The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCOM 0710.047 2010-2012 PUNA � GEOTHERMAL VENTURE c CO!, r64 46,x1/4 _' _6 All 8: 57 HAWAE'1 an ORMAT company TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL KALEIKINI, PLANT MANAGER, PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE (6-6-12 Council Hearing re Bill 256) As you know, Puna Geothermal Venture (PGV) has submitted a request to present detailed information regarding its operations that have been safeguarding the community since the project came online. We have also asked that the Hawaii Department of Health be invited to discuss the safety of PGV's operations and the ambient levels of naturally occurring gases. We don't think we can convey all of the points that need to be addressed in the confines of this three- minute window, today. If granted the opportunity to present, we will provide experts to address and answer any questions the committee and the public might have of PGV. Our goal is that PGV be an asset, not a liability, in assessing what is occurring environmentally in our community using what we've learned from our years of extensive monitoring. Concluding that residences within a one-mile radius are inhabitable harms the public perception about the safety of geothermal energy production. In my opinion, this approach fails to address the potential issue of health effects caused by natural emissions from the rift in the Puna District which are thought to be greater than any potential emissions from PGV. This is why we are encouraging testimony from the Hawaii Department of Health, as well. A report prepared by the US Dept. Of Health and Human Services' Senior Toxicologist analyzed PGV's operations and air monitors at the plant, at the plant's perimeter, and at monitoring stations located at Lanipuna Gardens and Leilani Estates, based on a 16-month period between January 1996 and April 1997. A copy of that report has been provided to you today. The report concluded that the low levels of hydrogen sulfide detected at monitoring stations did not pose a public health risk, when compared to several health standards and guidelines. Our operations have continued to be consistent with applicable standards. The report also notes that ambient levels of hydrogen sulfide, sulfur dioxide, ammonia and other agents from volcanic emissions should be assessed for long-term health impacts to residents. PGV is supportive of efforts to study potential health impacts around our facility, the East Rift Zone and the South Rift Zone. We are committed to working with the agencies to determine the causes of these complaints. But concluding that PGV's operations are the cause seems unwarranted at this time. Post Office Box 30 - 14-3860 Kapoho-Pahoa Roadon,m. Na. .7/°.147 Pahoa, Hawaii 96778 — Tel (808) 965-6233 - Fax (808) 965-7254 Ref. To: Ref. Date UN 06 Punageothermalventure.com In conclusion, it is our request that the Council allow PGV the opportunity to present information regarding the safety of PGV's operations, and that the Council invite HDOH to provide the Council with its assessment of PGV's compliance with HDOH health standards. Thank you for your time and consideration. Mahalo. .....L.:1 L J.IJI..u� CG '' e 11 10`y �,t,/UK`J 1!`I WH1Plt.H 1= J n 14 6 L 7 G :1 •J'1 1'V}�,1/1�. �' ,U J. • ,�6tWKry., DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH&HUMAN SERVICES , Public Health tea r �tiq a,iV fi Agency rasc rycss 0'1 IJc i l' ta . T7R tor January 5, 1998 " :,Z1't !' nl...%l.:i Health Consultation PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE PAHOA (PUNA DISTRICT), HAWAII COUNTY, HAWAII CERCLIS NO. HID984469536 DECEMBER 22, 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Health Assessment and Consultation Atlanta, Georgia _nip! LL 4U P. /1ZG r 1.0 n1 C.C. JO 11.1Y 111 wr111'th ( l ,U=1 • HEALTH CONSULTATION PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE PAHOA (PUNA DISTRICT), HAWAII COUNTY, HAWAII CERCLIS NO. HM984469536 Prepared by; Exposure Investigation and Consultation Branch Division of Health Assessment and Consultation Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry YL1 •YJratt f_L JV li AV ,,.Wf�J ill WI"1Al IVI'1Va v1I • ry r Vr 1 •JAL' 1 •rV Health Consultation: A Note of Explanation An ATSDR health consultation is a verbal or written response from ATSDR to a specific request for information about health risks related to a specific site, a chemical release, or the presence of hazardous material. in order to prevent or mitigate exposures, a consultation may lead to specific actions,such as restricting use of or replacing water supplies;intensifying environmental sampling; restricting site access; or removing the contaminated material. In addition, consultations may recommend additional public health actions, such as conducting health surveillance activities to evaluate exposure or trends in adverse health