HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0559.002 2006-2008 /MPLEMENT/NG ZERO
W,A/TE
'k
Zero Waste Kauai
August 2007
'rLAKIN' OUT THE TRAJH A?INT
WHAT IT CUED TO BE."
Burying and Buminp our natural resouroas pjl¦1
one use is irotwhat the 21~ <R~ry needs:
What the world needs are `discard management
systems" that:
. rrotect p~hlk haaha
. bum sustahubk amnomy
. aedua rnoiace dWudun
. Retluce gbaN wermap
MYmXYp Le W..I.m MBIpYWG ...pm31UI 3
~k
e
¦ Mixed waste is
just garbage
°~C"~ xyw..mgz.owr~Mep m~a nw~nmm a
Gomm. Na 55~.i ~ -
Ref. to: ~?as~ E G
Ref. Date 1
1
¦ Source separated
waste is a
commodity r , .
t'.,
¦ A commodity
that will increase
in value
.w....+cmwn.m..ewr.~e aywam
WHd~?T tI ZERO WA?JTE?
Zero waste is NOT
about getting to
zero.
It is about being on
the ia~th to zero. _ _ .emu ~ 4
sq~k
a~.oww.~w&uw.n ,uyr xm s
ZERO W,OJTE Ifs
. AphilowphY-
A design pri~ple -
A poliq goal -
ZW k n4S si~ly~l~ recovery ...it is not only
. ZW means gong "upstream" and designing
orodups and padwymg wkh reuse and regdhg
in mind
4rtNwNq Lm Wa4mtlueq WN NTmmF 6
2
Industry understands "zero"
goals, has had them for 20
years but never expected
to achieve them:
.Zero Accidents
.Zero Defects
.Zero Waste
In~p..WMgWcW....mM.6pWq IgW'IDA 7
ONCE A COMMITMENT TO ZfIlO
W.A/)f U MWDE s
The benchmark exists to measure
future actions.
. Invest in Resource Recovery InRasWcdrre
. Make Mew Rules fA Provide Incentives for
Diversion
. Require Local Market ResPO.siblliq (LMR)
. Use The Power of ZW Purcirasinp
aµ~..o..z.owm.o~w. aq W+.. uadmr e
fuccEr~uc zERO w,a?rre
coMMUivmEr
California other usa
eawrw.F Co
s o
y~.cw.r ogamuu..,w
s.M. a.zownr o.Aiwy.c
o.u..a C
ua v.n..ntwr
sxs o.. a.,.".'
~'civcl
s.. rnrNm opwu..Rr s..id.. w~
.uMib.~ik .r... G.wr, co
V.l.ub M.d.w4.~.wW...w...h gut
s....r.rmxao.uMy
su •r.w rwia
s.irns rrbb.. a.w.r
swmorawq
ser wc.wamW l.e.p.m ww
Nrnp.w. WN
wmmwp ~w.nna..v..unW.ar
t+s
Ti~ InpxiMUgZR WMbanM 9lYlYM W4.~dUt B
3
ELEMENT) OF ZERO WME
M,t1N,tWEMENT JYJTEM
E ~ 1 ,~.i~,;.=
4s
!'~'t
a
z
M{YVY1yLeWManIN&p Wa
'THE BIG fiX"
FMILITIEf EVERY COMMUNITY
NEED) TO BUILD
¦ The MRF (Materials Recovery Facility)
¦ The Composting Facility (ies)
¦ The C & D Recovery Facility
. The CHARM (Center for Hard to Recycle
Material)
¦ Re-Use Facilities
¦ The Residue Facility
THE MRF
(MATERI.ALf RECOVERY SACILITY)
. r-or traditional recyctables
. At a minimum, needs to
be dual-stream (fibers
and containers);
. New mechanical sorting w
technology is making
"single stream" possible;
. The future is a "2-sort
World"... bio~degradabies -
anddry sortabfes.
zgigk
4
THE COMPOfi1NG FACILITY
. Source-separated organics (SSD) onM
sa
~ perper, yard waste
anted biopolymers;
. Three pdrnary tedtnologies all wodc... bu[
how much Wnd and money do you have?
