HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0010.003 2010-2012i
FROM: Dan A. Cole 4 January 2011
P.O. Box 630
Keaau, Hawaii 96749
Council District #5
Testimony in COMMENT to Comm. 10.2: Requests
Discussion with Corporation Counsel Regarding the
procedures to Wave Attorney- Client Privilege. Referred for
Executive Session, Wednesday January 5, 2011, RE: RICO
Act 18 U.S.C. §1961 through 18 U.S.C. §1968 in light of
Council's acts and actions in support of violations of 18
U.S.C. §241 Conspiracy Against Rights; 18 U.S.C. §242
Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law; and 18
U.S.C. §1584 Sales Into Involuntary Servitude, et. al.
The request for discussion between the Council and Corporation Counsel
regarding the procedures to waive Attorney - Client privilege is mute. The Council by their
knowing and knowingly acts and actions, or non -acts and non - actions has confirmed the
existence of a Racketeering Enterprise that influences, controls, or extorts the official
actions of the Hawaii County Council in patterns and histories of racketeering activities
for the benefit of the Enterprise operating in criminal violation of the RICO Act, where it
is not disputed that Corporation Counsel Lincoln S.T. Ashida is a member of such
Enterprise.
Therefore: In accordance with Chapter 626 Hawaii Rules of Evidence, RULE 503 (d)
Exceptions (1),(2) there is no Privilege to Waive as all communications with Corporation
Counsel Ashida and the Office of the Hawaii County Corporation Counsel must be
construed or identified to be for the purpose of a furtherance of a crime or fraud.
Any Council Attorney - Client communications must be viewed in violation of 18
U.S.C. §2 Principals and /or 18 U.S.C. §3 Accessory after the fact, to violations of 18
U.S.C. §1512 Tampering with a Witness, victim, or an informant; 18 U.S.C. §1513
Retaliating Against a Witness, Victim, or an Informant; Violations of the Rivers and
Harbors Appropriations Act of 1899 Sec. 9 (33 U.S.C. 410), Sec. 10 (33 U.S.C. 403),
Sec. 13 ( 33 U.S.C. 407), and Sec. 16 (33 U.S.C. 411); Violations of the Securities Act of
1933, Sec. 17. (a)(2) RE: Section 922 of the Dodd -Frank Act, July 21, 2010, 18 U.S.C.
§ 1344 Bank Fraud; Violations of Hawaii Revised Statutes HRS §324H -30 Prohibition,
RE: Hawaii State Senate Bill S.B. 3092, July 1, 2004; HRS §707 -764 Extortion; et.al.
The knowing and knowingly acts and actions, or non -acts and non - actions, of the
Council in conspiracy with other Agents of the County of Hawaii, Sovereign State of
Comm. No. 400 43
Ref. To fyise "a l
Ref. Date JAN 0 5 mi
Hawaii and/or Agents of the United States Government, constitutes a conspiracy to
knowing and knowingly commit acts or actions, or non -acts and non - actions in patterns
and histories of violations of 18 U.S.C. §241 Conspiracy against Rights, 18 U.S.C. §242
Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law for the purpose to instill into a person
under the authority of the United States the beliefs through criminal coercion in violation
of 18 U.S.C. §1584 Sales Into Involuntary servitude, et. al., that Agents of the County,
State, and Federal governments had, and have, the legal authority to deprive a person of
their State and Federal Constitutional rights and freedoms without due process of law
thereby placing a person into involuntary servitude in violation of the Thirteenth
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary
servitude,..., shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
The attached documentation support the aforementioned allegations and is to be
considered original information or analysis presented to a civil authority under the United
States of the actual commission of a felony or felonies cognizable by a court of the United
States and establishes claim by this Testifier, Dan A. Cole, to any and all state and
federal rewards, bounties, and/or distribution of fines for such.
