Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0008.002 2008-2010 1-6-2009 Testimony of Tim Rees: (808) 959-5023 P.O. Box 1787 Pahoa, Hawaii 96778 on Comm. 8 in support of the Principles, Goals and Objectives of the Reinstated Government of The Hawaiian Kingdom. Testimony: My name is Tim Rees. I testify on behalf of myself and my Ancestors today. I speak in support of the Reinstated Government of the Hawaiian Kingdom's Principles, Goals and Objectives. Attorney General Mark Bennett's position in the so-called "ceded lands" case before the U.S. Supreme Court can only be described as a Scalawag's attempt to destroy the future negotiating positions of the Kanaka Maoli and their Progeny to all successive Ancestral Rights and Claims. His position disgraces the legacy of all Americans. This action has been commenced by one Politically Appointed State Attorney against the unanimous decision of five Hawaii Supreme Court Justices after the solemn U.S. Apology Resolution of 1993, when Congress Recognized the existence of Unrelinquished, Uncompensated Claims while speaking on behalf of the American People. Mr. Bennett and his hired guns would have the U.S. Supreme Court believe that our duly elected National Representatives, Senators and 280 Million Americans had their fingers crossed behind their backs when the Joint Resolution became United States Public Law. They now style it as a mere "Symbolic Resolution" and pretend no Offense should be taken. Even if the Hawaii Supreme Court committed errors in their findings such as sloppy nomenclature and verb usage or too much reliance on the Federal Apology Resolution rather than the History and Legal Issues it describes, it is minor. They came to Comm. No. I.2- Ref. To: W ( 1 Ref. Date, iaN n C 21109 the right conclusion which was that the Kingdom Lands should be preserved whole until un-relinquished claims to the same are resolved. This finding in no way prevents the State as Co- Trustee from responsibly managing the lands for all of Hawaii's residents; in fact it helps insure this. This issue certainly is about Race and Imperialistic Design. There's no question. It always has been. In fact Bennett's argument is identical to Sanford Dole's in 1893 when he responded to Grover Cleveland's Order that the Monarchy be reinstated. Dole's denial and legal analysis was a classic case of demented logic being used to create monumental absurdity and hypocrisy. But it worked under the circumstances and political atmosphere developing then. It was basically a "Simon Says" doctrine where he argued that once the U.S. acknowledged the Provisional Government (P.G.) through the actions of Minister John Stevens it could not then retract or interfere with the newly claimed "sovereignty" of the P.G. Bennett takes this absurd premise two steps further. He claims once the U.S. Congress declared the Kingdom Lands from the mis- named Republic of Hawaii to be free and clear of all claims in absolute fee, it was a done deal regardless of any illegalities committed during the acquisitions. He also argues that once these same Kingdom Lands were granted to Hawaii State in the Admissions Act, Congress could then do no more to affect Hawaii State's so -called "sovereign" authority over them. His arguments fail in many respects but it should be first noted that Congress has no explicit or implicit Constitutional Authority to arbitrarily declare Land Titles Free and Clear. We can't function like Somalia. Congress was never empowered to 2 acquire property through Mistake, Fraud, or Accident. President Cleveland, in his December 18, 1893 speech to Congress stated in part: "...Our country was in danger of occupying the position of having actually set up a temporary government on foreign soil for the purpose of acquiring through that agency territory which we had wrongfully put in its possession. The control of both sides of a bargain acquired in such a manner is called by familiar name when found in private transactions." my note: "FRAUD". Following are two excerpts from then Senator, President-elect Barack Obama's speech given on March 18, 2008 at the Constitution Center in Philadelphia shortly after tapes were released showing his friend and pastor Jeremiah Wright spewing Race-laden invectives and Offensive remarks damning America: working together we can move beyond some of our old racial wounds, and that in fact, we have no choice. We have no choice if we are to continue on the path of 'a more perfect union'. "The profound mistake of Reverend Wright's sermons is not that he spoke about Racism in our Society. It's that he spoke as if our Society was static; as if no progress had been made. As if this Country - a Country that has made it possible for one of his own members to run for the highest office in the land, and build a coalition of White and Black, Latino, Asian, Rich, Poor, Young and Old is still irrevocably bound to a tragic past. ( pause) What we know; what we have seen; is that America can change. That is the true genius of this Nation. What we have 3 already achieved gives us Hope; the audacity to Hope, for what we can and must achieve tomorrow. Attorney General Mark Bennett's Mistake and Ignorance is as profound as Reverend Wright's was. He would have us believe that the political and legal landscape of 2009 is irrevocably stagnated and beholden to the immoral, unlawful acts committed by thieves, liars, and cheats back in 1893. In contrast to these flawed holdings hear what the people of Hawaii adopted in the first operational clauses of their Constitution: "We reserve the right to control our destiny, to nurture the integrity of our people and culture, and to preserve the quality of life that we desire. We reaffirm our belief in a government of the people, by the people and for the people, and with an understanding and compassionate heart toward all the peoples of the earth, do hereby ordain and establish this constitution for the State of Hawaii." It doesn't say "with an understanding and compassionate heart toward all the peoples of the earth- except Native Hawaiians"! Someone please tell Mr. Bennett and his hired gun, Seth Waxman. They claim they are operating under the authority of this Constitution on behalf of "the people". It is now up to the American People to see to it that our Constitutional Legacy is upheld. That all Human Beings are held to be equal in their Inalienable Rights. That with an Understanding and Compassionate Heart we treat all Peoples of the World with Rightful Dignity including those of the First True Nation of Hawaii, the Kanaka Maoli and those they accepted as Citizen/ Subjects There can be no second Theft or Betrayal of National and Ancestral Rights allowed. 4 The Hawaii County Council should support the Hawaii Supreme Court and O.H.A. that in this matter has taken the high ground on behalf of all Hawaiians so that whatever form or entities future negotiations are conducted under at least there will be no further alienation of the Lands these negotiations will be centered around. The injunction also preserves the most meaningful base upon which efforts towards appropriate reconciliation and/or reinstatement of National rights of political self-determination can be founded. Thank You for your Consideration of this Testimony and Request. 5