HomeMy WebLinkAboutREP PC 054 06/18/2012 2010-2012 REPORT OF THE
COMMITTEE ON PLANNING
DATE: June 18, 2012 Re: Comm. No. 669/Bill No. 229
PLACE: Council Chambers
Kailua-Kona, Hawai`i
TIME: 9:04 a.m.
Council Chair and Members
Hawai`i County Council
Hilo, Hawai`i 96720
Your Committee on Planning, to which was referred Comm. No. 669/Bill No. 229, reports as
follows:
Bill No. 229, transmitted by Mayor William P. Kenoi, via Communication No. 669, dated
March 30, 2012, is an ordinance amending Ordinance No. 99-116 which amended Ordinance
No. 96-159 which amended Section 25-8-33 (City of Hilo Zone Map), Article 8, Chapter 25
(Zoning Code) of the Hawai`i County Code 1983 (2005 Edition) (formerly referred to as Section
25-114, City of Hilo Zone Map, Article 3, Chapter 25, Zoning Code) by changing the district
classification from Single Family Residential— 10,000 square feet (RS-10)to Neighborhood
Commercial—7,500 square feet(CN-7.5) at Waiakea, South Hilo, Hawai`i, covered by Tax Map
Key Nos.: 2-2-044:003, 031, 032, 035 and 037.
Also enclosed was a favorable recommendation for an amendment to Condition C and an
unfavorable recommendation for amendments to Conditions H and I, from the Windward
Planning Commission Chair Zendo Kern.
At the May 1, 2012 Planning Committee there was discussion regarding flooding, easement
access, the need for a Traffic Impact Analysis Report, and a successor trustee. At the May 1,
2012 Planning Committee Bill 229 was postponed to the May 16, 2012 Planning Committee
meeting; and again, from May 16, 2012 to June 18, 2012.
Mr. Thomas Yeh, representing the applicant, was present in the Hilo chambers; and
Mr. Roland Higashi, President of Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc. was present at the West Hawai`i
Civic Center to answer questions. Mr. Yeh gave a brief history of the property and stated that
the applicant was no longer seeking amendments to Conditions H and I and was only requesting
a five-year time extension to get the final subdivision approval as required in Condition C. He
further stated that the applicant will work with the Department of Public Works regarding
drainage improvements (Condition H) and to assure that all water runoff generated on the
property will be controlled on site (Condition L); and that they will comply with all dust and
earthwork restrictions during the construction of the project, the curb and sidewalk requirements
of Condition I, and if required would submit an updated Traffic Impact Analysis Report. He also
stated the applicant has always allowed easement access to his neighbors Ms. Elaine Stephanie
Salazar and Mr. Russel H. Doi to access their properties and will continue to do so.
PC Rept. No.: 54
PC-54 Page 2 June 18, 2012
Council Member Onishi confirmed that Bill 229 showed an amendment to allow a time
extension and stated that he was supportive of the bill. He asked Planning Director Bobby Jean
Leithead Todd and Planning Manager Daryn Arai to give the Planning Department's perspective
of the bill.
Ms. Leithead Todd stated the bill contains a time extension that is warranted due to no fault of
the applicant but due to the delay by the State Highway Department to comment on the bill.
Mr. Arai stated the bill also contained some housekeeping amendments and that the fair share
costs had been updated.
Council Member Yagong stated he was pleased that amendments to Conditions H and I were not
being considered.
Ms. Salazar stated that she does not believe the drainage will be contained on site and she objects
to the five-year extension request. She confirmed her acceptance to the 25-foot access easement
which might require cutting down mature trees. Mr. Doi added that the access road being used
currently is the original access road so that should not change.
Council Member Yagong asked if the time extension would allow the easement access to be
addressed; and Ms. Leithead-Todd stated the easement is set by the Land Court and only the
Land Court can change it, she added that the easement set by the Land Court is not where the
existing access is located.
Council Member Ford referenced the preliminary plan and stated that it created serious problems
for the Doi family regarding flooding and that there is a six foot deep flood channel only
acknowledged by the Doi family, because they live there and know it exists. She also stated that
there will be access problems including the possibility of landlocked lots or access only at a
dangerous intersection. She asked if it was legal for an access easement to go through
commercial property, such as a parking lot, and voiced concern that the five-year extension will
not help with the design problems regarding access and flooding.
Ms. Leithead Todd stated that, generally speaking, new subdivision approvals require access to
all lots and that it was legal to have an easement for access through a commercial development.
She also stated that there was an easement for access on this application so the applicant must
allow access or negotiate for a different easement agreement.
Council Member Onishi confirmed that he had walked the site with Department of Public Works
Engineer Kelly Gomes. He also confirmed that the easement needs to be negotiated between the
landowners.
Mr. Yeh explained that the current plan is a work-in-process but that no one will be landlocked
and the access for Ms. Salazar and Mr. Doi needs to be worked on as the current access is not
safe. He also stated that the flooding problem is from water generated from another property but
the applicant will do everything required to avoid flooding. He added that the clean up required
by the Department of Health has been done and all conditions in the rezoning application will be
adhered to.
PC-54 Page 3 June 18, 2012
Your Committee on Planning is not in accordance with the purpose and intent of Bill 229, and
forwards to Council with a negative recommendation.
mkh
AYES NOES A&E EX Respectfully submitted,
BLAS X
FORD x COMMITTEE ON PLANNING
HOFFMANN X
IKEDA X --�� t
ONISHI X \'` - . 1'1,, �
PILAGO X
SMART x PETE HOFF A 4 , CHAI 1
YAGONG X P ' ' • 'T NO. 54
YOSHIMOTO X ADOPTED: JUL 0 3 21
t