The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCOM 0525.018 2008-2010 Page 1 of 7 Murashige, LauraC 237 G@ , OAT 2{w From: Roxanne Hampton [rhampton@co.hawaii.hi.us] log! OCT 2Q Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 8:11 AM To: counciltestimony@co.hawaii.hi.us Subject: FW: [MCM] So IS there squalene in the new vaccine? il;n,~l1 Attachments: 18e2e9.jpg; 18e318.jpg; 18e327.jpg From•,jeremy broner [ma i Ito: mathshoppe@ya hoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 5:28 AM To: rhampton@co.hawaii.hi.us Subject: FW: [MCM] So IS there squalene in the new vaccine? (THE GOODS, thank you Daniel; please see why I've been so confused about all the contradictory stuff I'm reading. The right to know what we're being injected with. Even though squalene is naturally occurring in our nervous system, a concentrated dose of it sets off an autoimmune process against our own nervous system, i.e. gulf-war syndrome among other disorders. It took a court order and a lot of digging for people to get to the bottom of this. Love, Jeremy) On Sun, 10/18/09, Daniel Barenblatt <dib10280@yahoo.com> wrote: From: Daniel Barenblatt <dib I 0280@yahoo.com> Subject: FW: [MCM] So IS there squalene in the new vaccine? To: "mathshoppe@yahoo.com" <mathshoppe@yahoo.com> Date: Sunday, October 18, 2009, 6:03 PM Original Message Subject: [MCM] So IS there squalene in the new vaccine? Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:10:18 From: Mark Crispin Miller <mark.millern&nyu.edu> To: <newsfromunder rg ound(a googlegroups.com> So IS there squalene in the new vaccine? Below is a new email from HealthFreedomUSA, about the federal lawsuit filed by Gary Null et al. to stop the distribution of swine flu vaccine, on the grounds that it's "illegal, unnecessary and dangerous." If you scroll down to the email's third paragraph, you'll see this: Although the government Comm. Ref. To: Ref. Date - 10/20/2009 Page 2 of 7 states that none of the vaccines contain adjuvants, that is manifestly untrue, since the injected vaccines contain aluminum, a toxic adjuvant, and Novartis told the Natural Solutions Foundation on that same day that their approved vaccine contains MF59, their proprietary squalene adjuvant. The email then goes into great detail about the use of squalene in vaccines, and its advantages for the latter's manufacturers. Now, this claim that Novartis has admitted using squalene in its H1N1 vaccine flatly contradicts the many categorical assurances that the New York Times has offered time and time again. For example: "Some antivaccine groups are raising fears of thimerosal, a preservative used in some brands of flu vaccine. Others issue dire warnings about squalene, an immune booster used in military vaccines and in some European flu vaccines but not in any American ones Donald G. McNeil, Jr., "Don't Blame Flu Shots for All Ills, Officials Say," 9/27/09, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/health/policy/28vaccine.html?scp=4 &sq=swine%20flu% 20vaccine%20squalene&st=cse " There are also claims that the vaccine contains adjuvants - sometimes added to make vaccines more effective - although they have not been used in this one . " Jennifer Steinhauer, "Swine Flu Shots Revive a Debate About Vaccines," 10/15/09 http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/16/health/16vaccine.html?scp=1&sg= swine%20flu%20vaccine% 20adjuvants&st=cse And, from a recent op-ed, which lists a number of supposed "myths" about the H1N1 vaccine: " THE VACCINE CONTAINS A DANGEROUS ADJUVANT Some vaccines, like the hepatitis B and human papillomavirus vaccines, have substances called adjuvants, which are added to enhance the immune response, so that smaller quantities of vaccine can be given. Some people fear that the H1N1 vaccine contains, in particular, squalene, an adjuvant that, while included in other vaccines in Europe and Canada, has never been used in routine vaccines in the United States. But the H1N1 vaccine available in the United States has no adjuvant of any 10/20/2009 Page 3 of 7 kind. " Paul A. Offit, "Nothing To Fear But the Flu Itself' (op-ed), 10/11/09, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/12/opinion/12offit.html?scp=3&sq= swine%20flu%20vaccine% 20adjuvants&st=cse So what's the truth here? Either Gary Null et al. have got it wrong, and, evidently, filed a federal lawsuit with at least one whopper in it--or the CDC's been lying, and the New York Times has therefore been purveying a highly dangerous untruth. Why not ask the Times what's up? Clark Hoyt, the newspaper's ombudsman, is at public@nytimes.com. To email Donald G. McNeil, Jr.: htt p://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/m/donald_ gjr_mcneil/index.html? inline=nyt-per To email Jennifer Steinhauer: http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/s/*ennife r steinhauer/index.html?inline=nyt- per To email Andrew Rosenthal, editorial page director: andyr(a,nytimes.com To email David Shipley, editor of the Times op-ed page: shipley@Llytime s. com MCM http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p_3617 "Stop the Shot"Litigation Filed Today in DC Court! htt p:Hsalsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/t/1128/ -/dia/action/public/ ?action KEY=1545 Read Press Release Here: http://www.healthfreedomusa.or g//=3 617 The Foundation's Court complaint alleges that the government failed to follow its own rules and applicable legislation in rushing the vaccine approvals in the absence of any of the requisite minimum scientifically sound and appropriate testing for both safety and effectiveness as required by law since 1964. 