Sincerely,
4 �401�zl
Dan A. Cole
Attached:
29 DEC 2010 Fax Transmittal to Nancy Cook Lauer, Stephens Media Group,
containing a 27 December Open Records Law Request to Hawaii County Mayor
William Kenoi with copies to Hawaii County Mayor William Kenoi, Hawaii
County Council Chair Dominic Yagong, Hawaii County Council Member Fred
Blas, Council District 5. (4 pages)
7 December 2010 letter from Dan A, Cole to Dominic Yagong, Council Chair and
Fred Blas Council Member Council District #5. RE: Hawaii County $56M Bond
Fraud. (1 page)
3 January 2011 Hawaii Open Records Law Request to Hawaii County Clerk, Ms
Jamae Kawauchi. (7 pages)
FAX TRANSMITTAL: Three, (3), pages total.
TO: Nancy Cook Lauer FAX (808) -961 -5960, Phone:
Stephens Media Group
COPY TO: William Kenoi
Mayor, County of Hawaii
_Dominic Yagong
�Cliaii•, Hawaii County C cil
,_ kl
Q
R?
SUBJECT: Confirmation of Organized Government Corruption and Racketeering,
RE: 18 U.S.C. §1961 Definition, by Indirect Confession of the Hawaii County
Council, Hawaii County Police Chief, and Hawaii County Mayor by the assenting -
silence doctrine in knowing and knowingly violations of 18 U.S.C. §4 Misprision of
Felony; 18 U.S.C. §3 Accessory after the fact; 18 U.S.C. § Conspiracy Against
Rights; 18 U.S.C. §242 Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law; et ab
._ re as
C , j Haw aii County Council Member, Council District #5
PA,N MEDIA
FROM: Dan Cale, Phone: (808)- 966 -9229
P.O. Box 630
Keaau, Hawaii 96749
Aloha Nancy,
I noticed your 27 Dec, 2010 article on the front page of the Tribune - Herald about
Credit Charge information obtained through a Public Records Request by Stephens
Media_
I have attached a copy of my two page request for government records. Please
notice the time RECEIVED stamp time difference between the Mayor's Office on the
first page, and the County Councils stamp time RECEIVED on the second page. I gave
the Council a copy of the FOIA request just a couple of minutes after I left the Mayor's
office. The fact that the Mayor's Official Time stamp is set one hour and twenty -five
minutes ahead should be questioned, this is something that would have been known to the
Mayor as his responsibility in keeping the of County Seals.
I am amazed, (Not Really), that nothing appeared in the Local Media about my 30
November 2010 Testimony before the Hawaii County Council, RE: Bill 311, " r I L
accused Public Officials of the County of Hawaii of c r imina l involvement in
COPY
Racketeering Activity in criminal violation of the federal RICO Act, i.e., Extortion and
Bank Fraud, and played into the Council Record portions of recorded conversations I had
with Hawaii County Finance Director Nancy Crawford, Hawaii County Police Officer C.
Kekela, and Bank of Hawaii official Pamela Moy.
The accusations were clearly and deliberately made in accordance with the Legal
Doctrine of Assenting - Silence as defined on page 124 of the Eight Edition of Black's
Law Dictionary and the silence on the part of any and all County officials on the
accusations is by definition of Blacks Law Dictionary, page 317 in an indirect confession
by the County of Hawaii to the truthfulness and accuracy of my accusations.
assenting - silence doctrine. The principle that an accusation will be taken
as true, despite silence by the accused, if the accusation was made under
circumstances in which silence can fairly said to be an agreement.
indirect confession. a confession that is inferred from the defendant's
conduct.
The Constitutional Rights and Freedoms of Freedom of the Press are not
questioned here, however these rights and freedoms also require a responsibility of the
Press as to the Welfare of the People who bestowed upon the media such liberties. The
unquestioned information and evidence on record in State and Federal court records and
on file in the County of Hawaii's Clerks repository of records, and provided to Stephens
Media Group, identifying an immin peril to the safety, health, and welfare of the
people of Hawaii from a predicted flooding event that will have resulted from knowing
and knowingly illegal actions of the County of Hawaii in violation of County, State and
Federal laws must be made known to the people for their protection and to insure the
rights and freedoms as the State and Federal Constitutions guarantee to all people under
the authority of the United States and the Sovereign State of Hawaii.
