic Hawaiian coot, and migratory waterfowl such as northern pintails, northern shovelers, and American wigeon. • Coastal hunting ground for the endemic Hawaiian hawk or 'io, and probable nighttime flight path to sea for band-nxmped storm-petrels. • Habitat for the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat. • An unusually large complex of basal springs, intermittent streams, and wetlands that provide habitat for a broad range of native Hawaiian stream fauna. Notable geological forms in the study area include Ka'u Desert; the Great Crack, the Pahala ash layer; caves; and 'rr~, the ancient Ninole Hills and Valleys. Also found there are a wide array of coastal marine habitats including pahcehce and 'a'a flats, drifted sand, anchialine pond shores, protected beaches, spray-battered bluffs, islets, rock outcrops, exposed sea arches, intertidal benches, underwater springs dischazging into the neazshore zone, coves and bays bracketed by headlands, some shallow azeas protected by reefs and boulders, and miles of offshore bathymetry featuring a quick drop to deep water. Over 40 species of native coastal strand vegetation are found in this area. 3. Cultural Resources Collectively, the cultural resources and the living cultural practices in the project area commemorate the way of life in old Hawai i, both before and after Western contact. Ka'u is known for its remote and rural character and the people for their rugged independence. One can experience the cultural landscape via ancient and historic trails along the shoreline with visible features representing the traditional Hawaiian culture, agriculture, fishing, and the plantation impacts and developing a economy of the 19w century. Living practices include 'opihi-picking, salt gathering, fishing, and surfing. Notable sites include the ruins of a formal royal center at Punalu'u, with remains of the huge r.+~ luakini overlooking the bay; vestiges of acoral-marked ala loa; and other heiau, habitation sites and petroglyphs in the surrounding area. Throughout Ka'u are numerous features of cultural importance such as house sites, burials, cave shelters, fishing stations and petroglyphs. Many people of Ka'u continue to live a life that is deeply connected to the land and sea. They pick 'opihi, fish, gather salt, grow foods and collect native plants for medicine, food, and crafts. Hawaiians of Punalu'u conduct environmental education classes, work tirelessly to keep the surrounding lands from being developed, and struggle to protect the revered horru ea and honu. The people of Ka'u are living cultural resources with a deep connection to the land. Their personal knowledge and understanding of the resources are essential to the future management of the public trust lands. 4. Recreational and Scenic Resources There aze a limited number of public recreation designated sites within the district of Ka'u, however, there are a number of recreational activiries in which people engage such as sightseeing, fishing, camping, hiking, picnicking, studying nature, and visiting cultural sites. They also swim, surf, snorkel, dive, bodyboard, and pick'opihi. Ocean activities are limited for most of the yeaz due to rough seas and dangerous currents. Offshore £ishing from small boats occur during calm periods and at remote azeas like Kamehame, where mounds of 'opihi shells can be found along with an occasional fishing platform. The project area also features spectacular scenic vistas. Cradled between the green slopes of Mauna Loa and Kilauea volcanoes and the endless expanse of the Pacific Ocean, Ka'u screscent-shaped shoreline offers a uniquely unspoiled view, marked at one end by the steaming flow of lava into the sea, and at the other end by Ka Lae, the souflurnmost point in the United States. Ka Lae (South Point) • Boat Ramp and cultural sites • Limited hiking trails Ka'alu'alu Bay • Recreational sites can only Ue accessed by four wheel drive vehicles Punalu'u • County beach park • Sea Mountain golf course. • Boat ramp • Fishing, 'opihi picking, swimming, bodysurfing, and snorkeling • Cultural sites • Campgrounds Outdoor classroom 'V? ' e Honu'apo • Spectacular views, particulazly from the shoreline where one can look laterally along miles of undeveloped coast and mauka to Mauna Loa • From a high point along the Honu'apo pali there aze impressive views of the Ka'u coastline and one can see a good portion of Hawaii Volcanoes National Pazk with Wood Valley's cliff and valley formation in the background. • County beach park Kawa'a Bay • Bodysurfing, board surfing, picnic and hiking trails Public vehicular access from the highway to the shoreline is limited to the beach park access roads in Punalu'u and Honu'apo. However, there are two rough roads through private property that lead to Kaw~'a Bay that is regularly used by island residents. Private landowners