HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0345.019 2010-2012Murashige, Laura
From: Ron Tubbs [rtmb @hawaiiantel.net]
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 5:56 PM
C`t t
To counciltestimony @co.hawaii.hi.us COUN i ;.
Subject: Attachement -DLNR Stats report -clink on Each Island at bootom of table.
Attachments: testimony DLNR statsAquarium 1999- 2010.xls
I am testifying in opposition to Res. 140 -11 and 130 -11. Please do not pass a resolution requesting the
State of Hawaii to amend chapter 188.
On 11 -22 -10 in Oahu last year the 2011 HAWAII STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES
LEGISLATIVE PACKAGE No. 10 -290 Page 9 -15 from the Maui City Council was heard by the
Honolulu city council. It asked for many regulations on aquarium fish which would have
resulted in basically a ban on Aquarium Fish. Honolulu City Council unanimously opposed this
section and returned it to Maui for them to remove this section. It took hours of the Honolulu
City Councils time and much funds to fly to Maui to get it changed.
At the Honolulu meeting hours of testimony from both sides was heard and these were the
results. Similar legislation has be introduced in the State Legislature and all these bills were
deferred. You now find this same topic again before you. I hope we can learn from previous
decisions and avoid wasting everyone's time.
The Tropical fish association has been working with the DLNR creating a Rules Package
which will increase many laws for the Aquarium Trade. We are already sustainable and will
continue to work with the DLNR to make sure we stay that way.
Aquarium Fish catch report stats for this fiscal year are attached. They show no increase in
catch but an economic decline in take. There is no need with over %30 percent of the Big
Island in preserves to rush in to a complete fishery closure. The DLNR Stats show an overall
increase in fish populations in both FRA(Fish Replenishment Areas) and non FRA areas.
DLNR Marine Biologist in a meeting "the conflict is a user group conflict not a resource issue ". DLNR
has also not supported much of the legislation from Maui, why it is not scientifically based. We support
closed areas to allow tourists to see the wonderful fish in all their glory and we do understand the
importance of tourism. Our opposition takes tourists to preserves and shallow areas which we never
dive. The staunch opposition evades our understanding.
Page 1 of 5
picouNta
SEP 19 f ! 9 22
THE FACTS
A. State of Hawaii Licenses Aquarium Fish collectors and regulates us with the strictest laws of any
State in the US. Catch is restricted by take size, seasonal catch laws, weather, harbor access, depth,
currents, surf, and many other factors limit catch. Dive time is restricted by both air supply but also
nitrogen build up. Only small areas are covered in a day and most fish escape collection. The biggest
factor is the ability to keep fish healthy during boat and vehicle transport. Lots of water and weight are
needed to keep fish alive. Live perfect fish are a must. Limited demand for the fish is also a major
restriction. Of the Main Hawaiian Islands 30 percent is protected by Sanctuaries, Marine Protected
Areas, Fish Replenishment Areas (FRA), Marine Life Conservation Districts (MCLD), Refuges, Fishery
Management Areas (FMA), National Monuments, and restricted military areas. To say we have
Comm. No.
Ref. To: Pre' ° u &C
9/19/2011 Ref. Dat - 2011
Page 2 of 5
unlimited catch is just not true and shows the stupidity of those opposing us.
B. Attached fish catch stats show declines in number caught and number of collectors reporting. In the
Big Island for example there is a decline from 2007 to 2008 of 7 divers , there was also a
decrease in overall catch of 19,413 from 2007 to 2008 State fiscal year. Economy has led to a
decrease in catch and number of divers due to demand. Fish populations have continued to
increased. The past 10 years have seen nearly stationary catch and no declines in catch
validating the fact that we are sustainable. See attached DNLR catch stats attached.
C. Below is the information proving we have nothing to do with algae growth. We do not even collect
fish from these areas. Also we do not even dive where the tourists go. The tourists mostly dive preserve
areas. The only tourist conflict is the made up one by Snorkel Bob and Maui groups.
E. Reef fish produce one to five million fry per spawning with up to 7 spawning cycles per year ( 7
Kona yellow tangs spawns last year). Only 800,00 fish are taken from the whole State is less than one
pairs spawn (see attached Stats). With only 1 -10 % of reef fish fry surviving to adult breeding stage the
removal of younger fish for Aquariums never impacts overall populations! We are a sustainable fishery.
Fish are the most renewable resource.
For years, these discharged runoff from pineapple and sugar cane fields directly into ... West Maui has
gotten considerable attention because of repeated seaweed blooms. Studies commissioned in the mid -
90's by the West Maui Watershed ...
