Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 1231.001 2006-2008 :al Q Qn7 t A2.1 Wo t uug)o Z3 lei ©0 rn y r t~ 0 c~ EXECUTIVE PRESENTATION OVERVIEW • Status of Project Objectives & Goals - Deliverable 1 - Needs Analysis & Recommendation Report - Deliverable 2 - Preliminary System Report - Deliverable 3 - Procurement Specifications & Support - WIP • Project Continuance & Next Steps - Building Consensus - Project Funding - Project Deployment Plan • Build an Effective Project Team • Competitive Procurement • Deployment (Compressed Schedule to Meet FCC Deadline) MACRO Corporation May 19, 2008 Confidential 2 y~ A KEMA Company II'I 'I Critical Factors & Considerations • Findings - Four Separate Radio Systems (Police, Fire, Water, Local Government) • All Wide Band (25 kHz) Channels • Aged and Analog Field Equipment • Poor Portable and Spotty Mobile Coverage • Radio Systems Coverage Vary by Department with Limited Interoperability - Lack of Mobile Data Capabilities (CAD/AVL - Reports - Graphics) • Requirements FCC Narrow Band Compliance - January 1, 2013 - FCC Spectrum Efficiency Compliance - January 1, 2017 - Interoperability - APCO P25 Standards & SAFECOM - Uniform County-wide Mobile and Portable Coverage MACRO Corporation May 19, 2008 Confidential 3 y> A KEAAA Company I 'I P25 Interoperability Recommendations • The SAFECOM Program Information Lend NW-cd Fit Provided In The Report is Information Most Qxvete Long erm SaaAuft-Based S'f~ared 9ystetiis Solution Sysems e _ Intended To Educate The County On The SharWed c Filil ftkred,, Wdb Area Federal Program Supporting The s"$am"`J 14 Q"W Short Tenn Development of Interoperable Systems Gateway (OmsdePatdh) %ptmmomcedan (Cmwe Patch) I'S y - Illustrates The 6 different Levels of Interoperability I'S M1 W Aid VllIKn0m V11 W!c Mh Aid ¦ ~idS SaW - Provides Critical Elements of an Interoperability Design Ch-As vhM ~ -"-_7 Agmvies, U ~ EasilydaOoyad - Offers Insight To An Open Standards Design Approach Ta1k3VJid Siff* Stu1'erll Taltaraund t " - Design Recommendation is for Level 5 or Level 6 ~ SAMFRacf06 SOh,bd1S - Level 4 is Acceptable and Designed for ISSI Interface SyyapRadfas Tims- 0119U1 ng ~I MACRO Corporation May 19, 2008 Confidential 4 Y A KEMA Company II Future Requirements & Recommendations • Technology Recommendations - APCO Project 25 Phase 1 & Phase 2 (Trunking) • Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials • Simulcast With Voting • Utilization of Existing Digital Microwave Network - Qualifies The County For Federal Grants • Open Standards - APCO P25 • Provides A Flexible Solution To Recommended Requirements Prepares The County For A Competitive Procurement Process • At Least 5 Major Vendors & 4 Major Integrators Can Bid This Type of System or Subsystem - Prepares The County For State Interoperability Solutions MACRO Corporation May 19, 2008 Confidential 5 A KEMA Company Future Requirements & Recommendations • Radio Coverage Recommendations - RF Coverage Design Criteria • Countywide Uniform Coverage For All Departments - Mobile - 95% Service Area Reliability (SAR) • Prioritized for Traveled Major & Minor Roads • Gullies and Canyons - Oceanside Areas • Mobile Data (HPD and Broadband) - Portable (on streets & in building) - 95% SAR - at Hip Level • Urban Areas, Downtown in Cities, Hotel Areas - Fire Alerting/Paging - at Hip Level • Available Spectrum for System Development - 58 Channels Available in 700/800 MHz Band MACRO Confidential Corporation May 19, 2008 g A KEMA Company Coverage Comparison RF COVERAGE DESIGN RESULTS MOBILE PORTABLE IN-BUILDING SYSTEMS ON-STREET (qo) NOTES Existing County Systems (Estimate Based on Computer Modeling Predictions) Police 61.8 24.1 8.2 Police Network Fire 73.8 59.4 41.9 Fire Network Local Government 46.7 29.5 17.2 LG Network Water 41.1 12.8 4.6 Water Network Conceptual System Designs (Estimate based Upon Computer Modeling Predictions) 700/800 MHz LSM 85.9 69.5 57.4 Common Network 700/800 MHz Data 98.2 NA NA Common Network VHF Alerting/Paging 99 76.7 50.9 Mobile/ Fire House • Conceptual Design Utilized a Common Set of Radio Sites • Greatly Enhanced Radio Coverage • Resolved Portable Coverage Deficiencies (close to 200% Improvement) • Improved Coverage in the Urban Areas MACRO Corporation May 19, 2008 Confidential A KEMA Company i Conceptual Design Recommendations • System