grant permission and lend gate keys to trusted local residents who want to reach the coast for fishing, 'opihi picking and other traditional uses. There are trails along the rocky shoreline that entice hikers away from the beach and into rugged lava terrain. The trails are used for access to fishing sites by local residents or to pick 'opihi. Resource protection and recreation management issues vary in degree and detail but not in substance from other accessible locations along the coast such as Kawa'a and Honu'apo. ip From March 26 through Apri124, 2006, Ka'u Preservation conducted a 30-day survey to determine the number of people that visit Punalu'u Beach Pazk and how they arrive to determine the impact to the turtles and the surrounding environment (Appendix E). They recorded an average of 1,148 visitors per day with approximately 70% arriving by car, and 30% by bus or other commercial vehicles. The survey data included the following observations by survey takers: despite warning signs, people are going closer to the turtles than advised and the turtles aze driven back into the water or aze unable to come onto the sand to rest and digest after feeding. Further, people, including school children, aze taking the black sand and rocks from the beach area, encouraged by teachers and tour bus drivers. III. Methodology HCR 5 HDl SDl directed the Task Force to complete the following tasks: • Identify coastal and marine areas having environmental, cultural, recreational value that need protection • Identify mechanisms for protection and management of the resources; • Propose future uses, limitations for those azeas, manage activities and avoid hazards from potential volcanic activities and lava flows; r • Propose measures to protect marine animals, including monk seals, honu ea and hone, and their nesting and habitation azeas; • Seek funding from the private sector, through grants and contributions, to support the activities of the public/private partnership; and • Submit a report on the Task Force's activities and progress, including areas identified for protection and strategies to achieve protection to Legislature. The concurrent resolution also includes a clause that the Task Force will cease to exist on the last day of the 20071egislative session. A. Establishment of Working Groups Four working groups were formed, based on geographical azeas extending from the southern boundary of Hawaii Volcanoes National Park to Miloli'i. Members selected the group they wished to participate in based on their knowledge about the area and interest. Group I: Southern boundary of the Hawaii Volcanoes National Park to Honu'apo; Group II: Honu'apo to eastern side of Ka'alu'alu Bay; Group III: Ka'alu'alu Bay to Pali o Kulani; and Group PJ: Pali o Kulani to Manuka "Group V: Manuka to Miloli'i. 11 * NOTE: In an eazlier meeting, Gil Kahele, representing Pa'a Pono Miloli'i assured the Task Force that the azea from Manuka to Miloli'i has been extensively studied and is not immediately threatened by development. Moreover, the South Kona Wilderness Area, administered by State Parks, is afforded some protection through its wilderness azea designation. B. Identification of Areas that Should be Protected The azea from Kap~o'o Point - Punalu'u contains a wild shoreline and numerous archaeological remains. The shoreline from Punalu'u - Miloli i is the longest wild shoreline in the State with azchaeological remains, geologic and physiographic landmazks and several small sandy beaches - white sand, black sand, and green sand. Inshore waters off the coast are said to have the best marine life in the State. Portions of this area are being reviewed as potential candidates for a Natural Area Reserves designation under DLNR's Division of Forestry and Wildlife. Area I: Punalu'u, Ninole Cove, Kawa'a, Honu'apo, Hokukano and Hi ona'a; Area II: Pohina Pali, Puhi Ula Cave, Maniania, Waikapuna, Ka Lua Noio, Ka Lua O Wai, Ka Kua Lepo'o Kanaka; Area III: Pinao Point, Pu'ulia, Mahana Bay, fishing heiau, Lua Makalei, Cliff off Pu'u Kulani, Lua o Palahemo, Ki'i (Petroglyphs), Ka Lae; Area PJ: Pohue Bay, Wai Ahukini, Pali o Kulani, Kealakio, Kapua Bay, Anchialine Ponds at Kanonone, Kahakahakea, Hali'ipalala and North Pond _ Upon identifying the areas within the geographical boundaries, priority was assigned to those azeas where it was deemed to be critical to have methods and a strategy for the preservation of the resources. 1. Area I: Southern boundazy of the Hawaii Volcanoes National Pazk to Honu'apo ""~~17. = g T`-w ? ref d-. j K $ a H rwv'Ir .a K+f C S pw h r +'ST, ~ ~ ~f N f ,t AM ~ ~ 1. _ ,`R lY~ { Y ~ A ~ 9 l Fg :iY4 ~44TM_~ ~ S ~ i y^ \ ~ ~ i? X SA W q-. ~ p s -tax ~ ~ ,i u- 3 4 Y ~ A ~ t=. ~~.w - ' ~ ' 'y, ~ NAWAI'1 cxd ~x ~ ~.~r . - ('A:up4Ain 1:9ouNeln EauMM dlLw~Yi 1 ~ ; ~ V, V b:n:ts:~%ueal Yerk h:Hwq'epo L i ~ ~~p~ 1 ~ f l Sy a ~ t d ~ j { ` f .a.