Maui and Molokai runoff links: (They continue to blame us for excess seaweeds.)
www.turtles.org/aspects.htm
http : / /www.turtles.org /aspects.htm
http: / /www.hcri.ssri.hawaii.edu /files /media /mc -Ipub- 2005- 01- 03.pdf
http: // www. indigenousportal. com /es /Medio- Ambiente /Moloka -i -s- reef -is- choking- to- death.html
Kahekili DAR Herbivore fisheries management area (HFMA) was created July 25th 2009
Nitrite runoff problems link:
http: / /www.hcri.ssri.hawaii.edu /files /media /mc -Ipub- 2002- 12- 18.pdf
urban runoff effects coral reefs link:
http: / /www.hcri.ssri.hawaii.edu /files /media /mc -Ipub- 2002- 07- 15.pdf
Maui runoff and reef algae growth link:
http: / /www.hcri.ssri.hawaii.edu /files /media /mc -Ipub- 2001- 07- 14.pdf
E. Eighty five percent of the Big Island, almost all Maui, all Molokai, all Kahoolawe, all lanai, all
Molokai, 50% Oahu, all Kauai, all Niihau and the northwest Hawaiian Islands are not fished by tropical
fish divers.
2001 and 2002 Great annual fish counts conducted on several islands (www.reef.org) showed an
9/19/2011
Page 3 of 5
increase of fish in areas counted by 2% to 23% for most species showing an overall increase in State's
fish populations. The DNLR $3 million MPA (Marine Protected Area) study showed an increase there
as well (some species declined in counts there due to overpopulation- species crowding- ecosystems can
only support a certain population). University of Hawaii fish counts in Kaneohe Bay show fish increases
and fish counts at all artificial reefs like the YO57 ship off Waikiki show increased fish counts. DNLR
has done a great job placing artificial reefs around Oahu and needs to continue this practice.
Habitat increases fish counts! There is no scientific data showing population scarcity from tropical fish
collecting. FRA studies show fish declines in non FRA and FRA but breeding populations and natural
declines are not discusses. With these factors taken into account fish overall are on the increase.
Fish supply has never been an issue for our fish collectors. I have video to prove the abundance of fish
in Hawaii. Video available upon request and some of it on YouTube at:
http : / /www.youtube. com/watch ?v= pBJwE4tfuj g &feature = player_embedded
Hawaii Tropical Fish Association website:
http://www.hawaiitropicalfish.com/
Aquarium Fish Sustainability report link:
http:// hawaiitropicalsaltwateraquariumfish .com/
I am testifying in opposition to Res. 140 -11 and 130 -11. Please do not pass a resolution requesting the
State of Hawaii to amend chapter 188.
Thanks,
Ron Tubbs B.S. N.D.
President RT Distributors Inc.
rtmb@hawaiiantel.net
808 - 259 -9997
Kailua Kona, HI and
Waimanalo, HI
P.S.
The lies associated with the user conflicts:
• It was reported widely in the media that 9 million Aquarium fish are taken from
Hawaii's waters annually. The truth is approximately 800,000 fish are taken
annually. Invertebrate make up nearly 100,000 caught statewide.. Nowhere near
9 million! So many lies and in the public media. This is slander an illegal offense.
• Ecology groups have run daily TV commercials claiming 75% of all fish are gone
from Hawaii's waters. The true scientific statement was that 75% of the world's
oceans have been impacted by man's activities. I can provide this study. Many
believe these lies as they do not know any better. Fish catch reports show
increases as well does fish counts. See for yourself take a submarine dive! With
less reliance on fish as food for the near shore fisherman, fish populations are on
the increase.
9/19/2011
Page 4 of 5
• Maui groups say most of the fish are gone and tropical fish divers took them. The
truth: The great American Fish Count 2000 to 2001 sponsored by and done with
some of the same groups who oppose tropical fish showed an increase in
numbers of identified species on all Islands. Even though the counts were done
by amateurs and thus not scientific they are still useful. DNLR Bill Walsh's fish
count analysis study, revealed inexperienced people cannot count the fish
correctly, that their counts are too low because they cannot identify fish
correctly. Thus the fish identification counts should actually be higher.
• Coral reefs take tens of thousands of years to grow. The truth some places in
Kaneohe Bay has seen 6 feet of coral growth in 14 years. Coral grows 3 to 5
inches a year in the shallows! Harbors must be dredged regularly as we must
now do on Maui due to coral growth. Lava flows and new ocean areas on the Big
Island have complete coral growth and reef formation in 100 years. Abundance of
coral in a new area takes only a few years.
• Fishermen are taking all the fish. The truth one breeding pair of yellows can
repopulate a whole reef in a few months. One yellow tang spawning produces one
million larvae with around 60 %.
• Surviving to the reef where spawned and some spreading far way. The yellow
reproduces at least twice a year. This year saw three spawning of yellows. Many
other fish can produce as many as 5 million larvae. DLNR fish counts in Kona
prove the quick recruitment of fish in areas is only limited by food and ecosystem
habitat.
