Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0349.902 2006-2008 DEREK L.C. NAPOLEON MOKUAIKAUA CHURCH SenimPastm CHURCH OF THE CHIMES (sos) 3z9.o6ss EstablishedApnl1820 BRIANnL~BOStHARD 75.5713 ALIT DRIVE ~ KAILUA•KONA, HAWAII 96740 (sos) 329.5179 Emeritus I~ENRY K. BOSHARD + Semetary's Office ~ (808) 329.1589 OLDEST _ CHRISTIAN CHURCH - IN HAWAII Mr. Pete Hoffman, Chairnlan Hawaii County Council 4.J 25 Aupuni Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 August 2, 2007 Dear Chairman: I would first like to commend the present County Council for its viability, its independent thinking regazding our Hawaii County's numerous concerns, functions, infrastructures and property developments. Then too, I would also like to praise Councilman Dominic Yagong for his courageous foresight in taking necessary steps towazd effecting the composition of the County Council. That resolution on his part has in my opinion resulted in a reasonable and functional group of dedicated and elected legislative assembly. Many of us (who were born and raised on the Big Island) have been apprised of various azguments, differences of opinions and partial decisions relating to the issue of the County of Hawaii purchasing 150-acres of Punaluu Black Sand Beach for a County Pazk. However, in the recent past the Council members also discussed the subject of instituting a reasonable set-back from the ocean frontage, where no buildings (whether hotels, condominiums, or commercial structures) could be constructed and utilized. As a former County Planning Commission, chairman (1968-70) I visualized the special advantages in pursuing the foregoing action, i.e., if the County Council can legally establish an ordinance, where the set-back for a regional and unique Punaluu Pazk, one that would establish a 2,500-foot set-back distance from Punaluu Bay and incorporate the 150 acres of land (that the Council had been discussing) that action would save our taxpayers millions of dollazs. Furthermore, it would also save millions more continuous expenditures by our County and relating to park maintenance, insurance fees, salaries, etc. Then too, this transaction could be based upon the pazk- site's historic qualifications - as being the only adequate and acceptable beach pazk in the entire Kau District. Furthermore, it has appazently become the environmental haven comm. No. 3 ~ . 0 2 Ref. To: U Ref. date 0 8 200 for the Hawaiian turtle (honu `ea). Some how, our County needs to preserve the pazk-site at Punaluu. It has been such an entity as long as I can remember -including the County's Pavilion at Pu'umoa. Yet, at the same time we must realize that the development group will oppose continuous bureaucratic impedance. I am quite certain that the group, which would desire to develop Punaluu into a viable resort would be glad to abide by any reasonable pre-conditions set by our County Council. The present postponement would provide enough time for the two parties to confer (talk-story) on an acceptable compromise. I still remember the Kau District of the past having been prosperous and heavily populated. It can be that way in the future with more job opportunities being offered. Let us give it a try! Respectfully, eery . Boshazd