HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0050.002 2008-2010
Page 1 of 1
Murashige, Laura
From: Julie Nagasako [Julie.nagasako@catholiccharitieshawaii.org]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 11:34 AM
To: counciltestimony@co.hawaii.hi.us
Subject: Comm 50 - 01//06/09 (Committee on Human Services and Economic Development)
Attachments: Testimony - Communication 50 - Community Alliance Partners.pdf
Aloha,
Please find attached testimony from Community Alliance Partners regarding COMMUNICATION 50 to be heard
on January 6, 2009 at 10:30 am before the Committee on Human Services & Economic Development.
We appreciate your assistance in relaying this testimony to the Committee Members.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Mahalo!
Julie Nagasako
CATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII tjt
Hawaii Island Community Director
Catholic Charities Hawaii
204 Waianuenue Ave. NJ
Hilo, Hawaii 96720
Phone (808) 961-7051 Fax (808) 961-7059
julie.nagasakogcatholiccharitieshawaii.org
www.catholicchari6csha-,vaii.org
"Catholic Charities Hawai'i - helping people in need to help themselves, regardless of their faith."
The information in this e-mail is confidential and is legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized and may lead to civil and/or criminal penalties. If you have received this message in error, please
delete all electronic copies of this message (and the documents attached, if any); destroy any hard copies you may have created
and notify Catholic Charities Hawaii immediately at (808-535-0129).
Z
Comm; No. 50 -
Ref. Tot Y SEDG
Ref. Date JAN 6
1/5/2009
TO: Emily Naeole, Chair
J Yoshimoto, Vice Chair
Committee on Human Services and Economic Development
FROM: N^ej"z3 Pf
Julie Nagasako, Vice-Chair Advocacy Committee
Community Alliance Partners
DATE: Monday, January 05, 2009
RE: Comm 50: PRESENTATION BY STAKEHOLDERS OF THE ADULT
MENTAL HEALTH DIVISION IN RESPONSE TO THE RECENT
BUDGET curs
Please find a statement, included on behalf of Community Alliance
Partners regarding the impact of recent budget cuts to mental health
services. The attached letter has been submitted to the State Department
of Headth and we would also like to provide this feedback as testimony for
the informational hearings of the Hawaii County Council Committee on
Human Services and Economic Development regarding this topic.
We thank you for your consideration of this urgent situation and hope
productive action can be Laken to reach a solution.
r
Eh, got one house?
Community Alliance Partners (CAP)
Hawaii Island Continuum of Care to End Homelessness
P.O. BOX 2819
Kailua-Kona, H196740
Chiyome Fukino, MD
Director of Health
State of Hawaii
1250 Punchbowl Street, TO Floor
Honolulu, HI 96813
January 2, 2009
Re: Big Island Mental Health Service
Reductions
Aloha Dr. Fukino,
I am writing on behalf of the Big Island Community Alliance Partners (CAP) to
express our concerns about the reductions in public mental health services, and
to ask that you do everything possible to both ameliorate and redirect the
decisions to reduce services that are currently being implemented. We have
questions as to whether the degree and distribution of cuts to mental health
services is necessary and fair. As important, we believe that they are being
made in a manner that will cause unnecessary harm to those with the highest
level of need, and, in addition, will waste the precious resources that remain.
The CAP is a broad based consortium of homeless services providers and
community members that work to implement the state plan to end homeless in
the County of Hawaii. This includes delivering and assuring the availability of
programs that homeless individuals and families need to overcome the obstacles
they face in obtaining and maintaining housing. As you know, a significant
proportion of the homeless population suffers from serious mental illnesses that
can impede their ability to access and utilize the community resources that are
available for them. Therefore, a large number of the homeless people that CAP
providers work with are dependent on mental health treatment, and particularly,
case management services, in order to succeed in community settings.
We are concerned that the mental health service reductions on the Big Island will
render ineffective the case management services that homeless people with
mental illnesses need, and this, in turn, will result in an increase in
homelessness, dangerous behaviors, hospitalization, incarceration, and death.
Our members are already reporting an increase in symptoms and the crises
among homeless individuals.
First of all, we would like to be assured that people with mental illnesses are
being treated fairly in Hawaii. We understand that there is a budget crisis that is
affecting everyone, however, we would like to know whether the Department of
Health (DOH) is being cut disproportionately to other state funded services, and
that within the DOH that mental health services are not being reduced to a
greater degree than other health services. If the cuts to mental health services
are greater than for other health services we would like to know why and what
you are doing to correct this situation.
Secondly, within the DOH adult mental health system, we would like to
understand why services to the most seriously mentally ill are being most
severely impacted. Earlier this year DOH decided to eliminate all of the
Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) teams in the state. This approach to
treatment has repeatedly been demonstrated to be most effective for the highest
need individuals with serious mental illnesses including those who are homeless
or at-risk of homelessness. We were assured by your department that
Community Based Case Management services (CBCM) would continue to be
available to address these needs. Now we are learning that the CBCM services
are both being dramatically reduced and those that remain will be restricted in a
manner that will render them ineffective.
Of particular concern is the decision to limit case management services to 3.5
hours per consumer per month. With the distances that case managers must
travel on the Big Island, a single routine home visit for one consumer could
require more time than is being allowed. We would like to strongly suggest that
if CBCM services must be cut, that the decisions about how the remaining
services will be used, in terms of who receives priority for these services and
how they are distributed within the caseload, be made locally by the providers
who understand the unique situation of the Big Island. In this way we will be
able to assure that the CBCM services that remain available are implemented in
keeping with the intent and principles of case management programming, so as
to minimize the destructiveness of these cuts.
We are also wondering why the programs offered by contract providers that
serve those in greatest need are apparently being reduced to a greater degree
than state operated programs that, in general, serve a broader population of
people with mental illnesses.
i
We do understand and accept that during the current fiscal climate that cuts to
state services are inevitable. However, we also believe that budget cuts can be
an opportunity to move a system of services toward its strategic priorities by
making greater cuts to lower priority services, and, sometimes, even adding
resources to higher priority services. At the very least, the cuts should be made
in a way that will maximize the effectiveness of the funds that remain. We do not
see how the cuts that are now being implemented achieve either of these goals.
We would expect that DOH strive to maintain the evidence based programming
that has been established in recent years as a result of Federal supervision of
our system of care. This system has raised Hawaii from being one of the lowest
ranking mental health systems in the country to one of the best, and, we, on the
Big Island, have experienced the positive results of this programming. We are
concerned that this services system is being systematically dismantled as a
result of the current budget crisis. In our view this will maximize the pain for
highly vulnerable people, result in cost increases in other areas and waste the
precious treatment resources that remain.
We would appreciate a response to the questions and concerns we are raising.
We would also ask that your staff work with Big Island representatives and
providers to redirect the cuts you are making to best respond to our particular
needs. We thank you now for your time and consideration and await your reply.
Sincerely yours,
41
David Garcia
Chair, Community Alliance Partners
cc: State Legislators