• Tropical fish divers can take all the fish they want without regulations. The truth
is almost all boats can only support only a small amount of fish in good enough
condition to allow them to be sold as pets. The amount of water needed to keep
the fish alive is very heavy and takes a lot of space on the boat. Some big island
boats which are bigger have been specially modified with pumps to allow bigger
catches. Diving is very physical and most only dive 2 to 3 days a week. Weather
causes many days of non diving. Most of the summer sales are slow and divers
are told not to go out. Most fish aquarium systems will only support a few hundred
fish! Fish health and quality is everything so they are not crowded. THE AMOUNT
OF FISH TAKEN IS VERY LIMITED.
• Tropical fish suffer and keeping them as pets is not humane. The truth is very few
die. Life in a controlled environment with highly nutritional foods and medications
has lead to very long and healthy lives for the fish. Predators, starvation and
short life spans are the norm for wild ocean fish. If I was a fish give me a good
human aquarium home! Waikiki Aquarium has said many times marine fish can
live much longer in captivity. Private collectors have better technology and foods
than Waikiki Aquarium and use it.
Why would ecology groups testify against scientific based legislation? Many do not
care about the science! Some do not care about the truth. "Morality for the fish" is their
reasoning. We too humanize and love the fish. Caring for our loved pets is trying to be taken away.
How would you feel if they tried to take you dog away?
9/19/2011
Page 5 of 5
There were so many lies from groups and individuals trying to protect fish at all
cost, even to the point of perpetuating lies in numerous media adds, We must slow
down, assess the issues and logically and scientifically address the future of our
oceans. If we don't make the right decisions jobs and incredible benefits will be lost
for no reason.
Selfish uncaring individuals do not care about those who may lose their Jobs and
the ability to feed their families. Their only concern is their own interests or they would
not lie.
Ecology based legislation is needed to ensure the future of all Hawaii's fish, plants
and animals. Allot of good has come from ecological concerns. Fishermen love to hear
that people want to be protecting our Oceans but many have gone too far. Excessive
protectionism will only cost us all.
Science based information will provide for a rational decision - making process
coordinated by DLNR that will address the user conflicts, and fishing sustainability. We
need ecologically sound; least- biased, factual context aimed at perpetuating not lies,
but the sustainability and protection of Hawaii's ocean resources upon which all
parties depend.
Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 6474
(20110918)
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http: / /www.eset.com
9/19/2011
Hawaii County
Fiscal
Fishing
Effort
Sum
Harvest
Harvest by Species
Yellow tang
Other finfish
Hermit crabs
Feather duster
Other invertebrate
No.
collec-
tors
Hours
No
caught
No sold
Value
No.
collec-
tors
1
No. No.
caught sold
Value
No.
collec- No.
tors, caught
No.
sold
Value
No.
collec-
tors
No.
caught
No.
sold
Value
No:
collec- No. No.
tors caught sold Value
No.!
collec -,
tors
No.
caught
No.
sold
Value
2010
2009
2008
39
5,893.5
471,699
455,217
$1,635,399
34 319,020 316,789
$1,337,439
38
70,404
66,166
$288,115
7
650
567
$260
-
-
-
10
81,625
71,695
$9,585
382,2
549,526
458,587
$1,402,778
$1, 02,778
$1,549,031
$1,205,235
38
32
33
0411303,475
3,84
403,640
359,574
246,750
301,334
402,473
356,870
$1,009,702
$1,136,498
$927,023
$1,143,942
$825,319
33
33
40
36
33
62,018
65,862
58,062
99,007
84,176
60,368
63,743
55,641
95,054
81,987
$257,074
$262,913
$214,059
$400,047
$377,404
41
3
7
7
4
484
2,424
8,921
156
116
424
2,332
8,296
130
116
$621
$402
$918
$220
$245
-
n.a.
-
6
38,233
24,614
$4,056
34
34
5,392.3
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
10
10
10
4
19,137
33,352
51,875
22,617
12,571
29,338
51,869
19,614
$2,966
$3,832
$4,822
2007
41
6,090.0
7,904.0
6,996.2
39111
,607
554,678
466,483
2006
38
35
2005
2004
31
5,249.5
374,328
362,520
$948,710
29
301,954
300,695
$700,442
29
64,151
61,635
$247,689
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
4
8,223
190
$579
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
2003
23
5,355.2
265,689
264,356
$758,637
22
212,391
211,776
$508,050
23
53,298
52,580
$250,587
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
2002
20
5,112.5
226,290
277,313
225,774
275,359
$612,150
$591,945
19
24
177,888
213,515
177,705
212,266
$420,262
$387,841
20
24
48,402
63,798
48,069
63,093
$191,888
$204,104
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
2001
24
4,612.0
2000
26
4,304.5
3,604.0
303,896
225,063
301,621
223,837
$621,293
$531,252
25
21
240,487
167,763
239,033
167,062
$380,287
$289,213
26
21
63,088
57,212
62,267
56,687
$240,441
$241,671
4
4
117
9
117
91
$237
$74
5
3
204
79
204
79
$327
$293
1999
22