« ' k rt s ~ a" s. ..M x..r . ' Mx'AtFINI ~ f p~ 4 ~ M ~ ~ ~ 3 it :mwwa 12 Group I determined that the entire coastal area has resources that need to be protected, beginning with Punalu'u, and followed by Kawa a, Hokukano and Ninole Cove (Figure 2, area in red). The Ninole - Punalu'u area is one of the oldest areas on Hawaii Island. Punalu'u, meaning "diving spring" is famous for its black sand beach. The area is so named for the abundant freshwater springs that are found when diving to the bottom of the ocean. The bay was a historically popular canoe landing and an ancient surfing site as the waves and currents here are much safer and gentler than the rest of the southeastern coastline. Kauwila Pond is a small pond near the presently abandoned restaurant that was severely degraded when the Sea Mountain development was completed. It is fed by Kauwila Springs. Kauwila Pond is most at risk. Punalu'u Nui Heiau is a very large sacrificial heiau. The sacrificial nature of the site is evidenced by the many bones that were excavated during the construction of a warehouse. Between Honu'apo and Punalu'u, about 4.5 miles, there are many freshwater springs along the shore and many of them well up under the ocean. Hawaiians living in this area were experts in diving to the bottom of the ocean and would Eill an empty gourd with fresh water from the undersea springs offshore. Springs at Honu'apo, Ka'alaiki-Hilea, Ninole, and Punalu'u supported the cultivation of wetland taro as well as mullet. Both the hone ea and honu are frequent visitors to Punalu'u Beach. The threatened honu utilizes the coastline at Punalu'u to forage and nest. Breeding and nesting of these turtles occurs almost exclusively in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. Early Tuesday evening, September 12, 2006, a tiny newborn baby honu ea was discovered near the medicine pond at Punalu'u Black Sand Beach. The honu ea was released after being found by a local fisherman and headed out to sea. Last year several dozen hatchlings were sighted crossing the old road near the beach concession stand. According to experts, Punalu'u is a very important nesting site for the critically endangered honu ea and experts agree that any further development would negatively impact the critical habitat at Punalu'u and perhaps lead to the extinction of this sacred Hawaiian honu. Honu ea tend to feed on a variety of sponges and ascidians in the nearshore environment and breed offshore of Punalu'u during the months of February to May. In the immediate vicinity of the Sea Mountain development, honu ea nest at the Black Sand Beach, Laupapaohua Beach, and Koloa Beach. Nesting also occurs at Kawa'a to the west, and Kamehame to the east. Together, these areas comprise the majority of the known nesting sites for honu ea in the Hawaiian Islands. In Wailau, there are found'ili'ili hanau o Koloa. They are black, beach-worn, volcanic stones found at Koloa Beach and legends say the pebbles are able to propagate their species. Stories are told of the male and female pebbles coming together to make baby stones. The male stones are smooth, without noticeable indentations or eyes while the female stones have little pits in which their young are developed and eventually separate from their mothers. When C. Brewer built the Black Sand Restaurant at Punalu'u, they used the pebbles as flooring material and to build a wall above which a mural by Herb Kane once hung. Current maps indicate the location of Koloa Beach in Ninole ahupua'a. However, Koloa Beach was originally located in Wailau and some members of the Task Force would like Koloa Beach put back in its original location and efforts made to restore it. Kawa'a was once a Hawaiian village, where an entire community wrested a living from a place where rain and soil were precious commodities. There was taro, bananas, and other crops. The estuaries were used as fishponds, and water was drawn from a sweet spring that still flows from a pool near the ponds. There, in caves located mauka from the shore, are the iwi. Atop the cliff on the Puna side of Kawa'a Bay is Ke'eku Heiau, an immense black Hawaiian temple of the type where human sacrifices were performed. Kawa'a today is a cove and freshwater estuary surrounded mostly by the weedy barrens of a long- abandoned cow pasture. The view mauka is spectacular. On a clear day, it extends uninterrupted all the way up to the summit ridge of Mauna Loa. Apua Bay, Halape Bay, Keauhou Bay, Kamehame Bay, Punalu'u and Kawa'a Bay are nesting grounds for the hawksbill. Archaeological features found in Punalu'u include house sites, a school site, wall structures, canoe sheds, Punalu'u nui Heiau, Lanipao Heiau, petroglyphs, a sacrificial stone and an old government road that will be part of the Ala Kahakai National Historic Trail. 