HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0662.012 2006-2008 tra~
.,!....14
Kim Christopher J. Yuen
Mayor Director
BradKurokswa,ASLA
o
LEED®AP
!~l ~~~~Yj Deputy Director
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
101 Pauahi Street, Sui[e 3 Hilo, Hawau 96720-0224
(808) 961-8288 FAX (808) 961-8742
October 2, 2007 M1=
h
-i
Honorable Pete Hoffmann
Chair and Presiding Officer
and Members of the County Council
COUNTY COUNCIL
333 Kilauea Avenue, Second Floor
Hilo, HI 96720
Deaz Chair Hoffinann and Members of the County Council:
SUBJECT: BILL 175, DRAFT 2, PROPOSING CHARTER AMENDMENT
ESTABLISHING 2 PLANNING COMMISSIONS
After further reviewing Bill 175, Draft 2, presenting a charter amendment for two
planning commissions, I would suggest some changes for clarity.
Shared Jurisdiction.
The charter amendment should specify what happens in various situations where it might
not be cleaz which planning commission has jurisdiction, or whether the planning
commissions would meet together or separately to consider an issue.
There aze several different situations:
1. The obvious situation where the land use permit, change of zone, or state land use
boundary amendment involves property entirely within the area covered by one of the
commissions. In this case, only the commission with membership from the affected area
would take action either final action, in the case of certain land use permits, such as the
SMA permit, special permits, or use permits~r a recommendation, in the case of a
rezoning or state land use boundary amendment. (See discussion of the General Plan
below.)
Comm. No. ~ ~ ~C~~
Ref. To:_~hQ~l LUU!
Ref. Uate
Hawai'i County is an Fqual Opportunity Provider and Employer.
Honorable Pete Hoffmann
Chair and Presiding Officer
and Members of the County Council
COUNTY COUNCIL
Page 2
October 2, 2007
2. Where the property is in both the Leewazd and Windward Planning Commission's
areas-where it straddles the boundary line, for example. While this is likely to be very
rare, the Charter should specify what happens. I suggest that such actions be jointly done
by the two planning commissions, meeting together, and that action require a majority
vote of the combined membership of the two commissions. (This is the same approach as
in Bill 175, draft 2).
3. General Plan amendments. I suggest that each commission, acting separately, should
make recommendations on all General Plan amendments, even when they affect property
only within the area of one commission, such as an amendment to the LUPAG map. The
General Plan is supposed to be an island-wide document that guides the coordinated
development of the island as a whole. The LUPAG map, for example, is one map
covering the entire island. In the comprehensive review of the General Plan, it would be
very awkwazd to try to sepazate the parts of the General Plan that deal with one side of
the island or another and have them voted on separately by each commission. Having
both commissions consider all General Plan amendments will also help to keep both
commissions familiar with the General Plan and all changes made to it. In any event, the
planning commissions are only making a recommendation on General Plan amendments.
The council has the final say.
4. Community development plans. These should be heard by only the planning
commission with jurisdiction over the area, like rezoning ordinances.
5. Changes to the zoning or subdivision codes that are specific to a geographical azea,
for example, height limits in certain areas. These should only be considered by the one
planning commission that has jurisdiction over the azea.
6. Changes to the zoning or subdivision code that are not specific to a geographical area,
such as street standards in the subdivision code or permitted uses within a zoning district
in the zoning code. This is the typical situation. Both planning commissions, meeting
separately, should consider these and make recommendations to the council.
7. Rules of practice and procedure. These should be uniform throughout the county, so
these should require a majority vote of the combined membership of the two
commissions, meeting jointly. (This is the approach taken by Bill 175, Draft 2).
Honorable Pete Hoffinann
Chair and Presiding Officer
and Members of the County Council
COUNTY COUNCIL
Page 3
October 2, 2007
Generally, it will be cumbersome for the two commissions to meet together, so under this
proposal, this would occur only to consider changes to the rules, and when a land use
approval involved property within the jurisdiction of both commissions.
Judicial Districts
To reduce confusion, the Charter amendment should use the term "judicial district" when
refemng to South Hilo, Puna, and the other districts. While the "purpose" clause of the
ordinance refers to the judicial districts, Bill 175, draft 2 does not contain this term in the
portion that would actually go into the charter. The term `judicial districts" is used
elsewhere in the Charter to differentiate from council districts, for example, in the section
on the Reapportionment Commission.
North Hilo Representation
Although this is a small issue, it is not really fair to require that one member must come
from the judicial district of North Hilo (whose boundaries aze between Hakalau and
O'okala.) North Hilo, in the 2000 census, had a population of 1720, compared to 47,386
in South Hilo, 31,335 in Puna, 6108 in Hamakua, and 5827 in Ka'u, which are also
assured of only one member each. It would be fairer to say that one member must come
from the combined districts of North Hilo and Hamakua. The mayor could, of course,
still select the district representative from North Hilo, and could select at-lazge members
from North Hilo or any other district.