10/20/2009 Page 4 of 7 Despite the FDA's intention to begin delivery this week of what they describe as the novel "Swine Flu" 2009-HlN1-A live virus nasal mist vaccine to 90,000 government-approved locations nationwide, six New Yorkers, including Natural Solutions Foundation's Medical Director, Rima E. Laibow, MD, and several NonGovernmental Organizations (NGOs) filed for an Emergency Injunction in the US District Court for the District of Columbia to prevent the distribution of what they believe are illegal, unnecessary and dangerous vaccines. The case of Null et al. v FDA et al. [Docket No. expected Friday, October 9, 2009] challenges the legality of the September 15th, 2009 licensing of four vaccines prior to any safety testing for what the government calls a "novel flu virus with pandemic potential." Although the government states that none of the vaccines contain adjuvants, that is manifestly untrue, since the injected vaccines contain aluminum, a toxic adjuvant, and Novartis told the Natural Solutions Foundation on that same day that their approved vaccine contains MF59, their proprietary squalene adjuvant. The purpose of an adjuvant is to irritate the immune system into greater production of antibodies than it would otherwise create in response to a smaller antigen dose. Antigens are the most costly part of a vaccine to manufacture. Therefore, despite the enormous dangers, vaccine manufacturers are eager to use adjuvants. Adjuvants like squalene (also known as M1759, ASO 1, 2, 3 and 4) are highly toxic unapproved drugs in the US. The Novartis (approved) Swine Flu and GSK (awaiting approval) vaccines contain 1 million times more oil in water adjuvant (read, "squalene") than the devastatingly dangerous Vaccine A which caused the profound illness and death of so many previously healthy service men and women. Why so much squalcnc . Read on. A pair of patents filed in 1998 provide a means of turning the immune system of anyone receiving an injection of squalene at high doses plus a pig glycoprotein (very similar to the many biologically active human glycoproteins we all have) against the reproductive capacity of that person. That means that all of the children and pregnant women who are the first guinea pigs for these vaccines around the world could be rendered permanantly and irreversibly infertile through these shots. Perhaps this helps to explain the mystery of why the US government would invest almost half a billion dollars ($485M) to stock pile a dangerous, untested and unapproved injectable version of squalene. The rest of the mystery, of course, is solved when you recall that the FDA has said on 10/20/2009 Page 5 of 7 its site that the squalene will be added to ("admixed") with the vaccines administered at the 90,000 sites to which they will be sent for injection. Natural Solutions Foundation Seeks Delay in Vaccine Use Until Legally Required Safety Testing Has Been Completed Although safety testing of all vaccines is inadequate, as shown by the high levels of side effects, adverse events and damage caused by vaccines, especially influenza vaccines [and most especially, live attenuated influenza virus or LAIV vaccines], even that safety testing has been eliminated by the FDA. The government says that the HIM virus is so novel that they classify it as a bioweapon. Yet they say that there is no need to test the vaccines, adjuvanted, LAIV or not, because their manufacture was accomplished by the same means that other influenza vaccines are made. While this would not mean the vaccines should not be tested, the manufacturers themselves give the lie to this rationalization for imperalling all of us: Novartis and Baxter claims that their approved vaccine is, in fact, manufactured in a novel manner. It is so novel, in fact, that we have previously written about the dangers of vaccines cultured in monkey kidney cells which are infected with, among other stealth viruses, SMV40, a known cause of leukemia and other soft tissue cancers responsible for the leukemia epidemic which has impacted so many recipients of the polio vaccines. There is no assurance whatsoever that this danger, and others similar to it, has been eliminated from these vaccines. Yet FDA