2. Area II: Honu'apo to eastern side of Ka'alu'alu Bay _ _ ~ ~yl, r... a ,..,n ~ tw.,, t~~0., u,... tk. /l^~. °'~p' . ,...5 4 cj _ r 501: (11 NT ~ ~ w..w. ~ ,~-vr~~' !f` ;n l ~hn+ MntluPq't "i^. yqe a irr~4 y,+, a.~, ~ L \ PARR ~ ~ `1°'.. raa.n rAa~ A t .."~"5.~~r v r l! ~ ~ AY*' Yrr.°.....an .w w ~ t 1~ .M. Ka'u .r. 4- 4 ,y,~r,,: ~ ~,mupkA II:Ii u'apr to LAaer~ .~L aw ~ ~ ~ 3' PAH~LA From the south boundary of Honu'apo (honu -turtle and 'apo - to grasp; in ancient times it was a place where turtles were caught) to the eastern border of Ka'alu'alu Bay (named for the wrinkled lava encircling it), Group II selected four priority areas. (Figure 3, area in red). Waikapuna ("water of the spring') was first, a once thriving fishing community before the 1868 devastating earthquakes and tidal waves. It was famous for its three water holes: lua wai inu (drinking -water -hole), lua wai holoi 'umeke (water -hole -for -utensil -washing) and lua wai 'au'au (bathing -water -hole) nearest the ocean. It was also an occasional summer residence of Mary Kawena Pukui and her grandmother Po'ai -Wahine, who went there to pa'akai (salt) and dry their fish. Second is Puhi Ula Cave located in Paula (name of a beautiful woman turned to stone by Tutu Pele'sincensed fury) in the ahupua'a of Kaunamano between Honu'apo and W aikapuna. Reputedly, in this cavern lived the legendary large red male eel (puhi'ula), who lived with a small green . _ f _ , female eel (puhi). In addition, it was the home of an abundance of 'opae'ula (red shrimp) that would turn the pond red unpredictably, frightening its inhabitants. Third is Pohina Pali, southwest of Honu'apo. Kawelohea is a blowhole most noted for the legend of Kawelo. Murdered by her enraged husband, she is thrown over the pali (cliff) and lands on a pohaku (stone) below, lovingly calling out her innocence. Startled into reality, her husband buries her 'iwi (bones) in a nearby cave. Till today, one can hear her pleas. Maniania Pali (giddy cliff) is fourth. Inland, the tale of Niu-loa-hiki is associated with the god Ku- Hina. His mother's (Hina, wife of Ku) wish was to send her son to Tahiti. So, obediently, Niu-loa- hiki climbed atop this "supernatural" niu loa (tall coconut tree). It began to extend itself farther and farther causing its trunk to gently bow with each expansion causing him to feel "giddy or light- headed" until he reached his destination. Other subsequent areas of concern were Ki'i below Waiohinu on the coast (where foreign animal petroglyphs are found). Ka Lua Noio is seaward of Kahilipali Iki and known as a place with good ulua fishing. In addition, Ka Lua O Wai and Ka Lua Lepo'o Kanaka were identified. Kamilo, the latter meaning "swirling currents' was notorious for expired persons and/or objects that drifted there from afar, were known as Kamilo-pae-ali'i (landing of chiefs) and Kamilo-pae-kanaka (Kamilo landing of commoners). The recent acquisition of land in Honu'apo assures that it will be protected for the future generations of Hawai'i's people. 3. Area III: Ka'alu'alu Bay to Pali o Kulani ~ ^~;..ti` ~,•=........=~y,°+XIw9..u. ~ ~ ca~ ~ \°`(`~~'~~s+.e~" Kayq~M."~'W .r.. i ~f,. mil( 1 rti ~`\.:c ` 1 w. ~,~'/Xn~ ~u ° ® 8 t j' _ ~ SFr p b„~ ~ _ nor ~ I~,rw...w~w 4- ~ ~ ~3~`' okcwxa~ 111 x".o q r~ 4~ v°' :.ld k. .n l yr ~ y ..r .4 x rionC`J ~'1^ w v.. .ns.nw~~ p~0 • / ~W i ~ `;r f ~ Ya&k .n..n u.....4 risen dpg~ * Yn r.m,: `:.~;:u^ r. N y.p :.r ~,M ~ i l0 ` - `~.y+` ~ '~""',R."`.. Kau //~1.. . tlAWAI'I "w~ cn ~pk ~~~m. kn~.w .w s..., f Palio KUlmtl j r , ,?;S e ~ Kr fir' Group III, reviewed the area from Ka'alu'alu Bay to Pali o Kulani (Figure 4, area in red). It contains an exceptional wild shoreline that provides outstanding recreational opportunities for nature and scenic appreciation, a back country experience and opportunities for cultural appreciation. Scattered about the rugged countryside are a variety of natural assets, particularly geologic and physiographic landmarks. Examples include the Kahuku fault scarp, resulting from the sinking of the ground surface of the southwest rift zone of Mauna Loa; 3 pit craters, Luapuali, Luapo'ai, and Luapalalauhala, that were formed by a collapse at the crest of the Kahuku fault scarp; Pu'uhou is an unusually large littoral cone formed by the lava flow of 1868; and Pu'u Mahana and Papakolea beach, a littoral cone that is the olivine crystal source of the green sand beach at Papakolea. Other natural assets include the inshore waters west of South Point which are said to have the best marine life in the State, and the anchialine pools along the shore, especially Lua o Palahemo. Five remnant native plant associations add further interest to the landscape and have been significantly altered. Culturally, the site provides an excellent opportunity to effectively interpret the development of Hawaiian prehistoric culture from the earliest