Please feel free to contact me for additional information.
Aloha,
Dan A. Cole
TO: William P. Kenoi, ESQ.
Mayor
County of Hawaii
State of Hawaii
FROM: Dan A. Cole
Keaau, Hawaii 96749
T: (808) 966 -9229
27 December 2010
TY V at
SUBBJECF: Hawaii's Open Records Law Request for access to governm&t
records, HRS § 92F -12, RE: County Council Bill 311
$56M General Obligation Bond Authorization.
Aloha Mayor Kenoi:
On 20 October 2010 I had a tape recorded conversation with County
Finance Director Nancy E. Crawford in your outer office. Ms. Crawford
explained to me that in reference to County Council Bill 311, authorization
to float $56M of Municipal General Obligation Bonds, I understood Ms.
Crawford to say that there were no bonds going to be floated- as that was the
old way the County use to issue bonds, the County of Hawaii has "a vary
favorable short term borrowing relationship with Bank of Hawaii
Investments Section", and the County just had a Bond Float a few months
ago.
In light of the Securities Act of 1933, Sec. 17.(a)(2), and the Dodd-
Frank Act as enacted on July 21, 2010 Section 922, I request a copy of the
following County of Hawaii Government records in accordance with HRS §
92F -12, et. al.,
(1) A copy of the Contract, Agreement, or other documentatio
identifying, " a very favorable short term borrowing relationship
with Bank of Hawaii Investments Section`' that the County enjoys.
(2) A copy of the government's records identifying all
Municipal Bonds, General Obligation Bonds or Securities that have
been authorized and/or issued by the County of Hawaii since July
2004.
Page 1. of 2.
(3) A copy of the governmew records identifying a ll current
interest bearing investments or assets of the County of Hawan that
have resulted fiom lhe issuance of, or authorization to issue County
of Hawaii Municipal Bonds and/or Securities.
CS
Thank you for your attention in this matter, L�
ND
C
Sincerely,
Dan A. Cole
Cc: Dominic Yagong, Chair Hawaii County Counsel
Brenda Ford, Chair Hawaii County Finance Committee
TO: Dominic Yagong
Hawaii county Council Chaimnan
TO: Fred Blas
Hawaii County Council Member
Council District #5
7 December 2010
.I
FROM: Dan A. Cole Phone: 966 -9229
RE: Hawaii County $56M Bond Fraud; 3 Dec. 2010 Requesttor
County Resolution to request US Justice Dept. Investigation.
Aloha Council Chain Yagong & Council Member Blas:
From the recorded conversations with County of Hawaii and Bank of Hawaii
officials the below news article appears similar to the County's $56M Bond Float, RE:
Bill 311.
n E wr
T H E B L i . 1 RAVI At -
AF }._ 5-1 - 16, 9
a te. "-
BOFA UNIT AGREES TO PAY V37M IN MUNI BOND CASE
Posted on December 7, 2010 at 2:04pm
Updated on December 7, 2010 at 2:05pm
WASHINGTON (AP) — The government says Bank of America's securities division has agreed to pay $137
million to settle allegations by federal and state authorities that it made illegal payments to win business from
towns and cities looking to invest proceeds from municipal bond sales.
The Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulators announced the settlements with Banc of
America Securities.
The securities unit agreed to pay $36 million in restitution to settle the SEC's civil fraud charges and $101
million to other federal and state authorities. The company neither admitted nor denied wrongdoing in
agreeing to settle.
The SEC says Banc of America Securities paid undisclosed fees and kickbacks to municipal officials in
return for the investment business.
The agency is investigating corruption in the industry for investing municipal bond proceeds.