outcomes; conducting biological indicators of exposure studies to assess exposure; and providing health education for health care providers and community members. This concludes the health consultation process for this site, unless additional information is obtained by ATSDR which, in the Agency's opinion, indicates a need to revise or append the conclusions previously issued. You May Contact ATSDR TOLL TREE at 1-800-447-1544 or Visit our Home Page at: httpi/atsdrl.atsdr.cdc.gov:/8080 • yam, �.,,r„� uu .,u aa•lu ..,w�. LI1 wnitItr�v1� Jrnv LL 7v 7 .4V f.,/1C/V f V.J 4 BACKGROUND AND STATEMENT OP ISSUES The Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH). asked the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) to assess the threat to public health posed by releases of hydrogen sulfide from the Puna Geothermal Venture. The Puna District of the Island of Hawaii is an active volcanic area where natural emissions of steam, sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide, and traces of other gases occur continuously, but variably. Beginning in April 1976, geothermal wells have been drilled in the area for use in generating electric power. The Puna Geothermal Venture (PGV) geothermal plant generates up to 25% of the Island of Hawaii's electricity. During operation of the geothermal wells, gases may be released to the atmosphere. These gases include carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, and trace amounts of mradon. The emission of hydrogen sulfide gas is considered to be the most important public health problem related to the operation of these geothermal wells [1] . Since hydrogen sulfide is heavier than air, it can accumulate in low-lying areas during temperature inversions or when .prevailing trade winds are calm. The closest house to the PGV power plant is located about 1800 feet to the southeast in Lanipuna Gardens . Leilani Estates, a large residential community, is located west of the plant. Residential lots in this subdivision range in size from 2 to S acres. There are about 3, 900 residential lots within a one-mile radius of the plant, and houses have been built on about 140 of the lots [2) . The HDOH provided ATSDR with ambient air monitoring data collected near the' PGV facility. The Air Quality Monitoring Program of the HDOH operates two air monitoring stations in residential areas near the PGV facility: the Lanipuna air monitoring station, which is located about 450 feet southeast of PGV, and the Leilani station, which is located about 3300 feet southwest of PGV. The maximum concentrations of hydrogen sulfide detected at these stations from January 1996 to April 1997 is summarized in Table 1. During this time period, the maximum peak concentration of hydrogen sulfide was 20 parts per billion (ppb) , and the maximum 1-hour concentration was 5.5 ppb. Most of the hourly hydrogen sulfide levels were non-detectable or less than 1 ppb. 2 ucr .u ere ��...?s.:._•.ly .k; 4D tt,.wril.vvi oiL • J'HN 11 V:41 P.•.5!lab P .06 ATSDR also reviewed air monitoring data from the Lava Tree monitoring station, which is located about 1.5 miles upwind (northwest) of the PGV facility. From the time period January 1996 through September 1997, the maximum 1-hour air concentration of hydrogen sulfide detected at this station was 4 ppb. PGV operates three ambient air monitoring stations along the fence line of their facility; monitoring data from these stations are summarized in Table 2. During the time period, November 1995 through January 1997, the maximum 1-hour concentration of hydrogen sulfide detected was 46. 9 ppb on October 4, 1996. (The 1-hour, off-site level measured during this event was 20 ppb. ) ATSDR also reviewed PGV incident reports, which document leaks and releases of hydrogen sulfide during plant operations. ATSDR was provided .with 29 incident reports that spanned the time period, June 22', 1996 to July 22, 1997. The maximum peak concentration of hydrogen sulfide detected during a release event was 301. 7 ppb (October 4, 1996) ; the second highest peak concentration was 33. 66 ppb (June 19, 1997) . .DISCUSSION Exposure to high concentrations of hydrogen sulfide can cause well-documented, adverse health effects. At high concentrations (500-1, 000 parts per million (ppm] ) , hydrogen sulfide acts primarily as a systemic poison, causing unconsciousness and death by respiratory paralysis. At lower concentrations (50-500 ppm) , it acts as a respiratory irritant, which can lead to pulmonary edema upon exposure to concentrations in excess of 250 ppm. Exposure to hydrogen sulfide concentrations of 20-50 ppm may cause eye irritation and conjunctivitis. The occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has 'established an occupational standard of 10 ppm in the workplace to protect against eye irritation and conjunctivitis. • The health effects of chronic, low-level exposure to