The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCOM 0099.005 2008-2010} ` ;'County of Hawai' i Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan Update t - , ki fi r. p r IN ands ISyUMP I''nte_grat ons Zero � t.. ;N/aste aue M'o_delHResults �Resid.ual�Manage �e, plem_ent_ati'on� _, _jj !nJ CH2MHILL. inmwdahonvnlh cRna.,� 6. f ,: s'� yY ms's '�,1Ekr•RDS '. e�,. �F�1.lY�i "5.1 � P„ Agenda F = First draft chapters: Presented to SWAC and Council EMC — All but implementation plan and summary Remaining Milestones: — April 6/7: Implementation Plan (SWAG, Council EMC) — May 4-7: Draft Plan from consultant (for deliberation by SWAC, Council EMC, Public Meetings) — Late spring/early summer: Approval process (DEM, SWAC, Council) — Public hearing — Early summer: Submit draft plan to State — State review (60 days if no extension required) — Late summer/fall: Plan adoption by Council resolution • Basis for CH2M HILL initial recommendations —Our understanding of SWAC opinions • Discussions during SWAC meetings • SWAC "voting" for various options • Additional comments received by email — Interaction with Council EMC —Our understanding of input received at public meetings • Meetings for ISWMP Update and Zero Waste plan • Discussions with various community groups • One-on-one discussions with community members — Discussions with County DEM staff 2 Zero )Yaste. Study, 1 ISWMP Consultant 11 for Inclusion �." t"`ai 'b:k `ISWMP U d to v W `' Zero Waste Stud Summa of Recommbndatlon 1. Local ordinances to require the following: Zero Waste Stud Summa of Reeommendation i"t ,!,Ih If included, need to decide how to implement. Will Restores on at least six sites for recovery and require County composting of food/yard at SHSL and A sales of reusables Mini-MRFs on at least six sites to accept and W HSL, plus significant backyard element, plus study of A. Compostable organics out of landfill options at transfer stations (e.g., food bins with front C. Organic material and rock grinding areas load route at most stations; backyard in areas without D. Full signage and demonstration areas food bin at TS) Separation of designated organics, reusables 6 S. and recyclables (residents, businesses, Include haulers Construction and demolition reuse and Include C recycling lans Funds for training and social marketing Include D o rams Retailer and producer take back of problem Include E products and acka In S K 1 1 1 ISWMP consultant Recommendanon for Incluslon am `' ISWMPS.U2date" ^' Zero Waste Stud Summa of Reeommendation i"t ,!,Ih 2. Landfill and transfer stations redesigned into Resource Recovery Parks Restores on at least six sites for recovery and Include A sales of reusables Mini-MRFs on at least six sites to accept and Two MRFs (at landfills) and study cost-effectiveness of S sort commin led Tee fables MRF here or on mainland C. Organic material and rock grinding areas Include D. Full signage and demonstration areas Include 6 K 1 1 1 d'.` pr.• °, ^@P Zero Waste Stud me Of Recommendatlon 3. Training and social marketing programs ISWMP, Consultant.Recommandation for In • In1SWMP U date ` 0v ISWMP Consultant Recommendatlonifo Jo5lusson ,w �' s ,`. ".in ISWMPU date A. Train the trainers Include B. Train the technicians and regulators Include C. Train people and businesses Include D Facilitate research and public, private, and academic partnerships Include C. Get organics out of the landfill Include D. Construction and Demolition C&D Recycling StudyZe Waste (continued), 1 as r e i ;, n a}� y.,'s+ a a *'..$y',I f Zero Waste Stud Summa of Recommentlanon ISWMP Consultant Recommendatlonifo Jo5lusson ,w �' s ,`. ".in ISWMPU date 4. New rules for local and island -wide resource management issues A. Producer and retailer responsibility Include B. Source separation ordinance Include C. Get organics out of the landfill Include D. Construction and Demolition C&D Recycling Include E. Planning, Zoning, Health and Incentives Include 8 0 • Concept of Zero Waste Embedded in ISWMP Update • Initial suggested name for ISWMP: "The Path to Zero Waste" • Likely differences — Speed of implementation — Details of implementation — Funding ModelValue enxi xa mnnoa ro. mno:yi�q re:iaw..x.r Risk Analysis reaom•n reoeea�e.ocypn�e ogmn� oM�on z Can the alternative be implemented with confidence at the estimated cost i.e., what is the uncertainty surrounding the cost of each alternative? 