HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0766.029 2008-2010 EMILYLN.4EOLE -BE, (808) 965 -2712
Vice Chair oos,.v (808) 965.2707
\WA Email: enaeoleca2co .h wau:M.as
Council District .5 •
+TT
Business Address:
c H ' 15 -26621 ahoy 1 illoge Road
Pahoa .16 ,ketplace, Room 104
Pahoa, Hawaii 96778
County of f- awa/ r 1
Office of the County Clerk
25 .4upuni Street
Hilo, Hawaii 96720
Telephoner (808) 961 -8255
Facsimile: (808) 961 -8912
G�
May 3, 2010 Q
a 1 11
To: J Yoshimoto Council, Chair r rT
And Council members ,e' «?' CJt
From; Emily Naeole - Beason, Vice chair - L .,
Subject: Bill 234/250 z frt
cn
M CD
Aloha Kakou, -
Many decisions are being made fast and furious these days. The County Council postponed the vote on
Bill 234, to delay implementation of the new building codes, in the interim; Councilman Hoffman has
proposed Bill 250 for consideration. 1 understand that significant progress has been made in
amending Ordinance 09 -48. While the initial response has been extremely favorable to Councilman
Hoffman's proposed amendments, its implementation date exceeds the May 11 effective date.
Therefore, it is paramount that all who initially supported Bill 234 continue in their support to delay
the effective date. Clearly, the process of review must happen, the process of county government
must transpire, all of which would take longer than the required 2 weeks remaining for ordinance 09-
48 to become law. The only solution that would result in obtaining a well written, viable Energy
Conservation Code is to take the proper time and utilize the available expertise to complete a thorough
review and rewrite of the amendments. The only way to accomplish this is to delay the effective date
of Ord. 09-48 as is the intent of Bill 234. Upon completion of a thorough review and the writing of a
new Ordinance, hill 234 could be amended to fast track implementation sooner than the January 1,
2011 date.
1 have also taken the liberty of attaching some information for your consideration as it deals with the ,
acceptance ofARRA funding ties to State Energy Code Adoption and Enforcement.
EIN /jh
Att:
• Serving the Interests o/ the People of our Island
hIl D 01. (p ( p ,
1lmroi'i County is an Equal Oppotune° Provider and Employer p u � Cl I
Qr e / kt tD
S ts � to
Comm- No. / ' (c. 21
Ref. To: ' Gi
Ref, Date _'AY 052010
Alliance to Save Energy
American Council for an Energy- Efficient Economy
The American Institute of Architects
American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and
Air - Conditioning Engineers
Building Codes Assistance Project .
Building Energy Efficient Codes Network
International Code Council
National Association of State Energy Officials
Natural Resources Defense Council
Midwest Energy Efficiency Alliance
Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance
Southeast Energy Efficiency Alliance
Southwest Energy Efficiency Project
U.S. Green Building Council
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Media Contact: Ronnie Kweller, Alliance to Save Energy: 202 -530 -2203; rkweller @aso.org
NATION'S LEADING BUILDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY EXPERTS
CLARIFY ARRA FUNDING TIES TO STATE ENERGY CODE ADOPTION
AND ENFORCEMENT
Acceptance of February American Recovery & Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Funding
For State Energy Programs (SEPs) Requires "Prompt Action to Meet Tough
Legislative Preconditions and Swiftly Approaching Deadlines"
Washington D.C., December 1, 2009 —The above fisted organizations — noted for their broad
leadership role in national energy efficiency policy — have developed an explanatory statement
for state and local governments to clarity the intent of Section 410 of the American Recovei
and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) and to offer assistance as states and localities adopt, provide
training on and enforce advanced building energy efficiency codes. The participants Issued the
following remarks regarding their statement, which is attached (the Full statement follows)
We have Joined forces to clarify what Congress intended to be crystal clear when it
linked building energy code adoption and enforcement with finding under Section 410 of
ARRA
By accepting State Energy Program funding and submitting letters assuring the
Department of hnergy that their states would comply with the terms of Suction 41(1, all 50 status
have emu to do three things
1. Adopt a residential building energy code that meets or exceeds the 2009 Intewational
Energy Conservation Code (IECC),
Adopt a commercial building energy code that meets 01 e <cecds the ANSI /American
Society of Heating. Retiigctating and An- Concldionuig Engineers
(.ASHRAE) /IF:SNA Standard 90.1 -2007; and
3. Develop and implement a plan, including active training and enforcement provisions,
to au hleve 90 percent compliance with the tat get codes by 2017, mcl udine measuring
current compliance each year
key Deadlines Are Swiftly Approaching. With only a few states having adopted codes
that "meet or exceed" — let alone comply with — the target codes, most have a long way to go
ARILk regduis state - plans to he designed to achieve 90 percent compliance with codes b■ 2017
U.S DOE has determined that the 2009 International Residential Code (IRC) does not meet the
energy provisions of the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC)
and to make annual compliance progress assessments. The February 2010 anniversary of ARRA
marks the Act's first compliance deadline for states.