THE0 1 21"t-JR - Ki
I- I -f4
All information 0 2010 TheBlaze LLC
.z
TO: Ms. Jamae Kawauchi
Hawaii County Clerk
County of Hawaii
State of Hawaii
FROM: Dan A. Cole
P.O. Box 630
3 January 2011
Keaau, Hawaii 96749
Telephone: (808) 966 -9229
SUBJECT: RE VEST under Hawaii's Open Record Law for access to
government records, HRS §92F -12 et. a1., RE: 20 October 2010 Council's
request to Corporate Counsel Lincoln S.T. Ashida to review and advise on
correspondence Subject: Wanton & Reckless Criminal Misconduct of the
Hawaii County Council; 2010 NOV 12 PM 3 25 document filed with the
County Council RE: Hawaii County Police 18 USC 242 Civil Rights
Violations & SEC Bond Fraud
Aloha County Clerk Kawauchi;
Attached are documents emailed to County Council Members and on file in the
Clerks Repository of Records as attached to Comm. No. 10. 1, Ref. Date DEC 15 2010. I
Request the disclosure of all "government records" as defined by the Hawaii Uniform
Information Practices Act (Modified), where the term "government record" is defined
broadly to include any information maintained by an agency that is recorded in any
physical form. The cover page of Comm. No. 10. 1, Ref. Date DEC 15 2010 is attached to
aid in locating and identifying the requested government records.
I Request access to all government records related to, or generated from, the
following attached communications to the Elected Officials and a civil authority under
the United States known as the Hawaii County Council.
(I) Wed, October 20, 2010 2:07:18 PM, From: Dominic Yagong, TO:
Lincoln Ashida, Subject: FW: Wanton & Reckless Criminal Misconduct of
Hawaii County Council. (2 pages)
(2) Fri, November 12, 2010 1:04:45 PM, From: Dan Cole TO: Dominic Yagong
et. al., Subject: Hawaii County Police 18 USC 242 Civil Rights Violations &
SEC Bond Fraud. (2 pages)
This request for these government records is in accordance to HRS §92F -12
Agencies must also disclose (3), Records where compelling circumstances show an affect
on the health or safety of any individual. In the public interest as to be considered it the
public's interest in the disclosure of official information that sheds light on an agency's
performance of its statutory purpose and the conduct of government officials, or
which otherwise promotes governmental accountability.
The 20 Oct 2010 statement by Councilmember Yagong to Corporate Counsel
Lincoln Ashida, "Aloha Lincoln, I noticed that you were not Cc'd on this email from Mr.
Cole. Please review and advise. Much Aloha - Dominic Yagong", is a clear and obvious
breach of any attorney -client privilege according to Counsel Ashida's own words,
"merely stating that you have consulted with your attorneys will not breach the privilege.
However, stating the reasons underlying our opinion will. Further, once the privilege is
breached, it cannot be reasserted Thus, all communications surrounding the previously
privileged matter become fair game. In short, you cannot "unring the bell," ".
In accordance with Chapter 626 HAWAII RUELS OF EVIDENSE, RULE 503
LAWYER-CLIENT PRIVILEGE (d) Exceptions. There is no privilege under this rule:
(1) Furtherance of crime or fraud. If the services of the lawyer were
sought, obtained, or used to enable or aid anyone to commit or plan to commit
what the client knew or reasonably should have known to be a crime or fraud;
(2) Prevention of crime or fraud. As to a communication reflecting the
client's intent to commit a criminal or fraudulent act that the Iawyer reasonably
believes is likely to result in death or substantial bodily harm, or in substantial
injury to the financial interest or property of another.