of rimes to the present. The South Point complex provides one of the longest and most complete record of human occupation in the Hawaiian Islands, beginning as early as A.D 700. Cave shelters, burial grounds, fishing stations, heiau, salt pans, and the Pohakuokea Stone which allegedly turns over each time a reign changes on the Islands are found there. Group III identified the following coastal lands and nearshore marine areas that should be targeted for protection: Pinao Bay, where fish, lobsters, and limu are abundant and monk seals are seen occasionally, the white sand beach at Pu'ulia, Mahana Bay, with its green sand beach has significant cultural and historic significance for Hawaiians and has been recommended for inclusion in the Ka Lae National Landmark Area. It is a popular recreation area and provides coastline gathering of 'opihi and limu kohu. Lua Makalei is a lava tube shelter, believed to be the site of a large settlement. It was also thought to have been used for burials, as a classroom, a fisherman's work shelter, and work area. It is a popular place for nesting pueo (Hawaiian owl). There is also Pu'u o Kulani and Moi'lele heiau. Pu'u Ali'i is a sand dune that was the burial site of hundreds of sets of bones. Archaeologists from Bishop Museum in 1965 excavated here and found that some of the people were buried in an upright position, suggesting they were guarding the area. Lua o Palahemo is a deep rock pool thought to be connected underground to the ocean. It is believed to be haunted by a mo'o (spirit) also called Palahemo. It was taboo to bathe there when it rained. From the bluff above Palahemo it is said that one can see all the boundaries of Ka'u. 4. Area 1V: Pali o Kulani to Manuka 4 'i.~'~r p ~ M niv... y{ a' ~ ID'r ~uK v~nvs~ ir..~,'., ~ ~ Y f„iuw 4 ~ Wv T ~~~f' y'.'!n.r. ~u~11 j is & / f i n n ~.rrr. a f t, ~ .1~I ~a~G~ .L ..a~.. li . -"'A5" E. It ~ *q sy.~'R Y _ •y' .?.~,3~, `a Y~_'E i ~.r..r' / ~ IrWI',~f' NAS~UyA 1 ~•wl. .......r .a a 51 vAxK r... enrvr x ,fix- ,{p~ _ , ~ 4~ , J ~4 yI v y. 1 ` ~ I i°~y~ t,ronC k.lma N: Pnlin Aulani to Namda aim. - Sfi. a a~:~ _ _ _ .r ,y' +ecn _ M ?r ~`r~,Tri ~~rq:w~...~~ / aY'~ FAHALA , L.h" - •.tna ~wmura ..u. Group IV\), covering the area from Pali o Kulani to Manuka (Figure 5, area in red), identified the anchialine ponds and lauhala stand at Kanonone, Kahakahakea, Hali'ipalala and the North Pond with an abundance of 'opae'ula as the most fragile resources. The petroglyph fields and south of Pohue Bay were studied by archaeologist Aki Sinoto in 2006. There are numerous burials in various locations. Pohue Bay's white sand beach and honu ea nesting sites need to be protected. Vern Yamanaka, a member of the Task Force, offered the following information about the area's fragile resources and the need to have them protected. "Other significant sites include the coastline in and around WaiAhukini, Pali o Kulani and Kealakr'o that served as a main landing, portage, and settlement site. There is a need to protect dte special resources such as the anchialine ponds, lauhala, hao and other native plants, petroglyph fields, archaeological sites, habitats forhonu, seals, koas, intertidal resources and endangered mammals. In the Kahuku area from Kaimuu'wala to Na Pu'u a Pele thatinc/odes over 5mi/es of ocean frontage and 19,(X70+ acres 2 to 3 archaeo%gical surveys ha ve been completed and today, there are ongoing studies that are cataloguing archaeological sites, burials, and petroglyphs. Since the early 1980s we have managed and protected sites and marine resources in conjunction with the National Park Service, UHHiIo Marine Science Center, Kupuna, Burial Council, and the Volcano Observatory. Recommendations for future uses tie in closely with the need for funding to support interpretive and resource managementplans. Pasthistoryhasshownusthatwithoutsufficientmonitorinp management and enforcement, setting up a conservatr'on corridor willlead to the devastation of marine and land resources. To effectively manage just 3.Smiles ofshoreline in Kaupulehu, North Kona, from Kiholo to Kauhuwai with an interpretive center and a resource management plan will require an annual budget of approximately $500, 000. The management of just our Kahuku lands would require up to$450,OOOannual/ynotcountinginhastructureimprovements. Thehonuea monitoring program at Pohue alone requires over $150,000 fora 7month period each year (Kahuku has at least 3 additional sites). There are many other nesting sites along the Group IV coastline that do not ha ve the necessary funding to properly monitor and manage this single resource. If these areas that are closed were putinto public access conservation corridors that resource will disappear without costly security, management and enforcement. Marine resources m addition to the turtles immediately become atrisk upon