To ensure ARRA compliance, it is in each state's best interest to begin the process of
adopting target codes (or better) and to develop the means to train code officials 10 enforce them
as soon as possible
Help and Funding are Available for Enforcement and Training. In addition to
revenue from building Inspection fees. funding for enforcement and training is aeailablc from
federal grants -- including the State Energy Program (SEP) and the Energy Efficiency and
Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) —and from existing state and federal energy efficiency
funds. In addition, the groups issuing this statement are working together closely to boost new
building code - related funding in the pending climate and energy legislation before Congress
The actual statutory provision is as follows:
114111
Explanatory Statement on Section 410, Recovery Act (HR1) by
National Building Community Stakeholders (November 16, 2009)
Since the passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) in February 2009,
State Energy Program (SEP) funding tied to building energy code adoption and enforcement has
a , been the subject of much discussion and debate. The objective of this statement is to clarify the
intention of the statute and to offer assistance to state and local governments to advance building
energy efficiency codes, including code adoption, training in the operation of the codes and
efforts at compliance and enforcement. We recognize that success in this area will not be easy,
but we have joined together to help In nn effort to provide accurate, understandable d nd
actionable information to states, local governments and the organizations and entities that
support greater energy efficiency in the built environment. the undersigned groups oflel the
following information about Sec. 410, of ARRA
Section 410 (a) (2)
The State, m the applicable units of local government that have authority to adopt building
codes, will implement the following:
(A) A building energy code (or codes) for residential buildings that meets or exceeds the
most recently published International Energy Conservation Code, or achieves equivalent
or greater energy savings.
(B) A building energy code (or codes) for commercial buildings throughout the State that
meets or exceeds the ANSI /ASHRAE /IESNA Standard 90 1-2007, or achieves equivalent
or greater energy savings.
(C) A plan for the jurisdiction achieving compliance with the building energy code or codes
described in subparagraphs (A) and (8) within S years of the date of enactment of this
Act in at least 90 percent of new and renovated residential and commercial building
space. Such plan shall include active training and enforcement programs and
measurement of the rate of compliance each year.
Some of the descriptions of this statutory language provided by third parties have resulted in
inaccurate information and confusion among those mho are involved in meeting the requirements
of this Act.
The key points are as follows.
2
1- Conditions for Acceptance of ARRA funding. All 50 state governors have submitted
letters to the Department of Energy, providing assurances that their states would comply
with the tens of Section 410 All 50 stales have accepted SEP funds that were conditioned
on these assurances. Therefore, all 50 states have committed to do three things:
a. Adopt a building energy code for residential buildings that meets or exceeds the 2009
IECC;
b. Adopt a building energy code for commercial buildings that meets or exceeds the
ANSI /ASi-IRAE /IESNA Standard 90.1 -2007; and
c. Develop and implement a plan, including active training and enforcement provisions, to
achieve 90 percent compliance with the target codes by 2017, including measuring
current compliance each year.
Achieving 90 percent Compliance in Eight Years Requires Prompt State Code
Adoption. While ARRA, out of respect for the variations in state and focal adoption
procedures, includes no specific date by which states must adopt compliant building energy
codes, the legislation does specify that state plans for demonstrating 90 percent compliance
with the codes should be designed to achieve that compliance level within eight years from
passage of ARRA, i.e., 2017. In order to ensure compliance with the law. it is in a state's
best interest to begin the process of adopting target codes (or better) as soon as possible.
The measurement of compliance "each year" means states will need to begin assessing
their rate of compliance with the target codes in February 2010
3- Code Adoption Integral to Compliance. While there is not yet a published common
means of measuring and iepolling compliance with the target codes, we recommend
assessing compliance with the existing codes. DOE is currently developing these common
means. It is clear that unless a compliant building energy code addressing both residential
and commercial buildings is adopted in the state, it will be extremely difficult to provide
compliance statistics that are based on the target codes.
4 - A Long Way to Go. As of this writing, only a few states have adopted codes that "meet or
exceed" the target codes.
5 - Training and Enforcement Essential to State Compliance To achieve the required
levels of compliance, training and enforcement must match the adopted state code or codes:
so the process of adopting these codes m tandem with the development of such training and
enforcement provisions is critical.
6- Funding Available for Enforcement and Training. Funding for enforcement and
training can come from fees imposed for inspections, from grants (including SEP and the
Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants (EECB0)). from existing state and
federal energy efficiency funds and from new funding supported by the groups that are
U S DOE has determined that the 2009 International Residential Code (IRC) does not meet the
energy provisions of the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC).
working together to increase building code - related finding in the pending climate and
energy bills.
7- The First ARRA Compliance Deadline is Approaching. The Department of Energy will
begin requesting that states report their rates of compliance w ith the target energy codes in
the near future, and we expect DOE to require regular repotting in conjunction w ith ARRA
compliance
8- Funding Opportunities For Jurisdictions. Congress is considering tying future funding
for states to progress towards satisfaction of the assurances made in accepting ARRA
funds
The undersigned groups are committed to providing support to any requesting state and local
government to achieve adoption of the target codes, to develop workable plans for training and
enforcement, and to assist in developing a plan to address the measurement and reporting of
annual compliance with the target codes.
Alliance to Save Energy
American Council for an Energy - Efficient Economy
The American Institute of Architects
American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air- Conditioning Engineers
Building Codes Assistance Project
Building Energy Efficient Codes Network
Intermittent]] Code Council
National Association of State Energy Officials
Natural Resources Defense Council
Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance
Midwest Energy El ficienev Alliance
Southeast Energy Efficiency Alliance
Southwest Eneigy Efficiency PI eject
U.S. Green Budding Council