hydrogen sulfide have not been well-defined. Several epidemiological studies have examined the health impact of mid to high level hydrogen sulfide exposure in workers and residents exposed from oil refineries, paper pulp mills, and other industrial sources (3] . These studies have reported respiratory, ocular, and neurological effects in exposed individuals. However, interpreting the findings of these studies is hampered by inadequate data for the exposure levels of hydrogen sulfide, inability to distinguish between the effect of high-level acute 3 J 1 � {„( JZ P.7'12r t" .11( • •✓ cc 70 11•14 I.VVK WHl1'ILH V L • • • exposures vs. low -level chronic exposures, concurrent exposures to other organic sulfur compounds, and the subjective nature of some of the health endpoints. In a recent study, health effects and neurophysiological function were studied in former workers and nearby residents who were exposed to hydrogen sulfide from a desulfurization unit at an oil refinery (41 . The study reported that exposed individuals were more likely to demonstrate persistent alterations in neurobehavioral function. However, several aspects of the study confound interpretation of the findings: (1) To create an "exposed" cohort, neighborhood residents with relatively low level exposure were grouped together with ex-workers who likely had much higher exposures. (2) Exposure data were sparse. Ambient air data were available for only one week. During this week, hydrogen sulfide levels were 10-100 ppb, but several other air contaminants were also detected (dimethyl sulfide, mercaptans, hydrocarbons, vanadium [V203) , thioglycolic acid, and sulfur dioxide) . On site, high air levels of hydrogen sulfide were detected (0-8, 800 ppb) , as well as high concentrations of other contaminants. Therefore, it cannot be determined whether the effects observed in this study were due to hydrogen sulfide or to other chemicals from the site. To date, no epidemiological study has demonstrated that chronic exposure to hydrogen sulfide at concentrations in the low ppb range has caused adverse health effects. ATSDR has developed Minimal Risk Levels (MRL) of 500 ppb for acute (1-14 days) and 90 ppb for intermediate (15-364 days) exposures to hydrogen sulfide (3] . MRLs are defined as an estimate of daily exposure of a human, being to a chemical that is likely to be without risk of deleterious effects (nonearoinogenic) over a specified duration of exposure. The EPA developed a Reference Concentration (RfC) of 1 pg/m' (0.7 ppb) for chronic exposure to hydrogen sulfide. This value was derived from an experimental study in which nasal inflammation was observed in mice that were exposed to 80 ppm hydrogen sulfide for 90 days. This RfC is very conservative, since it incorporates an uncertainty factor of 1,000. There is no direct evidence that exposure to hydrogen sulfide in the low ppb range causes adverse health effects in any animal, including humans. 4 j r .LJn11 cc 7o 11•lc I.UtMS 111 wH111t140 z JHN L1 'y25 V :41 P.8/121b F .08 After being absorbed into the blood, hydrogen sulfide is rapidly metabolized - primarily by oxidation to sulfate, which is then excreted in the urine (3) . Because of the rapid metabolism and elimination of hydrogen sulfide, it would not accumulate in the _ body during chronic exposure. Ambient air concentrations of hydrogen sulfide in residential areas near the PGV are typically less than 1 ppb. These levels are similar to naturally-occurring, background levels (0 . 11 to 0.33 ppb) that have been detected in ambient air at other locations (3) . There is no toxicological evidence that chronic exposure to these levels of hydrogen sulfide would have an adverse impact on public health. Air monitoring data indicate that hydrogen sulfide releases from operations at PGV have resulted in off-site peak concentrations of hydrogen sulfide of 20 ppb for a few minutes duration, or hourly concentrations of 2-5 ppb. These concentrations are less than ATSDR's acute MAL of 500 ppb and intermediate MRL of 90 ppb and do .not pose a public health hazard. The maximum concentrations of hydrogen sulfide detected on-site at PGV monitors (peak - 302 ppb, 1-hour - 47 ppb) are also below ATSDR' s acute MRL and would not be expected to pose a health hazard. Hydrogen sulfide is a colorless gas with an odor suggesting rotten eggs. Humans vary in their ability to smell hydroqen sulfide, and individual odor thresholds range from 3-12 ppb or higher. Hydrogen sulfide was sporadically detected at residential air monitoring stations at concentrations that exceed the odor threshold. This has likely contributed to the numerous citizen complaints over air quality near the facility. The upwind, ambient air monitoring station at Lava Tree recorded hourly hydrogen sulfide levels comparable to those detected at the Lanipuna and Leilani stations. Therefore, hydrogen sulfide releases