. opal wmmors... saw aM lean
e~he:
. ASp (Aerated Smtlt Pfks) wlMrays
wlm ache ak arq moisture management;
. lmvessel most cdnplal aM most
expensNe
Inpxmmgsowa.mw.Oa w,M Mqr Am la
CONIfRUCT10N /DEMOLITION
RECOVERY
'L r
. TheFadliry -
. Rzceives both separated and mixed mahaial
. Cdnstructlon wanes ono Danglitlon DBMS Arent the same!
• AdtlitWrNl prace$hy m separate matedak
. Requires a Heavy Duty sort line
. Grinders, Gushers, Balers, etc to produce products
. Deconslrudion of buildings should be encouraged
~~M.~mnwlowr muxeb wsw wyram
THE CHI.IRM
(CENTER FOR HJARD TO RECYCLE
M,9~TERI,ALf)
fu non-tratlabrlalraydable5
. Itans mTatttl Indulle the hard
stub: c N5, j~k pk5d6 ~ ,
eh~ (Wren furtature). Styrofoam. `,.~s.-~
w~ Paintna®baCa, aPPazWnces,
tacytles, and on and pn.
Elld-use marketlng will Indutle re
use, rerytlln9l disassemblyior-
recytlmg.
.~Wnmeoezaowwmrs.ea ssm ay,ymm Is
5
RE-UIE FJ~CILITIEJ
¦ Diverse and customized
¦ Used Building Materials can be a source
of profits
¦ Local thrift store network it exists
and is working!
z'~k wgM~az.owro~".WUm ww,zm +a
THE REfIDUE FACILITY
. Ina "Zero Waste - Or Darn Near" world, a
realistic goal is to make this "mixed garbage"
less than 20%;
¦ The residuals must be "stable" to minimize
toxic impacts, landfill gases and liquids;
¦ The final inert material can then be buried in a
dry tomb landfill.
z~Gk
"".~"+mvowrmw.epwm „
M,0?~CIMIZING THE 3R't
¦ Just What Is Hawaii's ~
_ ,,rs_
Diversion Potential t'~' -`2.
. .-E'..
v
~'4
i~ bWmuwrwowmmm.agwm anaavm ,a
6
MaARKE7ING TO THE PACIFIC
RIM
Growing Asian Economies are
Demanding Feedstock
{ Mu:YM~M1 O1PUVrwCP4R
Ie
3~
ImpYmxLLy2w WYmOxBy WM ' Y@~rIIN 1B
MA?RKETI FOR MA?TERIA?Lf
Current Market Trends Exceed
Processing and Shipping Costs
P'w?4 YYuMCURaiy NMWM~~YIe
wJ11cWHx~m.tYLIDM
1~
Im"mwrhp Z~owsw mXa WlYtl II9d3A! 30
BUILDING 1TRONG LOGAL
M,ARKETI
¦ "Losing the Loop" within your community
has always made the most economic
sense.
. A growing need for a high quality rnmpost
at over $30 per cubic yard
¦ Glassphalt in our roads and high quality
silica sand in golf course constnution
imp.nw~wuzwvwmmu.epww~e aw.mmm z~
z
7
HAWAII'I DIVERIION
POTENTIAL
. What is going into the landfill today?
. Paper nearly i/3 of the total
. Food/9reeNwood waste 15 - 20%
. Plastlq/metal/glass 10 to 15%
60 to 70% of the waste now
entering the landfill is easily
recoverable and marketable!
~mW+wwx zewr~sebww apr aw a
TRADITIONAL RECYCLING
REfIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL
. Cardboard, Paper, glass,
cans, plastic containers,
etc.
. Approx 30% of the solid
waste currently being
IarxiFllied
. Recycle 70°k of what is
currently landf111ed or an
additional 20% diversion
tinr+~.~wwam. e. aria aywzom n
x~lt
GREENWAffE AND ORGANIU
. The dNersion of greemvaste & organic material has the
potential fa achieve the largest gairu
. These materiak represent neany'A% of the solid
waste now being Wndfilled
. Fw the roost part these are some of the easiest
materials to separate and colleU
~p.mw+rczwwrm+wagm.d MprmW 1.