5 Value Modeling- Overview` enaronmem best method for managing residuals after reduction, reuse and recycling Pmmate Job, with Zem Creation Waste Water ponutlon Value Modeling Overview - Select best method for managing residuals after reduction, reuse and recycling Imtectnumen Minimize 'Promote Job Wth Zer tedph entl the Soclallmpetl" C,eatlan Waste Principid We", palluban 7 u ? Value Modeling Overview select best method for managing residuals site reduction reuse and recycling Promote Job CreaOen environment m ertenM1ouW.I., nh..ea pollution Value Modeling Overview Select best method for managing residuals after reduction reuse and recycling teBoma puma' Mine'. promote Job alth and the eoclalimpecb Creation Weter pollution Value M odehrig Overview Select best method for managing residuals after t A. Minimize greenhouse gas production (from process and/or vehicles) reduction, reuse antl recycling cpnpiaency Pr01¢ct 11um0n Mlnimlx0 PrpmBi0 J00 wI1M1 20m he¢IN enU 1M1e - WeOt¢ Minlmlz0Cas1 1-55cale SOC411mpaMs CnellOn envlronnwnt Pnnd lea 1-55cale D. Promote worker and public safety WetOr 2. Options A. Minimize proximity Impacts (e.g., traffic, noise, od or) Greenllouee Ge EmlsslOna p011uapn Option 1 Measures C. Promote envlenmental justice Option2 ii� Weighting 1-5 Scale io o.eron me+aure of lxdpnnance Performance Minimize long mn lifecycle cast System average q cost in FV 200 Protect public health and the environment A. Minimize greenhouse gas production (from process and/or vehicles) Change norm, I Carbon Equi at B. Minimize other harmful air amissions them process antler vehicles) 1-55cale C. Mlnmizewaterp im,on 1-55cale D. Promote worker and public safety 1-5 Scale Minimize social mpads A. Minimize proximity Impacts (e.g., traffic, noise, od or) 1-5 Scale B. Provide locallobs Added lobs C. Promote envlenmental justice 1-5 Scale Accommodates futurenductions in resldualsaM changes in composition (i.e.. no out -or pay) 1-5 Scale M 1. Waste -to -Energy Facility for Fast Hawai i; Ash and Bypass Materials to SHSL 2. Waste -to -Energy Facility for all County Residuals, Ash and Bypass Materials to WHSL 3. One or More Modular Waste -to -Energy Facilities in Rural Areas; Ash and Bypass Waste to SHSL and WHSL 4. Develop Mechanical -Biological Treatment (MBT) Facility at the SHSL and/or WHSL Sites 5. Expand SHSL for East Hawaii residuals, and use WHSL for West Hawaii residuals 6. Close SHSL and landfill all County Waste at the WHSL 7. Bale and Barge East Hawaii Waste and utilize WHSL for West Hawaii residuals C6untv Residuals Management-, $ s 500 C 65.0 11,5 . Alt, ) A0.0 Aft.fi Alt.4 C_ O 35.0 J U W30.0 g11.2 d 7 25.0 Aft. t t0 > 20.0 150 10.0 $50 $60 $70 $80 $90 $100 $110 $120 $130 $110 $150 $160 $"0 $180 $190 No Per -ton Disposal Cost (FY 2008) 10 L Waste -to z. Warta -to- Y. On Or a. Dewlap S. Espana s. clam z Bala and Energy Energy Mare MMular Manhanlwl SHSLO'East SHSLand Barge East Fastly for Fmnry, for ell Wells 'a Bengal Hawaii landnn an Hawal'1 East Hawal'C Counly Energy Treatment reseal and County Waste Waste and Aso and Hesid"Is Ftend.a In (MET)Fmlllty use WHSLIar a1 de WHSL uln-WHSL Eaton. All end Raral Araae: al tha SHSL Weal Hawal'I for Weal ...H."la Bypass ASH and aawaFI sooner WHSL reaJYS H SHSL Ma"rlan,W Orleans Waste Sues regall WHSL to SHSL and C6untv Residuals Management-, $ s 500 C 65.0 11,5 . Alt, ) A0.0 Aft.fi Alt.4 C_ O 35.0 J U W30.0 g11.2 d 7 25.0 Aft. t t0 > 20.0 150 10.0 $50 $60 $70 $80 $90 $100 $110 $120 $130 $110 $150 $160 $"0 $180 $190 No Per -ton Disposal Cost (FY 2008) 10 als t law c6u�ty cost lmpiipMentation Risk Can the alternative be implemented with confidence at the estimated cost i.e., what is the uncertainty surrounding the cost of each alternative? Alternative Risk 1. Waste -to -Energy Facility for East Hawai i; Ash and Bypass Materials to SHSL Low -Moderate 2. Waste -to -Energy Facility for all County Residuals; Ash and Bypass Materials to Low -Moderate WHSL 3. One or More Modular Waste -to -Energy Facilities in Rural Areas; Ash and Low -Moderate Bypass Waste to SHSL and WHSL 4. Develop Mechanical -Biological Treatment (MBT) Facility at the SHSL and/or High WHSL Sites 5. Expand SHSL for East Hawaii residuals, and use WHSL for West Hawaii Moderate residuals 6. Close SHSL and landfill all County Waste at the WHSL Low 7. Bale and Barge East Hawaii Waste and utilize WHSL for West Hawai'i Moderate residuals "22 11 Weiahts Changes In Wel has Scores with value soar., p.,e.pia. 3. Mn. or Nan .. Da"lop 1. Wu1sW Foshay Fwa, MWuler Wart. Neor,oplul al ].... en. Sara Enxpy Fetlllly for all CwnW bEn.M` Iw Fea Hewell 6. Cion ana. Forel wwtil Io, Fe. Xafew 1; Rwkk ZLh Fxlllwfln a,N TneMenl lu 6T) nwelow, ono Wd. end unit.. pNBtuu and enE Byyn MaeI YM1wW FxlF.111al Ne SN6LaMld ue. WXSL Ioh Woo wwYI xelaMllll all County Wafbtl WH6xlor at NandWeto MNehltle\o Syyeff Waeleb WNSL SIIee nakuau ba WXSL Xawellnal,luali Con setaew Mf SNSL WHSL SHSL and WH6L 41B a2.1 8fi] 61.] 