from volcanic activity on the island may be contributing to background levels of hydrogen sulfide in the Puna District. Significant releases of hydrogen sulfide reportedly occurred at the PGV facility in 1991 and 1993. However, the public health impact of these releases can not be assessed, since no ambient air data are available for these events. As part of their Emergency Response Plan, PGV modelled air .concentrations of hydrogen sulfide that could result from an accidental release of hydrogen sulfide from the facility during worst case conditions. They estimated that a hydrogen sulfide concentration of 12,786 ppb could occur at a distance of 1, 300 feet from the plant. This 5 M..1 r717 cc. 70 11.1J W%JflJ 111 ff111 IVi1 --' 1 concentration exceeds OSHA's Permissible Exposure Level of 10 ppm for an 8-hour exposure for workers; however, it is less than the American Industrial Hygiene Association's Emergency Response Planning Guideline-2 (ERPG-2) of 30 ppm. An ERPG-2 is defined as "the maximum airborne concentration below which it is believed• nearly all individuals could be exposed for up to 1 hour without experiencing or developing irreversible or other serious health effects or symptoms that could impair their abilities to take protective action. " The HAOH indicated that an evacuation of the area would be initiated if an unplanned release of hydrogen sulfide resulted in air levels of greater than 1, 000 ppb (2] . ATSDR concurs that such action would be protective of public health. No information was available for ambient air levels of other gases (e.g. , sulfur dioxide, ammonia) that are known to be present in volcanic emissions. Therefore, the potential health impact of these other gases, if they are present, can not be assessed. CONCLUSIONS (1) The concentrations of hydrogen sulfide detected in air at monitoring stations in residential areas near the Puna Geothermal Venture do not pose a public health hazard. (2) The HDOH emergency level of 1,000 ppb hydrogen sulfide for evacuation in the event of an unplanned release is protective of pubic health. =COMMENDATIONS (1) None <.,4c or.q(Kenneth G. Orloff, Ph.D.., DART Senior Toxicologist 6 -.., •.Y JPlu 1 4L .,uJ 11 iJ vrVVIlJ li 1 Vlrlil Il_I V - - - - --- - ..._ ___ Table 1: Maximum 1-hour and peak hydrogen sulfide (H4S) concentrations detected at Hawaii Department of Haalth off-site, ' . ambient air monitoring stations [Date H S concent=1 Station January 1996 3.2 ppb (hour) Lanipuna February 1996 1.7 ppb (hour) Lanipuna March 1996 3.3 ppb (hour) Leilani April 1996 3.5 ppb (hour) Leilani May 1996 2.9 ppb (hour) Leilani June 1996 5.5 ppb (hour) Lanipuna July 1996 1.9 ppb (hour) Leilani August 1996 10 ppb (peak), Lanipuna • 1.7 ppb (hour) Leilani September 1996 7.5 ppb (peak) Lanipuna 3.3 ppb (hour) Lanipuna October 1996 20 ppb (peak) Lanipuna 2 .7 ppb (hour) Lanipuna November 1996 2. 6 ppb (hour) Lanipuna December 1996 2.2 ppb (hour) Lanipuna January 1997 2.0 ppb (hour) Lanipuna February 1997 2.3 ppb (hour) Lanipuna March 1997 3.9 ppb (hour) Lanipuna April 1997 1.6 ppb (hour) Lanipuna ppb - parts per billion (1) - this finding was of questionable validity because of the symmetry of the peak and the lack of other traces around the peak 7 .ern. .... .ru .+•t•+ ....VVnJ 111 WM11'Ic_i-,v1L Jrtiv tL ,0 , •44J P.11/10 r . 1i Table 2: Maximum 1-hour hydrogen sulfide (H=3)' concentrations detected at PGV on-site, ambient air monitoring stations Date H2S concentration Station November 1995 3.3 ppb B . December 1995 6. 0 ppb B and C January 1996 5.1 ppb A February 1996 3. 3 ppb March 1996 2. 6 ppb April, 1996 5, 8 ppb May 1996 1.4 ppb June 1996 12.4 ppb A July 1996 2 . 8 ppb g August '1996 1.3 ppb September 1996 19.8 ppb A October 1996 46. 9 ppb A November 1996 3. 6 ppb C December 1996 2.7 ppb A January 1997 2 .7 ppb A ppb - parts per billion A SE station, topographically down 'gradient from PGV facilities B SW station, in the prevailing downwind direction from the facility C = W station, selected because of its proximity to a residential neighborhood 8 11c.r •UN^':.r-f....?4.J.l 1;I LUU$ 111 WH.IltHO1.: JRIV Lh 70 7 •'I'I Q,12,12 r • 1i REFERENCES (1) Hawaii Department of Health; Health Status of County of Hawaii Populations Exposed to Geothermal and Volcanic Emissions - Preliminary Report; March 1991. (2) Barbara A. Brooks; Health Risk Assessment: Evaluation of potential adverse health effects from short-term exposure to hydrogen sulfide resulting from an unplanned release from geothermal wells in Puna, Hawaii; The Hawaii State Department of Health; August 16, 1993 . (3) Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry; Toxicological Profile for Hydrogen Sulfide, Draft; September 1997. (4) Kaye Kilburn and Raphael Warshaw; Hydrogen sulfide and reduced-sulfur gases adversely affect neurophysiological functions; Toxicology and Industrial Health 11 185-197 (1995) . • • 9