Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutREP PC 053 11/06/2007 2006-2008 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON PLANNING DATE: November 6, 2007 Re: Comm. No. 759/Resolution No. 386 PLACE: Councilroom Ben Franklin Building 333 Kilauea Avenue, 2°d Floor Hilo, Hawaii TIME: 2:30 p.m. Council Chair and Members Hawaii County Council Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Your Committee on Planning, to which was referred Resolution No. 386, reports as follows: Resolution No. 386, transmitted via Communication No. 759 from Emily Naeole, Council Member, dated October 23, 2007, transmitting a Resolution urging the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands and other property owners not to negotiate any commercial leases for big box or other super stores in South Hilo until an alternate route between Hilo and Puna is established. Resolution No. 386 states that traffic has become a major concern on the Big Island and has affected the quality of life for East Hawaii residents. Shopping centers that have been developed in the area between Lanikaula and Kahaopea Streets attract not only Hilo residents, but residents from Hamakua, Volcano and Puna as well. Because the outlying rural area of Puna lacks shopping centers, most Puna residents travel into and out of Puna via Highway 130 and Highway 11 and thus any more stores, particularly big box or super stores, will compound the existing traffic problem. The recommendation of the Puna Community Development Plan, Transportation Working Group, calls for the extension of Railroad Avenue (in Hilo) to Shower Drive in Kea`au, which route would help relieve some of the congestion currently occurring on Highways 130 and 11. Because the alternate Hilo/Puna route is not listed as a project to occur within the next five years with the State Department of Transportation, Resolution No. 386 urges the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands and any other property owner considering negotiating commercial leases for big box or super stores to encourage the State Department of Transportation to expedite the alternate route between Hilo and Puna. At the November 6, 2007 Committee on Planning meeting, oral testimony was presented by Paul Campbell, Chairman of the local Sierra Club, who testified in total opposition to superstores on Hawaii island, and Mr. Jim Weatherford who stated that competition is good, however, allowing very large enterprises or big box stores can negatively impact free enterprise. PC Report No. 53 Communication 759 Resolution 386 Page 2 of 2 Council Member Naeole explained the serious traffic impacts that would result if a superstore was built in Hilo and stated her position that if Department of Hawaiian Home Lands were to allow superstores to be built on their lands, then it should be part of the solution and help with problems it generates. Ms. Naeole also felt that DHHL should be asked to provide some of the necessary infrastructure as well. Council Chair Hoffmann stated that regardless of the traffic situation, there is a serious infrastructure shortfall in Puna which should be addressed and if that was the purpose of the proposed resolution he supports it as he liked the idea of utilizing every resource possible to address infrastructure problems. Council Member Yagong noted there was nothing in the resolution that directs DHHL or big box stores to help with infrastructure. He further stated there is no relationship between what's currently being discussed and the language of the resolution and therefore could not support the measure as he feels this is not the way to solve Puna's infrastructure needs. Council Member Yoshimoto noted that if one of the things Ms. Naeole wanted to accomplish was to bring DHHL representatives to the council and to begin dialog, then he said it would be a good opportunity to see where DHHL stands. If that be the case, Mr. Yoshimoto felt it would be best to talk with DHHL first and offer them the opportunity. Committee Chair Pilago stated the resolution was very interesting and demonstrated some foresight if it triggers discussions with DHHL and the possibility for further discussions. Your Committee on Planning is in accord with the purpose and intent of Resolution No. 386 and recommends its adoption. and raves noes nix ex Respectfully submitted, FORD X HIGH X COMMITTEE ON PLANNING HOFFMANN X IKEDA X ~ ~ JACOBSON X NAEOLE X K. ANGEL PLLA ,CHAIR ~ PILACO X YAGONC X PC REPORT NO. 53 YOSHIMOTO X ADOPTED: AFC O 5 1007