The nature and content of the government records requested is in the Public's
Interest to insure the governments compliance to its statutory purpose as to the protection
of the public's health, safety and/or welfare. The requested government records exposes
organized government corruption and the existence of a Racketeering Enterprise engaged
in patterns and histories of racketeering activities for the benefit of the Enterprise in
violation of the Federal Racketeer Influence & Corrupt Organizations Act, RICO Act,
with such acts and actions by members of the Enterprise to include, but not limited to,
Extortion and Bank fraud, and the influence, control, or extortion of County, State, and
Federal officials and employees located in Hawaii, to include Judges and Officers of the
Court of the State and Federal Court systems in Hawaii, by and through the conduct of
government officials
Thank you for your attention to this UIPA Request.
Sin rely,
9 Zor- 4 O
Dan A. Cole
1 3 11cama
FROM- Dan A. Cole,
P.O. Box 630
Keaau, Hawaii 96749 LL
Council District #5\
Testimony in COMMENT to Comm. 10
Request
Discussion 'WrIth Corporate Counsel Regarding Attorney -
Client Privilege, referred for Executive Sessloll,
Wednesday, December 15, 2010, RE: Can a Council
Member be held civilly Or criminally liable in a lawsuit,
where, it is learned the Council m em b er f t h e
advice of the Corporatio C ounse l?
The attached August 11. 2003 four page MEMORANDUM from Lincoln S.T.
Asbida Hawaii County Corporate Counsel, RE The Attorney - Client Privilege,
combined with a copy of Clapter 626 HAWAII RULES OF EVIDENCE RUEL 503
Lawyer-Client Privilege as refirenced in Counsel Ashida's Memorandum. The
documentation and the language contained therein speaks for itself
I call the aftention ofthe Council to item #5 of Counsel Ashidas memorandum;
5- Can 11 be held personally liable in a kW9014 where it is learned I did
not follow the advice of the Corporation Counsel? -
A prudent Council M mo b er s bo n ld a as h e Corporation Counsel:
Can a Council Member be held personally HaNe, admitudly or civilly,
where it is learned that the Council Member DID MLLOW the advice of the
Corporation comud?
Please refer to the athwhed page identified as RULE 503 LAWYER-CLIENT
PRIVff,ECTIP, (d) Exceptions. There is no privtiege under this rule.-
( Furfficrame Of mime or fraud It the services of the l awyer were
sought, Obtained, or used to enable or aid anyone to com or p t
commit what the client know or reasonably should h ave k nown to be a
crime or fraud;
Page 1. of 2.
Cam_ Kmjo- I
P.eL Tog . tn2ga7stir
. if
1W. Date u 1 2glo
M
From Dominic Yagong {dyago�c0.hawau hi.us)
To: 1ashida@co i h _ us;
Date: Wed, October 20, 2010 2:07:18 PM
Cc: cote hawaii@yahoo_com;
Subject: FW: Wanton & Reckless Criminal AfmnduCt of the Hawaii County Council
Aloha Lincoln ,
I noticed that you were not Wd on this errmad from Mr_ Cole_
t ; Much Aloha - Dominic Yagong
I
Please review and advise_
Page 1 of 2
From: Dan Cole {rr aft. -W hawali ftahoaoom]
Seft Wednesday, October 20, 201011 :30 AM
To: bl♦ord@ao hawal.hi.us; .hawaii.hi.us; bliord@oo haWa1i.hi.us; dilaeda@co.hawaii.hLus;
don Fti@co.hawan.hi.us; ciyagong@co.hata►ali.hi.us; enaeo .hawall.hl.us; genriques@oo.hawaii.hl.us,
jyoshlmoto@co.hawaLhl.us; kgr @oa.hawan.hi.us; phofftffln@om.hawaii.hi.us
Cc awles@djou -mm; DerekJ.Chow@usaw- arnwinii; oip@hawa .gov; AP Rem; Chief Pollee; Eric Simmons;
Glenn Becig John Brisld; Kenai WNliam; Stever Slagle; West Hawaii Today; )ft was POH Williams
Subject: Wanton & Reddess C hminal Misonduct of the Hawaii county Council
Aloha Hawaii County Council. Members:
I have not received any correspondence from any of you disputing my
assertion that State and Federal critnin charges should be filed against
you for your Wanton & Reckless official actions to keep from the public
an ;mm;n peril to the public safety, health or welfare from possible
future flooding events as described or alluded to by Mayor Kenoi in a
Hawaii Tribune - Herald article, and predicted and identif ed by County,
State, and /or Federal government engineering documentation on file as
an Exhibits in the civil case against you, Civil No. 10 -1 -82, in the Circuit
Court of the 3rd. Circuit, State of Hawaii.
