HomeMy WebLinkAboutREP PC 110 10/05/2004 2002-2004REPORT OF THE
COMMITTEE ON PLANNING
DACE: October 5, 2004 RE: Communication. No. 770/Bill No. 327
PLACE: Councilroom
TIME: 1:35 p.m.
Chair and Members
Hawaii County Council
Hilo, Hawaii 96720
Your Committee on Planning, to which was referred Communication No. 770 and Bill No. 327,
transmitted by Mayor Harry Kim, dated September 22, 2004, regarding an amendment to Change
of "Lone Ordinance No. 91-71 request by Kona Oasis, Inc. at Puaa 2nd, North Kona, TMK: 7-5-9:
40 (2.23-acres) reports as follows:
Bill No. 327 seeks to amend Change of Zone Ordinance 91-71, which rezoned approximately
2.23-acres of land from Multiple Family Residential 1,000 square foot (RM-1) to the Resort-
Hotel 1,000 square foot (V-1) district, with the following:
• Condition B. (Time Extension). Allows an additional year (l year) for the applicant
to apply for a SMA permit for the project.
Condition D, E, F. (New Conditions- Roadway improvements, Fair Share
contributions and Affordable Housing requirements) Mandates specific roadway
improvements, fair share contributions and affordable housing requirements that were
not included in the original Change of Zone Ordinance.
• Various grammatical, re-alphabetizing and numbering corrections.
Communication No. 770 reports that the Hawaii County Planning Commission, as required by
the Hawaii County Charter, Article VI, Chapter 4, Section 6-4.3(c), considered the above request
on September 2, 2004. At this meeting, the Commission concurred with the Planning Director's
favorable recommendation for approval of this matter. Communication No. 770, in synopsis,
describes the Planning Director's Findings and Recommendations as the following:
The applicant, Kona Oasis, Inc., is the owner of 2.23 acres of land identified as
TMK 7-5-9:40. The property is located between Alli Drive and Kuakini Highway
adjacent to the Kona Billfisher and Kona Mansions Condominium complexes.
2. Ordinance No. 89-54, effective April 1989, changed the district classification of the
subject property to Resort-Hotel 1,000 square foot (V-1). The applicant intended to
construct a 93-unit condominium project with commercial office and residential space.
Report No. 110
Communication 770
Bill 327
Page 2
3. Condition B of Ordinance No. 89-54 required that the applicant file a SMA Use Permit
application within one year from the effective date of the ordinance. An administrative
extension was granted in April 1991 to afford the applicant more time to comply with this
condition.
4. Ordinance No. 91-71, effective on July 1991, amended Ordinance 89-54 by allowing an
additional year to comply with Condition B. A second administrative extension was
granted in July 1992.
5. The applicant was notified in October 1993 that the deadline to comply with Condition B
had lapsed.
6. The applicant, in November 2003, submitted a formal request to amend Condition B of
Ordinance No. 91-71. The applicant also reported that several economic and financial
factors had caused a delay in compliance with Condition B and that they were now ready
to proceed. They also expressed a desire to have both the extension request and SMA
Permit application heard simultaneously.
7. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the General Plan or for the
original reasons for granting the rezoning request based on the following:
^ The General Plan LUPAG Map designates this area as Medium Density Urban and
Resort. The Kona Master Plan for Kailua-Kona adopted by Resolution No. 371-98
identifies this area as High Density Residential. This request is not contrary to these
designations.
At today's meeting, Planning Director Chris Yuen provided this committee with background
information about the origins and purpose of Bill No. 327. Mr. Yuen explained the tests applied
to and justification for imposing new conditions on an already approved rezoning. According to
Mc Yuen, the new conditions proposed in Bill 327 are warranted. An opinion from the Office of
the Corporation Counsel dated May 7, 1991 regarding this matter was circulated in the meeting.