GREENW,AfTE laND ORWANIU
. A Central Composting /Organic
Pnxessing FaUltty
. Regional Greenwaste composting
& mulching
. °Ckning the loop.
.Need to partner with the pdvate
sector to insure strong markets.
. An 80% diversion rate is easily
achievable
. An aggressive Green & Organics
dNersion effort could diver[ an
additional 2g - 25%
! imq.".Mpz.Aw... mex OgFW ,~.pr am S
CONIfRUCT10N & DEMOLITION
. Construction ~r?r?~
. Waste types generated IINICIION3
sequentially :~os~-,_.-; -
• On-site separatlon
. OppwVrnity for reuse
. Off-site sortlng
. Demolition ~ ~
.Materials all enticed together
. Whs of small pieces '
.Less opportunity for reuse
. Opportunities for °Deconstructlon"
~gnn.n. x.mww mn.ero wrw ayu+xvr a
CONIfRUCiION & DEMOLITION
. Recover over 60% from wnstnfction
¦ Recover half of tfie mixed demolition
wastes
. Divert all inerts from disposal
¦ Potential Diversion - 55% or !0% of the
waste currently landfilled
m
~ma•~ezow.rd,m.oq.~..a aaram n
9
H1l~RD TO RECYCLE MIdTER1,Alt
a=,r-c-- - .rt:
ImrLnIYFp Zeo VlrYm MGghIM N4. SN A
HARD TO RECYCLE MJ.ITERIA1Lf
. Electronics - Ns, Computers, CeI Pbones, etc
. Household Hazardous W ante, Flazardo~ Waste from Small
Businesses
. Plastic Bags, Bock Styrofoam, lan7e Durable Plastic Items
. Paint, Batteries
. Discards from local thrift stores, Textiles, shoes, Books
. Appliances, Bicycles, Garden Equipment
. Diversion Po[endal s%-but some of the most difficult N
hantlle stuff!
miq.m.mci."wr mweelr wm ayrmu, a
REDUCTION & REUJE
. Reduction / ~iminatlng waste before tt becomes Waste
• lmplanent Pofides regxdng Wrrlrasin9 & mntrac[s
. mmrradal seGar, Da~9lag / Padmgln9 / Parka9iM
• aggrexHe lxptlc etrrotlon pro~am
. OutrkjR oam an the most otteiswe Proalem materials
. Reuse / "Stlll Good Stuff"
• Fa[9lydtlrg the reuse Mgovt swpNrs
• AggressNely atldressing CnnStructlon ant Resorts
. Restore & Resource Curter
• bryaaahi9 eosBn9 reuse programs
. Pubac Edumtlon
. Initial 3 to 5% reduction ultimately 10% or more.
m
k i~.mn,r."w.»d,...v.i.a mo.. aim m
10
i~..z.ows.~n. auum ra.~am
H,t1WJ.111'I UIYERJION
POTENTI.~1L
. T2ditional Recycling 20°k
. Composting 25°k
. C&D Recovery 10%
. Hard to Recycle Materials 5%
Reduction and Reuse
• Total 65°fo x 85% = 55%
. Current Recyding Rate
. Potential Diversion 70%
~V2soWmsmMEk IWM /+9~d2M II
Q^--
~mN~M~GMISONNYmMWYIN hqY 2%R 14
11
HOW MUCH WILL IT COIF
a_:_
- .
m~++azw w..m n.ab r•a aqw am v
wFRA?rrRUCTURE corer
. The Investment in Infrastructure is the major
cost of implementing any non-disposal option
. The Big Six a number of the "essential"
fadlities would be required whether the
County decides on maximizing diversion,
in6neration, or continuing to rely on
landfilling.
Im~.pp4g3wOW~smtlx&p Wtl FW~A]l JS
INFRAIfRUCiURE coat
. The MRF
• A modem, sbte of the art SOtpd (adltty
• Cost approx 55,000,000 (plus land a inhasexture)
• Require 5 acres
. The Composting FaUlity
. land costs would be the major ksue - appmx IS acres
. Equipment M ContraQOr
• Pad Prep a InfrasNRUre
. The CHARM
. If bated at the MRF, cost would run $1,000,000 to
x,000,000
. EnvironnKmal aril economic bene0ts.