I have attached the front page of the 14 October 2010 notice to file
Criminal Complaints I delivered to the County Clerks office, and the US
Postal Service Certified Mail Receipts identifing that the aforementioned
Federal Complaints were sent out
I am presently preparing complaints to' be filed with Hawaii County
Police Department for patterns and histories of violations of Hawaii
Revised Statutes 707 -764 EXTORTION, against all Council Members as
Principles, Conspirators, or Accessory After the Fact. An example of
Extortion is identified in records of the Council meeting for the approval
of a FEMA Grant to revise identified corrupt and /or fraudulent FEMA
Flood Insurance Rate Maps, esp. FIRM Community Panel Number 155
166 0870 C, also know under Letter of Map Revision Case No. 09-09 -
2120P. The official statements as recorded in the minutes of the Council
httpJ nW2 mail. VWwo_com/dcllanuch? 83aviatp&
1/3/2011
Print
Page 2 of 2
meeting where Council member Naeole- Beason stated that she has seen
me in the neighborhood drinking beer and shooting and she had to seek
advice from the County's Corporation Counsel for possible protective
actions because Council member Naeole - Beason stated she was being
and had been harassed for years by me. I call on Ms. Naeole- Beason to
identify Where and When she purportedly witnessed the publiclly stated
acts and actions, and What Acts of Harrasment she is identifing in the
Council minutes. Additional statements made during the same meeting
by Council members Hoffmann and Enriques were also acts and actions
in violation of HRS 707 -764 (1)(e)(f)(h)(i)(k) for the purpose to subject me
to hatred, contempt, or ridicule to impair my creditability so that other
Council members would be influenced to ignore my testimony and
warnings of immin peril to the Public Safety, Health, and /or Welfare,
along with identified crimin activity and organized government
corruption by other county officials, and approve the FEMA Grant to
produce fraudulent and corrupt FEMA FIRMS for the benefit of an
Enterprise organized and controlled by and through "Local" cultural and
ethnic norms by persons and corrupt government officials that have
engaged in patterns and histories of racketeering activities for the benefit
of the enterprise, which in this case would be to hide, or reclassified
FEMA Flood Zone designations for land/ subdivision development in Hilo
by politically connected persons at the jeopardy of people downstream
from the County authorized and supervised non - permitted and non-
documented Stream Diversion Works constructed in 2001 from over
4,000 cubic yards of material under a federal funded contract P -3535 to
clear Hilo Stream beds of storm debris from the 2000 floods with the
material used to constructed flood protection structures for said
properties.
As always if any Hawaii County Council member disputes any of the
aforesaid assertions or statements you must contact me with verified
evidence and /or reasons for your official actions as recorded in Council
Minutes of various meetings. It is my intention to begin filing criminal
Extortion complaints with the Hawaii County Police Department for RICO
Act violations on 27 OCTOBER 2010
Thank you for your attention in this matter.