the creation ofpubGc access conservation areas due to increased takingfrom land based access. All of these areas already suffer from individuals who are able to access the resources from the sea. We expect that the impact of the proposed interisland Superferry will increase the takingin all coastal areas. Future uses needs to monitor and limit taking so that the zesources stock can be maintained at a sustainable level. In the past, governmenthas mandated public access in areas that are developed or acquired as parks without assessing the impact that public access will have on the resources in that area. In practically every case, the marine resources in the immediate area have been decimated and never recovered their original population. Limitations to designated sites will need to include a limit on users and a sound management/monitoring plan. The State will need to find funding to increase the manpower needed to enforce laws and rules related to the preservation of these resources. r ~ a~,l Waterholes, anchiaGne ponds, and marshes provide y ~ unique biological environments thatneed buffers, active monitoring and management. The cost of properly protecting these areas is expensi ve but manageable while access is constricted. With public ' access ttre management costs would soar and the environment will face negative impacts immediately. : j Archaeological sites require constantmonitoringond management since they draw the interest of a broad spectrum of visitors and locals. Each visitimpacts these sites unless accompanied by knowledgable docents. Many sites need to be kept offlimits and protected from any visitors who have no genealogical connection to the site. In areas where fundingis available for interpretive centers and managementprograms (i.e. Kaupulehu) itis possible to protect and preserve these special sites." C. Proposed Future Uses and Limitations The Task Force recommends that proposed future uses include backpacking, camping with a permit, cultural and environmental protocols, fishing, hiking, hunting (pigs, goats), kayaking, natural /cultural resource education, development (where preservation corridors could be enhanced by the proper type of development), organized visits, and trash removal. Proposed limitations are no all-terrain vehicle use, no cars /vehicular traffic, no commercial use without a permit, no sand collecting, and no cross netting. D. Mechanisms to Protect and Manage Identified Areas The Task Force identified the following tools to apply to areas having significant resources that should be protected from development. The tools are: rezoning/redistricting (reclassification); public/private partnerships; conservation easements; setbacks; federal, state, and county rules and regulations; and land trusts, donations, and exchanges. Land acquisition is of course another way a site can be protected if the purchase is for the purpose of its preservation and sustainability. Any one or combination of these tools can be used to protect an area from actions that would otherwise impact its resources to the extent that their special features, cultural, environmental, and/or recreational values are compromised. Further, enforcement of government rules and regulations, by the appropriate agency, can also be an effective tool that will prevent the degradation of these resources from human actions. Other mechanisms that can be used to protect significant sites are government designated reserve areas; cooperative agreements between developers and the community that include a benefits package that will address the community's need and recognize a developer's financial investment; integrated resource management plans; fishery management areas; landowner incentive programs; and transfers of development rights. These tools are described below. Integrated Resource Management Plans: (IRMP) are based on the principles of ecosystem management. Such plans provide for the management of natural resources including fish, wildlife, and plants; allow multipurpose uses of resources; and provide public access where appropriate for those uses, without any net loss. IRMPs can identify specific actions required to attain natural resource management goals and can be applied to fish and wildlife management, land management, forest management and fish and wildlife oriented recreation. They may also be used for wetlands protection, enhancement, and restoration and where necessary, for the support of fish, wildlife, and plants. As shared by Vern Yamanaka who has extensive experience with IRMPs, funds from developed areas (common area charges) were used to Eund an IRMP at Kaupulehu. The plan sought to coordinate public access, marine and land resource management, interpretive center staffing and operations, and educational programs about the ahupua'a. They were able to preserve 80 percent of the