HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 071 Draft 01 1994-1996COUNTY OF HAWA~L STATE OF HAWAII
RESOLUTION N0. '77. • 95
WHEREAS, Section 10-11 of the County Charter requires that any
contract, lease, or other obligation requiring payment of funds from
the appropriations of a later fiscal year or more than one fiscal
year be approved by resolution; and
WHEREAS, HRS 36-41 provides that any agency may enter into a
multi-year performance contract, not exceeding 10 years, for the
purpose of undertaking or implementing energy conservation or
alternate energy measures in a facility or facilities; and
WHEREAS, by entering into a Performance Contract for an energy
retrofit to the Hawaii County Building, the annual electricity cost
savings would be approximately $58,000 or 35"s; and
WHEREAS, a copy of a scenario for a performance contract for the
Hawaii County Building is attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the County of
Hawaii:
1. That the Mayor is authorized to enter into a performance
bond contract for an energy retrofit for the Hawaii County Building.
2. That sufficient funds be budgeted in future fiscal years to
cover the anticipated obligation of the County under the performance
bond.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk transmit copies of this
resolution to the Departments of Finance and Research & Development.
Dated at Hilo, Hawaii, this 5th day of Aoril 1995.
Int duced By:
Cou cil e , County of Hawaii
i hereby mrl
vote indicated
the County of
ATTEST:
~~ ~
'Q`'°~ i
CO ; ITY CLERK CHAIRbYAN & PR IDING OFFICER
~~ ~ ~ ~~
COUNTY COUNCIL
of Hawaii
t
C AYI+S ROES A83 RY
oun
y
Hawaii
Hilo ARAICASI X
. 8O~_anaaucOR X
the
RESOLUTION wm b
i CBII.DS
y
ng
ify that the forego
ht hereof adopted by the COUNCIL of
the ri
t DS LIDSA
g
o
Hawaii on April 5, 1995 DODtIZIGO
OSORIO
RATS
RAY
SMITE
9 0
Reference C-246/FC-53
RESOLUTION NO. "Tl 9S
EXHIBIT "A"
ILL'. dATZVE SCENARIO FOR A PER._dMANCE
CONTRACT FOR HAWAII COIINTY BIIILDING
Annual electricity cost (basis. year 1994) ------- 165$000
Annual electricity cost after energy retrofit --- 107,000
Annual savings due to performance contract(35$)-- 58 000
Table 1 shows a possible scenario for distribution of the
above energy cost savings in a performance contract. The
assumption is made that unit energy cost savings remain
constant over the years and that energy usage is stable.
(In practice, a performance contract has provisions built
in to allow for variations in utility rates and significant
changes in actual energy usages such as might occur if a
large number of new computers were installed.)
This table is only an approximation of the savings and their
distribution. Actual values will depend on the contract
entered into with the energy service company (ESCO).
NOTE: The performance contract guarantees that the County
will not be liable for electric utility costs in excess of
what would have been incurred had the performance contract
not been implemented.
TABLEI: SAVINGS DISTRIBUTION
FROM A PERFORMANCE CONTRACT
YEAR TOTAL COUNTY $ COUNTY ESCO $ PAYMENTS
SAVINGS OF SAVINGS OF TO ESCO
$ SAVINGS $ SAVINGS $
1996 58,000 10 5,800 90 52,200
1997 58,000 10 5,800 90 52,200
1998 58,000 20 11,600 80 46,400
1999 58,000 20 11,600 80 46,400
2000 58,000 30 17,400 70 40,600
2001 58,000 40 23,200 60 34,800
2002 58,000 50 29,000 50 29,000
2003 58,000 60 34,800 40 23,200
2004 58,000 70 40,600 30 17,400
2005 58,000 80 46,400 20 11,600
End of Contract
2006 58,000 100 58,000 0 0