HomeMy WebLinkAboutREP PC 085 05/06/2008 2006-2008
REPORT OF THE
COMMITTEE ON PLANNING
DATE: May 6, 2008 Re: Comm. 1201/Bill 297
PLACE: Sheraton Keauhou Bay Resort and Spa
78-128 Ehukai Street
Kailua-Kona, Hawaii
TIME: 2:30 p.m.
Council Chair and Members
Hawaii County Council
Hilo, Hawaii 96720
Your Committee on Planning, to which was referred Bill 297, reports as follows:
Bill 297, transmitted via Communication 1201 from Planning Director Chris Yuen, dated April
15, 2008, presents an amendment to Chapter 16, Hawaii County Code 1983 (2005 Edition, as
amended), establishing a framework for the Community Development Plans and Establishing the
Community Development Plan (CDP) Action Committee.
Bill 297 seeks to establish a framework to adopt and amend Community Development Plans and
to establish the Community Development Plan (CDP) Action Committee as the body that
supersedes the CDP Steering Committee upon adoption of a community development plan by the
County Council.
The Planning Director states that the key elements and rationale of Bill 297 are as follows:
• The proposal amends Chapter 16 (The Hawaii County General Plan), as CDPs are "short
and middle range" plans that further define the broader goals of the General Plan;
• The proposal outlines the relationship of the CDPs within the context of the broader
General Plan framework and the process for CDP adoption and amendment;
• The proposed ordinance also addresses details relating to the "CDP Action Committee"
which is named as such to avoid confusion with other councils. The proposed ordinance
also provides that the CDP Action Committee would consist of a 9-member body to
provide adequate representation and compensate for inevitable absences, and details
membership terms and a broad membership selection criteria;
• The proposed ordinance also outlines duties and responsibilities of the CDP Action
Committee and its key focus is advisory oversight and advocacy. It is not the intent that
the Action Committee duplicate existing regulatory review such as Planning Commission
and Board of Appeals.
• The Action Committee is intended to be the community entity to provide input on CDP
and General Plan amendments and updates and will also monitor the effectiveness and
progress of CDP implementation and provide recommendations on County CIP and
operating budgets.
PC Report No 85
Communication 1201
Bill 297
Page 2 of 3
At the May 6, 2008 Committee on Planning meeting, Margaret Wille and Ken Melrose presented
testimony in support of Bill 297 and Mr. Mark McNett provided comment.
Council Chair Hoffmann presented a brief summary of the proposal explaining that when a
Community Development Plan is completed, the CDP Steering Committee no longer exists and
therefore regardless of the success of the CDP, there is no existing legislation or method to
continue the effort of the CDP Steering Committee. Mf. Hoffmann stated that this proposal is
the mechanism that will provide what takes place as the CDP moves ahead.
There was discussion among Councilmembers regarding adequacy of the number of members
comprising the action committee and whether that number should be less than nine especially
due to the ongoing difficulty in securing volunteers from the community to serve on committees
such as this. It was also discussed whether Chapter 16 was the appropriate section within the
Hawaii County Code in which to imbed the proposed measure.
Director Yuen explained that this action committee is being looked at as an advocate and
implementation group. Mr. Yuen noted that because a great deal of effort has been expended in
developing CDPs he does not see this group engaging in continuous planning efforts but rather
saw the group as advocates for a CDP that has been adopted by the Council. Mr. Yuen envisions
this group as the community's voice on implementing the CDP rather than another body that
reviews and makes changes to the CDP.
Councilmember Yagong said it makes good sense to him to have some of the CDP Steering
Committee members also serve on the CDP Action Committee. Councilmember Jacobson stated
this is a vitally important process containing the vision of the community who created the plan
and expressed his support with the hope that the implementation team carries forward the
community's desires.
Council Chair Hoffmann stated there is the need for a consistent overview by the people within
the community to ensure that the CDP is implemented as intended and that the important thing to
remember is not the number of members, but the opportunity to have something on the books
that allows for further input regarding the implementation process. This would allow the Puna
community, who was the first to complete its CDP, the means for continued community
oversight
Councilmember Naeole stated she preferred a 9-member action committee because it equates to
a well-balanced representation comprised of three members from her district, three members
from Councilmember Yoshimoto's district and three members from Councilmember Jacobson's
district.
Councilmember Higa's concern was that formation of this action committee group seemed to be
duplicating the CDP process. Mr. Higa felt that the administration, the Council and the Planning
Commission's use of CDPs and the General Plan as their respective template for planning was
adequate and therefore could not see how this new action group fits in.
PC Report No. 85
i
Communication 1201
i
Bill 297
Page 3 of 3 1
- I
i
Planning Director Yuen stated that the impetus is that the CDP process was a grass roots effort
and the people wanted some means of being able to carry the CDP forward via a follow-up
community body which all CDP Steering Committees advocated for. Mr. Yuen said they took
this concept in an effort to make the desires of the people happen and also afford the group
standing with the County.
i
Your Committee on Planning is in accord with the purpose and intent of Bill 297 and
recommends it pass first reading.
and
AYES NOES A&E EX Respectfully submitted,
FORD X
HIGA X CONMTTEE ON PL G
HOFFA ANN X
MDA X
JACOBSON X
NAEOLE X K. ANGEL PULA , CHAIR
PILAGO X
YAGONG X PC REPORT NO. 85
1 YOSHIMOTO x ADOPTED: JUN 0 3 2