Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0064.117 2010-2012Murashige, Laura From: Richard Hoeflinger [hilodik @gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 6:57 PM To: counciltestimony @co.hawaii.hi.us Subject: Testimony Re: Bill 17 Richard Hoeflinger HCR 1 Box 5344 Keaau, Hawaii 96749 7/18/2011 flhl JUL 18 TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION TO BILL 17, "PLASTIC BAG BAN" Page 1 of 1 PICO al lin . G- 4 . St; 3 I am opposed to the passage of Bill 17 which would prohibit businesses from providing plastic bags for containment of customer purchases. This is a "feel good" response to a non - existent crises generated by a vocal minority of environmental zealots, which will unnecessarily lower the standard and raise the cost of living of all island residents. I am an outdoor person, spending the majority of my time on the beaches and in the forests of this island. My vision is quite good, and I fail to see the calamity of plastic bag misuse depicted in newsprint and Internet accounts. Yes, there are irresponsible residents who do not properly dispose of plastic bags. They are probably the same ones who discard the automotive parts, appliances, food and beverage containers, medical supplies, animal waste, and other disgusting detritus that many of us have been picking up for years on island roadways and beaches. Shall motor vehicles, microwave ovens, restaurants, pharmacies, ranches, and other sources of rubbish likewise be banned? Or should the direct cause of these problems, citizen irresponsibility, be more properly addressed. I am one of those who employ plastic grocery bags in a myriad of uses in my home, shop, orchard, and kennels. They are an everyday convenience to me and thousands of island residents. A minority may misuse them, but there is simply not a shred of data that supports the emotionally- manufactured, headline - grabbing plastic crises on which Bill 17 is based. Bureaucracies have a propensity to punish all for the actions of some. It's the easy way out. I urge you to carefully consider this matter and defer action on the bag ban proposal. Citizens don't need more government intrusion in their daily lives nor additional job - killing legislation. Why not focus on activities that benefit, rather than punish people. Relieving the horrible Puna traffic congestion would be a good start. Comm. No. f '. It 7 Ref. To:�s eM� C°1404‘, Ref. Date JIjL.2 2QU .