• Costs ro Manage Ma[edal
u^d*i~ozsnww mn.ee w.,e aye2am x
12
Mgn»rorez.,ewr.mwWU.a r+.~ram n
imgxn.n.~pT.ow.rmwa4HW .upy A4r M
INFRAffRUCTURE COlfJ
. The Reuse Facility
• SuPPOr[eck9i5OPeratlms
. Pmvitle'rake It a leave IC aptlons at all transfer Na[bns
• ~k Cast to Ca~mN-bokatde+AgMngg2n[qOg2msfor~wn-
. The Construction (Demolition Facility (C>AD)
. Again, IaM k the PnreMY ksue
. Numaais mntrMlps are iMerPStM fFthere vras a place
• De\elop a pudirJgriate VartriesliiP
. Stte-saoesl NerAS easja~ss
. The Residue Faality
. 9mpry put a'resl0ue fatlllly° k lest the County IanMAI
• Preserve yWrht... NOentlveboxaerve vdWde airspace
. Insure tlla[ the Rmalnl~~gg in~abaial k hee of nWSWre, organk5 and
any Cwntner[Iatly genentea tlaTaNOUS Waste
z~nk imq.mmmzwww,mwayu.is rwrarn s
13
MRF OPERATING COlTt
. Can the MRF (recycling facility) cover it's
ope2ting costs!
. the market value of recovered material is
50% higher than it was in the 199ds ($boJton
$90/ton+). With processing costs running
between $s0 & $7s/ton.
¦ The Key Issue ...how to guarantee a large
volume of clean recyclable materials?
`~k ~.~droz.nwr.mweq wm ay~ram u
14
THE MRF
MIARKET PRICE FOR M.~TERI.t1Lf
~ttktkkkkt![itlttt161111t
tia.~dnz.owr.mm.eo wie war~nm a3
zp~gk
MRF PROCEflING COJTI
~w.~:.~
~tttttttktttlktatmtlttltt
i~-+nez.,w..~a,amW.~a a+a.mv, u
THE MRF
PAYMENT TO HA?ULERf
~kkktktkk&Itkkt6kltilillk
u~gn.nrp Z.ewwma. ey wma wpram w
15
iMPLEMENTfNG A? ZERO
WA?!fE 1TR,a?TEGY
_ - _
mow: ~
Sg~k uM...+~ala.w..mY.abw.~a w.wmol a
THE NEXT JTEPI
. Passing A Zero Waste Ordinance
. MakeammMbnentb Ciafge
. Modify the ISWM Plan Update
. MaXYMa° UkerSion
. Delay yam mmnYbnent to
. Assess the Collectlon Sdutlons
and Flnandal Options
~ Pi6
k a conversatlon wflh the
imp.iwLL.LOwrm~.eV Wq i+a<mm a
iw.~wu,o z.Awrmn. av u.a Ewa+vm ~e
16
•.i.m.upnmwrann..q FdM Na. ml ,e
THE NE%T lTEPI
. Basic Improvements
. Develop Mandates
. Improve the Drop-0ff program
. Build a MRF
aA
.Provide effiUant, state oP the
art processln9 ~P
. Flexlbilily for future expansion
mq.1xn..z.owrmw.rw.a i+~r+mm a
!`1~C
ti.µn.~u.vvwr.ms. eaw wyr mr si
17
WHY NOT BURN TTT
. cost
. Environmental Concerns
¦ Time Frame
¦ The "No Landfill" Myth
¦ NIMBY (Public Resistance
¦ Lack of Rexibility
¦ Lack of Successful Projects
dgmnbgS~e WeebmNe NY Wtl IwPet X01 9
zew..ene.en rre ayrzarr a
z~fik
imgemxtiq ZVOWMa mawpp WrA r4pYXQl 51
18
MMnirYg2m Wwbm MOklwtl N4YIDS! S
E<0.CYClE
ZFRO Wpm.
,ww~RR
~f
THE FIffURE _
OF ZERO `x`"'~'
WAJTE
A? GO,a1L FOR
THE BIG
U1.AND , ~
mwm.myz.ewr ova. Rq W.~e ...~R. m
P~U
R^q~E9=m Wr=n m.R6~ .n,.IDT 9
19