Sincerely,
Dan A. Cole
Council Distirct #5
h4i„ - // „c r»a') mail vahnn rnml�alla�mrh9 rnn�l-- ffl�St�avtatn�l, ri i�ni
Ant
Page l of 2
From: Dam Cale (cola havasii@yaboo=m) _ o
To: dywgg@ o- -us; org I&wai�u a
Date: Fri, November 12, 2010 1 4 45 PM
Cc: wI md@co l =s iNLug b&KI@wIwwfiILus; a us; 1
do o i; , ' us• enaeole&o WwanJI;.uS;
oip � -gov, wwaRILUS6 eric simmons�dhs -god
gleunu o mews cam;J - m" o com;J` lLu
sslagle(a�nicb w Nelly� r-
Snbjeet: Had Cou aly Police 18 USC 242 Civil Rights Violations & SEC Bond Fraud
Aloha. Council member Yagong, C ALEA Representative Mitchell, and
Police Chief Kubc jurL
st opped by the Hawaii Cou S ervims ieic a few •.
ago and gave County council member Yagangs Staff Member
Barbarasome' ft r - nation about the and forms I will be
usi ng to notify Ihe S ecur i ties c, • - • ! H t ! t t o 1
consph-acy of corrupt County of Hawaii officials to -- a $56M
s • ! • • / • •J! t !! f E t M! ! ' • • and de f" * ! i • i o
•!! i tt !,r 1;att• �• • if a t, / i!' 1 1 s - 1 Ri t !
• t t ' `• f :3i % t tt - • T �3 i !! - t tt €! - • �i ' i ! - i •
ti • I - %It • f ft �% M• ! • • I i ! f • ! 1 NEW
T he re o f the r' .f C ounty Police Department • excep
c o : 62pjaint bya. person. within the United States is a Deprivation of fthts
Under the color of Law RE.- 18 U.S.C. 242 and aids and comforts the
Enterprise. I have mpted to bring this informe6on before the Hawaii
County Police . 3n. but all ' - I present is given the
Lincoln S.TAshida County Corporafim Caimsel. I have brought
t h i s it i it i t ! be ! - " aIt Coun Counci ! • t he €! t It i • i
was ref&red to Lincoln S.T. Ashida for review and advice. I have
presented i r •1 K eii i office w it h t h i s i f t! a wh ..
re f erred t o t he c orporation • ! - office w no .i• • GIi action ta
to protect the public healfli, safety, or welfare., with the Hawafi County
, c or p or ate Counsers Office advising the Hawaii County Police
Departm S • excep any Complain on the m atters.
COPY-4
. -- .. .. « -' -- ---- is_x --- - s — , • ..�... w�n: .. ti III n^nII n
Print
Page 2 of 2
Lincoln S.T. Ashida has committed by himself and in conspiracy with
others a number of acts and actions of Extortion against my person to
Portray me as mentally unstable or to demean my person for the purpose
to influence other government officials, to include the Hawaii. County
Police Department to deprive me of my State and Federal Constitution
rights and freedoms, in violation of HRS 707 -764, where the Hawaii
County Corporation Counsel Office has advised. the Hawaii County Police
Department to deny me any ability to file a Complaint against
Corporation Counsel Ashida and other identified corrupt County, State,
and Federal Officials in Hawaii that are formed into an Enterprise by and
through the adherence to "Local" cultural and ethnic norms and
school or other associations that influence, control, and /or extort
County, State, and Federal Offices in Hawaii to include the Judges and
Officers of the State and Federal Court systems in Hawaii.
The pattern and history of racketeering activities by the Hawaii County
Police Department, and their documented pattern and history of Civil
Rights violations by Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law in
violation of United States Code, 18 U.S. C. 242, by this email are referred
to CALEA to be used as the bases to deny the Hawaii County Police
Department's accreditation in the Commission on Accreditation for Law
Enforcement Agencies, Inc., (CALEA) organization.
As always if any person or organization disputes any of the
aforementioned information or allegations please refer to page 124 of the
Eight Edition of Black's Law Dictionary and read or reread the definition
of the "assenting - silence doctrine ", failure to respond to this email by 18
Nov. 2010 will be understood that there is no dispute of the veracity of
the aforementioned statements and allegations will be understood by all
to be true and accurate as stated and an indirect confession by the
Hawaii County Police Department of Civil Rights violations, RE: 18
U.S. C. 242.
Thank you for your attention in this matter.
Dan A. Cole
Telephone: 808- 966 -9229