A letter from the applicant's representative, Sidney Fuke, informing members that he will not be
present at today's meeting and discussing various conditions proposed in Bill 327, was also
circulated.
During discussion, this Committee questioned the rationale and justification for continually
allowing extensions. Members of the Committee suggested that there should come a point where
the zoning would revert or lapse. Also during discussion, the appropriateness of Condition H was
questioned due to the fact that the State usually maintains authority over the preservation of
archeological sites. Mr. Yuen reported that the State's area of regulation is normally restricted to
the location and preservation of burials only and not other archeological sites. Condition H would
apply to other sites as well.
Communication 770
Bill 327
Page 3
Post discussion, Your Committee requested that the Planning Department forward a complete
copy of the application, requested the Mr. Yuen review the language in Condition I and voted to
amend Bill 327 with the following:
Condition E. The applicant shall provide a 5-foot wide road widening setback along
[c°as@.;,c°-ili] the Alii Drive/Walua Road frontage...The applicant shall provide full
improvements to the entire frontage along Alii Drive/Walua Road and collector street
improvements to realign the intersection of Walua Road and Alii Drive, meeting the
approval of the Department of Public Works, consisting of, but not limited to, pavement
widening with concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk, drainage improvements, and any
relocation of utilities...(Comm.770.l);
2. Condition 1. Should any unanticipated archaeological sites be uncovered during land
preparation activity, work within the affected area shall cease immediately and the Planning
Director notified. Work within the affected area shall not resume until clearance is obtained
from the Planning Director;
3. Condition J. [T" " a c ,. a:,..,°,.°i .."°n ..,°°. .. :." ."° .,Yr.° ,°i °F."o °Yr or '~
sw,~°-~-~--°~~°' °~-°~°~°°•] The applicant shall be required to hook up to the County sewer
a_ . ______________ _a______.,,
s S_y tem;
4. Condition K. [ ,
"°" "° °°--~-'~°a ~~~~'"] The applicant shall comply with all applicable County State and
Federal laws, rules, regulations and requirements;
5. Condition L. ... In lieu of paying the fair share contribution, the applicant may construct and
contribute improvements/facilities related to parks and recreation, fire, police, solid waste
disposal facilities, and roads within the region impacted by the proposed development,
[ .] subiect to the review and recommendation
of the Planning Director upon consultation with the appropriate agencies and approval of the
Hawaii County Council.
6. Condition P. [An initial extension of time for the performance of conditions within the
ordinance may be granted by the Planning Director upon the following circumstances; 1)
the non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been foreseen or are
beyond the control of the applicants, successors or assigns, and that are not the result of
their fault or negligence; 2) granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the
general plan or zoning code; 3) granting of the time extension would not be contrary to
the original reasons for granting of the change of zone; 4) the time extension granted
shall be for a period not to exceed the period originally granted for performance (i.e., a
condition to be performed within one year may be extended for up to one additional year);
and 5)] [i]If the applicant should require an additional extension of time, the Planning
Director shall submit the applicant's request to the County Council for appropriate action.
Further, should any of the conditions not be met or substantially complied with in a
r ® •
Communication 770
Bill 327
Page 4
timely fashion, the Planning Director shall initiate rezoning of the area to its original or
more appropriate designation.
Your Committee concurs with the Planning Commission and the Planning Director's favorable
recommendation for approval of the amendments to Change of Zone Ordinance 91-71.
Your Committee on Planning is in accord with the intent and purpose of Bill No. 327, as
amended to Draft 2, and recommends it pass first reading.
AYES NOES A&E EX
ARAKAKI X -,,,�COMMITTEE ON PLANNING
CHUNG X 0\:' t 10 1
ELARIONOFF X s -1 lb a Jam, 1
HOLSCHUH X •
JACOBSON X
REYNOLDS X Leningrad Elarionoff, air
SAFARIK X PC REPORT NO. 110
TULANG X ADOPTED: I 14® 2004
TYLER X