Recommendations - 700 MHz Voice & Data Countywide (Critical - User Safety) • 26 Sites - 700 MHz High Performance Data Countywide (Information Access) • 18 Radio Sites • WiFi Broadband (235 Access Points) - VHF Fire Alerting & Paging Countywide (Critical - Fire Dispatching) • 18 Radio Sites - Digital Technology Recommendations • APCO Project 25, Trunking, FDMA and/or TDMA, Vol P - Utilize Existing County Microwave Backbone - Frequency Plan - 40 Channels Required MACRO IConfidential Corporation May 19, 2008 8 A KEMA Company i Microwave Recommendations • Microwave Interconnect Design - Current Assumptions • Utilize The Existing 6 GHz Loop & Spur System • 17 New Paths Required Due to Increased Amount of Radio Sit es ~ • Analysis Indicates Paths are Available Between County Backbone and New Radio Sites Except for 2 Blocked Paths • 4.9 GHz, 6 GHz, 11 GHz & 18 GHz Utilized for Conceptual Design - Further Work Required to Establish a Preliminary Design • Finalize the Radio Site Selection • Physical Path Surveys • Design for Blocked Paths MACRO May 19, 2008 Confidential 9 Corporation A KEMA Company I Sites & Facilities Recommendations Total of 29 Sites Existing -13 Sites for All Systems New -16 Sites Owned Land New -7 County Owned Locations Vs. New - 9 Need to Acquire Land Lease/ Purchase Land MACRO Corporation May 19, 2008 Confidential 10 y~ A KEMA Company I Project Cost by Phases MILESTONE SYSTEM COSTS BY PROJECT PHASES 700 MHz Radio Microwave VHF High WIFi - Phase System System & Site Paging Performance Broad Band Data Subtotals Elements Data Phase 1 - RF Cell S2 (6 Sites) $21,206,899 $15,562,201 $36,769,100 Phase 2 - RF Cells S1, S3, SA1, SA2, SA3, SA6 (10 Sites) $13,678,165 $13,678,165 Phase 3 - RF Cells S4, S5, SA4, SA5 (10 Sites) $13,678,165 $13,678,165 Phase 4 - Stand Alone (18 Sites) $2,717,150 $15,472,331 $1,640,000 $19,829,481 System Totals $48,563,228 $15,562,201 $2,717,150 $15,472,331 $1,640,000 $83,954,910 MACRO Confidential Corporation May 19, 2008 11 A KEMA Company Project Deployment Overview • Phased Migration Plan - Potential for 60 to 76 Month Project Schedule • Exceeds 2013 FCC Deadline • Requires Deployment Mitigation (Part of the Project Plan) - Project Oversight and Management (County & Outside Services) - Compressed Schedule - Parallel Tasking - Additional Resources - Phased Deployment • Infrastructure & Users - 4 Phases - By Coverage Design and Geographic Area - Overlay the 700 MHz Data & Fire Alerting/Paging - Activate the Data & Fire Alerting as the Final Step MACRO Corporation May 19, 2008 Confidenfial 12 A KEMA Company Deployment Phase Durations DURATION TABLE (MONTHS) DEPLOYMENT PHASE S2 S1, S3, S4, S5, HPDNHF Total SA19 29396 SA4, SA5 Alerting 1) Radio Site Acquisition TOTAL DURATION FOR ALL SITES 16-18 2) Civil Work 4-8 3-5 3-5 0 12-18 3) Microwave System 4-6 3-4 1-2 0 10-12 4) Radio System 6-8 4-6 4-6 3-4 18-24 5) System Acceptance 4 Totals 60-76 MACRO Confidential Corporation y> May 19, 2008 13 A KEMA Company I Project Continuance - Next Steps ? County Consensus & Acceptance of The ? Procurement Project Recommendations ? Competitive ? Funding Plan ? Final Design & Build ? Project Management Plan ? Vendor Selection ? Preliminary System Design Engineering v" Contract Negotiations l ? Radio Site Access ? System Acceptance Documentation I ? Site Selection (2nd Pass) ? System Performance Testing ? RF Coverage (2nd Pass) ? Deployment/Construction ? MW (2nd Pass) ? System Acceptance Testing ? RFP Specification- Final System ? Punch List Items ? Procurement Boiler Plate ? Final System Acceptance ? Design & Coverage ? System Warranty Begins ? Subsystems MACRO Corpora tion May 19, 2008 Confidential 14 A KEMA Company I SUMMARY • Use the Available Opportunities to Your Advantage I - County Must Comply with FCC Mandates - Meet Your Present & Future Communication Needs - Comply with State & Federal Grant Requirements - Develop a Deployment Plan to Meet the FCC 2013 Deadline • Subjects That Require Further Consideration • Prioritization of the Available Funding • Competition with Other County Projects • Competition with State and Federal Projects I • Project Deployment Team • Type of Procurement • Maintain Project Momentum! MACRO May 19, 2008 Confidential Corpora tion 15 A KEMA Company I I r r ri 0 0 0 3 Y C Cl) 604 0 z Cl) ¦N) X CD CD cl tic ` 1 c c o C) ` D t ~1 c t