races to approve them before their dangers CAN be documented in order to protect the manufacturers - and itslef! - from loosing their protection from all litigation and liability UNLESS they act in willful negligence. Any court in the land would find that if they completed the safety tests, saw the dangers of the vaccines and continued to use them, they would be acting in willful negilgence and then all sorts of fiscal hell would break loose. So it is imperative that they reap their astonishing financial windfalls and sow their deadly whirlwinds BEFORE any safety testing is completed. Nasal spray vaccines, which are LAIV vaccines, according to their manufacturer, Medimmune, while 10/20/2009 Page 6 of 7 not adjuvanted, work by producing the very illness they are supposedly designed to prevent (it's not a case of the flu since it was not "acquired in the community", but it has the identical symptoms. Of course, we say, "If it coughs like a Swine, Flies like a Swine, has muscle aches like a Swine, it must be the Swine that Flu", right?) That means, of course, that the government, in collusion with WHO and the depopulationists, have every intention of unleasing a pandemic. Once the virus is well established, it is free to reassort, mutate, recombine and undergo changes that could turn it from a trivial infection which requires, despite all the hype, no treatment and is actually milder than the regular seasonal flu, into something truly fearsome. At that point, if it happens, several things will happen: First, we believe that mandatory vaccination, now permitted under emergency powers at the State and Federal levels, will be invoked, with vaccine refusal criminalized and punished by misdemenor or felony status, fines and incarceration/involuntary quarantine. Second, vaccine refusers who do not allow their children to be vaccinated will either see them forcibly vaccinated against their wishes or removed from their homes. Intrusion teams are already funded by the Federal Government and many States are following suit. FEMA announced a few months back that they had set up special camps to meet the special needs of children. Third, if people try to protect themselves and their children using physical means to stop the intrustion teams, vaccinations, loss of rights and personal autonomy and indignity of being forced to undergo dangerous proceedures which violate their beliefs and wishes, the spectre of Martial Law will suddenly become very, very real. Therefore, our best protection is urgent, vigorous action now, not tomorrow. Our government has, in fact, turned against both our rights and our bodies. In fact, it has turned against our very survival. We still have legal actions available to us and there are, astonishingly, still some judges loyal to the Constitution they have sworn to uphold. There are also some military people loyal to the same document and their loyalty is a factor which may yet save us all, IF the foreign troops quartered on US soil (also forbidden by the Constitution) are not brought to bear upon us in tyrannical ways. After you read the Complaint and the Brief and some documentation on the dangers of Squalene and similar adjuvants, it's time to talk about what you can - what we believe we all must - do before the last second of the last minute of the now-past 11th hour has vanished and, with it, our ability to own 10/20/2009 Page 7 of 7 and control the fate of our own bodies. Link to Complaint http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=3619 Link to Brief http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/~?pagg- Read more: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=3617 Squalene: Be Very Afraid I hitp://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=3582 Squalene: Be Very Afraid lI http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=3592 Sheila Parks, Ed.D. Founder and Director Center for Hand-Counted Paper Ballots Belmont, MA 02478 617-932-1424 DEMOCRACY IN OUR HANDS www.handcountedpaperballots.org You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's "News From Underground" newsgroup. To unsubscribe, send a blank email to newsfromunderground-unsubscribe(a~googlegroups.com OR go to http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunder rg ound and click on the Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page. For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com 10/20/2009 •~°•uoa°'J' J Y ',Q a •~'f k ---ter-- f '~I``'+4~-'+, a • J: ~.i' o• ...e..~,yr..-_.._w.1 {•~A..•.i, ' k - t i NL kv 11-7 k A f" 11j ; r ~A^ 'ti 4 .t - - - C4 AP 711- kipm , Vw !~+•,St ~ , a: J ~ , , „r~ ~ t t , C' { .ISV , A ~ e f h' i qa, vtt~ .'a? 0 • ,f, . _ ~Jnr a _1 ? r L L, Li '13 1 , F" J* ? III 11f _ i + ` ~ (I 1 ~1 ? ~L ' LL- F-I ~ - t Fi. _LJf.1 E J r La L Il,;lam' J- L ] 4 LIE, C] 1 1 ! "t i t~~ 13 : I l L.J { F].-' , r. Fl ! I f ¦ C3 r . 9P mFl ~ J} I wFl y _ 1 a , r f9 ! 61 ¦ It im ¦