shoreline up to 300-1,000 feet inland and dedicate more than 600 acres to a permanent conservafion corridor. On lands developed in North Kona and Kohala, many sites were kept secret and involve kupuna and knowledgable land managers in the planning process that creates large archaeological preserves that would be off limit to visitors. The protected sites are located within the preserve and the cost of securing the area and providing meaningful management of the resources is quite expensive. FisherX Management Areas: DLNR's Division of Aquatic Resources (DAR) may establish, maintain, manage, and operate freshwater and marine fishing reserves, refuges, public fishing areas for the purposes of managing, preserving, protecting, conserving, and propagating introduced freshwater fishes and other freshwater or marine life. The Federal government has jurisdiction over the higher marine vertebrates through the Endangered Species Act, like turtles, whales, and seals. The State has concurrent laws protecting these endangered animals. DAR's basic responsibility are the "lower" vertebrates and invertebrates. They establish marine life conservation districts (MLCD) involving total area closures such as Hanauma Bay and Kealakekua Bay; partial closures for fish replenishment such as West Hawai i Fish Replenishment Area, exclude commercial use such as Hilo Harbor, exclude certain gear use (no netting such as at Kiholo Bay) which are called fishery management areas. This type of designation takes a lot of time and effort and involves the conduct of surveys to determine the uniqueness or decline in fish stock, followed by a series of public meetings and a public hearing. To initiate this process, unique or special areas should be identified such as Honu'apo, which already has some protection. DAR will identify if it serves as a nursery habitat for juveniles that will eventually populate coastal areas. The nursery ground gets protected and fishing along the coast is allowed. Anchialine pools and coastal springs are often "kipukas" for rare native invertebrates and should be identified and afforded the highest level of protection. Transfer of Development Rights: Traditional land use planning methods for growth management have proven inadequate in preventing or slowing the encroachment of urban development on rural lands. Too often, zoning changes are made based on political pressures that fail to take into account bigger socioeconomic and environmental considerations. As a result, there is a demand for new land use planning techniques that recognize the need for an economic and environmental balance, the importance of private property rights, the power of using amarket-based approach, and states' particular legal and political structures. One such method is the use of transferable development rights (TDR). A TDR regime controls growth and development by focusing land use changes in areas targeted by the communities. TDR allows the market transfer of development rights from areas designated for preservation to landowners and developers in areas deemed appropriate for development. Such a system seems to provide a solid foundation for a successful equitable and efficient method of controlling growth, balancing equities and protecting environmental and natural resources. Landowner Incentive Program: The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) provides funds to State landowner assistance programs that provide financial assistance to private landowners to enhance, protect, and restore habitats that benefit federally listed, proposed or candidate species or other at-risk species. Locally, the Division of Forestry and Wildlife (DOFAW) administers the program which has a committee comprised of DOFAW and FWS representatives. DOFAW provides technical assistance to private landowners to implement funded projects, fiscal and administrative oversight and prepares the annual fiscal and progress reports. The projects support the ongoing efforts of the Department to protect threatened and endangered species as well as to promote environmental education opportunities and community participation. E. Funding Sources Funding sources or solutions is the Task Force's greatest challenge. Areas and resources set aside for preservation will require substantial funding to manage. A constant, guaranteed and inflation proof source of funding will be required to maintain any responsible management plan. Grants are fine generate funds to manage and protect resources that are chosen to be protected will require some development as is the case with Kaupulehu. The development of compatible resorts and other ecofriendly entities such as marine science education centers or campuses close to oceanfront or anchialine /marsh sites may provide Eunding that will manage and utilize resources positively with minimal impact to the