To accomplish the suggestions above, the attached amendments are proposed:
Amend section 5 of Bill 175 to read as follows:
SECTION 5. Article VI, chapter 4, of the Hawaii County Charter (2000), relating to the
Planning Deparhnent, is amended by adding new sections 6-4.3, 6-4.4, 6-4.5, and 6-4.6 to
read as follows:
" 6-4.3. Windward PlanninE Commission.
( al There is established a windwazd plannine commission that shall have jurisdiction
over the area consisting of the iudicial districts of Puna, South Hilo, North Hilo,
Hamakua, and Ka'u.
Honorable Pete Hoffmann
Chair and Presiding Officer
and Members of the County Council
COUNTY COUNCIL
Page 4
October 2, 2007
(b) There shall be seven members on this commission. The commission shall include
one member from the judicial districts of Puna, South Hilo, North Hilo/Hamakua
combined and Ka'u and three "at-large" members selected from these districts. The
members shall be appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the council in the manner
prescribed in section 13-4. Each member representing a district shall be a legal resident
and registered voter of that district. In addition the director of public works and the
manager of the department of water supply or their designated representatives shall
serve as ex-officio members of the windward planning commission. without power to
vote.
Section 6-4.4. Leeward Planning Commission.
(a) There is established a leeward planning commission that shall have jurisdiction over
the area consisting of the judicial districts of North Kohala, South Kohala, North Kona,
and South Kona.
(b) There shall be seven members on this commission. The commission shall include one
member from the judicial districts of North Kohala, South Kohala, North Kona, and
South Kona and three "at-lazge" members selected from these districts. The members
shall be appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the council in the manner prescribed in
section 13-4. Each member representing a district shall be a legal resident and re isg tered
voter of that district. In addition the director of public works and the manager of the
department of water supply or their designated representatives shall serve as ex-officio
members of the leeward planning commission, without power to vote.
Section 6-4.5. Duties and Functions of the Windward and Leeward Planning
Commissions.
(a) Both commissions shall:
(1) Advise the mayor council and the planning director on planning and land use matters
pursuant to law and this charter
(2) Review the general plan, its amendments and other plans and modifications thereof
and transmit such plans with recommendations thereon through the manor to the council
for consideration and action.
Honorable Pete Hoffrnann
Chair and Presiding Officer
and Members of the County Council
COUNTY COUNCIL
Page 5
October 2, 2007
( 3) Review proposed subdivision and zoning ordinances and amendments thereto and
transmit such ordinances with recommendations thereon through the mayor to the council
for consideration and action.
(4) Conduct public hearings in every case prior to action on any matter upon which the
commission is required by law or this charter to act. Notice of the time and place of the
hearing shall be published at least ten days prior to such hearing in at least two daily
newspapers of general circulation in the county.
(5) Perform such other related duties and functions as maybe necessary or required
pursuant to law and this charter.
( b) A uniform body of rules of practice and procedure, except for meeting places and
times shall apply to both commissions. Uniform rules of practice and procedure shall be
adopted by a maiority vote of the combined membership of the Windwazd Planning
Commission and the Leeward Planning Commission, meeting iointly. The existing rules
of practice and procedure of the Hawaii County Planning Commission, except for
meeting places shall apply to both commissions until the new uniform rules of procedure
aze adopted.
(c) Each planning commission shall review and take action upon applications for land
use changes and community development plans involving onlyproperty within their
respective iurisdictions other than those involving the General Plan. If an application for
a land use change or a community development plan includes land within the jurisdiction
of both the Windwazd Planning Commission and the Leewazd Planning Commission, the
application shall be considered by both commissions meetingjointly and action shall
require the affirmative vote of a maiority of the combined membership of the two
commissions. All amendments to the Genera] Plan or the adoption of a new General Plan
shall be considered by each planning commission, meeting sepazately, and each
commission shall make its own recommendation to the council. Each planning
commission meeting sepazately, shall make its own recommendations to the council on
changes to the subdivision and zonine codes and any other planning or land use matters
which apply generally and not to a specific area. The planning director shall determine
which commission shall take iurisdiction over any matters when not fully established by
the charter.
Honorable Pete Hoffmann
Chair and Presiding Officer
and Members of the County Council
COUNTY COUNCIL
Page 6
October 2, 2007
<Remainder of Section 5 to follow Bill 175, Draft 2.>
Sincerely,
/J ~
CHRISTOPHER J. EN
Planning Director
CJY:pak
Wpwin60/Chas 07/HOffmann -Planning Commission Charter Amendments.doc
cc: County Clerk
Legislative Auditor
Ms. Maile David
Corporation Counsel