61] 6vNnv 43a <Ca 427 42,7 43.1 H.B 45B 434 4<9 65.9 620 6]E WOM1d SaI. -EB 52 .) 495 518 )4,6 fi99 602 on C. 39.1 VA 421 Jl.l 451 63.360 ES_ n•EB 440 J).B 46d 19 E3I 2eroWUNCom lide�no In •fio 42S In We Mt 1=HI halt Stolid AIbTa1We Hank Order with Chan as peal, Orddln .Value SuxeI ) 3 BazN. ) I 3 GHG - IS fi E 4 6 dnx soma - so Con. Rm 4 3 I 3 wo Wvk Co no..- no off w pay ad S 5 ) 4 21 als t law c6u�ty cost lmpiipMentation Risk Can the alternative be implemented with confidence at the estimated cost i.e., what is the uncertainty surrounding the cost of each alternative? Alternative Risk 1. Waste -to -Energy Facility for East Hawai i; Ash and Bypass Materials to SHSL Low -Moderate 2. Waste -to -Energy Facility for all County Residuals; Ash and Bypass Materials to Low -Moderate WHSL 3. One or More Modular Waste -to -Energy Facilities in Rural Areas; Ash and Low -Moderate Bypass Waste to SHSL and WHSL 4. Develop Mechanical -Biological Treatment (MBT) Facility at the SHSL and/or High WHSL Sites 5. Expand SHSL for East Hawaii residuals, and use WHSL for West Hawaii Moderate residuals 6. Close SHSL and landfill all County Waste at the WHSL Low 7. Bale and Barge East Hawaii Waste and utilize WHSL for West Hawai'i Moderate residuals "22 11 Discussions with SWAC begin tomorrow • Likely recommendations: — Transfer system • Retain system and reconstruct aging stations • License haulers, but no curbside • Phased implementation of PAYT • Fully staffed with reduced hours and/or fewer stations — Develop two materials recovery facilities — Expand on-site composting — Commercial recycling initiative — Expand education and training — EPR and expand HHW/E-waste program • Review this material with SWAC Develop three implementation scenarios for discussion at the April SWAC/Council EMC meetings • Develop draft plan 12 Initial Thoughts Financial Incentives and Infrastructure Requirements for Increasing Residential and Commercial Recycling Key Objectives: — Increase diversion of waste from landfill — Provide financial incentive to waste less — Encourage program consistency at all County facilities to the extent practicable Three key strategies: — Mandatory recycling and PAYT at County recycling and transfer stations — Increase recycling from commercial businesses and institutions — Differential tip fee for: disposal of designated recyclables will be double regular tip fee Education, promotion, and phase-in is critical 13 Mandatory recycling ordinance for recycling/transfer stations Allow one trip per day at RTSS for commercial businesses in relatively small vehicles (1 ton or smaller) Bag/tag system for garbage - Standard garbage accepted only in special County -authorized bags • Bags made available for purchase at local retail institutions — Non -recyclable bulky items accepted only with special County - authorized tags • Tags made available for purchase at local retail institutions • one tag per item for most bulky items (white goads, couches, mattresses) • Multiple tags for various sizes of mixed hard -to -bag non -recyclable material like home remodel demo (e.g., 5 tags for a pickup load) • County designate a list of materials delivered to landfills that must be recycled - target large quantity materials relatively easily diverted — Possible candidates: green waste, scrap metal, cardboard • Tip fee increase as needed to pay for added recycling • Differential tip fee (double regular fee) for loads delivered with designated materials - No tolerance in ordinance; "reasonable" enforcement • County develop materials recovery facilities (MRFs) in East and West Hawaii for accepting/processing all designated materials (private sector operations) • Recyclables accepted at landfill/MRF sites free of charge except for: - Scrap metal fee: encourage private sector to handle these materials - Green waste fee: encourage on-site management 14 Two key actions for 2009 — Implement fees for scrap metal and green waste at East Hawaii after 2-3 month education and promotion effort — Begin siting process for West Hawai'i sort station implement Implementation of commercial recycling and PAYT — Extensive education and promotion campaign for 3-6 months prior to implementation • Multi-media social marketing campaign (print, radio, N) • MUST be adequately funded and staffed — Recognize economic realities (recession) and implement only after recession is nearing end? — Implement with a "grace period" where fees are not yet collected 15