Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0050.001 2008-2010 communication 50-Adult Mental Health Page 1 of 1 Murashige, Laura P1145WC From: Gretchen Lawson [gretchen@arcofkona.orgj Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 11:18 AM To: counciltestimony@co.hawaii.hi.us Cc: 'Julie Nagasako' Subject: communication 50-Adult Mental Health Attachments: County council-homelessness.doc p For tomorrow's hearing. gretchen Gretchen S. Lawson, President/CEO_ Arc of Kona PO Box 127 Kealakekua, HI 96750 808-323-2626 808-323-9444 fax CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message and all attachments are confidential or proprietary to the Arc of Kona, and disclosure, use, or distribution to anyone other than the intended recipient without the prior written permission of the Arc of Kona, is prohibited. This message and any attachments may contain confidential health information that is protected by law. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named avove. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you think you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply to this email and delete the message without disclosure. Thank you. Comm: o. S0 Ref. To• °0~f~ S 66C Ref. Date JAN 6 2 U 1/5/2009 January 5, 2009 Mr. Pete Hoffman, Vice Chair Hawaii County Council Re: Comments concerning Communication 50: Adult Mental Health Reductions Good Morning Vice Chairperson Hoffman and members of the County Council: My name is Gretchen Lawson, I reside in District 8 at 75-5342 La'aulu Rd in Holualoa. I am the President/CEO of the Arc of Kona providing supports and services to individuals with disabilities, primarily developmental disabilities. I am also an active member of the Community Alliance Partners working to identify and provide solutions to Homelessness in West Hawaii. I commend this council for recognizing the need and the importance of providing assistance to this population. My interest in speaking to you today is two fold: 1) People who are homeless find themselves in that position based on many differing circumstances; a majority of people who are homeless are mentally ill and have not been able to adjust to the expectations of society. Therefore individuals affected by mental illness are unable to work to earn enough money to participate in the economy and obtain housing. These people can be helped and housing is the most important factor. Once they have shelter (a primary drive) their world becomes more secure and they are able to build enough trust to accept counseling and medical help so they can learn to re-integrate into their communities. The cuts to Mental Health are unbelievably severe-the worst part is that the cuts are going to pull the supports from under people who can and have made great progress in helping themselves to a better life. Without the supports society will pay anyway, they will just pay in less obvious ways such as need to more protection, greater risk of health hazards as the need for hygiene and medical care becomes more complex and the impact on the communities is more visible. Whatever the county can do to counteract this downward spiral would be most appreciated. The worst part of this is that the services are being cut to the population directly affected by mental illness but, as I am told, the State workers who oversee those services will stay in tact as the Governor has promised no State layoffs. A very disturbing scenario, if the people who are intended to be supported by the Department of Health, Adult Mental Health Division lose services, what will all those state emplyees be overseeing? It doesn't make sense. 2) The loss of services to vulnerable populations goes far beyond the mentally ill. People with Developmental Disabilities are also losing services. Their individual budget are being cut 15% from the 2007 year based on utilization. In reality, that 15% cut has meant as much as 60% for some people because they did not live on the island full time in 2007 or because they had such little to begin with. An across the board cut leaves precious little room for considering individual circumstances. When individuals are separated from their support, it often means families can no longer work as they must be there to care for the dependency of the individual. I do not have answers to these complex questions. I do understand the State as the rest of the world is now in a declining economic spiral; but I also think that in a world where unscrupulous mortgage lenders, insurance companies, auto manufacturers and now the steel industry is given monetary support; we could come up with something that supports our most vulnerable populations. Thank You, Gretchen Lawson