coastline. In Kaupulehu where 3.5 miles of coastline has been put into a perpetual conservation corridor, an interpretive center and resource management plan will be supported with allocations from the common area charges assessed against property developed along approximately half a mile of coastline and areas mauka. These funds increase as project costs increase, providing an inflation hedge. Marine resources are sustained in part from the creation by the State of a fishery management area that limits taking and provides reproductive stock. Management funds also monitor water quality, fishery and inter-tidal stock and land-based resources. The interpretive center provides an educational resource to the whole island but most significantly a monitoring and management base for resources. These two models can be effective funding sources that would utilize a small portion of the coastline to effectively preserve and manage large stretches of oceanfront. Other potential sources of funding may include: educational use fees such as those applied to visiting universities who bring students to areas chosen for their unique, environmentally significant resources to do research and perform studies; and commercial use fees for the sale of products cultivated at specially designated public land trust sites. IV. Task Force Recommendations A majority of the Task Force members voting recommended that: • A special conservation zone be established and called the "Ka'u Coasta] Protection Trust" that extends from the southern boundary of Hawaii Volcanoes National Park to the ahupua'a of Manuka from the shoreline inland for 1.5 miles and from the shoreline out into the ocean a distance that would be determined by the boundaries of specific Marine Life Conservation Districts (MLCDs), Fishery Restricted Areas (FBAs), Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), active and historical Koa, and any other new or historical marine managed area along the Ka'u Coast. ? Legislation be enacted to allow tax deductions to private landowners in the area who donate their land, within specified times to the "Ka'u Coastal Protection Trust". ? Legislation be enacted to grant state lands in the Kau Coastal Protection Trust area to the Trust. ? Legislation be enacted to purchase property at Hokukano and to allow for the removal of all existing structures within the Ka'u Coastal Protection Trust area. ? Organized uses of the areas within the Kau Coastal Protection Trust shall emphasize education as a living classroom open to all levels of education and expertise to include agriculture, aquaculture, and traditional and existing uses. • The creation of an advisory board comprised of 7 members who are Ka'u Kupuna, landowners, land managers or residents who shall advise and recommend action to DLNR and/or the Planning Department of the County of Hawaii on any land use requests that involves development and subdivisions in areas identified to be protected. • Establishment of a "No-Development" setback line from the coast to protect resources, subject to changes where preservation corridors maybe enhanced by the development. Such development within the setback that is allowable shall include an integrated resource management plan and a perpetual preservation corridor, with infrastructure that is supported with allocations from the common area charges assessed against property developed along the coastline and areas mauka. • Legislative authorization and funding for the formation of a South Hawai i Fisheries Management Council (incorporating all districts of northern -southern Kohala and Kona, to the Ka'u boundary of the Hawai i Volcanoes National Park), allowing the establishment of a council that is similar in organization and composition as the West HawaYi Fisheries Management Council, to protect and conserve coastal resources in partnership with the Department of Land and Natural Resources. • Punalu'u be designated as a living classroom and commercial activities at Punalu'u Black Sand Beach prohibited. • The State, in conjunction with the County of Hawaii, the federal government, and interested private parties, develop financial plans for the purchase of private lands in the project area. • Puhau, Kauwila, and Kauwale fishponds be restored. • State and county public hearings and meetings involving land use requests be held in the communities nearest the proposed project area and notification of such hearings and meetings be provided to community organizations and interested individuals. • Legislative and county council approval and funds for additional State and County enforcement personnel for the South Kona - Ka'u Districts. • Prohibit the use of direct artificial light along the SO miles of South Kona - Ka'u coastline. • Conservation District subzones be re-evaluated and administrative rules amended where appropriate.